ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • Founder’s Page
  • AARC PRESIDENT DAN ALCORN
  • About the AARC
  • NEW AARC Lecture Series – 2024/2025
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • BILL SIMPICH ARCHIVE
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • FBI ELSUR
  • Gallery
  • JFK Assassination Records – 2025 Documents Release
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership
  • In Memoriam
  • JFK Commemoration Lecture Series – 2024

Copyright AARC

Joe Backes, ARRB Summaries: Page 11.

 

The 11th Batch

Released February 9th, 1996
Federal Register Notice January 2, 1996 pps. 48-52
Reviewed by Joseph Backes


A note of explanation on getting documents from the Archives. Since I last reviewed ARRB document releases and referred to many pages of documents as missing, as well as entire documents missing too, I have received a letter from the National Archives. The documents are not “missing” as such, but are in the JFK Records Collection. They are just not in the ARRB release boxes. I have been concentrating on those documents released by the ARRB as I know they will have the least redactions. The documents released by the ARRB and kept in “ARRB release boxes” are a courtesy for researchers to get in one go the documents being released by the ARRB. At least that is the way it should be, the way I thought it was, but it isn’t. This letter states that some documents will not be reproduced in their entirety and kept in the ARRB release boxes. They say they want to cut down on duplication and space. So now you have to see what is available in the ARRB release box and check with the same corresponding document in another box in the JFK Records Collection, and put it together yourself, hopefully, with enough knowledge to know whether or not you are still being cheated of a few pages.

This increases the workload of getting documents by having a researcher look in two separate places. You will not be able to know in advance which documents are not in the ARRB release boxes. So, you have to go through it all, meticulously, noting all discrepancies between how many pages the RIF says the documents should be there with what is there, and noting those documents that are not there at all. You then take this list of document RIFs and ask for them from the JFK Records Collection. You then compare and contrast the same document from the two different sources, copying what was missing in the ARRB release box and is, hopefully, there in the JFK Records Collection box to get the full and complete document.

Most of the material that is not in the ARRB release boxes are being listed under Additional Releases, as seen on p. 51 and 52 of the Federal Register notice for this release.

How many of you want to write out a request form for each individual document therein listed to search in the box you will be given for that individual document? That would be 352 request forms to fill out to look through 352 boxes and matching that with the ARRB release boxes on this particular batch of documents. Fun, eh?

The FBI documents

Document # 124-10001-10059

Document # 124-10018-10363

Document # 124-10018-10373

Document # 124-10020-10093

Document # 124-10027-10001

Document # 124-10027-10024

Document # 124-10027-10030

Document # 124-10027-10065

Document # 124-10027-10235

Document # 124-10035-10022

Document # 124-10035-10155

Document # 124-10058-10009

Document # 124-10058-10023

Document # 124-10058-10024

Document # 124-10058-10042

Document # 124-10058-10043

Document # 124-10058-10056

Document # 124-10062-10385

Document # 124-10063-10432

Document # 124-10073-10337

Document # 124-10079-10230

Document # 124-10101-10017

Document # 124-10143-10359

Document # 124-10145-10105

Document # 124-10169-10080

Document # 124-10169-10165

Document # 124-10175-10414

Document # 124-10176-10376

Document # 124-10179-10180

Document # 124-10182-10051

Document # 124-10227-10320

Document # 124-10229-10085

Document # 124-10230-10093

Document # 124-10230-10098

Document # 124-10230-10117

Document # 124-10234-10000

Document # 124-10239-10385

Document # 124-10244-10426

Document # 124-10262-10087

Document # 124-10263-10223

Document # 124-10264-10324

Document # 124-10264-10333

Document # 124-10265-10120

Document # 124-10272-10262

Document # 124-10272-10288

Document # 124-10275-10359

*Document # 124-10058-10007 was for some reason in here. See corrections listing for the 13th batch.

CIA documents

Document # 104-10004-10257 (note they left off the second “4” in the Fed. Reg.)

Document # 104-10015-10001

Document # 104-10015-10003

Document # 104-10015-10036

Document # 104-10015-10043

Document # 104-10015-10090

Document # 104-10015-10096

Document # 104-10015-10097

Document # 104-10015-10121

Document # 104-10015-10138

Document # 104-10015-10143

Document # 104-10015-10149

Document # 104-10015-10151

Document # 104-10015-10155

Document # 104-10015-10237

Document # 104-10015-10238

Document # 104-10015-10365

Document # 104-10015-10390

Document # 104-10015-10401

Document # 104-10015-10404

Document # 104-10015-10414

Document # 104-10015-10421

Document # 104-10015-10422

Document # 104-10015-10423

Document # 104-10015-10424

Document # 104-10016-10006

Document # 104-10016-10013

Document # 104-10016-10023

Document # 104-10016-10033

Document # 104-10017-10017

Document # 104-10017-10034

Document # 104-10017-10037

Document # 104-10017-10041

Document # 104-10017-10042

Document # 104-10017-10045

Document # 104-10017-10051

Document # 104-10017-10061

Document # 104-10017-10069

Document # 104-10017-10074

Document # 104-10018-10003

Document # 104-10018-10008

Document # 104-10018-10012

Document # 104-10018-10034

Document # 104-10018-10035

Document # 104-10018-10036

Document # 104-10018-10037

Document # 104-10018-10052

Document # 104-10018-10059

Document # 104-10018-10060

Document # 104-10018-10063

Document # 104-10018-10071

Document # 104-10018-10073

Document # 104-10018-10087

Document # 104-10018-10090

Document # 104-10018-10093

Document # 104-10018-10106

Document # 104-10018-10108

The HSCA documents

Document # 180-10070-10282

Document # 180-10076-10061

Document # 180-10076-10062

Document # 180-10076-10102

Document # 180-10076-10123

Document # 180-10076-10124

Document # 180-10076-10155

Document # 180-10087-10362

Document # 180-10093-10496

Document # 180-10097-10328

Document # 180-10097-10495

Document # 180-10117-10086

Document # 180-10117-10173

Document # 180-10117-10174

Document # 180-10117-10175

Document # 180-10117-10176

Document # 180-10117-10179

Document # 180-10117-10181

Document # 180-10117-10184

Document # 180-10117-10185

Document # 180-10117-10186

Document # 180-10117-10189

Document # 180-10117-10190

Additional releases (These were included in the ARRB box releases. They are depositions taken by the HSCA. The last document, Document # 180-10081-10347, is a 6 page portion of a 140 page document of previously referred material of a 2/26/78 letter from Dr. Finck to the HSCA.)

Document # 180-10081-10347 Part of Dr. Finck letter

Document # 180-10110-10007 Deposition of Yuri Nosenko

Document # 180-10131-10320 Deposition of James C. Michael

Document # 180-10131-10323 Deposition of Yuri Nosenko

Document # 180-10131-10342 Deposition of E. Howard Hunt

Document # 180-10131-10343 Deposition of J. Lee Rankin

In addition, after consultation with ARRB staff, the FBI has agreed to open in full the following assassination records, which previously contained postponements.

Note, the following are not included in the ARRB release boxes.

Document # 124-10001-10243

Document # 124-10001-10247

Document # 124-10002-10432

Document # 124-10002-10434

Document # 124-10003-10065

Document # 124-10003-10425

Document # 124-10003-10437

Document # 124-10003-10463

Document # 124-10005-10132

Document # 124-10005-10189

Document # 124-10005-10387

Document # 124-10006-10321

Document # 124-10007-10203

Document # 124-10009-10054

Document # 124-10009-10380

Document # 124-10017-10247

Document # 124-10018-10353

Document # 124-10018-10355

Document # 124-10018-10357

Document # 124-10018-10364

Document # 124-10018-10474

Document # 124-10018-10475

Document # 124-10018-10476

Document # 124-10018-10477

Document # 124-10018-10478

Document # 124-10018-10488

Document # 124-10018-10492

Document # 124-10020-10120

Document # 124-10020-10129

Document # 124-10020-10157

Document # 124-10023-10212

Document # 124-10023-10243

Document # 124-10023-10268

Document # 124-10024-10440

Document # 124-10026-10348

Document # 124-10027-10004

Document # 124-10027-10007

Document # 124-10027-10009

Document # 124-10027-10014

Document # 124-10027-10019

Document # 124-10027-10020

Document # 124-10027-10027

Document # 124-10027-10031

Document # 124-10027-10038

Document # 124-10027-10070

Document # 124-10027-10071

Document # 124-10027-10074

Document # 124-10027-10076

Document # 124-10027-10080

Document # 124-10027-10106

Document # 124-10027-10107

Document # 124-10027-10108

Document # 124-10027-10113

Document # 124-10027-10114

Document # 124-10027-10115

Document # 124-10027-10129

Document # 124-10027-10130

Document # 124-10027-10148

Document # 124-10027-10154

Document # 124-10027-10155

Document # 124-10027-10156

Document # 124-10027-10157

Document # 124-10027-10158

Document # 124-10027-10159

Document # 124-10027-10160

Document # 124-10027-10162

Document # 124-10027-10168

Document # 124-10027-10169

Document # 124-10027-10170

Document # 124-10027-10171

Document # 124-10027-10172

Document # 124-10027-10173

Document # 124-10027-10174

Document # 124-10027-10175

Document # 124-10027-10191

Document # 124-10027-10376

Document # 124-10029-10253

Document # 124-10029-10480

Document # 124-10030-10278

Document # 124-10034-10465

Document # 124-10035-10051

Document # 124-10035-10053

Document # 124-10035-10058

Document # 124-10035-10059

Document # 124-10035-10091

Document # 124-10035-10118

Document # 124-10035-10126

Document # 124-10035-10129

Document # 124-10035-10131

Document # 124-10035-10143

Document # 124-10035-10156

Document # 124-10035-10426

Document # 124-10038-10106

Document # 124-10044-10003

Document # 124-10045-10034

Document # 124-10045-10407

Document # 124-10045-10464

Document # 124-10045-10472

Document # 124-10047-10284

Document # 124-10049-10041

Document # 124-10049-10136

Document # 124-10054-10017

Document # 124-10054-10018

Document # 124-10057-10227

Document # 124-10057-10229

Document # 124-10057-10230

Document # 124-10057-10479

Document # 124-10058-10003

Document # 124-10058-10019

Document # 124-10058-10026

Document # 124-10058-10027

Document # 124-10058-10028

Document # 124-10058-10029

Document # 124-10058-10032

Document # 124-10058-10033

Document # 124-10058-10038

Document # 124-10058-10041

Document # 124-10058-10054

Document # 124-10058-10067

Document # 124-10058-10301

Document # 124-10058-10444

Document # 124-10063-10020

Document # 124-10063-10224

Document # 124-10063-10355

Document # 124-10063-10474

Document # 124-10065-10355

Document # 124-10068-10132

Document # 124-10068-10183

Document # 124-10069-10214

Document # 124-10069-10401

Document # 124-10070-10223

Document # 124-10070-10390

Document # 124-10072-10144

Document # 124-10072-10153

Document # 124-10072-10168

Document # 124-10072-10179

Document # 124-10072-10213

Document # 124-10072-10261

Document # 124-10072-10312

Document # 124-10075-10004

Document # 124-10076-10085

Document # 124-10077-10196

Document # 124-10079-10104

Document # 124-10081-10020

Document # 124-10081-10026

Document # 124-10081-10037

Document # 124-10084-10016

Document # 124-10087-10335

Document # 124-10087-10341

Document # 124-10087-10344

Document # 124-10092-10037

Document # 124-10093-10184

Document # 124-10100-10102

Document # 124-10101-10024

Document # 124-10102-10004

Document # 124-10102-10110

Document # 124-10102-10307

Document # 124-10103-10220

Document # 124-10104-10235

Document # 124-10104-10242

Document # 124-10105-10247

Document # 124-10108-10033

Document # 124-10108-10095

Document # 124-10108-10189

Document # 124-10108-10205

Document # 124-10108-10235

Document # 124-10108-10260

Document # 124-10110-10009

Document # 124-10110-10040

Document # 124-10116-10042

Document # 124-10118-10017

Document # 124-10118-10352

Document # 124-10118-10353

Document # 124-10118-10354

Document # 124-10118-10424

Document # 124-10118-10426

Document # 124-10118-10429

Document # 124-10119-10049

Document # 124-10119-10216

Document # 124-10122-10014

Document # 124-10122-10014

Document # 124-10125-10120

Document # 124-10126-10132

Document # 124-10131-10144

Document # 124-10137-10027

Document # 124-10138-10000

Document # 124-10142-10152

Document # 124-10142-10325

Document # 124-10143-10029

Document # 124-10143-10130

Document # 124-10143-10179

Document # 124-10143-10293

Document # 124-10144-10065

Document # 124-10145-10009

Document # 124-10145-10061

Document # 124-10145-10103

Document # 124-10146-10120

Document # 124-10146-10227

Document # 124-10151-10010

Document # 124-10151-10150

Document # 124-10151-10376

Document # 124-10156-10049

Document # 124-10156-10053

Document # 124-10156-10055

Document # 124-10157-10024

Document # 124-10157-10447

Document # 124-10157-10487

Document # 124-10158-10017

Document # 124-10158-10026

Document # 124-10158-10046

Document # 124-10158-10112

Document # 124-10158-10199

Document # 124-10158-10429

Document # 124-10159-10381

Document # 124-10159-10396

Document # 124-10159-10441

Document # 124-10159-10447

Document # 124-10160-10014

Document # 124-10162-10400

Document # 124-10163-10117

Document # 124-10163-10125

Document # 124-10164-10263

Document # 124-10164-10268

Document # 124-10164-10274

Document # 124-10169-10106

Document # 124-10169-10121

Document # 124-10169-10127

Document # 124-10170-10000

Document # 124-10170-10011

Document # 124-10170-10013

Document # 124-10170-10030

Document # 124-10170-10110

Document # 124-10170-10124

Document # 124-10170-10126

Document # 124-10170-10438

Document # 124-10170-10452

Document # 124-10171-10002

Document # 124-10171-10063

Document # 124-10171-10094

Document # 124-10171-10098

Document # 124-10171-10123

Document # 124-10172-10029

Document # 124-10173-10112

Document # 124-10173-10245

Document # 124-10176-10378

Document # 124-10178-10244

Document # 124-10178-10265

Document # 124-10178-10480

Document # 124-10179-10084

Document # 124-10180-10116

Document # 124-10183-10094

Document # 124-10183-10100

Document # 124-10183-10154

Document # 124-10187-10012

Document # 124-10191-10092

Document # 124-10227-10105

Document # 124-10227-10112

Document # 124-10227-10310

Document # 124-10227-10366

Document # 124-10228-10036

Document # 124-10228-10039

Document # 124-10228-10042

Document # 124-10228-10044

Document # 124-10228-10055

Document # 124-10228-10058

Document # 124-10228-10085

Document # 124-10228-10091

Document # 124-10228-10094

Document # 124-10228-10242

Document # 124-10229-10405

Document # 124-10230-10012

Document # 124-10230-10022

Document # 124-10230-10054

Document # 124-10230-10421

Document # 124-10230-10425

Document # 124-10230-10426

Document # 124-10230-10427

Document # 124-10230-10428

Document # 124-10231-10483

Document # 124-10233-10233

Document # 124-10233-10294

Document # 124-10233-10452

Document # 124-10234-10088

Document # 124-10234-10289

Document # 124-10234-10460

Document # 124-10235-10183

Document # 124-10235-10184

Document # 124-10235-10191

Document # 124-10235-10199

Document # 124-10235-10284

Document # 124-10235-10436

Document # 124-10236-10087

Document # 124-10236-10113

Document # 124-10236-10129

Document # 124-10236-10131

Document # 124-10236-10285

Document # 124-10236-10296

Document # 124-10236-10321

Document # 124-10236-10332

Document # 124-10237-10010

Document # 124-10239-10093

Document # 124-10239-10094

Document # 124-10240-10347

Document # 124-10240-10368

Document # 124-10241-10130

Document # 124-10241-10414

Document # 124-10241-10417

Document # 124-10242-10106

Document # 124-10242-10262

Document # 124-10243-10243

Document # 124-10244-10061

Document # 124-10246-10080

Document # 124-10247-10193

Document # 124-10248-10027

Document # 124-10249-10127

Document # 124-10249-10153

Document # 124-10250-10368

Document # 124-10250-10481

Document # 124-10250-10491

Document # 124-10251-10396

Document # 124-10252-10037

Document # 124-10254-10009

Document # 124-10254-10181

Document # 124-10254-10342

Document # 124-10255-10095

Document # 124-10255-10371

Document # 124-10256-10291

Document # 124-10256-10294

Document # 124-10259-10374

Document # 124-10259-10418

Document # 124-10259-10421

Document # 124-10259-10423

Document # 124-10260-10249

Document # 124-10260-10332

Document # 124-10260-10348

Document # 124-10262-10192

Document # 124-10262-10414

Document # 124-10263-10381

Document # 124-10264-10224

Document # 124-10269-10474

Document # 124-10270-10144

Document # 124-10270-10484

Document # 124-10270-10487

Document # 124-10270-10488

Document # 124-10270-10490

Document # 124-10272-10019

Document # 124-10272-10040

Document # 124-10272-10334

Document # 124-10275-10259

Document # 124-10276-10013

Document # 124-10276-10049

Document # 124-10276-10073

Document # 124-10276-10075

Document # 124-10276-10377

The FBI Document Review

Document # 124-10001-10059 Is a two page document from SA W. Harlan Brown to SAC, Dallas. It is dated 12/09/63.

A portion of the informant file is postponed .

Informant determined that Joe Landin and Augustin Estrada had lunch together on 11/26/63. Landin told him (Estrada) that Albert Gonzalez had called him. Gonzalez is an ambitious, hard driving opportunity. (sic) Both Estrada and Landin are familiar with his promotions. Gonzalez wanted to know what Landin thought of the fact that Joe Molina, ex-GI Forum member chairman, had been questioned in regards to Lee Oswald on the President’s death. Gonzalez recalled how conservative Molina is yet he was questioned. If Joe Molina had been questioned, Gonzalez said, what could he and Landin expect since they were really outspoken (when they attended forum meetings). Gonzalez thought that Bill Lowery had given Molina’s name to the FBI together with all of the Forum members names. He said he was going to Washington to see if he was on the subversive list. He was pretty sure that he could not get that information there. Landin recalled that Gonzalez knew Ruby and that sometime ago (4 years ago) he (Albert Gonzalez) had told Landin that Ruby was an ex-labor organizer and was “no good”. Gonzalez said that he did know Ruby and had recently spoken to Mrs. Grant, his sister at the Vegas club. He is interested in buying the club.

Informant determined that Estrada warned Landin not to give too much of his time to him for he is known to twist things around and could be a dangerous character. He could be working for someone at that very moment, that is, as an informer. After all, he hadn’t visited Landin in almost 3 years.

1 – 134-{ }-801A Is the informant’s file number.

There are then a series of file numbers with subject names. This shouldn’t mean that they denote anyone is an informant.

1 – 100-(8?)001 (J. Landin)

1 – 100-7995 (A. Estrada)

1 – 100-9847 (J. Molina)

1 – 100-10461 (L Oswald)

1 – 100-9734 (G. I. Forum)

1 – 100-7929 (B. Lowery)

Gonzalez also informed Landin that at a recent luncheon sponsored by the G. I. Forum in Dallas, Bill Lowery had spoken to Dr. Garcia and explained to him that his work as an agent did not reflect distrust on the present membership. In the past, he continued, there were some “Pinkos” in the forum.

Document # 124-10018-10363 Is a 2 page document from SAC, Phoenix to Director.

Info received from Jack Eurich, owner, Highliter Bar, 4712 N. 12th St., Phoenix, Arizona, telephone 279-9079, that at 11:25 A.M. MST, November 22, last an unknown man entered bar and asked that TV set be turned on, which was done, immediately thereafter shooting of President was announced. This suspect remained about one hour, drank three bottles of beer, and considered sober. Suspect made telephone call from above phone to Dallas but call not immediately completed. Eurich took one call from operator who advised there would be delay on call “to the rifle range” to Dallas. Eurich believes suspect may have known assassination was about to occur.

Eurich described suspect as WMA, 60 to 65 years, 5’10” to 11 inches, 185 to 200 lbs., grey hair red face. Suspect driving old Buick, possible 1950 to `53 model, faded light green. Montana license plates.

PCI Gordon Hitt, protect identity, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co.,

located tickets reflecting three calls from above phone to Dallas telephone 631-5050, listed to Parkland Hospital, at 12:14, 12:20 and 12:30 all P.M. of Nov. 22 last and MST. First two lines indicate line busy at Dallas and last call apparently completed.

PCI Hitt also located ticket reflecting another call from same Phoenix number to Dallas telephone number 368-0096, time not indicated.

PCI Hitt located operator on calls to Parkland Hospital who advised caller was Bill Means, phonetic, who made person to person call to Jacqueline Kennedy. After line was busy twice Means was connected with a “security officer”.

Dallas, if advisable, identify subscriber to telephone 368-0096.

Butte, Montana through drivers license and vehicle registration records attempt to identify Bill Means, phonetic, and if successful will develop background information and current whereabouts so that he can be located for interview.

Document # 124-10018-10373 SAC, Phoenix to Director FBI dated 11/27/63.

Enclosed for the Bureau is the original and seven copies of a letterhead memorandum and enclosed for Dallas are four copies of the letterhead memorandum.

The unidentified source mentioned in enclosed letterhead memorandum is PCI Gordon Hitt.

Of course there is no LHM enclosed at all, let alone 11 copies.

Document # 124-10020-10093 Is a two page document from SAC, Cincinnati to Director dated 02/07/64.

Enclosed for the Bureau are eight copies LHM suitable for dissemination.

William Miller furnished information to SAS John T. Pryor and James W. Awe on

2/4/64.

Confidential source #1 utilized in LHM is [ (long black ink line) ] Ohio who furnished information to SA Benny J. Canny and W. Dodson Hanes on 2/5/64.

The second confidential source utilized in LHM is Clarence Brandenberg, 618 Mill Street, Lockland, Ohio.

He furnished information to SA John T. Pryor and SA Benny J. Canny on 2/5/64, and to SA John T. Pryor on 2/6/64.

Two copies of LHM has been furnished Secret Service and one for the Treasury Department locally, due to their interests in racial matters involving possible violence and the illegal possession of automatic weapons.

[ ( long black ink line obliterates first sentence and most of next sentence) ] at

which time he was to be charged with Grand Larceny. Rather than charge [ blank] with Grand Larceny, the police Department offered him an opportunity to become an informant. [blank] accepted this opportunity, and among the information he furnished was information concerning the guns contained in this LHM.

[blank] made it crystal clear that if information concerning these guns got back to [several words blanked out ] Ohio, [blank ] might be “taken care of” by friends of [blank ] Kentucky.

[blanked a few words ] is engaged as a “fence” and he believes [blank] is capable of taking care of him fatally in the event information concerning these guns is returned to [blank].

[blank] as an informant for the Police Department, in making efforts to locate these reported weapons. We are maintaining close liaison with the Police Department in connection with this matter to insure protection of Bureau interest and to determine if there is any violation within our jurisdiction.

Cincinnati has no concrete information that any automatic weapons are presently located in the Cincinnati territory to be used by racial organizations.

Document # 124-10027-10001 Is a two-page document from SAC, Tampa to Director dated 11/23/63.

Contacts with majority of Cuban, CP, and NOI and criminal sources and informants negative to date. Contacts will be completed today.

TP 27 S was with Christina Pages Amor, Bureau file 105-107781. Her husband Manuel Amor 105-111992 and Lillian Cook McFarland, Bureau file 105-117285, principal officers of FPCC – Tampa, Bureau file 97-4196-64 when news of assassination first announced on radio all expressed shock at news and complete abhorrence of this type activity

114-S* reports Amors contacted by reporter from TIME magazine night of November 22 last. Reporter from St. Petersburg, Florida said TIME had information that Lee Oswald was affiliated with FPCC. Manuel Amor disclaimed any knowledge of Oswald, said he did not know anything about FPCC and denied affiliation with group, also…

(page 2 missing)

Document # 124-10027-10024 Is a 1 page document from SAC, LA to Director dated 11/23/63.

Enclosed herewith for the Bureau are five copies of a LHM which are self-explanatory. One copy each of the LHM is being furnished to Miami and Dallas for information purposed. One copy of the LHM is being disseminated locally to the Secret Service, Los Angeles.

Handwritten in on the bottom are instructions “Place cc in 105-78016 (Hall), 105-86406 (Hemming) 134-[blank]

Document # 124-10027-10030 Is a two page document from SAC, Birmingham to Director dated 11/23/63.

James O. Murray has been interviewed at Birmingham on September 27, `63 and on October 31, `63 at Washington, D.C. During interviews Murray advised he is not a member of the NSRP (National States Rights Party) or any Klan or hate-type organizations. He has admitted association with various individuals connected with NSRP and Klan organizations. He has also indicated opposition to any violence type action. He has been employed by the NSRP at Birmingham, Alabama, from March `63 until June `63 in capacity of mimeo machine operator.

Murray has been developed as a PCI by Birmingham division and had advised he would cooperate fully with the FBI and is presently subject of Birmingham file 173-1056. Murray has prior arrest for carrying weapon without permit and was arrested during September `63 at Birmingham in connection with NSRP activities re: opposition to school desegregation at Birmingham during this time. Upon his release from local custody, Birmingham, Murray indicated desire to cooperate with FBI and to return to NSRP headquarters, Birmingham. However, Dr. Edward R. Fields, informational director, NSRP, Birmingham, advised him Murray’s services not immediately needed at this time.

During last week October, `63, Murray advised he was returning home to 4800 Georgia Ave. N. W., Washington, D.C. to reside with his parents there and would return to Birmingham, Ala., during January 1964 at which time he would rejoin the NSRP.

Document # 124-10027-10065 Is a three page document from A. Rosen to Belmont. It is dated 11/26/63. This is really about the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama on September 15th, 1963.

The third page is missing.

While Governor George Wallace, the political figure most closely identified with the views and beliefs of suspect Klan and National States Rights Party (NSRP) members, made an appearance at the funeral of President Kennedy in Washington yesterday, a confidential informant reported prime suspect Thomas Blanton, Jr., and his father, along with officials of the NSRP, have been jubilant and celebrating.

However, another reliable informant reports the Klan has had no meetings this week and none is planned due to FBI “activities”.

Among those at NSRP headquarters who were happy over the assassination were James Warner, Dr. Edward R. Fields, Jerry Dutton and Albert DeShazo. DeShazo, in discussing the current issue of the NSRP publication “The Thunderbolt,” which contains bitter anti-Kennedy diatribe, (advance copy of which has been furnished the Attorney General) made the statement they would now have to change the name from Jack to Robert.

An informant reported Edward R. Fields was in contact with Mary Lou Holt, representative of United Americans for Cooperative Government, and both agreed the assassination of the President was an act of God as if he was not a communist, he was a fellow traveler and his demise would prevent his delivering them into the hands of the communists. Fields and Holt discussed at length the FBI’s investigation of the Birmingham bombings, and both agreed this investigation was most detrimental to the objectives of their respective organizations. Both asserted they would be happy to see the FBI’s attention diverted.

As a result of conferences of Agents working on the bombing cases in Birmingham, it was agreed that the following remain as prime suspects: Thomas Blanton, Jr., Charles Cagle, Robert Chambliss, Troy Ingram, Levi Yarborough. Secondary suspects are Bobby Frank Cherry, Walter Earl Thompson, Billy Neil Tipton, Herbet Eugene Reeves and Ross Keith. While [Blank] is believed to have participated in bombings other than the principal ones being investigated, Agents handling him are convinced he eventually will reach informant status as he has recently furnished signed statement identifying Cagle and Yarborough as the persons who burned the St. James Methodist Church, Warrior, Alabama, August 10, 1963. While witnesses have not been able to corroborate the later information, [blank] has been cooperative in furnishing coverage of special meetings, which coverage has been corroborated, and has also accepted money for securing information and realizes full well the “hold” Agents now have on him.

Document # 124-10027-10235 Is a 25 page document from Robert P. Gemberling to SAC, Dallas. It is dated January 1/27/65.

Actually there are only 6 pages here.

There is an index that lists the topics

One is about an allegation by unknown caller to radio station KTUC, Tucson, Arizona, that a call was received at radio station KWKH, Shreveport, Louisiana, month before assassination stating President Kennedy would be murdered if he came to Texas.

Only the information from Fay Leon Blunt is here.

On December 1, 1964 Fay Leon Blunt, Dallas, Texas, phoned the FBI at Washington, D.C. stating that 17 individuals in the Hospital Ward of the 5th floor of the Dallas County Jail had witnessed the assassination of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963; however, Blunt stated that none of these witnesses have ever been interviewed.

The following investigation was conducted by Special Agent Richard J. Burnett.

On December 14, 1964 Sheriff Bill Decker, Dallas County Sheriffs Office, Dallas, Texas advised that thorough investigation was conducted at the Dallas County Jail immediately subsequent to the assassination and no witnesses to same were located among inmates.

Chief Jailer Ernest Lloyd Holman, Dallas County Jail, Dallas, Texas, on December 14, 1964, personally escorted Special Agent Richard J. Burnett through the hospital section of the County Jail on the fifth floor where white inmates with a mental history are confined. The mental inmates are kept in a large tank type cell which has one barred double window overlooking the scene of the assassination. The view from this window would have seen the President at the time of being struck by the assassin’s bullets, but the window in the Texas School Book Depository from which the shots were fired is not visible from this cell area.

The hospital section for white prisoners on the fifth floor also has another large cell area in the northwest corner, which has west windows overlooking the site of the President’s car at the time of the assassination, and another window on the north side of the building which overlooks the TSBD, including the window from which the shots were fired by the assassin.

However, Chief Jailer Holman advised that this large cell area is used only on weekends by persons serving their three-day sentences for “Driving While Intoxicated” charges and is not occupied until late on Friday nights as Texas law states any part of a day constitutes a full day’s credit on drunk sentences. Thus, Holman noted that persons serving such “DWI” sentences report late on Friday’s night to gain credit for one full day. Holman further advised that no “DWI” prisoners were in this cell at the time of the assassination.

It is noted that the north corner jail window (which overlooks the TSBD and the window of the TSBD from which assassin’s window were fired) is very dirty and is backed by an iron mesh type grid guard. The view from this particular window is very distorted and it is believed by Holman to be impossible to identify anyone from this window, including the President in his car which would have been rounding the corner of Houston onto Elm Street approaching the Triple Underpass seconds before the shooting.

Both Sheriff Decker and Holman pointed out that anyone who would have been confined in the hospital section on the fifth floor of the jail at the time of the assassination would have been a mental case and the reliability of such a person would be highly questionable. Holman noted that it would be a most difficult and time consuming task at this late date to attempt to determine just who was confined in the Hospital Ward at the time of the assassination. Furthermore, Holman pointed out that such persons, if identified, have since been either released or sent to other State mental places of incarceration.

Holman and Chief Identification Officer James H. Kitching advised that Fay Leon Blunt (complainant in this matter) is well-known to them as a person completely unreliable who has been arrested on several occasions in the past on lunacy charges. Both stated they would place no confidence whatsoever in any information furnished by him. Kitching pulled Blunt’s arrest record and noted that Blunt was not incarcerated in the Dallas county Jail at the time of the assassination.

Then page 20 of the report is included, which is part of the index.

Document # 124-10035-10022 Is supposed to be a 797 page report. 3 pages of which are here. There is kind of a cover sheet with a hell of a lot of notations on it

The title of the case is interesting LEE HARVEY OSWALD, aka L. H. Oswald, Lee Oswald, Lee H. Oswald, Leslie Oswald, A. Hidell, A. J. Hidell, Alek J. Hidell, Alek James Hidell, O. H. Lee.

Leslie Oswald?????

Cover page B identifies some informants.

Dallas T-1

Dorothy Reeder, Info. clerk

U.S. Post Office, Forth Worth, Tex.

New Orleans T-1

Joseph J. Zarza

Postal Inspector

New Orleans, La.

New Orleans T-2

Salvadore Garcia Vargas

Room 534, Whitney National Bank Bldg.

New Orleans, La.

New Orleans T-3

Richard Le Blanc

1933 North Claiborne

New Orleans, La

New Orleans T-4

Salvador Margin

2220 Mandeville

Utility Carrier,

Branch Post Office

Napoleon & Carondelet Streets

New Orleans, La.

New Orleans T-5

Carlos Quiroga

3134 Derby Place

New Orleans, La.

New Orleans T-6

Germinal Messina

1228 Gallier Street

New Orleans Division of Employment

Security

New Orleans, La.

Cover page C Administrative

This report is marked “confidential” inasmuch as it contains data from Immigration and Naturalization Service, New Orleans, which was so “classified,” namely data obtained by SA John T. Reynolds, New Orleans, from Eugene Urban, I &NS.

On 11/23/63, a photograph of an unknown man was exhibited to Marguerite Oswald at Dallas, Texas, by SA Bardwell D. Odum in an attempt to determine if this individual was known to Mrs. Oswald as an associate of Lee Harvey Oswald. Mrs. Oswald could not identify the photograph as anyone she knew. This photograph was furnished by CIA and the identity of this individual is not known, although it is definitely not a photograph of Jack L. Ruby.

Document # 124-10035-10155 Is a 27 page report. 3 pages of which are here. It is from James J. O’Connor to Director. It is dated 1/25/64.

The cover page states that Bureau letter to Miami 1/8/64, enclosing a copy of an editorial article appearing in the 12/23/63 issue of “The Augusta Courier”, published at Augusta, Georgia.

The second page, perhaps it was cover page B, is completely useless. Stamped on the top is information that this was seen or sent to the Senate Select Committee and or House Select Committee on Intelligence Activities. What may have been on cover page B is a mystery.

Cover page C states, “…regard to Cuba. This report further reflected that Buchanan, in addition to being a newspaper writer, was getting involved personally in revolutionary activities pertaining to Haiti and Cuba.

“Miami file 47-4019, Bufile 47-48702, pertains to a fugitive investigation on Jerry Buchanan, FBI # 148937D, the brother of James Buchanan. That case involved the use of U. S. Army identification in the name Jesse L. Murphy by Jerry Buchanan in cashing three stolen checks at Miami. That file reflects the brother of Jerry Buchanan as James Charles Buchanan, and the parents as James and Mary Buchanan, 3543 Northwest 33rd St. Miami.

“Miami file #2-317, Bufile 2-1712, also pertains to Jerry Buchanan, FBI #148937D, and this case was based on recruiting activities by Jerry Buchanan for the Anti-Communist International Brigade of Frank Fiorini. The same file reflects Jerry Buchanan was sent to the Florida State penitentiary as of 7/28/61 for three years as a Parole Violator from a forgery conviction.

Document # 124-10058-10009 Is a 2 page document from SAC, LA to Director dated 4/23/64. Apparently, a Gertrude Tracy was interviewed about the allegations she wrote about in a letter. She did not offer any valuable information.

And without knowing who she is or what the letter said this document is pretty much worthless.

Document # 124-10058-10023 Is a 3 page document from SAC, San Antonio to Director dated 6/16/64. Only two pages are here. This is about certain comments made by Alfred Dwight Amos Featherston.

This is an airtel that refers to an letterhead memorandum (LHM) which is not enclosed. Featherston came into informants place of business in San Antonio in May 1964. The informant told SA Daniel Magennis that Featherston was interviewed by the FBI and thereafter made comments to informant that he was suspicious of one Dr. Ruth Bellinger McCoy having furnished the FBI information about him (Featherston). Informant continued to explain that Featherston’s story concerning the assassination could conceivably be an attempt to trap informant inasmuch as the information could later come to Featherston’s attention.

For the reasons set out above, informant requested that the information he furnished, which is set forth in enclosed LHM, be furnished to the President’s Commission only and that no other dissemination of this information be made. In view of this, the San Antonio office recommends that informants request for limited dissemination be honored. Therefore, the San Antonio office is not giving consideration to interviewing Featherston concerning his statements about the assassination.

It is further recommended that any leads in this matter be left to the Bureau, and that the Dallas and San Antonio offices do not incorporate the information in enclosed LHM in any investigative report or other document that will be disseminated.

Document # 124-10058-10024 Is a 5 page document, of which three pages are here. This is apparently the LHM referred to above. It is actually a two page report with an extra copy of the first page.

Featherston stated that there is a paper circulating throughout Mexico which contained the story that there were seven men involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. Featherston said that Officer Tippit of the Dallas Police Department was the sixth man on the list, and that he was killed because he failed to carry out his orders. He further advised that half the men on the list were Dallas police officers and that the assassination was carefully planned.

On December 20, 1963, Harold McKenzie, Special Agent with the U. S. Bureau of Narcotics, San Antonio, Texas, advised that he had been partially responsible for the detention of an individual who was arrested in New York City, New York, on a narcotic charge and was presently serving time.

Featherston informed McKenzie that he was born October 10, 1927, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and was presently residing at the Hotel Deluxe, 104 Sycamore Street, San Antonio, and was writing newspaper articles for the San Antonio weekly Negro newspaper Snap , which has offices at 107 Chestnut Street, San Antonio. Featherston informed McKenzie that he had spent a considerable amount of time in Belize, British Honduras, and recently came from there via Los Angeles, California.

Featherston advised he was trying to raise funds for the new government which will take over British Honduras when they receive their independence next year sometime.

Further, regarding Featherston, it is to be noted that SA T-2 advised on August 7, 1959, that according to the Guatemalan semiofficial newspaper, Novedades, Featherston was arrested in Guatemala City around the middle of July, 1959, in connection with a plot to assassinate President Ydigoras during the later’s visit to Panama.

Document # 124-10058-10042 Is a two page document from T. J. McAndrew to Evans. It is dated 12/11/64. It is about Fay Leon Blunt.

At 12:20 A.M., 12-11-63 Blunt made a person to person call from Dallas, Texas, to Mr. DeLoach and was referred to SA Arthur R. Ware, Night Supervisor, Special Investigative Division.

Blunt stated he had information that 17 individuals, wardens and inmates, were in the hospital ward on the fifth floor of the Dallas County Jail and from there witnessed the assassination of former President Kennedy. He alleged that none of these individuals have been interviewed on this matter. Blunt said that their information would indicate a search should be made of the top of the Dallas Post Office building.

Bureau files show Blunt was a potential security informant, Dallas Office, on racial matters from 1-15-58 to 3-27-58. He was discontinued when he made inflammatory remarks re integration on a radio program. He was arrested in Arkansas in 1959 for drunk and disorderly and carrying concealed weapon (gun). In 1959 and 1960 he made several telephone calls to Mr. DeLoach, sometimes while under the influence of liquor, and frequently made exaggerated and false claims about his association with the Bureau.

Addendum General investigative Division 12-11-64

With regard to the allegation related by Blunt, no information concerning this matter has been previously received by the Bureau and no one known to have been incarcerated in the Dallas County Jail has ever come forward to volunteer information. The feasibility of making an observation from the fifth floor of the Dallas County Jail is not known; however, it appears quite remote that anyone further removed than the immediate vicinity of the assassination could furnish any information of pertinence. However, in view of the allegation a teletype is being sent to Dallas instructing them to determine the feasibility of such an observation and if so, promptly interview the informant and initiate logical investigation to establish the identity of alleged witnesses to the assassination.

Document # 124-10058-10043 Is a two page document from SAC, Dallas to Director dated 12/15/64.

This is an airtel in response to above. It contains the same information as document #124-10027-10235. This is the original airtel however, and does contain two paragraphs not in the other copy.

In view of the above information and observation, the Dallas Office does not contemplate pursuing this matter further, UACB. (Someone writes in “I fully agree”.)

Document # 124-10058-10044 Is a one page document from Director to SAC, Dallas dated 12/11/64. This is an instruction to Dallas to investigate Blunt’s claim.

Document # 124-10058-10056 Is a 2 page document but only one page is here. It is from SAC, Miami to Director. It is dated 02/06/67.

This is a cover page for an LHM. It refers to Mobile airtel to Bureau 1-11-67. This is something about Roy Emory Hargraves in Cuban affairs; Rolando Masferrer Rojas, who’s Bureau file is 105-118615, Miami file 105-7313; and the “United National Front Against Castro” bureau file 105-138074, Miami file 105-9794.

The last paragraph is cut off as it is continued on page two which is not included, “In view of the fact that this investigation is predicated upon information furnished by William Blanton Acker, Jr., an individual with a diseased mind and also…”

Document # 124-10062-10385 This is a three page document from the Legal Attache in Mexico City to Director dated 1/24/64. Actually only two pages are here. This is a rather interesting one.

Immediately following the assassination of President Kennedy on 11/22/63, all sources of this office were instructed to be alert for any information which would tend to indicate a connection between Oswald and the Cubans or the Communist Party. The following is a summary of information furnished by Mex[blank] and Mex[blank] both of whom have furnished reliable information in the past, since that time.

On 12/6/63 sources reported that Elizabeth Catlett Mora aka Betty Mora, Bufile 100-395934, had been very upset and excited over the involvement of Oswald as the reported assassin of the President. She indicated that the Communist Party of Mexico was very interested in obtaining all the information available concerning Oswald’s travel to Mexico and particularly as to how much the American authorities know.

Mora told informants that the only way Oswald could be linked “to Mexico” was through his activities before his trip to the Soviet Union. She was very interested in obtaining information concernng the date Oswald departed for Russia. Mora considered it “terribly important” to have any press references to Oswald’s activities in New Orleans before he went to Russia. She stated that if something regarding his activities at that time appeared in the press it could “blow the lid and we could all get fired” Mora indicated to informants that she could not understand why the investigation of Oswald, as reported up to that time in the press, had not focused on New Orleans instead of on Dallas.

Mora told the sources that Oswald was well known in Russia among the Americans who were there at the same time and he was “not that much of a nut” (as to singlehandedly undertake to assassinate the President). Mora did not indicate the source of her information concerning the impressions of Oswald gained by Americans in the Soviet Union, but she did indicate that one Mary Lou Patterson (no record in Mexico City files), who at present lives in the Soviet Union and is attending the “Friendship School,” knew Oswald while he was in Russia.

On 12/20/63 informants reported on a dinner which they had attended on 12/11/63 at the home of Kurt Odenheim, bufile 100-386282. The only other dinner guest present besides the informants was Charles Small, bufile 100-12632. It will be recalled that Small operates a tourist-type store in Mexico City, selling jewelry and other items.

During the course of the evening Small was questioned by Odenheim as to whether or not he knew Oswald. Small stated that he had consulted his books when the story first broke in Mexico and he is sure Oswald must have been in the store because “you know everyone reports in there and he would have done so too.” (There have been indications in the past that Small’s store serves as a message center for visiting Communists from the United States.) Small went on to say, however, that fortunately when Oswald was in Mexico, according to the newspapers, Small was out of the country. He said he has been carrying his “red book” ever since as he momentarily expected to be arrested and could prove by the book that he was in the United States at the time.

On 1/6/64 sources reported that Betty Mora was ill and had declined to discuss the Oswald case any further. They said Charles Small is still worried, believing he must have known Oswald at some time and that Oswald must have visited Small’s store while at Mexico.

On 1/13/64 informants reported on a conversation which they had on that date with Elizabeth Mora, who had told them of a conversation she had held with Teresa Proenza, Cultural Attache of the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City.

According to Mora, Teresa Proenza had told her that Oswald walked in “cold” to the Cuban Embassy and the first person he talked to was Proenza. She does not speak English and, therefore, turned him over to the nearest person (not identified by Mora) who was higher in rank and who spoke…. (The rest is on page three which is not included. And it was just getting interesting too.)

Document # 124-10063-10432 is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10001.

Document # 124-10073-10337 Is a duplicate of Document # 124-10058-10056.

Document # 124-10079-10230 Is a 9 page document from the Legal Attache, Mexico City. It is dated 4/10/64. This is further information about Elizabeth Catlett Mora but it’s focus is on Joseph and Reva Frank Bernstein. Mora was a member of the Communist Party USA, and is now a member of Partido Comunista Mexicano (PCM – Communist Party of Mexico), and acted as a liaison between the PCM and another Communist group the American Communist Group in Mexico.

The Bernsteins reside in Detroit, Michigan. The Bernsteins picked up mail for the FPCC at a post office box in Canada.

The document then gives a brief history of the FPCC.

After the assassination, Canadian authorities wanted to question her about the FPCC. So did a Detroit newspaper.

We learn that Charles Small’s real name is Charles Nelson Smolikoff, that he was born on March 16, 1911,[and] is a United States citizen residing in Mexico. He lived in Miami, Florida from `39 to October `54, when he moved to Mexico. Small was a prominent member of the CPUSA in Miami and is a prominent member of ACGM.

Document # 124-10101-10017 Is a one page teletype from SAC, New Orleans to Director. It is dated 3/5/67.

No 1213-S advised this date that Aura Lee (Last Name Unknown), Clay Shaw’s former secretary at International Trade Mart, New Orleans, who is employed by the Heart Fund at Ochsner Clinic, stated in front of Dr. Charles B. Moore and others at Ochsner Hospital 31 last, after Shaw’s press conference where he advised he never met David Ferrie, that she had seen Ferrie go into Shaw’s office in the International Trade Mart building on a number of occasions, and believed Ferrie had privileged entry into Shaw’s office.

Informant furnished the following information in the strictest confidence since it was furnished to him by Orvie Aucoin, a cameraman for Channel 12, WVUE-TV, a neighbor of the informant, who swore informant to secrecy before furnishing the information. Informant advised that according to Aucoin, he had talked to the judge who had handled the matter involving Clay Shaw and this judge stated that after he had seen the evidence District Attorney Garrison has, he strongly believes that if the case against Clay Shaw goes to a jury, the jury will vote 11 to 1 in favor of a conviction.

According to Aucoin, Garrison’s ace in the hole is well documented proof consisting of a certified photostatic copy of a job application made by Lee Harvey Oswald in his own handwriting during the spring or summer of 1963 with a trucking company, name not mentioned, believed to be in New Orleans, in which Oswald listed three personal references one of whom was Jack Ruby. Aucoin also mentioned that attorney Sam (MONK) Zelden has knowledge of this application as he is an attorney for the trucking firm.

Document # 124-10143-10359 Is supposed to be a 14 page airtel from SAC, Phoenix to Director dated 11/27/63. Only two pages are here, and that is two copies of one page.

Enclosed for the Bureau is the original and seven copies of a letterhead memorandum and enclosed for Dallas are four copies of the letterhead memorandum.

The unidentified source mentioned in enclosed letterhead memorandum is PCI Gordon Hitt, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, Phoenix, Arizona. (Protect Identity)

Document # 124-10145-10105 Is a four page document from SAC, Phoenix to Director dated 11/23/63. It is a copy of Document # 124-10018-10363, actually two copies.

Document # 124-10169-10080 Is a 791 page document from Warren DeBrueys to Director. It is dated 12/02/63. There are only three pages here. It is a copy of Document # 124-10035-10022.

Document # 124-10169-10165 Is a 27 page document from James J. O’Connor to Director dated 1/25/64. It is a copy of Document # 124-10035-10155.

Document # 124-10175-10414 Is a 12 page document from SAC, San Antonio to Director. Only 8 pages are here. The first two pages are the same as the two pages of Document # 124-10058-10024. That’s repeated again. So, that’s four of the eight pages. The other four pages are two copies of the two pages from Document # 124-10058-10023.

Document # 124-10176-10376 Is another copy of Document # 124-10035-10022. Once again only 3 pages of a 790 page report.

Document # 124-10179-10180 Is a a copy of Document # 124-10027-10030.

Document # 124-10182-10051 Is a copy of Document # 124-10027-10235.

Document # 124-10227-10320 Is a copy of Document # 124-10035-10155. Only the cover page and Cover page C are here, two copies each. The RIF says it is supposed to be a 54 page document. There are probably two copies of the 25 page report that was not excluded.

Document # 124-10229-10085 Is a copy of Document # 124-10062-10385.

Document # 124-10230-10093 Is a copy of the two pages from Document # 124-10027-10235 about Fay Leon Blunt’s claim that 17 individuals in the Dallas jail saw the assassination and were never interviewed.

Document # 124-10230-10098 Is a copy of the two pages from Document # 124-10027-10235 that deal with the investigation of Fay Leon Blunt’s claim. The two pages wherein the claim is basically dismissed is here, twice.

Document # 124-10230-10117 Is a another copy of Document # 124-10027-10235. This one has a few more pages. All copies of pages I’ve already reviewed. 12 pages. 1 cover page, 1 Table of Contents, 1 “RE: Fay Leon Blunt – Information”, 1 copy of the two page report dismissing Blunt’s claim, 1 copy of page 20 Index, Another cover page, table of contents, another “RE: Fay Leon Blunt – Information”, another copy of the two page report dismissing Blunt’s claim, another page 20 Index.

Document # 124-10234-1000 Is a copy of Document # 124-10062-10385.

Document # 124-10239-10385 Is a copy of Document # 124-10058-10009.

Actually two copies of Document # 124-10058-10009.

Document # 124-10244-10426 Is another copy of Document # 124-10027-10235. 6 pages here.

Document # 124-10262-10087 Is a copy of Document # 124-10035-10155. Only two pages here.

Document # 124-10263-10223 Is a copy of Document # 124-10058-10056.

Document 3 124-10264-10324 Is a copy of Document # 124-10058-10024.

Two pages are Featherston’s claim, then two pages from Document # 124-10058-10023.

Document # 124-10264-10333 Is a copy of Document # 124-10018-10363.

Two copies of the two page report.

Document # 124-10265-10120 Is a copy of Document # 124-10058-10056. It is supposed to be 11 pages, only one is here.

Document # 124-10272-10262 Is a copy of Document # 124-10018-10363.

Document # 124-10272-10288 Is a copy of the two pages of Document # 124-10143-10359.

Document # 124-100275-10359 Is a copy of Document # 124-10058-10009.

The CIA Document Review

Document # 104-10004-10257 is a 7 page document from Deputy Director for Plans to Director of FBI. It is dated 11/23/63. It is postponed in part. There are “sources and methods” discussed here that still need protecting. They will be protected until 2017.

1. Reference is made to CIA Out Teletype Number 84915, dated 23 November 1963.

2. Forwarded as Enclosure A is a transcript of the 28 September 1963 telephone call reported in referenced teletype and of a 1 October 1963 phone call to the Soviet Embassy by a man who identified himself as Lee OSWALD. It is noted that the “North American” who participated in the first call is the same man who identified himself as Lee OSWALD in the second.

3. Forwarded as Enclosure B is a transcript of three phone calls made on 27 September 1963, one made on 1 October 1963 and one made on 3 October 1963.

Voice comparisons indicated that the “North American” who participated in several of these conversations is probably the person who identified himself as Lee OSWALD on 1 October 1963.

4. Our tentative conclusion from reading these transcripts is that OSWALD went to the Soviet Embassy hoping to get a visa to go to the Soviet Union and live and that, failing to get it quickly, he tried to get a Cuban transit visa so he would go to Cuba and wait for the granting of the Soviet visa. This is also the conclusion reached by Silvia Duran, the Mexican national employee of the Cuban embassy who dealt with OSWALD.

This document is another reference to the tape of the conversation existing after the assassination.

Document # 104-10015-10001 is an odd one page document. It is titled,

“Control Document — File Restriction Note Form That Is To Remain As First Document In File”. It is dated February 19, 1988. It is to OG/CFS. Then under that GC-52 Tube DT-6. The file number is 201-289248. Restrict to : (Use country or Non-country code number.) See DOI 70-28. 621. It was restricted by Ray Brewers of CI/CE

Document # 104-10015-10003 is a two page document from C/SR/CI to Mr. Wigren. It is a note concerning the existence of a Soviet Intelligence school in Minsk. It is dated 12/17/63. It has a postponement because the true name of an intelligence agent would be revealed.

To: Mr. Wigren – re GPFLOOR

Mr. Paul Chretien called me at 1420 hours on 17 December, presumably on the basis of some press query, asking “whether there is still a Soviet intelligence school in Minsk.” I told him I never heard of one in the first place: had he? No, he hadn’t. I then checked through Mary Kay Viering and got the following sole trace, which I passed to Chretien by phone, simply saying that there had been a report of one back in 1947, source reliability unknown, but that if — as I suspected — his query concerned “spy schools”, then there are none anywhere. Spies are trained individually; schools are for staff personnel, here and in the U.S.S.R. I discussed fabrications of this sort and he seemed to understand fully.

There is then a document stamped 17-525 for FOIA review April 1976. This document reports of a possible intelligence school in Minsk in 1947. Perhaps a MVD training school. There is an estimate of 200 students. The Source is TS 40288 (WELA 4060) report date 2 June 1950 from [crypt] London. Source is a Russian deserter.

Crypt is substitute language.

Document # 104-10015-10036 is a one page document from Berlin to Munich. No traces on a Garnet Moorhead Hart. This is dated November 12, 1963.

There is a reference to BRLN 4775.

Document # 104-10015-10043 is a one page record and routing sheet. It is dated 8/30/62. It is from RID/AN to CI/SIG. This was for inclusion in Oswald’s file.

You need to be John Newman to decipher the stories of these record and routing sheets. There is one handwritten bit in the comments. Betty Eggeter CI/SIG has full file. And there are the initials DL.

Document # 104-10015-10090 is a seven page report with some postponements. It is from Montevideo to Director. Information report entitled: Cuban Precautions Following Assassination of President Kennedy. It is 7 pages and dated 11/23/63. The first page states that attached to this document TDCS-3/565, 829, is the partially declassified version (partially and de are crossed out) which is available to the public at National Archives. (Someone wrote a ^ and a “not” between is and available) This is Commission Document 294a.

It think that this is old news. I’m sure CD 294a is open in full now.

Source: [ ]ALANCE-6. With his usual inaccuracy, [ ]CANE-1 had advised the Station that the Cuban embassy had requested police protection before the shooting. However, [ ]ALANCE 6 checked the official log in presence of CO and confirmed it occurred an hour after shooting announced.

Enclosed is a CIA Telegram from a Uruguayan Police Official.

1. Ricadro Guttierez Torrens, third Secretary and CIS (Cuban Intelligence Service) Chief of the Cuban embassy in Montevideo, telephoned the Montevideo police at 1710 hours (Montevideo time) on 22 November to request extra police protection for Cuban embassy. Guttierez said the embassy had received reports that a mob was planning to stone the embassy. (Field comment: the news of President Kennedy’s assassination was received in Montevideo at approximately 1600 hours, Montevideo time).

2. The police furnished extra protection to both the Cuban embassy and to the Soviet ligation, although the latter had made no request.

There is a handwritten note, circa 1970’s, about this document being in CD 294a and that it is not available to the public. Then there’s another copy of the telegram.

Document # 104-10015-10096 is a one page document from Montevideo to

Director. A Pianzi (phonectic) called the Cuban embassy in Montevideo 20 November to request urgent appointment with Charge. Said he had news “of importance to the nation” and that he would have all necessary documentation ready by 1400 hours.

Well the Charge ain’t in. They check the areas hotels and find out the guy is Dandol Dianzi, an Argentinean and 39 years of age. He has been registered at the hotel since 28 October.

Someone at the CIA station there was worried that he might know something about the assassination prior to its occurrence. They requested a name trace on him.

Document # 104-10015-10097 is a two page document from Santiago to CIA Director dated 11/23/63. It is a cable regarding remarks made by Cuban embassy officials in Santiago, Chile regarding the assassination of President Kennedy. Jose Toha, Vice President Chilean Cuban Cultural Institute and Director Pro Castro Leftist Press Ultima Hora informed Pedro Martinez Pirez, charge Cuban Emb Santiago that Kennedy had been assassinated. Toha said, “Este asunto de Kennedy se esta poniendo color de hormigas”. Possibly means assassination of Kennedy looks like it could have serious repercussions. Martinez commented that he had heard that the person arrested was president of Fair Play For Cuba Committee and that if the Yankees or the CIA assassinated Kennedy to resume assault on Cuba, then a third World War would start. He said things are very clear and there is no doubt that they have assassinated him, the contradictions are well defined and the moment was very special, like that of the Maine. Martinez said the United States is now in the most difficult position of the past several years in Latin America.

Toha said he was very worried after reading the cable traffic. Martinez added that if the USA is thinking of invading Cuba then they must have everything all prepared and all the strategy ready and therefore the alarm must be given so that Cuba can be prepared.

There is then some discussion about should the flag be at half mast.

Martinez denied several times that assassin was involved in Fair Play for Cuba Committee insisting that this person is only a suspect and that extreme rightist or segregationist is to blame. Martinez said he believed that the US gov’t would try to put blame on Cuba.

Document # 104-10015-10121 Is a two page cable postponed in part. It is from London to Director.

Para 1. Dir 84608 Alert put to [blank] [blank] alerting field stations.

Para 2. Expressions of sorrow and sympathy received from Top Command [blank] as well as working level. Effect in U.K. is one of profound shock and public reaction here similar to death of Franklin Roosevelt.

Para 3. Due to background man charged with assassination, [blank] reported morning 23 Nov following some similar phone calls of strangely coincidental nature persons received in this country over past year, particularly in connection with Dr. Ward case. [blank] Reported that at 1805 GMT 22 Nov an anonymous call was made in Cambridge, England to the senior reporter of the Cambridge News rpt Cambridge News. The caller said only that the reporter should call the American Embassy in London for some big news and then rang off. Last night after word of the President’s death was received the reporter informed the Cambridge police of the above call and the police informed [blank]. The important thing is that the call was made, according [blank] calculations, about 25 minutes before the President was shot. Cambridge reporter had never received call of this kind before and [blank] say he is known to them as sound and loyal person with no security record. [blank] wanted above reported particularly in view reported Soviet background Oswald. Depending on circumstances, HQS may wish pass above to State Department as [blank] could not reach State Department rep this morning. [blank] stand ready to assist in any way possible on investigations here.

Document #104-10015-10138 is a one page document from Mexico City to Director dated 11/25/63

According LIFIRE DIP couriers ref left Mexico for Cuba 12 Nov via Cubana 465 returned to Mexico 18 Nov. According LIENVOY they probably left for New York on 23 Nov. via AERONAVES flt 451. Ananyev (phonetic) of Sov consulate New York phoned SOVEMB 23 Nov asking for info on which flight courier is taking. Comment: This only infrequently occurs. Asst. Consul Kostikov handled the call from New York.

C/S comment: Aleksey Papkov and Valentin Ponomarev, son DIP couriers arrived Mexico 10 November.

Document # 104-10015-10143 is a one page document from A.C. Palmbeck to Director dated 11/25/63. This is about an interview with Alvarado

This document repeats the Alvarado claim. The important information in this document is Alvarado’s telephone number 41-07-31. His address Pino 173, Col. Santa Maria de La Virrera. He was born 1/31/40 in Ciudad Rama, State of Celaya, Nicaragua. Also important is Juan Lorillo, Rolan Alvarado and Carlos Fonseca AMADOR are members of his organization in Nicaragua.

Document # 104-10015-10149 Is a two page document from Bern, Germany to Director.

1. Following is complete text of second memo re Lee Harvey Oswald received by FBI Bern from [blank] at same time as memo forwarded ref A, [blank] and FBI rep Bern internal reference numbers omitted.

Oswald Lee Harvey, Born 18 October 1939 at New Orleans/USA.

In view of the recent and tragic developments we have again

contacted the “Albert Schweitzer College” at Churwalden for

possible additional information.

It has been found that all correspondence which had been

exchanged with the college by subject and his mother was

forwarded, in March 1961, to Jim Wright, member of Congress,

Washington D.C. on request of subject’s mother.

We felt that the above information might assist you in the

present investigation.

2. Kubark only: exam of ODENVY (FBI) and [blank] memo reference data indicates FBI Rep Bern queried [blank] re Lee Harvey Oswald first on 16 June 60, then again 28 July 61, that [blank] replied 29 Sept 62, then again 20 October 60. When ELMARD (I have no clue what ELMARD is supposed to be. It’s a CIA crypt for something) noted above and queried FBI rep. Bern latter replied that original query re: Oswald originated from FBI Paris. Speculate FBI checked Paris and Bern in connection persons associated with Fair Play for Cuba Committee including Oswald.

3. Kubark only: significance of reference to Albert Schweitzer College at Churwalden not known to station. Quick check station files shows no traces. Check phone book shows college listed at Churwalden, Graubuenden.

4. Will review above aspects Oswald case with FBI rep. Bern on 27 November. Advise any HQS guidelines.

C/S comment; *Forwarded information on Marina Nikolaeva Oswald, wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, which was volunteered by Moroccan student Mohamed Reggab.

**Forwarded station comments on [blank] (2) memo concerning Richard Thomas Gibson, who was acquainted with Oswald.

Document # 104-10015-10151 Is a three page document from Berlin to Director dated 11/26/63. This is the information on Marina Oswald from Mohamed Reggab. Reggab was born 1/3/38 in Safi, Morocco. Reggab moved to West Berlin. He was a student at Moscow’s Institute of Cinematography from Sept. 60 to April `62. He came to Berlin April 63 as a student and was debriefed on Moscow experiences at PBHASSOCK. On 26 Nov. he returned to PBHASSOCK to volunteer info on Mrs. Oswald who had been his girlfriend in Moscow

Reggab stated that Marina lived with her mother in Moscow in area near agricultural exposition. He did not know the address. Her father was deceased. She was employed early 61 as punch card operator for business machine firm.

He met her at a large Saturday night dance in January `61 sponsored by Russian student organization for foreign students at a university. They saw each other 3 or 4 times per week until May 61 when Reggab dumped her for one of Marina’s friends, Lousa Bourlakova, now age 21.

Reggab said on their first meeting he told her he was dissatisfied with life in Moscow as it was not Communist. She later spoke openly of opposition to regime and stated that her main goal in life was to marry a foreigner so she could leave Soviet Union.

He was aware that some girls who were members of KOMSOL had missions to report on foreign students and that such girls could be instructed to voice anti-regime sentiments to ingratiate themselves. He did not think this was true of Marina.

Document # 104-10015-10155 Is a two page document from CIA to FBI dated 11/26/63 open in full. It is a cable about the travel plans of a pro-Communist Costa Rican Congressman. He is going to Texas on November 26, 1963.

Julio Sunol Leal, pro-Castro deputy to the Costa Rican National Assembly, planned to leave San Jose, Costa Rica for Poland 24 November to attend World Peace conference in Warsaw, Poland. He delayed his departure and now plans to leave on 26 November. He intends to stop in Texas en route to Poland.

Representatives of this agency in Costa Rica suspect that Sunol will try to gather data in Texas to use in pro-Communist/Castro propaganda in connection with the assassination of President Kennedy.

Document # 104-10015-10237 Is a one page document from the Hague to Director dated 11/29/63. This is about a trace on two subjects. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina.

Subject trace results negative by station, PBSWING, AMCONSULATES Rotterdam and Amsterdam; inadvertently omitted ref B.

Re-Checking on basis ref A info

** Confirmed arrival of GPFLOOR (2) at New York 13 June 1962 aboard Holland American liner Massdam.

**No identifiable trace GPFLOOR (2), although Dutch Charge’ in Moscow issued transit visa to his wife on 13 May 1962.

Document # 104-10015-10238 Is a one page cable from London to Director dated 11/29/63. It is about a name trace on John Wilson AKA Wilson Hudson.

Although station tracing John Wilson AKA Wilson Hudson with [blank] believe on first returns from FBI check he likely be psychopath. Station gathers he gave this impression when testifying before Eastland Committee in `59. We are therefore not pursuing further except thru [blank] for any info they have on him.

C/S comment: *Dissemination applicable to RYBAT GPFLOOR DYVOUR Cables.

** Wilson claimed he knew “Ruby” while in Cuba 1957-59, and could identify Ruby from a clear picture.

Document # 104-10015-10365 Is a one page cable from Lima, Peru to Director. It is dated 11/26/63. This is about a phone conversation between Ulloa and Celso Pastor de la Torre made on November 22. Ulloa suggested to Pres. Bulaunde be the first Latin American president to announce he would attend funeral of President Kennedy.

Document # 104-10015-10390 Is a one page document from London to Director. It is dated 11/27/63. It is about the possibility of one Lyudmilla Nikolaevna Pruskova, who received a visa to visit the U.K. She was one of a group of 28 Soviets invited to visit the U.K. 12 May 1960 by Scottish Union of students. CIA thinks she might be related to LHO”S wife.

Cable all [blank] and [blank] traces re Lyudmila Nikolaevna Prusakova and Marina Nikolaevna Prusakova. Pouch photos if available. Slug answer. RYBAT GPFLOOR only.

Document # 104-10015-10404 Is a one page document from Mexico City to Director. It is dated 11/27/63. It is about border checks on Oswald’s alleged travel to Mexico City.

FYI there are about six separate Mexican first class bus lines servicing border points, with 28 arrivals around clock Mexico daily at six terminals, with hardly exception busses not on schedule. Above does not include numerous second class bus services, does not include train, air possibilities.

C/S comment: * Requested HQS try arrange with FBI surveill subj into Mexico and get firm info on border point at which crosses and bus used to arrive here.

It sounds from this that someone ordered the Mexi station to send out their boys to check the whole damn Mexican-U.S. border and how Oswald got into Mexico long after the fact, an impossible task.

Document # 104-10015-10414 Is a one page document from Mexico City to Director dated 11/27/63. This is an odd one. The Mexico City Station is having or going to a seminar. I wonder what the seminar is about?

1. Ref sent info Mexi silent on site and means organize seminar, set for January at earliest by agreement [ ]acrobat liquifers 7 and 8 by 12 December. Station feels more advance notice needed for meeting this scope and is not sanguine of success organizing in matter of days.

2. As HQS knows, liquifer 8 still mnty, travels Mexico City alternate week ends, unable plan [ ]afraid share seminar. L-7 still Europe at last report. New [ ]afraid leadership shaking down, unready for rapid coordination on nation wide event, particularly as Friemanis not scheduled visit Mexi. Station contact [ ]afraid through Rikon, who turning over contact to new outside case officer.

3. Station requests clarification need hold seminar such short notice.

Document # 104-10015-10421 Is a one page document from Ottawa to Director dated 11/23/63.

1. [ ] report Erwin Herzog departed Vancouver 0800 hours 23 November on Seattle express bus. Believed bound for Mexico City. Presume bus is Greyhound.

2. He was wearing….

3. [ ] unable learn time arrival, hotels, or probably contacts, Mexico City.

Document # 104-10015-10422 Is a one page document from Ottawa to Director dated 11/27/63. It is a name trace on Oswald.

1. [ ] and station records reveal no trace Oswald.

2. Also [ ]admix has searched all arrival and departure records from 1959 to present with negative results.

Document # 104-10015-104-10423 is a two page cable from Ottawa to Director. This is about the initial reaction of Cuban ambassador Cruz and his staff to the report of the assassination of President Kennedy.

1. Review current [ ]sime indicates initial reaction of Cuban ambassador Cruz and his staff to report of assassination President was one of happy delight. After further info was received indicating that Oswald had connections with Fair Play for Cuba Committee there was some apprehension concerning possible U.S. reaction.

2. Speech of Cuban ambassador to UN indicated to ambassador Cruz that he and his staff might be expected adopt more somber attitude in public. Some time later ambassador Cruz received cable, apparently signed “ROA”, which ordered ambassador and his staff to govern their actions by official attitude of gov’t to which they accredited. Cruz thereupon issued instructions to his staff and to Cuban consulates and trade office Toronto and Montreal to “cease looking happy in public”.

3. When it was announced in Canada that an official requiem high mass would be held, Cruz, decided that on basis his instructions from Havana he would have to attend although he made it clear that he would not do so if he had any personal choice in the matter. Cruz ordered other members his staff not to take part in official mass or any private ceremonies of mourning.

4. This info rcvd orally from [ ]acquire on basis quick review [ ]smine and believed essentially accurate. [ ] will provide written report in due course.

5. Station has confirmed that ambassador Cruz did attend requiem mass as official rep of his govt.

C/S comment: * Because of obvious significance any scrap of information which bears on President’s assassination, desire stations screen carefully all audiotapes since 22 November 1963 for comments and cable any significant information so obtained.

Document # 104-10015-10424 Is a one page document dated 11/27/63 from Ottawa to Director. More on the travels of Herzog.

[ ] Have now learned from second ticket agent that Herzog, following inquiry reported ref, purchased roundtrip Greyhound Bus ticket, Vancouver to Mexico City via El Paso.

Document # 104-10016-1006 Is a one page document from Mexico City to Director dated 11/28/63. It’s about Alvarado.

1. Delighted have Erythroid-3. Have him call 46 94 00 extension 250 and ask for Mr. Daniels, identifying self as Alberto Suarez. Meeting will take place lobby plaza hotel corner Insurgentes Norte and Sullivan just off Paseo Reforma. Time will be set by phone. If rpt if he should be able arrive 23 Nov give him number 20 96 24 and ask for Sr. David. Please furnish identifying data.

2. If KUBARK (CIA) interrogation in E-3 presence unsatisfactory retain alternative of turnover to government of Mexico.

C/S comment: *Suggested sending E-3 (1) to Mexico City to help in the investigation of Alverado

Document # 104-10016-10013 Is a 3 page document from Peter Baranowski to MFR. This is really a memorandum for record. It is dated 12/15/63. This is further amplification of Deryabin’s report on the Planned Assassination of Eisenhower.

1. As you are aware, Peter Deryabin prepared a report dated 27 November 1963 of his comments on the assassination of President Kennedy. In discussing this report with the undersigned, Deryabin mentioned that he had reported in 1954 that the Soviets had had an operation to assassinate President Eisenhower.

2. We resurrected this report. (See attachment.) The following is in amplification of Deryabin’s 19 October 1954 report on the KGB plan to assassinate President Eisenhower: Deryabin reported that while he was Acting Chief of the German Branch in 1952 (the chief, Ivan Kuzmich Krylov, was on TDY in Austria for a couple of months), Deryabin had occasion to speak to a new officer, Lt. Col. Brusov. Brusov had just returned from North Korea where he was assigned to Military Counterintelligence. Deryabin said he got to know Brusov both from talking to him and from reading his party file. You will recall that Deryabin was the Party Secretary for the German Branch. The sum total of the conversation that concerned Eisenhower’s planned assassination was that Brusov said, “We were preparing an operation to assassinate Eisenhower during his visit to Korea in order to create panic among the Americans and win the war in Korea.” Supposedly one of the actions taken was that military activities in the areas where Eisenhower was supposed to visit were intensified and there were special bombings and other air sorties mounted. Deryabin said that he did not question Brusov too closely in this matter because Brusov had worked for Sudoplatov. You will recall that Sudoplatov used to command the SPETSBURO #1 in the MGB. SPETSBURO #1 was concerned with assassinations and other executive action type projects and there was an unwritten rule in the MGB that nobody ask questions about their activities.

3. Concerning Brusov, Deryabin recalls that he (Brusov) worked for SUDOPLATOV during World War II when SUDOPLATOV was in charge of partisan activities. In 1949 Brusov moved to Poland where he was the CI advisor to the Polish State Security for the Warsaw Vojevodstvo. From 1949 to 1952 Brusov was supposedly in Korea where Deryabin believes he continued to work for SUDOPLATOV’s SPETSBURO #1. While under Deryabin’s command in the German Branch, Brusov was in charge of handling all English, American and French defectors in Germany. He had two officers, one Umnov and the other SHUKIN. You will recall that Umnov is the TASS correspondent in Vienna now, and is handling a couple of double agents that we are aware of.

4. After Beriav took over in March of 1953, Deryabin recalls that there was some discussion as to what should be done with SUDOPLATOV’s SPETSBURO#1. The last that Deryabin recalls is that Brusov was transferred sometime in 1953. He was assigned as Deputy Chief to the Moscow Oblast of the MVD and his responsibilities were investigation of sabotage of transportation in the Moscow Oblast. Deryabin recommends that we ask SVIALTO about Brusov as SVIATLO might have met him or knew him in Warsaw.

signed

Peter Baranowski

CSR/CI/S

Document #104-10016-10023 Is a one page document from London to Director dated 12/02/63.

1. Sunday Telegraph 1 Dec. `63 caries editorial page article by Washington correspondent Stephen Barber devoted largely to Fair Play For Cuba Committee (FPCC). Barber had interviewed and quotes Robert Bruce Taber (about whom see Ref A Contact report) as doubting the FPCC Natl Chairman Vincent Lee had any dealings with Lee Harvey Oswald.

2. Airmailing Clip Winston Gargarin. Have informed Local State Dept.

Document # 104-10016-10033 Is a six page document from Richard Helms Deputy Director of Plans, CIA to J. Lee Rankin dated 3/24/76. There is a record and routing sheet dated March 24, 1976 from CI Staff / Hartman with a note.

Jim, this doc is not in the system and should go into Oswald’s 201 file. See attached subject. You may also wish to check whether Riccardo Guttierez Torres has a 201 and, if so B code it. You will probably want to use the TDCS number.

This appears to be Warren Commission document #1012, however, there is an interesting Memorandum For Record dated November 16, 1977.

This report, Warren Commission Document No. 1012, was recently forwarded to CIA by the National Archives for consideration in response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act by a third party. A search of documents contained in the Lee Harvey Oswald 201 file has revealed that the four-page version of Commission Document No. 1012, currently in National Archives, is a slightly different version of the same document in the Oswald file, now numbered 18-522 and containing only three pages on the subject of Geroge and Jeane DeMohrenschildt. A comparison of the two documents (18-522 and Commission Document No. 1012) also contains additional information. This additional information has been determined to be releasable under the Freedom of Information Act. It has also been discovered that Commission Document No. 1012 utilizes an exact copy of page 2 from Document No. 18-522. This has destroyed the substantive continuity in the text of the material connecting pages 1 and 3 with page 2 which can easily be ascertained when Commission Document No. 1012 and Document 18-522 are similarly made to CD 1012. However, information identifying Agency components and internal Agency filing instructions are not present in Commission Document No. 1012. As a result, deletions of this information claimed in Document No. 18-522 are not to be claimed in Commission Document No. 1012.

Document # 104-10017-10017 Is a two page document to London from Director dated 12/03/63. This originates from Mr. Scelso, unit CWH/3, ext. 5613, 3 Dec 63.

1. Carl John Wilson AKA John Wilson-Hudson DOB 29 December 1916 Liverpool well known HDQS. In 36 left Oxford to join international brigade in Spanish Civil war, later became Spanish citizen. In 39 went to Chile with Spanish passport and resided Santiago. Journalist stated employment. While Chile Brit Amb requested that he be expelled for open crusade against U.K. government and masquerading under various nonexistent titles. Wilson’s strange behavior attributed to mental illness. Expulsion order dropped after Wilson promised to cease and desist. But he continued similar activity. Violently anti-U.S.

2. In June 59 wrote to UK parliament and UK trade union saying could confirm U.S. giving military advice to dictators and protested in name of humanity. Arrested by Castro govt early July 59 for involvement revolutionary group planning attack on Nicaragua. Detained in Cuban prison 54 days then went to Kingston, Jamaica, where issued nonimigrant visa U.S. to sell story to Miami Herald. Apparently, returned UK latter part 59

3. Although Wilson intelligent, erratic behavior indicates mental unbalance. Married to Chilean Elina Bronfman.

4. Latest info HDQS record 59. Continue request with [ ] [ ] and report all info HDQS. HDQS pouching full traces LOND which HDQS passed FBI Wash.

*Ref Rybat – Station asked [ ] (2) to follow up any leads on British subjects abroad relating to GPFLOOR (4).

Document # 104-10017-10034 This is a one page document from Munich to Director dated 12/06/63. Munich was asked to confirm Oswald’s travels.

Muni and [ ] files negative.

Document # 104-10017-10037 This is a 33 page document from CIRA/RS to IP. It is dated 12/06/63. This is a preliminary biographical study on Lee Harvey Oswald. DTD 6 December.

Actually, it is two copies of a 15 page document. The 15th page is missing in the first copy but there in the second.

There is a record and routing sheet, dated December 6, 1963.

They give his date of birth as 18 October 1939, New Orleans, Louisiana.

They say there is sensitive information on pages 11 and 12. Those are about Oswald in Mexico City. For those of us fascinated with John Armstrong’s research I’ll reproduce this stuff.

Date Event Reference

1942 (or 1943) At the minimum age of three, OSWALD New York Times

was placed in a Lutheran home for 3 December 1963

children, in New Orleans, Louisiana

(Note, the period after children is turned into a coma and “in New Orleans, Louisiana” is added in someone’s handwriting.)

1945 New York Times

5 May When OSWALD’s mother married Edwin A. 3 December 1963

EKDAHL on 5 May 1945, she moved to

Fort Worth, Texas, and took Lee Harvey

OSWALD with her. Prior to that time

Lee Harvey OSWALD and his brothers were

living at a Lutheran home for children

in New Orleans, Louisiana. The two

older children, John Edward PIC and

Robert Edward Lee OSWALD, Jr., were

left in the Lutheran home.

1948

12 March On 12 March 1948 Edwin A. EKDAHL Washington Post

divorced OSWALD’s mother, Marguerite 28 November 1963

OSWALD, in Ft. Worth, Texas.

EKDAHL’s attorney was former Navy

Secretary, Fred KORTH.

1952

September In September 1952 OSWALD moved with

his mother and two brothers to

New York City,where they resided at

1455 Sheridan Avenue, in the Bronx.

OSWALD attended a junior high school

at 1865 Morris Avenue, at which time

he was in the seventh grade.

1953 OSWALD moved with his mother and

brothers to 825 East 179th Street in

New York City, and OSWALD attended

Junior High School #44 at 1825

Prospect Avenue.

Four judges of The Bronx Children’s Washington Post

Court who interviewed OSWALD in 1953 3 December 1963

felt that OSWALD needed psychiatric

care.

In 1953 OSWALD was absent from two

junior high schools for 47 days.

Around December 1953 OSWALD entered New York Times

Beauregard Junior High School at 3 October 1963

4621 Canal Street, New Orleans,

Louisiana, as an eight grade transfer

student from Public School #44 in

New York City

1955 OSWALD attended the Warren Easton New York Times

High school in New Orleans, Louisiana, 3 December 1963

in 1955

1956 For a brief period, prior to his DBF-82181

enlistment in the U. S. Marine Corps, 3 July 1963

OSWALD was employed in an import-

export business (place of employment

not given).

Prior to his enlistment in the U. S. DBF-82181

Marine Corps OSWALD attended high 3 July 1963

school in Ft. Worth, Texas. At the

time of his enlistment he had not

finished high school.

October On 24 October 1956 OSWALD enlisted in DBF-82181

the U. S. Marine Corps, and was assigned 3 July 1963

serial number 1653230. At the time of

his enlistment he was residing at

4936 Collingwood Street, Fort Worth,

Texas.

1957

March to June From March to 3 May OSWALD was

stationed in Jacksonville, Florida.

From 4 May to 19 June OSWALD was

stationed in Biloxi, Mississippi, where

he received special training as as

electronics and radio operator.

1958 OSWALD served in Japan from July 1957 Washington Post

to October 1958. 1 December 1963

1959

Spring In the spring of 1959 OSWALD made

arrangements to attend the Albert

Schweitzer college in Switzerland.

He paid a registration fee of $25 and

was expected to arrive at the college

on 20 April 1960. There is no record

of OSWALD’s actual attendance at the

college, or his presence in Switzerland.

From March to September 1959 OSWALD was Washington Post

stationed at Marine Air Control Squadron 3 December 1963

9 in Tustin, California. OSWALD’S direct

superior was Marine First Lieutenant John

E. Donovan. When it was learned that

OSWALD was in Moscow, USSR, all secret

radio frequencies, call signs and codes

for the air control units had to be

changed.

3 September On 3 September 1959 OSWALD received an DBF-49478

honorable (dependency) discharge from 12 May 1960

the U.S. Marine Corps, after 14 months

service in Japan and the Philippines.

His serial number was MS-1853230-6741,

USMC. He was a PFC (E-2), and was in the

Marine Air Corps School (MACS-9) and held

the status of MWHG (radar operator).

When OSWALD applied for a U.S. Passport Foreign Service

in September (?) 1959 he gave his Dispatch #234

occupation as “shipping export agent.” 2 November 1959

10 September When OSWALD was issued U.S. Passport Foreign Service

#1733242 on 10 September 1959 his Dispatch #234

address was given as 4936 Collingwood, 2 November 1959

Ft. Worth, Texas.

(note Dispatch spelled incorrectly as “despatch” in document)

11 September On 11 September 1959 OSWALD received an

honorable discharge from the U. S. Marine

Corps, and reenlisted as a private in the

Reserve; on the same day.

Reason for discharge given as “Dependency

hardship in order to support mother.”

1959 continued After OSWALD’s discharge from the U.S. DBF-82181

Marine Corps in September of 1959, he 3 July 1963

visited his mother in Fort Worth, Texas,

for a few days. At that time he stated

that he was going to New Orleans,

Louisiana, to resume his employment with

an export-import company. He also

mentioned his desire to travel and he

told his mother that he might go to Cuba.

During the time OSWALD served in the DBF-82181

U. S. Marine Corps he saved $1600. 3 July 1963

9 October On 9 October 1959 OSWALD arrived

in Southampton, England. His landing

card indicating that he had no fixed

address, but planned to remain in

England one week for vacation before

going to “some school” in Switzerland.

OSWALD subsequently left England on

10 October for Helsinki, Finland.

14 October On 14 October 1959 OSWALD applied for Foreign Service

a Soviet visa in Helsinki, Finland. Dispatch #234

2 November 1959

16 October OSWALD claimed that on 16 October 1959 Foreign Service

he applied for Soviet citizenship by Dispatch #234

letter to the “Supreme Soviet.”

22 October On 22 October 1959 OSWALD’s Soviet

visa and militia registration expired.

He was then residing at the Hotel

Metropole, Moscow, USSR.

31 October On 31 October 1959 OSWALD stated that Foreign Service

he wished to renounce his U. S. Dispatch #234

citizenship, claiming that he had already 2 November 1959

taken steps to become a Soviet citizen.

2 November As of 2 November 1959 OSWALD was residing

in a non-tourist status at the Hotel

Metropole in Moscow.

18 December On 18 December 1959 OSWALD’s mother, DBF-49478

Marguerite OSWALD, mailed him a check 12 May 1963

for $25 as a partial payment of the

$100 he had lent to her. She sent the

check to OSWALD at the Hotel Metropole,

Moscow. On 18 January 1960 OSWALD

returned the check to her and asked her

to mail him a $20 dollar bill, which

she did. On 25 February 1960 the letter

she had written to OSWALD and the $20

were returned to her and the envelope

was stamped “retour, parti.”

After OSWALD arrived in Moscow he Washington Post

reportedly slashed his wrists, and was 2 December 1963

hospitalized for several days. It was

not known whether this was a suicide

attempt, or an “attention getting gesture.”

1960

13 January As of 13 January OSWALD was employed in

the Belorussian Radio and TV factory in

Minsk, USSR, as a metal worker in the

research department.

22 January Mrs. OSWALD, Lee Harvey OSWALD’s mother,

secured a foreign draft from the First

National Bank of Ft. Worth, Texas, for

$25.00 which she sent to Oswald in care

of the Metropole Hotel, Moscow, USSR.

May As of May 1960 OSWALD’s mother, Marguerite DBF-49478

OSWALD, was employed at the Methodist

Orphans Home, 1111 Herring Avenue, Waco,

Texas.

6 May As of 6 May 1960 Marguerite C. OSWALD,

aka Mrs. Edward Lee OSWALD, was employed

at the Methodist Orphans Home, 1111

Herring Avenue, Waco, Texas.

(Note, I don’t know why the above information is repeated nor do I understand the subtle distinction made identifying Marguerite Oswald. It’s as if they are trying to say there were two Marguerite Oswald’s employed at the same place.)

17 August OSWALD was given a dishonorable discharge DBF-82181

from the U. S. Marine Corps Reserve on 3 July 1961

17 August 1960.

1961

26 January On 26 January 1961 OSWALD’s mother, Memo of Conversation

Marguerite OSWALD, visited the Dept. Department of State

of State in Washington, D.C. to see 26 January 1961

what could be done to help her son.

At this time she gave her address as

Box 305, Boyd, Texas.

30 January On 30 January 1961 OSWALD wrote a letter

to Governor John Connally, then Secretary

of the Navy, protesting his dishonorable

discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps

Reserve.

5 February On 5 February 1961 OSWALD mailed a letter

to the U.S. Embassy in Moscow from Minsk,

indicating his desire to return to the

United States. The letter was received

at the Embassy on 13 February.

10 April As of 10 April 1961 OSWALD’s mother, DBF-82181

Marguerite OSWALD, was residing at 3 July 1963

1612 Hurley Street, Fort Worth, Texas.

She said that she had returned to

Fort Worth about 1 April 1961 from Boyd,

Texas, where she had operated a dress

shop which she found necessary to close

on account of financial difficulties.

30 April When OSWALD married Marina in Minsk on Washington Post

30 April 1961, OSWALD was earning 80 28 November 1963

rubles a month, whereas Marina earned

only 45, even though she had more formal

training.

On 30 April 1961 OSWALD married Marina

Nikolayevna PRUSAKOVA, a dental technician.

One Loussa BOURLAKOVA was reported to be DIR-85177

a friend of OSWALD’s wife, Marina OSWALD. November 1963

25 May On 25 May 1961 the U.S. Embassy in

Moscow received an undated letter from

OSWALD asking for a “full guarantee” that

he would not “under any circumstances”

be persecuted.

8 July On 8 July 1961 OSWALD appeared at the

U. S. Embassy in Moscow with his wife

with regard to his return to the United

States. At this time he denied that he

had applied for Soviet citizenship, and

his U. S. Passport was returned to him.

20 July On 20 July OSWALD made application for

an exit visa to return to the United States

to the Soviet authorities.

Early October In the early part of October 1961 OSWALD

mailed four letters to the U. S. Embassy

in Moscow dated — July, 15 July, 8 August,

and 4 October. These letters indicated

that he and his wife were being subject to

harassment by Soviet citizens in Minsk,

and reasserted his desire to return to

the United States.

1961-1962 While living in Minsk OSWALD liked to go New York Times

hunting. His wife said her impression 27 November 1963

was that it might have been only as a

guest of a hunt club. OSWALD reportedly

was irritated because the Soviet Government

would not allow him to own a gun.

1962

15 February On 15 February 1962 OSWALD’s daughter,

June Lee OSWALD, was born.

22 March On 22 March 1962 OSWALD wrote to

Brigadier General R. Mc. C. Tompkins,

U.S.M.C., Assistant Director of Personnel,

regarding his dishonorable discharge.

OSWALD’s address at that time was

Kalinina St., 4-27, Minsk, USSR.

24 May U. S. Immigration Visa (#52) was issued

to OSWALD’S wife at the U. S. Embassy in

Moscow on 24 May 1962.

13 June On 13 June 1962 OSWALD arrived in the U. S.

at New York, NY, with his wife and daughter

on the SS MAASDAN.

18, 19, 20 June On 18, 19, and 20 June 1962, Miss Washington Post

Pauline V. BATES, a public stenographer 30 November 1963

in Ft. Worth, Texas, typed about a

third of a manuscript for OSWALD

concerning his views of the USSR and

his experience. OSWALD stopped the

work because he said that he only had

$10 to pay BATES.

15 August On 15 August 1962 OSWALD stated that

he had been residing with his wife and child

at 2703 Mercedes Street, Forth Worth, Texas,

since the middle of July 1962.

October In 1962 OSWALD was employed by a New York Times

graphics concern in Dallas, Texas. He had 28 November 1963

been referred to the firm by the State

Employment Commission.

1963 In the early part of 1963 OSWALD told New York Times

his wife to return to the USSR as he could 27 November 1963

not support her here. After urging she

contacted the Soviet Embassy in Washington,

D.C., for a visa. When the Soviet Embassy

asked why she wanted to return to the USSR

she reportedly did not reply to their query.

March In March 1963 OSWALD was given a discharge New York Times

notice by the graphic arts concern in Dallas, 28 November 1963

Texas, by which he was employed.

April In April 1963 OSWALD’s employment with the New York Times

graphics arts concern in Dallas, Texas, 28 November 1963

was terminated. OSWALD had been paid about

$1.45 an hour. After deductions his pay

amounted to about $50 a week.

10 May On May 10 1963 OSWALD informed his wife, Washington Post

who was residing in Irving, Texas, with 28 November 1963

Mrs. Ruth PAINE, that he had found work in

New Orleans, Louisiana. Ruth PAINE then

drove Marina to New Orleans, and stayed

with her for “a couple” of days.

16 May As of 16 May 1963 OSWALD was employed

as a maintenance man with the William

Reilly Coffee co., 640 Magazine Street,

New Orleans. At the time he was hired

by this company he was residing at

757 French Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

May In May of 1963 OSWALD received a membership

card from the New York Chapter of the Fair

Play for Cuba Committee which was signed

by V. H. Lee .

6 June On 6 June 1963 OSWALD claimed that he

received a card from the New Orleans

Chapter of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee

signed by A. J. HIDELL.

25 June On 25 June 1963 OSWALD was issued a passport Washington Post

for travel to Russia, Poland, and Western 1 December 1963

Europe as a photographer.

17 July On 17 July 1963 OSWALD’s employment with

the William Reilly Coffee Co. was terminated.

At this time OSWALD was living with his wife

and child at 4095 Magazine Street, New

Orleans, Louisiana.

9 August On 9 August 1963 OSWALD was arrested in

New Orleans, Louisiana, for disturbing the

peace. At the time of the arrest, OSWALD

was distributing throwaways for the Fair

Play for Cuba Committee.

21 August On 21 August 1963 OSWALD appeared on

radio station WDSU in New Orleans, Louisiana,

at which time he admitted being a “Marxist”

and claimed that the Fair Play for Cuba

Committee was not Communist controlled.

16 September According to an article appearing in the Washington Post

Milwaukee Sentinel on 30 November 1963, a 1 December 1963

man who signed his name “Lee OSWALD, Dallas,”

registered at a well known night club about

30 miles from Milwaukee on 16 September 1963.

17 September On 17 September 1963 OSWALD applied in DIR-85653

New Orleans, Louisiana, for unemployment 28 November 1963

insurance.

23 September On 23 September 1963 Marina OSWALD, New York Times

and her child, departed from New Orleans 27 November 1963

with Mrs. Ruth PAINE, and drove to

Mrs. Paine’s house in Irving, Texas.

OSWALD did not go with them claiming

that he wanted to visit a friend in

Houston, Texas.

25 September On 25 September OSWALD moved from his DBA-55715

apartment at 4905 Magazine Street, New 31 October 1963

Orleans, owing 17 days’ rent.

26 September On 26 September 1963 OSWALD entered MEXI-7040

Mexico at Nuevo Laredo. He claimed 24 November 1963

that he was 23 years old, a resident

of New Orleans, Louisiana, and that his

destination was Mexico City. He gave

his occupation as “photographer.” He

was issued Mexican tourist card #

24085.

On 26 September 1963 OSWALD took a 2:30 New York Times

P. M. bus from Neuva Laredo, for Mexico 3 December 1963

City on the Frontera Line. The bus fare

is $5.71 at the exchange rate of 12 1/2

Mexican pesos a dollar.

OSWALD’s bus was due to arrive in Mexico New York Times

City on 27 September at 8:30 P.M. After 3 December 1963

his arrival he found lodging at the Hotel

Commercio on Bernardo de Sahaguan Street.

He occupied Room 18 at a cost of $1.28 a

day. When he traveled to Mexico, OSWALD

carried a leather suit case which was about

two feet long.

27 September On 27 September 1963 a man later Sensitive CIA Source!

identified as OSWALD, telephoned the

Soviet Embassy stating that he needed

to get a visa to go to Odessa, USSR.

A little while later a woman from the

Cuban Consulate telephoned the Soviet

Consulate stating that an American male

has requested an in-transit visa for Cuba

because he wanted to go to the USSR. The

woman claimed that she had sent the American

to the Soviet Embassy, saying that if the

Soviets made or accepted the visa, the Cubans

would also give it to him without further

procedures. The woman from the Cuban

Consulate wanted to know with whom the

American had spoken when he visited the

Soviet Consulate. Later in the day the

Soviet Consulate telephoned the Cuban

Consulate again regarding OSWALD’s request

for a visa, and mentioned the fact that the

Soviet Embassy in Washington, D. C. had not

as yet been authorized by Moscow to issue

OSWALD a Soviet visa. Both consulates agreed

that nothing can be done until they receive

further advice from the Soviet Embassy in

Washington.

28 September On 28 September 1963 the woman at the Senistive CIA Source!

Cuban Consulate, Mrs. Silvia Tirado de Duran,

called the Soviet Consulate, saying that the

American was at the Cuban Consulate and that

she would put him on the telephone. OSWALD

then spoke to the Soviet Consulate and said

that he had just been at the Soviet Embassy

and that he had spoken with the Soviet Consul

there. OSWALD was asked to return to the

Soviet Embassy to leave his local address with

them. OSWALD stated that he would be there

right away.

1 October On 1 October 1963 OSWALD telephoned Sensitive CIA Source!

the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City

and said, “Hello, this is Lee OSWALD

speaking.” He asked if anything new

had been heard from Washington, and he

asked to be given the name of the Soviet

Consul to whom he had spoken previously.

2 October OSWALD left Mexico city on a Frontera bus New York Times

which departed at 1:00 P. M. 3 December 1963

3 October On 3 October 1963 OSWALD arrived by bus New York Times

at Neuva Laredo at 6:30 A. M. He arrived 3 December 1963

at Dallas, Texas, on the evening of

3 October and took a room at the Dallas

YMCA.

4 October On 4 October 1963 OSWALD returned to Washington Post

and stayed at the YMCA. 1 December 1963

14 October On 14 October 1963 OSWALD applied for Washington Post

a job in the Texas School Book 1 December 1963

Depository. He started work on 15 October

1963 as a stock clerk at $1.25 per hour.

OSWALD applied for a job at the Texas Washington Post

School Book Depository after a Mrs. 28 November 1963

William RANDALL had told Ruth PAINE

of the opening.

Around 14 October 1963 OSWALD took an Washington Post

$8 a week room at 1026 North Beckley 1 December 1963

street, Oak Cliff, a suburb of Dallas,

Texas, in the home of Mrs. Arthur C.

JOHNSON. He was known to Mrs. JOHNSON

as O. H. Lee.

8 November Approximately two weeks (ca. 8 Nov. 1963) UPI-141

(app.) before the assassination of President 25 November 1963

KENNEDY, OSWALD reportedly visited

Wytheville, Virginia, where he asked

the local Red Cross office for fare to

Ansted, West Virginia, near Charleston.

21 November On 21 November 1963 OSWALD spent the Washington Post

night at the home of Mrs. Ruth PAINE

in Irving, Texas, where his wife

resided, and where he had stored his

gun, rolled in a blanket, in the PAINE’S

garage.

22 November On 22 November OSWALD drove to

the Texas School Book Depository

Building in Dallas, Texas, with B. Wesley

FRAZIER, who also worked in the building.

OSWALD was carrying an ungainly package,

and when FRAZIER asked him about the

bundle OSWALD allegedly explained curtly

that the bundle contained “windowshades.”

Shortly after 12:00 noon, Charlie GIVENS, Washington Post

a porter, saw OSWALD on the sixth floor 1 December 1963

of the Texas Book Depository Building,

the floor from which the shots* were

fired at President KENNEDY.

(*Note, I corrected this. The document says “shoots”.)

At approximately 12:20, as President Washington Post

KENNEDY’s motorcade was making a sharp 1 December 1963

S turn from Main Street in Dallas,

Texas, three shots were fired, from a

window on the sixth floor of the Texas

Book Depository Building.

At the moment the shots were fired,

Roy S. TRULY director and superintendent

of the Texas Book Depository, joined by

policeman, ran into the building. As

they made their way to a back stairway

they saw OSWALD standing by a soft drink

machine, sipping from a coke bottle.

TRULY told the police that OSWALD was

employed in the building, and they went

on. OSWALD then left the building and took

a bus headed for the Oak Cliff area of

Dallas where he resided. As the bus moved

slowly through the traffic he got out and

took a taxi to a corner five blocks from

his rooming house. At approximately 1:00

o’clock he ran into the rooming house where

he was living, grabbed a zipper jacket, and

ran out again in the direction of a

neighborhood shopping area. Police

Pvt. J. D. TIPPET, driving in a patrol

car hailed OSWALD after hearing on his

radio that a man of OSWALD’s description

was wanted. OSWALD talked to TIPPET

for several minutes, and was arrested.

TIPPET got out of his car and began to

walk towards OSWALD, who pulled a pistol

and fired three shots at TIPPET from a

distance no greater than the width of

TIPPET’s car. TIPPET died almost

instantly, and OSWALD darted off

through a vacant lot where three spent

cartridges were found. A shoe salesman

noticed OSWALD as he slipped into a

lobby between two display windows.

Observing that OSWALD was disheveled,

the shoe salesman decided to keep an eye

on him and, when OSWALD managed to slip

into a movie theater without paying, the

shoe salesman told the cashier to call

the police and he assisted an usher lock

all the emergency exits of the theater.

When the police arrived, the lights

inside the theater were turned on. When

ordered by the police to stand up, OSWALD

said, “Well I guess it is all over now.”

OSWALD raised his hands, then made a fist

and hit one of the policemen in the nose.

He drew his pistol, but was overpowered by

police officers, and arrested.

(Tippit misspelled in original)

At 7:15 P.M OSWALD was formerly charged

with the murder of Patrolman TIPPIT. (now spelled correctly)

At 11:36 P.M. OSWALD was charged with the Washington Post

murder of John F. KENNEDY, President of the 1 December 1963

United States.

23 November At 11:19 on 23 November 1963 Jack RUBY Washington Post

shot OSWALD as he was being transferred 1 December 1963

to the Dallas County Jail, from the Dallas

Police Station. Less than two hours later

OSWALD died of massive internal injuries

at the Parkland Hospital in Dallas where

President KENNEDY had been pronounced

dead the day before.

(Note incorrect date! Oswald is shot on Sunday, November 24th)

25 November On 25 November 1963 OSWALD was buried New York Times

at a cemetery on the Eastern edge of 26 November 1963

Fort Worth, Texas, shortly after 4:00

P. M.

Document # 104-10017-10041 is a 3 page document from London to Director dated 12/06/63 about an Alexander Ivan Koster, or Kosterski who met Jack Ruby (NKVD) in Palestine in 1943.

I don’t know what NKVD means.

Document # 104-10017-10042 is a one page document from Director to Berlin dated 12/03/63.

RYBAT REDWOOD LCIMPROVE [ ]BURBLE

FYI Valery Vladimirovich Kostikov mentioned in ref is believed to be the Soviet with whom Lee Harvey Oswald was in contact during his visit to Mexico City in late Sept and early Oct 1963. We do not feel that there is necessarily any connection between these cases and do not anticipate any effect on the [ ]burble operation because of this. Desire only that necessary KUBARK (CIA) personnel be aware of situation and be alert to and report any unusual KBG reaction during [ ]burble visit to Germany. [ ]burble is not aware of this situation and it should not be discussed with him.

C/S comment: Outlined developments in operation since subj left Germany.

A lot of people sign off on this. C/SR/CI Mr. Bagley, C/SR/O/EE D. W. Schroeder, C/WH/3 [SCELSO] (Note WH written in, 3 nearly obliterated in this poor quality copy.) CI/OG/SS, (can’t make out signature) (another which I can’t make out the letters or the signature) C/EE/G/CE (K. Wagner?) C/SR/CI K [COIGNE]. Coigne appears to be another false name like Scelso.

I remember John Newman during one of his presentations on Oswald in Mexico City that part of the solution to what is going on might be knowing what operations were going on while Oswald or the impostor was in there. We now know of a

[ ]burble operation.

Document # 104-10017-10045 Is a one page document from Paris to Director dated 12/05/63. It is about someone who claimed to have documents concerning Lee Harvey Oswald. Stephane Cisowski, born 5 May 1936, Charny, Siene et Marne, France. He created the entire story in attempt to “roll the Americans.”

Document # 104-10017-10051 Is a one page document from Paris to Director dated 12/05/63. A name trace on Lee Harvey Oswald.

1. Station[ ] Sung [ ] [ ] traces negative.

Document # 104-10017-10061 Is a one page document from Frankfurt to Director dated 12/05/63. Information was requested on Lee Oswald with his wife and oldest child on their return from the Soviet Union to the United States.

Fran and service files contain no traces on subjs and no information concerning their travel.

Document # 104-10017-10069 Is a one page document from Bonn to Director dated 12/04/63. It is about Oswald’s travels.

1. According records Auslaenderzentralregister (Foreigners Records Office) Cologne Marina Nikolayevna Pusakova Oswald entered Fedrep (Federal Republic of Germany) transit visa 694/62 issued Fedrep Emb Moscow.

Document #104-10017-10074 Is a two page document from Paris to Director dated 12/04/63. This is an earlier report on Stephane Cisowski. They don’t know his name yet or that his story is false.

1. FBI Paris has been contacted by person claiming possess documents identifying American associates Lee Harvey Oswald in USSR including one alleged to have had control over Oswald. FBI contact refuses identify self beyond few elements below. Wants four thousand dollars and two tickets Lisbon in return for documents.

2. FBI rep. assesses contact as probably sane. FBI Wash. instructed him in telecon to get French police support for hostile interrogation if necessary. FBI rep has arranged this and now awaiting reappearance contact for further talk.

3. Contact states first name is “Stephan”, nationality Polish, knew Oswald in USSR, departed USSR 6 January 61. States was in contact Kubark base Hamburg on another matter (presumably after 61) Claims sister in New Bedford, Mass and that he once involved in arrangement to immigrate to Muncie, Indiana. FBI describes Stephan as about 30 years, 6 feet 160 pounds, light brown hair combed forward, one inch horizontal scar near right nostril, speaks fluent French.

Document # 104-10018-10003 Is a one page document from Stuttgart to Director dated 12/09/63.

No confirmatory info available Stut re June 1962 travel Oswald family. Records of 66th, Central Registry, LFV/BW and LKA/BW were checked.

Document # 104-100018-10008 Is a two page document from Chief of Base, Bonn to Chief of Station, Germany dated 12/09/63. This is a dispatch concerning travel data for Lee and Marina Oswald.

This is a copy of theTWX received from the Auslaenderzentralregister. Marina list’s her place of birth as Archangelskaja/obl rather than Minsk.

They say they might be able to get another form that could have Marina’s Soviet passport number on it.

Since Lee Oswald traveled on U.S. papers he did not require a visa to travel through Fed. Rep. of Germany. Nor did he have to register at the border.

Document # 104-10018-10012 This is basically a duplicate of the above but much easier to read as it is a much better quality copy.

There is a record and routing sheet.

Document # 104-10018-10034 Is a two page cable from Paris to Director dated 12/10/63.

1. To date, only [ ]PRY item mentioning President Kennedy assassination is brief 27 November exchange between [ ]LIFT/2 and Peng Min of Mesucora group. They obviously been studying newspaper article and photos re Dallas events. Peng said “Is this the guy who killed him (Kennedy)?” [ ]2 answered “That is Oswald but I don’t think he is only one involved. Oswald shot to death by Ruby and latter picked up by Dallas police. Killing in USA is so easily accomplished.”

2. Sta comment. French press has given sensational coverage to possibility that assassination was many-angled plot, stressing “second man in the window”. Sta interprets above as [ ]2 briefing Peng on basis press stories [ ]2 has read. Sta will continue [ ]PRY coverage and report any further related comments.

3. No index.

C/S comment: * Dissemination applicable to RYBAT DYVOUR GPFLOOR CABLES. **Requested any information on assassination of President Kennedy.

Document # 104-10018-10035 Is a one page document from Paris to Director dated 12/10/63.

1. [ ]Sierra for 24 and 25 Nov gives target reaction to Kennedy assassination.

[ ]SNAFU/12 AND [ ]SNAFU/16 appear happy about it, and sorry for Oswald. Comment that Oswald is “dead duck” since to be judged in Texas. 25 Nov after Oswald shot, [ ]SANFU/12 states Oswald poor boy and “he had nothing to do with Kennedy’s murder.” Targets laugh when hearing of Chinese reaction to assassination.

C/S Comment * Requested stations screen all audio tape since 22 November 1963 for comments on assassination of President Kennedy.

Document # 104-10018-10036 Is a one page document. It is unknown who wrote it or to whom it was addressed. It is dated 12/10/63. The RIF lists its title as Note explaining cable that contains details of a sensitive operation in

( (deletion) ).

T is cable bares details of a sensitive operation in Paris. Nothing in the text of the message is substantive in nature.

Document # 104-10018-10037 is another document very similar to the one above. This is also dated 12/10/63.

This message contains no substantive information and is based on a sensitive operation in Paris.

Document # 104-10018-10052 This one will make you happy, happy, happy, as Emeril Lagasse might say. This is a four page document. It is dated 12/16/63. It is from CIRA/RS, CIA to IP/AN, CIA. There is a record and routing sheet.

The first page is a letter from Robert G. Lamprell possibly to Chief, SR, Chief, WE, Chief of station, Paris.

GPFLOOR – Lee Harvey OSWALD

For information

For the record we forward herewith a memorandum by^ staff employee Thomas B. Cassasin in which he gives his recollection of SR interest in Subject following Subject’s return to the United States from the USSR.

(Note, “staff employee” is written. Also Oswald is written in next to word Subject.)

25 November 1963

Subject: Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald

To: Walter P. Haltigan

1. It makes little difference now, but REDWOOD had at one time an OI interest in Oswald. As soon as I had heard Oswald’s name, I recalled that as Chief of the 6 Branch I had discussed — sometime in Summer 1960 — with the then Chief and Deputy Chief of the 6 Research Section the laying on of interviews(s) through KUJUMP or other suitable channels. At the moment I don’t recall if this was discussed while Oswald and his family were en route to our country of it it was after their arrival.

2. I remember that Oswald’s unusual behavior in the USSR had struck me from the moment I had read the first ODACID (State Dept.) dispatch on him, and I told my subordinates something amounting to “Don’t push to hard to get the information we need, because this individual looks odd.” We were particularly interested in the OI Oswald might provide on the Minsk factory in which he had been employed, on certain sections of the city itself, and of course we sought the usual BI that might help develop target personality dossiers.

3. I was phasing into my [ ]OVER cover assignment, and out of KUDOVE, at the time. Thus, I would have left our country shortly after Oswald’s arrival. I do not know what action developed thereafter.

Thomas B. CASASIN

Addendum

4. As an afterthought, I recall also that at the time I was becoming increasingly interested in watching develop a pattern that we had discovered in the course of our bio and research work in 6: the number of Soviet women marrying foreigners, being permitted to leave the USSR, then eventually divorcing their spouses and settling down abroad without returning “home”. The [ ]OCEAN 3 case was among the first of these, and we eventually turned up something like two dozen similar cases. We established links between some of these women and the KGB. KUDESK became interested in the developing trend we had come across. It was partly out of curiosity to learn if Oswald’s wife would actually accompany him to our country, partly out of interest in Oswald’s own experience in the USSR, that we showed operational intelligence interest in the Harvey story.

T.B.C.

This document also comes with a previous, rather heavily redacted version. John Newman reproduces a copy of this document on p. 478 of “Oswald and the CIA”. Now the second copy of the document is even more redacted than the one Newman reproduces. So we have three copies of the document.

John starts chapter 13 of his book with the phrase “operational intelligence interest”.

Document # 104-10018-10059 Is a one page document from Director to Berlin. It is dated 12/20/63. It is a follow up on Mohamed Reggab. FBI wants a follow up.

1. Although we have little info as yet from interrogation of Marina Oswald, ODENVY (FBI) wants to follow up the Mohamed Reggab lead and try to get her letter and picture which he says are in his effects in Morocco. PLS find out just where they are, how he or we can get to them, what help from local authorities might be necessary, whether he thinks he is in trouble with Moroccan government because he studies in Moscow.

2. Reggab story sounds plausible but we are wary that he might just want free ride home. Can Berlin reconstruct how much of Marina’s life history was in public domain when Reggab told his story?

CS Comment: Moroccan student Mohamed Reggab, volunteered information on Marina Nikolaeva Oswald.

Document # 104-10018-10060 Is a one page document from Chief of Station Santiago to Chief of Station Lima. It is dated 12/13/63. The subject is an anonymous letter received by Santiago Embassy.

1. On 27 November, an anonymous letter, mailed in Santiago on 26 November, was received by the Embassy. The letter stated the Embassy in Lima might be interested in watching the activities of two United States citizens who debarked at Callao on 2 September. Abroad ship, the unknown informant alleged, these two, who are from the South, possibly Texas, made remarks and statements revealing themselves as “ultra-reactionaries” and “anti-racists”, and as enemies of the regime of President Kennedy. The Americans’ names were given as James Bland Catlett jr., and Bob Bobo.

Document # 104-10018-10063 Is a 14 page document from Chief of Station Mexico City to Chief, WH Division. It is dated 12/19/63. It is on the travels of Vincent Theodore Lee. A photo and Cubana passenger manifest are attached. There is a record and routing sheet.

I don’t think I have ever seen a photo of Mr. V.T. Lee of the F.P.C.C before.

Document # 104-10018-10071 Is a two page document from Buenos Aires to Director. Aleksandr Medvedev and wife Natalya arrived in Buen on service passports. It is dated 12/13/63. It is postponed in part.

Ref: A. Dir 88864

B. Buen 0111

1.Subj Ref A arrived Buen 13 July 63 with wife Natalya Medyedeva on service passports 014636 and 7. Listed as interpreter in Embassy, non diplomatic.

2. Subj ref B, [ ]AGOG, described subj as follows: apparent age 30, height 5’8″, weight 175, hair dark brown, thin, combed straight back, eyes dark, broad forehead, well dressed, no glasses or moustache, spoke fair Spanish with thick accent.

3. Station officer MAGAFAN met subj 8 Aug at Soviet Embassy movie showing. MAGAFAN’s description: apparent age 30, a 5’9″ rather pleasant face, blue eyes, hair dark and slightly greying, slight widow’s peak. Subj said he could read English but not converse. Very self possessed, easy conversationalist.

4. MAGAFAN”S description wife: Ca 5’2″, looks like pert, almost pretty teenager, dark hair, blue eyes, fashionable beehive hairdo, mucho make-up, obviously spends much time on appearance and clothes. Has two-month-old baby, no other children.

5. In Buen opinion subj intel officer, because of interpreter listing, role in [ ]AGOG case, and fact he and other “interpreter” only non diplomatic Sovs exposed to foreigners at social functions.

6. Will advise results our queries liaison whom we hope can get photo.

C/S Comments: *Requested all additional identifying data on SUBJECT (1) who may be relative of person involved in investigation of assassination of President Kennedy.

**[ ]AGOG (2) visited Soviet Embassy on 9 Aug. and received by SUBJECT (1) (probably RIS).

Now what is that C/S comment supposed to mean? Who is subj (1) supposed to be related to????

Document # 104-10018-10073 Is a one page document from Director to Buenos Aires dated 12/13/63. It is a cable requesting additional information on

Aleksandr Medvedev.

1. Using all sources, including liaison, pls obtain all additional identifying data on the Aleksandr Medvedev mentioned as Soviet Official in Buen 0111. Include photo if possible.

2. He may be relative of person involved in investigation of assassination of President Kennedy. Pls slug all traffic only RYBAT GPFLOOR.

C/S Comment: In 98626 -Franics Xavier Chapman visited Soviet Embassy 9 August, where he received by Aleksandr Medvedev who called himself Secretary of individual named “Sebastian” who originally phoned Chapman.

Document # 104-10018-10087 Is a one page cable from London to Director, dated 12/13/63.

No [ ] traces subject. [ ] still making inquires and will advise.

C/S comment: *Requested all [ ] (10 and [ ] (20 traces re Lyudmila Nikolaevna Prusakova and Marina Nikolaevna Prusakova. It considered possible that Prusakova may be related to wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, Marina Prusakova.

Document # 104-10018-10090 Is a one page document from Buenos Aires

to Director, CIA. It is dated 12/13/63

Photos were apparently obtained on Medevevs.

Document # 104-10018-10093 Is a one page document from Director to London dated 12/12/63. This is more on the checking of Lyudmilla.

Pls reply as soon as you get liaison to respond.

Document # 104-10018-10106 Is a one page document from Paris to Director.

25 Nov ambassador Gramatages stated he had received cable from Cuba with instructions to make no comments whatsoever on Kennedy assassination and to instruct Cuban Consulate adopt same attitude.

Document # 104-10018-10108 Is a one page document from Director to San Jose. It is dated 12/11/63.

WH/Comment: *Undated letter to Amb. Telles, San Jose, Referred to the assassination of Pres. Kennedy as part of a general plan to exterminate all the Presidents of the democratic world. Writer, who identified self as a Costa Rican of Marxist-Leninist ideals, allegedly has assignment to assassinate Pres Orlich and Foreign Minister Oduber.

The HSCA Document Review

Document # 180-10070-10282 is a 56 page document of which only 33 are here. The first 8 pages are the same as document # 180-10076-10062. The next two pages are the same as document # 180-10076-10123. The next two pages are the same as document # 180-10076-10124. We then get the same 8 pages as document # 180-10076-10062, again. Then the two pages from document # 180-10076-10123, again. Then the two pages from document # 180-10076-10124, again.

Now we get stuff we haven’t seen before. The next and final 9 pages concern Cubans. The first page has handwritten notes on a Luis L. Gomez Lima. There is a date of 3/16/61 and “Cuba”, written as the first line. Then a photo of Luis L. Gomez Lima (left) for the second line. Then Passport # (?) 109-23-IAI for the third line. Then Ragelio J. Lima (Right). There are then two fairly large photos, full face. Note, there were many copies of this page.

The next page is similar in style to the above mentioned page.

March 1961 “Cuba”

Photo of Luis Tacornal

I.D. Card “Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front”

Notes indicate subject frequents or

worked at Habana Bar.

Knew Aracha Smith at 74 Egret St.

Attached to drawn map of Cuba (Bay of Pigs)

Indicated that subject is Pro & Anti Castro???

There is then a photo of this person on the left with a photo reproduction of a card on the right. Frente Revolucionario Democratico F.R.D. Delegation New Orleans. On the right hand side of the card, vertically are numbers, five zeros, the last is a “7” which appears on the top. There were many copies of this page as well.

There is then a page titled CRUSADE to FREE CUBA. There is then a list of people.

City-Wide Committee

William A. Monteleone – General Chairman

William T. Walshe

Col. Provosty A. Dayries

Maurice Andry

Edward Brignac

J. B. McMahon

Mrs. Stockton B. Jefferson

Mrs. Sidney Schoenberger

(B. or E.) A. Tharpe, Jr.

Rudolph Vorbusch

Paul Burke

Dr. Gilbert Mellin

Maurice G. Maher

Charles C. Deano

Manuel Gil

Louis A. Garver

Arnesto Rodriguez

Mrs. R. G. Robinson

Robert D. Reily

Mrs. Philip Wogan

Edward M. Hannan

Rev. William K. Sisk, Jr.

John Altman, Jr.

Jack Yates

Mrs. Naomi Marshall

Councilman Henry Curtis

There then seems to be the resolution that binds these people together.

Resolution

WHEREAS, the presence of International Communism in the Fidel Castro regime in Cuba has been established beyond any reasonable doubt; and,

WHEREAS, the security of our American way of life is constantly under attack by Communistic forces based in Cuba today; and,

WHEREAS, the Communist-controlled missile bases in Cuba and the Russian MIG squadrons based in Cuba represent a very real military threat to our security; and,

WHEREAS, the Communist forces based in Cuba are constantly attempting to infiltrate our American institutions of government, military defense, communications and other important areas; and,

WHEREAS, the Communist-dominated forces in Cuba, only 90 miles from the United States, represent a very real danger to our community and our nation; and,

WHEREAS, the CRUSADE to FREE CUBA is being organized in New Orleans from December 1, 1961, to January 31, 1962, supported by a proclamation from the honorable Mayor of New Orleans, Victor Schire; and,

WHEREAS, President Kennedy has publicly states: “Any help rendered these struggling freedom fighters is certainly all right and does not breach the Neutrality Act”; and,

WHEREAS, Attorney General Robert Kennedy issued a statement April 20, 1961, clearly outlining the freedom of American citizens in supporting such a cause;

THEREFORE, we, the _________________________________________

________________ of New Orleans do hereby go on record as endorsing the CRUSADE TO FREE CUBA and the work being done on behalf of the Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front, New Orleans Chapter.

There is then a page that looks like a flyer for the organization. This gives the address for the Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front, New Orleans Chapter as,

533 Camp Street, room 6, New Orleans, Louisiana, Sergio Aracha Smith, New Orleans Delegate. With a National Headquarters: 1700 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, Fla.

Manuel A. de Varna Laredo, Co-ordinator. The Crusade to Free Cuba has a P.O. Box 523.

There is another sheet that starts with Attendance Record, a place that asks for a signature and if they can use your name in the General City Wide membership list.

It also asks what committee you would like to serve on.

There is then a newspaper clipping. Someone wrote SI 11/30/64. “Ignorance Led to Castro, Says Ex-AF Leader”.

“The former commander of the Cuban Air Force said in New Orleans that the Cuban people’s ignorance of Communism was a direct cause of Fidel Castro’s being able to take over the island.

“Maj. Pedro Diaz Lanz of Tulsa, Oklahoma., and presently a special assistant to the founder-director of the Christian Crusade…”

There is then another newspaper clipping that doesn’t seem to have anything to do with anything.

Then there is a card for the Cuban Revolutionary Front. It’s Sergio Aracha Smith’s business card.

Document # 180-10076-10061 is a four page document. It is a statement from someone, an associate of Ferrie’s. There is something missing as who this person is recalling this story is not identified. Let’s call him “Fred”.

Fred joined the CAP in the later part of 1953 or early part of 1954. He was introduced to Ferrie, who was then the Senior Squadron commander. Ferrie was employed by Eastern Airlines and living in Airline Park.

While in the CAP “Fred” and the others built a plane, a blue Stenson Voyager. Ferrie kept it in someone’s garage out in Kenner. It was taken to Moisant airport, lettered and numbered and they flew it down to New Orleans airport.

Other members of Ferrie’s CAP were Pat Macadoo, Henry Wiegand, Harold Friesard, Jerry Walker, Layton Thomas (or Thompson), Ivy Rodriguez, Danny Smetherman, Mike Crouchet and Al Landry.

“Fred” described how Ferrie would fly for Eastern down to Mexico and bring back Rum and he would have parties that would last the whole weekend.

Once a year Ferrie would take a field trip with the CAP and go across the lake to Abita Springs. While he was there he would shoot 30.06 and M-1 rifles.

This report of “Fred’s” was made after Ferrie died, as “Fred” remarks on how Ferrie died and that Ferrie always had lots of pills in his house. Fred said Ferrie got his drugs from a druggist on Jefferson Highway. Ferrie would enter through a side door.

Fred also commented upon how Ferrie was a fanatic about hypnosis and thought of himself as a Doctor.

Fred stated that when Ferrie got into legal trouble he hired G. Wray Gill. Eventually, Ferrie started to work for Gill. Oddly, so did the boys who put the charges against Ferrie.

* * *

Go to Part Two

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Joe Backes, ARRB Summaries: Page 10.

 

The Tenth Batch

(Part Two)

by Joseph Backes

 


Stevenson exhibit No. 5053, 21H 562 at p. 570 indicates that a plan to include a DPD squad car in the motorcade behind the Vice President’s car was changed by Lawson at a DPD-SS meeting on the 21st. Lawson was asked why there is no mention of this in his preliminary report of Nov. 19. Lawson stated that “the DPD could have put it in on their own” and that he could “not recall who took it out”. Lawson added “it would have been listed if it had been scheduled”, that he is “not sure it was scheduled to be there”, and that he “doesn’t know who canceled the DPD car because he doesn’t know who decided to include it.” As for the meeting on Nov. 21 he said that “maybe it (the matter of the squad car) came up.”

The Stevenson report also states that Lawson changed a plan to have the JFK motorcycles parallel to the JFK limousine and instead decided to deploy the JFK motorcycles parallel to the rear fender. In this interview Lawson said he had “no recall of changing plans.”

Even the HSCA saw through this. A comparison of CE 767 (Lawson’s Preliminary Report) and CE 768 (Lawson’s Final Report) show “that the intended sequence of vehicles on 11/19 was changed.” In the actual motorcade of 11/22 as described in CE 768 Congressional Car #1 was placed immediately behind the SS Vice-Presidential Follow-Up Car rather than in its original position as the fifth car behind Vice Presidential Follow-Up.

Mr. Lawson was unable to explain the change except to say that he is “not sure that 768 is what it (the vehicle sequence) was.” He is unsure of the accuracy of his own report!!!!!!

Another weird sentence, “As for the on site (Love Field) formation of the motorcade, Mr. Lawson said that he is not sure whether the deployment of the wire service car and press cars was done by the “local press man” in charge of press cars or by Mr. Lawson.” Why is Mr. Lawson referring to himself, in the third person, as Mr. Lawson? Is he hanging out with Bob Dole? Or was someone else’s name supposed to be here?

Lawson was also unable to remember whether the local press man in charge was Felix McKnight, Sam Bloom, or a White House press man.

Mr. Lawson said that during the whole time he was in Dallas he received no information about threats to JFK that were made in other regions. He specifically recalled receiving no such information from Florida or Chicago.

Lawson acknowledged that Lt. Col. George Whitmeyer who was part of the Dallas district U.S. Army Command, whom Lawson said “taught Army Intelligence” and who rode in the pilot car, “wasn’t scheduled” to be in the motorcade. Mr. Lawson denied that the presence of Col. Whitmeyer had anything to do with Lawson’s prior service in the CIC.

Interesting that they asked, isn’t it?

Lawson stated that in 1963 he had nothing to do with the CIC and that he has attended no inactive USAR meetings since March, 1958. Well, did he attend any active meetings?

During the Dallas Advance, Lawson had contact with an Air Force advance team and with Chief Officer Bales of the White House Communications.

Who was in this Air Force advance team and when did Lawson meet with them?

There are some other details of the assassination and the turmoil at Parkland but nothing that seemed too new.

Document # 180-10078-10384 is missing.

Document # 180-10078-10493 is an eight page summary interview with Samuel A. Kinney. I found this to be an amazing document. I will reproduce nearly all of it word for word.

“SA Kinney, who was the driver of the Presidential follow-up car at the time of the assassination. He first entered the field of law enforcement in 1950 when he was appointed to the Metropolitan Police Department (Washington, D.C.) He was assigned to the White House Police force in 1958, and was then appointed to the Secret Service in 1960.

“SA Kinney worked the November 17 Presidential visit to Tampa, Florida, then traveled to San Antonio, Texas, to prepare for the President’s first stop in the visit

to Texas scheduled for November 21-22. After President Kennedy’s departure from San Antonio, Kinney proceeded to Dallas on November 21.

“As follow up car driver, SA Kinney had supervisory responsibility for the follow-up vehicles, two 1956 Cadillacs specially fitted out with running boards and other equipment. He remarked that the same car used in Tampa was used in Dallas, but that he did not know whether that car was also used in Miami for the visit of November 18.”

Kinney stated that there were “many occasions” when problems with the Presidential car required that the follow up cars be used as Presidential vehicles.

The car in which the President was assassinated was ultimately sent back to the factory (Ford Motor Company) for preservation and display as an historical exhibit.

“SA Kinney stated that the SS agent most responsible for security planning was White House Detail Advance Agent Winston G. Lawson. He recalled that Lawson was working with photographs of possible threat subjects, was concerned about a threat poster printed with the slogan “JFK- Wanted Dead or Alive,” and was “working around the clock”.

Kinney thought that he was responsible for whether or not the bubbletop was used. Kinney was, “of the opinion that if he had put it on at Love Field, it would have been taken off during the motorcade.”

Wonder what he meant by that?

“The follow-up car was interconnected by radio to the Presidential limousine. The radio link was manned by SA Emory Roberts in the front row passenger seat. In addition, four agents rode the running boards, two on each side. In Dallas, Presidential Appointments Secretary Ken O’Donnell and Aide Dave Powers would not have been included in the follow-up car if security planning had been solely the responsibility of SA Kinney. However, since O’Donnell and Powers were stationed well in board, neither one of them in any way affected the operation of the follow up car.

“SA Kinney stated that he was in charge of placing the news media vehicles (Ford Convertibles) in sequence behind the follow-up car. SA Kinney volunteered for this duty because it was “unusual for LBJ to be along” and he felt that his assistance might be useful. He was unable to recall any unusual or suspicious events that took place during this process. He recalled that he had no conversation with advance agent Lawson about the selection of specific vehicles for placement in the sequence.

“SA Kinney immediately recognized the first sound as that of gunfire, realizing that it was a “shot from over our right shoulder” which hit the President in the throat. The President, his movement (in Kinney’s opinion) affected by the brace he wore, fell toward Jackie, who, “after catching him, set him back up.” Kinney commented on Mrs. Kennedy’s influence on the position of the President by remarking that the SS preferred not to have persons riding in jumpseats with the President. The writer understood this remark to mean that the President might have had room to be pushed to the floor.

“While Jackie was setting him back up, Connally turns rights, then left, then pow, pow. The second shot” (hit Connally and) “left Connally’s back open.” “The third shot hit the President.” As the third shot landed, SA Kinney was able to see “hair coming up”. At this point he hit the siren on the follow up car.

“Immediately after SA Kinney hit the siren, portside forward running board SA Clinton Hill said “I’m hitting it” (e.g. announced that he would make a break on foot for the presidential limousine). SA Kinney acknowledged this by lining up the left front side of his follow up car so that that side of the follow up car would offer the shortest, most direct path to the Presidential limousine. SA Kinney stated that at no time after Hill left the follow-up car did Kinney himself see Mrs. Kennedy “come out” (i.e. over the back seat onto the rear of the limousine); “if she had come out, I’d have hit her.”

“During the period of time beginning when SA Hill reached the Presidential limousine and ending with the acceleration of the Presidential limousine, forward starboard running board SA John Ready announced to SA Kinney and Mr. Roberts that he was “going to go” i.e., to run for the Presidential limousine. Roberts ordered him to “stay aboard.” Mr. Kinney’s analysis of Robert’s order was that if Roberts had permitted Ready to go, and “if Ready had done what Hill did, I’ve got one of them,” i.e, because of the impossibility of swerving away at an angle wide enough to avoid both of them.

“SA Kinney stated that he “(didn’t) think they (the people in the Presidential limousine) knew what was happening. They had no control.” He also remarked that when Greer (the driver of the Presidential limousine) looked back, his foot must have come off the accelerator.” N.B.: On the question of the rate of movement (if any) of the Presidential limousine during the assassination, SA Kinney observed that at the time of the first shot, the speed of the motorcade was “3 to 5 miles an hour”.

“SA Kinney indicated that at the moment when the Presidential vehicle began to accelerate, “it went up to 80-85 m.p.h.”, even though “I didn’t know Parkland from the man in the moon”. Upon arrival at the hospital, he “pulled in” in such a manner as to “block off” the Presidential limousine. It was his impression at the time that “the news media didn’t see what happened (in Dealey Plaza) and did not get a story.”

“At the hospital, SA Roberts, who was in command of Vice Presidential protection, noticed a “thumbs-down” signal flashed by SA Hill at the arriving Vice Presidential detail. Roberts understood this to mean that President Kennedy was dead, and accordingly he ordered the other agents in the detail to “surround and protect” the Vice-President and to “get him to stay back.”

“Since SA Hill and SA Kinney had not been assigned a post at Parkland, they improvised their roles. SA Kinney “Bailed out and Clint (Hill) went to the left side of the car (presidential), I to the right.” There they found “Jackie huddled over JFK who was slumped over” and whose “feet were locked under the jump seat.” SA Hill and SA Kinney were unable “to get Jackie to let loose of JFK.” The press had not arrived yet. SA Hill then said to Mrs. Kennedy “Jackie, we got to get him out” and he raised her up. When the President first came into view, SA Kinney believed that he observed the President’s “right eye on his chin.”

“The two agents began to wrap SA Hill’s coat around the President. At this point, SA Kinney “lost control” and for a brief moment ceased assisting in caring for the president: “Someone else wrapped him up by the feet.” By this time the press had arrived. “In the vicinity of the Presidential vehicle”. Captain Cecil Stoughton gave orders that there were to be no pictures.

“SA Kinney soon returned to Vice-Presidential duties. “LBJ was in shock when the SS grapped him.” As a driver, Kinney concentrated on the condition of his vehicle and on events taking place near it. He recalled that “someone wanted to wash the (Presidential) car. I said no one touch. A Dallas Police Department Officer and I put the bubble top back on the car and enclosed it by its snaps. Then pictures were taken of the roses, but not of the Presidential limousine. After the buttoning on of the bubble-top, I told Kellerman (SA Roy Kellerman, no. 2 SA in the White house Detail) that I’d take the cars back to Love Field and wait. I asked for two motorcycles escorts. I told Major Nedbal of the Air Force that I was coming and to have the ramp down on the vehicle transport aircraft. We then flew back to D.C.”

“Inside the aircraft during flight, the loading sergeant, who had been in the rear compartment where the cars were stored, entered the forward cabin and said, “I can’t stand to be back there.” SA Kinney gave him his seat and returned to the rear compartment. At this point he discovered in the Presidential limousine a skull fragment under the jump seat where Connally had been seated, and a bullet fragment in the front seat between the driver’s and passenger’s seat. He remarked that the bullet fragment “Looked like it had hit the windshield frame above the windshield.”

“SA Kinney put on a radio patch to Presidential Physician Admiral Burkley to inform him that he had discovered the skull fragment. Chief Petty Officer Tommy Mills, an aide to Burkley, received the message. SA Kinney then announced that he was going to go directly to the White house non-stop. The Washington field Office learned of this and sent 6 to 7 Park Police to escort SA Kinney to the White House Garage. In the garage they were met by FBI agents.”

On the cancellation of the 11-2-63 Presidential visit to Chicago, “SA Kinney was assigned to drive the Presidential follow-up car for the motorcade. His records show that he went to Chicago, prepared for the trip and was awaiting the President’s arrival. At the last minute, the trip was canceled. SA Kinney’s was informed that the “Cuban missile crisis” necessitated the cancellation.”

What the hell is this? Holy Halderman Batman! The Cuban missile crisis was in October of 1962. So what does this mean?

“SA Kinney finds the view of conspiracy plausible for two reasons.

“First, the view of the Presidential limousine that presented itself from the vantage point of the alleged sniper’s nest is consistent with careful planning. From that vantage point, tracking the target through a scope did not require a side-to-side movement but required the use of vertical movement in order to track for distance. SA Kinney stated that tracking for distance is much easier than tracking from side to side. He also indicated that the sequencing of the shots — one before the sign, once after — suggested that the sniper was familiar with the scene.

“Second, SA Kinney reported that on the day of the assassination, SA Stuart Stout of the four-to-twelve shift was driving into Dallas to man a post at the Trade Mart in time for the President’s arrival at the Mart. Stout was passed by a car leaving Dallas at a speed of 110 m.p.h. Stout remarked that “that car must have robbed a bank.” SA William Duncan, who was on the same shift had given notice that it was five minutes away from the Mart. Duncan’s story places the appearance of the speeding car at approximately 12:30 P.M.”

Document # 180-10080-10131 is missing

Document # 180-10080-10231 is missing.

Document # 180-10080-10497 is a one page outside contact report dated 2/17/78. Robert Goff, the Secret Service’s legal counsel called and indicated that John Marshall ex-SAIC is in serious medical condition. Marshall had a stroke and his mental as well as physical condition is not good.

Document # 180-10082-10452 is a four page summary dated 1/30/78. It is an interview with Glenn Bennett. He lived at 5601 Seminary, Falls Church, Va.

Mr. Bennett worked for a time in the PRS. Bennett stated that there were five agents in PRS at that time. He stated that they would receive intelligence and had liaison with FBI, CIA, ATF, the military, U.S. Customs and local police departments.

Bennet stated that he was detailed from PRS to the White House detail for the Dallas trip. This was because there was a manpower pull for the Dallas trip.

Bennet then gives his impression of the assassination. “He remembers hearing what he hoped was a firecracker. He then heard another noise and saw what appeared to be a nick in the back of President Kennedy’s coat below the shoulder. He thought the President had been hit in the back. Bennett stated that he does not recall any agents reacting before the third shot. He believes Agent Ready started to react but was stopped by Emory Roberts, because the limousine had accelerated and Ready might have been injured.

Bennett helped unload the coffin and place it on the plane. He said he came back to the White House via helicopter.

Bennett remembers that Chett Miller and Walter Pine were in the PRS with him in 1962. He didn’t know Abraham Bolden, but he had heard of him.

The name Conrad Cross was familiar and he remembers the name Vallee, but does not recall why.

Bennett was not on the Florida trip and was not scheduled for the Chicago trip. He stated that he does not recall any talk or information on alleged threats in Miami or Chicago. He doesn’t recall any name of persons to be checked out relative to the Dallas trip, filtering back.

Document # 180-10082-10453 is a 3 page summary dated 02/01/78. It is a summary of an interview with James S. Griffiths. He was living at 1809 Chapel Hill Rd., Silver Spring, MD. at the time of the interview.

Griffiths stated that he started as an agent in August, 1961 in Chicago. At first Griffiths had no recall of a proposed Presidential visit on November 2, 1963. When refreshed about the information of President Kennedy attending a Army-Air Force game at Soldier’s Field, he stated, “Isn’t that the one that was canceled at the last moment?”

He stated that he was assigned to the airport for that proposed trip. The HSCA interviewers informed him that the work sheet showed that he was assigned to the airport and this is where he was when word came of the cancellation of the trip.

Griffiths stated that the name of Thomas Vallee was familiar and remembers a case concerning Vallee, but does not remember any of the details. He stated that he does not remember anything outstanding regarding a threat to the President for that particular visit.

He had no knowledge of any of the information in Edwin Black’s article.

Who’s Edwin Black? What article?

He stated that David Grant was the advance man for the Chicago trip.

Document # 180-10082-10454 is a 6 page summary dated 01/31/78. It is a summary of an interview with William “Tim” McIntyre. Mr. McIntyre lived at 3434 Beverly Drive, Anandale, Virginia.

Mr. McIntyre mentioned that agents are given training in dealing with mentally afflicted people.

I am uncertain if Mr. McIntyre is referring to 1963 or when this interview took place but he stated that “The local police department would help the area agent and advance man in staying aware of possible threatening characters. The working agent assigned to protection would not get involved in anything other than Presidential protection. The shift leaders would be responsible for shift reports. The advance agent would be responsible for the pre-trip report and the post-trip report although all agents present made reports relative to the assassination. He stated that each agent assigned to a trip would read the advance agent’s report covering cities to be visited. This report would also contain PRS information as far

as suspicious persons or organizations.”

Mr. McIntyre was assigned to Presidential protection on the 8-4 shift for the Dallas trip. He stated his function on presidential protection was to be alert for any kind of trouble such as missile or objects being thrown, people running to the President’s car and also ramming incidents.

McIntyre’s assignment was the left rear running board of the Presidential running board of the Presidential limousine, behind Clint Hill.

McIntyre heard the first report, which he described as “very loud”. He said that he had no doubt that it was a shot. There was a pause and then two more shots in succession.

McIntyre remembers an FBI agent over reacting at Parkland Hospital, trying to get into the operating room. McIntyre stated that he has no recall of the Agent’s Commission (ID) books being called in and new ones being issued.

McIntyre remembers as a later date Agent Dick Johnson didn’t say which stretcher but McIntyre got the impression it was from the President’s stretcher.

McIntyre, when asked if any Secret service men had stayed behind in Dealey Plaza, he stated that he had heard that Agent Lem Johns, assigned to the Vice president, had left his car and was left behind, but made his way to Parkland Hospital.

McIntyre had heard of Abraham Bolden but did not know him.

Another reference is made to Conrad Cross. McIntyre said the name was familiar. Who is this?

McIntyre did not know the names Vallee and Moseby.

Document # 180-10083-10419 is a 7 page summary of an interview with Lubert F. deFreese. It is dated February 2, 1978. Mr. deFreese was living at 4101 Chestnut Place, Alexandria, Virginia.

Mr. deFreese was a member of the Secret Service White House Detail for JFK’s November 18, 1963 visit to Miami, Florida. Mr. deFreese was in charge of all security measures for the protection of the President.

The final survey report Mr. deFreese indicated JFK landed at Miami International Airport, took a helicopter from the airport to a heliport near the Americana Hotel, and then rode in a motorcade from the heliport to the Hotel, where he addressed the Inter-American Press Association.

Mr. deFreese stated that because he received (at some point during his advance) information criticizing the originally selected landing site for the helicopter, he speculated that perhaps “someone from the White house office had gone to do a multiple stop survey and come back to brief us.” Hypothetically, if a pre-advance survey had been conducted (and Mr, deFreese is not sure that a survey was performed), its result in Miami was to condemn the original helicopter landing site as too close to the hotel. Its proximity placed it too close for a motorcade and too far to walk.” Consequently, a second landing site was chosen which was “a mile or two miles away.”

Who did this multiple stop survey? Where did there stop? What did they survey?

How did they survey whatever they were surveying?

A number of questions were posed for this witness on the subject of an alleged cancellation of a motorcade that, as originally scheduled, would have transported the President from the airport to the hotel. Mr. deFreese stated that to “the best of his recollection” he does “not recall a plan for a motorcade other than to go from the heliport to the hotel.”

“In his Final Survey Report (FSR) of December 11, 1963, Mr. deFreese, in a section entitled Protective Research (p.7), discusses PRS-related contacts with (1) the chief of the PRS service; (2) a local Miami office agent, Ernest I. Aragon, who was a specialist in local Cuban affairs and whose “report on the Miami Cuban Affairs” is mentioned in the FSR; and (3) a local Miami agent, Talmadge Bailey, who submitted reports on two PRS subjects, one “Rohinski” and one “Derber”.

“Although Mr. deFreese acknowledged in the interview that PRS is responsible for the acquisition and the intra- and inter-regional distribution (the latter in case of “floating” threats) of threat information, and although in the FSR he wrote that PRS Chief Bouck “promised to keep the Miami office advised,” he had no recollection of contact with PRS except to say that in 1963 it was rare for a PRS agent from Washington to accompany an advance agent into the field, and that no PRS agent accompanied deFreese on this trip.”

A threat did surface in connection with the Miami trip, but in describing it Mr. deFreese did not indicate that his source of information about it was from PRS.

Mr. deFreese remembered that Mr. Aragon “briefed” him, but cannot recall anything about the content or manner of Aragon’s briefing except that he admitted that Aragon’s briefing may have concerned the pre-November 18 threat activity described in Aragon’s December 30, 1963 supplement to deFreese’s December 11, 1963 FSR.

More convenient memory loss, and exactly what was the threat?

Mr. deFreese remarked that the names (Rohinski and Derber) of the PRS subjects which he discussed with agent Bailey now “mean nothing” to him; “I have no idea what they did.” He observed that the inclusion of their names in the FSR “did not mean that either subject had made a threat” and added that “in 1963 the SS did not have quarterly check-ups” on subjects as it does today. Then he explained (a) that as to Rohinski, the numerical symbol 601.0 was an all-inclusive designation, not necessarily one representing the assignment of a number to an individual, and (b) that, as to Derber the “#3-11” meant only that a record about Derber had been made by the local Miami office.

Mr. deFreese acknowledged that there was an active threat against the President of which the Secret Service was aware in November 1963 in the period immediately prior to JFK’s trip to Miami. Mr. deFreese indicated that the threat was made by a group of people who were to some extent members of one family, including a “sister and brother.” Mr. deFreese was unable to recall the original source of his information about the group. His immediate source was local Miami Agent Robert Jamison, who “had touched base with the FBI” and who “briefed me about meetings with other agencies.” However, he did remember that the group included “southerners” and originated not in the Miami area but in a “neighboring state,” “possible Alabama or Georgia.” He termed the group a collection of “rabble rousers.” Beyond that he “cannot remember details.”

When asked if a Joseph Milteer was a member of the group, Mr. deFreese acknowledged that “he might have been one” of them and stated that “if he is the one, then yes.” “The name does ring some vague bells.”

Mr. deFreese had no awareness in November 1963 that Joseph Milteer had come to the attention of the SS because of a tape recording of Molters statements held by the Miami Police Department.

Mr. deFreese was part of the November 21-22 Presidential trip in that he went to Houston on the 21st to assist the Houston advance agent, Mr. Ron Pontius. He was sent home after the President left Houston.

Document # 180-10087-10136 is a seven page report from the Chicago Field Office of the Secret Service on Thomas Mosley and Homer S. Echevarria. Information is supplied by an informant still unknown, the symbol number for this informant is 2-1-266. Investigation was made by SS agents Edward X. Tucker, Joseph E. Noonan, Gary M. McLeod and James S. Griffiths. It covered a period between November 29-December 10, 1963. It was previously numbered as CO-2-34,030. It was previously titled Lee Harvey Oswald Assassination of President Kennedy. It is now numbered CO-2-34, 104. It is now titled Homer S. Echevarria.

The informant told of meetings between Echevarria and Mosley and between Mosley and a man named “Mannie” (last name unknown), who allegedly is a leader of all Cuban groups in Chicago. “Mannie” expressed an interest in obtaining automatic weapons, detonators and explosives. These items were to be paid in cash for an action to take place in 90 days.

Apparently the Secret Service turned this matter over to other agencies seeing no jurisdiction for itself. There is a reference to a report of SA Tucker and Noonan dated December 3, 1963.

The informant advised of a meeting to take place between Mosley and Echevarria on December 1, 1963 at the Chicago Transit Authority station, 4221 West Diversey Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting was to take place between 2:00 and 5:00 p.m. This concerned the desired items mentioned above and the “hit in 90 days”, what this “hit” meant was not determined.

A check of the Chicago Police Department files on suspect Thomas Mosley revealed a record for Mosley under the alias Art Rickoften where in 1959 he was arrested for possession of fictitious license plates. A search of his car found machine guns. He was turned over to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the Internal Revenue Service.

FBI Special Agent Walter Rogers was informed of the meeting between Mosley and Echevarria on Dec. 1. Rogers was also advised of the possible negotiations for explosives. Rogers recalled that Martin Morua, a member of the Directorio Estudiante Revolucionario, (DRE) had come North from Miami about eight or nine months ago and had been in Chicago. Morua had expressed an interest in obtaining detonators too and had been up in Michigan trying to buy them.

On December 1, 1963 at 4:45 p.m. Mosley was observed sitting in his parking lot behind the above referred to bus station. At 5:03 p. m. Echevarria arrived, got out of his car and into Mosley’s. At 5:10 Echevarria got out of Mosley’s car, dressed in his uniform and went to work at the bus station.

Essentially Mosley wanted to take over Echevarria’s Cuban group, promising financial backing, paying any debts the group had etc.

They ran a credit check with the Chicago Credit bureau on December 3, 1963 on Francisco Blanco, residing at 1838 South May Street, Chicago, Illinois, wife Madalupe, formerly lived on (house number not shown) Culerton Avenue. More on Franciso Blanco in a moment. The Lapin Furniture company did a credit check on him. A search of files with the INS revealed one Francisco Blanco originally from Mexico was of record. It was noted that the description of Blanco was not the same as the subject referred to in the earlier Tucker and Noonan report.

On December 5, 1963 “Mannie” and Mosley are supposed to meet.

SA Thomas E. Manson, U.S. Bureau of Customs, and Special Investigator Thomas R. Brennan, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division were consulted regarding the dealings with automatic weapons. SA Manson made available files from that Bureau reflecting some Cuban arms activity in the past. From those files the following information was culled:

In August 1961, one John Burkman, residing at 535 baseline Road, Northvile, Michigan, and who is employed as a sales representative for the Richmond Arms Company, Blissfield, Michigan, was approached by one William Newton and a Lt. General (FNU) Osborne. William Newton, allegedly residing at Miami, Oklahoma, was suspected of being a leader of a Cuban movement but was a person who stayed in the background. The Customs file did not reflect information on Lt. General Osborne. Newton and Osborne requested that Burkman attempt to obtain 10,000 M-1 rifles for an anti-Castro revolution.

On August 29, 1961 Newton; a Commander Evelio Duque, allegedly residing at 1228 Northwest sixth Street, Miami, Florida, and apparently the head of the (DRE)

Directorio Estudiante Revolucionario; and one Jose Cardoso, met in Kansas City, Missouri to discuss a meeting that was to be held on September 9, 1961 at Chicago. Also, present was a man named Martinez, allegedly from Kansas City. Reportedly, Cardoso was acting as arms procurement officer for this movement. According to Customs files Cardoso is an American citizen and was residing at 2317 South Trumbal Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.

On September 9, 1961 Burkman met at the LaSalle hotel in Chicago with Cardoso, Duque, and one Dr. Orlando Bosch, representative of the Cuban anti-Communist Army. This meeting was called for the purpose of discussing the sale of such items as M-1 rifles, M-14 rifles, hand grenades, flame throwers, bazookas, and ammunition for the same.

On September 12, 1961 another meeting was held to discuss the price and type of arms.

Some time late in 1961, exact date unknown, one Martin Morua, probably the same person mentioned by FBI Agent Rogers, who according to the Customs files is the National Coordinator of the Directorio Estudiante Revolucionario, obtained 3,000 fuse-type blasting caps from Burkman and two telegraph sending and receiving sets which allegedly were given to Evelio Duque, who supposedly took them to Miami. According to the Customs file, Morua had originally submitted his request for blasting caps to Jose Cardoso.

On October 24, 1962 George Marti, probably Jorge Marti Salazar, residing at 131 Englewood, Bellwood, Illinois, Cuban refugee allegedly working for the DRE, telephoned Burkman and inquired into the possibility of obtaining four or five tons of an explosive known as C-4. At about this same time Burkman allegedly supplied Marti @ Salazar [Marti @ Salazar is how it is written. They are using the “@” symbol as “also known as”.] and Morua with 1,00 blasting caps and Morua and Marti @ Salazar reportedly in Miami. Allegedly, these men had driven to Burkman’s residence and then allegedly drove on to Miami after receiving these materials.

The files of the Bureau of Customs also reflected that in October 1963 three individuals, all allegedly Cubans, who were identified as Jose Cardoso, (FNU) Sierra, and (FNU) Hernandez, had come to the Willow Run, Michigan airport, where they were met by Burkman and then taken to rooms which had been reserved for them at the Mayflower Hotel in Plymouth, Michigan. Allegedly, these Cubans advised Burkman that they wanted to purchase .45 caliber pistols, sub machine guns, Browning automatic weapons, composition C-3 explosives, recoiless rifles, and ammunition for these weapons. They indicated that they had the necessary funds and were impatient to consummate the purchase. Burkman was told that the group needed these items for a guerrilla action which was to precede a real attempt at a revolution in Cuba. It is not known whether delivery of the items was ever made by Burkman. However, the report indicates that Sierra and Hernandez departed Willow Run by plane for Chicago and that Cardoso departed Willow Run alone by automobile.

Regarding the name Sierra, mentioned above, it is noted that the Customs file reflects that the Sierra at Willow Run, Michigan was constantly referred to as “doctor” by the other Cubans. A confidential source at Chicago has advised that there is one Paulino Sierra, an attorney, who has been very active in the Cuban movements in Chicago, who claims to have financial backing, and who allegedly wants to unite all anti-Castro groups. It now appears possible that this Paulino Sierra, the “Doctor” Sierra who appeared at Willow Run, and the “Mannie” who met Mosley at the Terminal lounge on December 5, 1963 may be one and the same person.

Regarding the Evelio Duque mentioned above, it is noted that the local television newspaper guide for the week of December 7 through December 13, 1963 reflected that the local NBC station at Chicago would carry a “White Paper” program on the evening of December 8, 1963, at 9:00 p.m. CST, which would concern itself with the Bay of Pigs invasion of October 1961. It was determined that this program was canceled and another one substituted in its place; however, the brief sketch in the TV guide listed Cuban personalities to be interviewed and one of the names listed was one Evelio Duque, who was described as one of the participants in the Escambray (Cuba) Mountain revolt.

A search of the Chicago office indices failed to make a definite association with any of the names appearing in this report.

On December 5, 1963 informant 2-1-266 advised that Mosley had gone to the meting with the man known as “Mannie” on that date at the Logan Square Terminal Tap. A description of “Mannie” will appear below. “Mannie” allegedly advised Mosley that he wanted to meet Mosley’s superior, and he indicated to Mosley that the backers of his group were very responsible people in high positions who had ample money. “Mannie” also advised that his group is buying ships which are being purchased in the names of different American citizens. Allegedly, nothing of a detrimental nature was said during this conversation regarding the United States.

Relative to the policies to be followed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, “Mannie” indicated that it made little difference one way of the other as to the policies President Johnson followed. “Mannie” allegedly stated that the late President Kennedy helped “sometimes”; however, he “…played both sides of the fence to save face.” “Mannie” also indicated that all of the Cuban groups in Chicago were now united with the exception of one.

According to “Mannie” his movement is headquartered in Miami, and his group wants no credit of any kind extended to it and will make all purchases on a cash basis. “Mannie” indicated that he had been doing a lot of traveling lately –to San Francisco, New York, and other cities. When the subject of New Orleans came up, “Mannie” allegedly avoided any discussion of that city, for unknown reasons.

“Mannie” indicated to Mosley that by the 9th or 10th of December 1963 he would know what his Cuban group’s requirements would be. “Mannie” said he was going to get in touch with Miami and that he definitely wanted to meet the person who Mosley has alleged makes his groups’s decisions in order that “Mannie” can place an initial order for demolition explosives.

On December 9, 1963 informant 2-1-266 advised that there is a possibility that Echevarria has contacts in Cuba, as he allegedly is going to obtain commemorative Cuban stamps depicting the flights of the Russian cosmonauts.

2-1-266 also advised that the Cuban groups are indicating that they desire to step up the sabotage program; however, it is not known if the groups mean the sabotage program in Cuba or elsewhere. 2-1-266 has also determined that there is a desire on the part of the Cuban groups to have any and/or all of the explosives they purchase in Chicago distributed to various parts of Illinois.

On December 10, 1963 2-1-266 advised that he is positive he can introduce an undercover agent into this group at any time.

“Mannie” is described as a white male, (Cuban); could be Jewish or Greek; 48 to 52 years; 5’9″; dark, short wavy hair (receding); very sharp dresser; suit and tie; speaks fluent English; very neat and clean.

The SS discontinued its investigation and turned copies of this report over to Customs, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the IRS and the FBI.

Document # 180-10087-10137 is a 7 page memorandum from Acting SAIC Maurice Martineau to Deputy Chief Paterni on subject Homer S. Echevarria dated November 27, 1963.

Martineau references an earlier memorandum to Paterni dated November 26, 1963 which related to information received from 2-1-266. This information concerns a group of Chicago Cubans, allegedly anti-Castro, who may have had a connection with the assassination of President Kennedy.

Martineau phoned SAIC Marlin Johnson of the FBI’s Chicago Office and informed him that a confidential informant of this SS office that he had knowledge of a group of Chicago Cubans, who were bitterly opposed to President Kennedy and a member of that group made a remark to the informant, “WE now have plenty of money– our new backers are Jews — as soon as `we’ (or `they’) take care of Kennedy…”.

Martineau told the FBI that this informant had worked with them before on a counterfeiting case and had proved to be reliable.

Martineau told Johnson that the Secret Service’s Washington headquarters told him to provide the information to the FBI and as this group would constitute a threat to President Johnson that they should conduct a joint investigation.

Johnson called back later that day and assigned SA’s Bob Baker and Walt Rogers to the investigation. Martineau then told Johnson that the informant, together with Edward Z. Tucker and Joseph E. Noonan would meet with his agents at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 26, at the intersection of Marine Drive and Lakeside Place, Chicago, Illinois.

Acting under Martineau’s instruction’s Tucker and Noonan met with the informant early, at 6:00 p.m. to explain that the informant was to keep the SS office advised of any contact he has with any other agency.

At the 6:30 scheduled meeting SA Baker stated that the reason he had agreed to come was because he knew the informant previously in relation to a Brink’s truck robbery in Chicago. Baker felt that the matter now under investigation was a protective matter and best left to the SS.

Okay, Mosley appears to be the informant 2-1-266 because he is instructed to contact Homer Echevarria, who is a co-worker with the informant as a driver of a Chicago Transit Authority city bus. Both the informant and the suspect work out of Keeler Station, 4221 West Diversey Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.

In early September (1963) Echevarria had indicated to the informant an interest in buying machine guns to be used in a Cuban revolution. The informant stated that he would be in a position to provide arms of this type, and Echevarria presumably relayed this information to higher authorities in the Cuban group of which he is a member. He subsequently told the informant that others in the group were interested in purchasing machine guns, but that they would first have to satisfy themselves that the informant was trustworthy and was not a CIA agent.

On Thursday, November 21, 1963, Echevarria told the informants, “We now have plenty of money — our new backers are Jews — as soon as `we’ (or they) take care of Kennedy…” the informant was unable to continue this conversation with the suspect because of the presence of other bus drivers.

Acting under instructions to continue his association with the suspect, Mosley arranged to meet with Echevarria at 12:00 o’clock on Thursday, November 28, 1963, for the purpose of being taken to Echevarria’s associates for discussion as to the purchase of machine guns. On November 27, Martineau interviewed Mosley, at which time Mosley assure Martineau that he had not gone to any other agency with this information.

SA’s Noonan and Tucker were instructed to make a background investigation of Echevarria.

Martineau was interested in finding out how the FBI knew the identity of their informant.

Of note are two newspaper clippings that are attached, from Chicago area newspapers, The Chicago American and the Chicago Daily News . The Chicago American has a clipping from a gossip column called “Daly Diary” by Maggis Daly dated November 26, 1963. She writes, “Rumor Row…The word is that the assassination of President Kennedy was planned at a meeting on Chicago’s west side in the early part of February…That a dissident Cuban group financed Lee Harvey Oswald and that he lived on occasional money from the members and occasional money from his mother. ACTION…The FBI went into action in investigating this group last Friday before the Oswald shooting and we hear that after a 30-day mourning period for President Kennedy will begin an open discussion on the subject. GUN FOR HIRE?…The tip on that Italian 6.5 carbine came from a prominent Chicagoan who recognized the gun and knew that the only place in the country where it was available with the scope and sold as a unit was at Klein’s Sporting Goods. The man phoned the Dallas police to save them the trouble of checking thru massive records of gun stores thruout (sic) the country.

He told us, “It’s a wonder the assassin used such cheap equipment. A good high powered rifle for high powered telescopic work sells in the neighborhood of $175 to $200 without the scope. The scope is usually $50 extra.

“And the pistol that misfired when Oswald shot at the Dallas policeman in the movie theater is no jewel either. It is the type that can be purchased from $4 to $6. A high quality pistol sells for $75. Oswald was a good marksman.”

The Chicago Daily News has a small article “Drab Future for Mrs. Oswald”. This is an article designed to create sympathy for Marina. Quoting Mrs. Ruth Paine, “I understand there are people in the Chicago area who are talking of helping her too.” This was underlined.

Document # 180-10087-10138 is a three page report. This is from the Secret Service. It is numbered CO-2-34.030. It was written by Ernest I Aragon. This was for the period December 10-13, 1963.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in Miami, Florida advised the file of Homero Valdivia Echevarria is not in their local office. They stated their Central Office, Washington, D.C. could advise the location of this file. The Francisco Blanco in subject case is someone other than the Francisco-Blanco mentioned in C)-2-30.156. The Francisco Blanco of interest in this investigation has been tentatively identified as Juan Francisco Blanco-Fernandez, a member of the Student Revolutionary Directorate at Miami, Florida.

Reference is made to a memorandum dated December 3, 1963 by SA Edward Z. Tucker, Chicago requesting further investigation of this case in the Miami area concerning Homero Samuel Valdivia Echevarria and Francisco Blanco.

On 12-10-63 inquiry was made of 3-11-14 relative to Valdivia-Echevarria and he is not of record. On the same date, records of the I & NS, Miami, Florida was in this district. SA Charles Challendes, I & NS advised that Valdivia-Echevarria may have been a transient through Miami and his file would have been forwarded to the office where he was to establish residence. Mr. Challendes stated that if this particular file was not in Chicago that their Central Office in Washington, D.C. would be able to advise the exact location of this file. On Dec, 11, 1963 reporting agent discreetly interviewed Francisco-Blanco mentioned in CO-2-30.156. It was determined due to his age and physical appearance that this is not the Francisco Blanco of interest in the investigation.

On December 12, 1963 a check with the DRE through a confidential source found they had a Francisco-Blanco as a member. This same source had a conversation with Jaun Francisco Blanco Fernandez and found that he had been in Chicago approximately two weeks ago. Fernandez allegedly is the head of the military phase of the DRE in Miami, Florida.

On 12-13-63 the INS file of Juan Francisco Blanco Fernandez under their No. A12496140 was reviewed and it discloses that Fernandez entered at Miami, Florida on 10-13-61 through Cuban Passport No. 46784 valid until 10-11-61. He is described as w/m; Cuban; DOB 5-6-39 at Pinar del Rio, Cuba; 5-9; 170; blue eyes; black straight hair parted on one side. At the time of his entry, he was detained for violation of the immigration laws. He was subsequently given an indefinite parole. His FBI number is 340837E. The file further discloses that Juan Francisco Blanco-Fernandez, along with seventeen other members of the DRE, participated in a raid on the Miramar section of Havana, Cuba, on 8-25-62.

On 11-13-62 Fernandez enlisted into the U.S. Army and he was assigned to UC 50303110, COC 3RD Bn, lrst, Inf. REgte, Ft. Jackson. S. Car. The inclusive dates of his active service in the U.S. Army are not known, nor is the exact date of his discharge. Since his discharge from the U.S. Army, he has been residing in Miami, Florida except for his recent trip to Chicago and he is currently the head of the military section of the DRE.

A photograph of Fernandez was extracted from the INS file and exhibited to the confidential source and he identified him as the subject in question. The photograph has been reproduced and copies are attached hereto for use by the Chicago office.

Of course, it’s not attached.

CONCLUSION: Copies of this report are being forwarded to the Washington F.O. (Field Office) in order that inquiry may be made at the Central Office of INS in an effort to determine whether the INS file of Homero Samuel Valdivia Echevarria

INS number A12236480 is located there. For the information of the Washington F.O. Echevarria is also known as Homer S. Echevarria and is described as w/m

Cuban; 32; born at Jatibonico, Camaguay, Cuba; 5-9 160; black hair; mustache; olive complexion. INS number A12236480.

Photographs of Juan Francisco Blanco-Fernandez are attached for Chicago and unless otherwise directed this investigation is closed in Miami.

Document # 180-10087-10191 is a seven page interview summary with Maurice Martineau.

Martineau retired from the Secret Service in 1972 after 32 years with the Secret Service and has been traveling on tours to Europe and the U.S. He recently received a telephone call from Robert Goff, counsel for the Secret Service advising him of the HSCA’a desire to interview him.

When Martineau left the Service he had been assigned to the Inspection Division as an inspector. He inspected Field Offices and personnel to determine if they were in compliance with Secret Service regulations. He reviewed files in these field offices and determine if they were handled probably. And he would interview agents “to see if they had any beefs to unload”. Visual inspection of the physical plant and equipment issued would also be undertaken. These visits would take 2-3 weeks. Martineau would then return to Headquarters in Washington and write up the report of inspection. Recommendations would then be made by the Inspecting Agent. Martineau agreed that an Inspector for Secret Service was usually a senior agent and had or developed a great knowledge of workings of the Service. He functioned as an Inspector from 1969 until he retired in 1972. In his tenure he covered about one half of the 65 field offices.

In 1954, Matrineau was Special Agent in Charge of the office in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In 1955, he went to Milwaukee, Wisconsin as SAC and remained in that position until 1961 when he was transferred to Kansas City, Missouri.

In February 1963, he was sent to Chicago as Assistant Special Agent in Charge. The head man at that time was James Burke. Burke was shortly thereafter transferred to Detroit and John Handley was sent to Chicago as Special Agent in charge (SAC). After a while, Handley left for Paris, France but Martineau remained as Assistant Special Agent in Charge. After Handley left Mike Torino was sent to Chicago as SAC.

Martineau described the close relationship between the Secret Service and the Chicago Police Department on Presidential protection, particularly the close surveillance. He complained that the Secret Service was always short of agents. He told about a situation earlier in his career when then Vice President Richard Nixon visited a small town in the northern peninsula of Michigan. Martineau and the local police chief were the only “protectors” for Nixon.

Martineau said that he was in Chicago when president John F. Kennedy made a visit prior to November 1963. He could not recall the precise date. “We got a telephone threat. The caller was not identified, that Kennedy was going to be killed when he got to Jackson Street. We adjusted the routine to rely on the Chicago police to cover the area. The threat did not materialize.” he said. Martineau said that if a threat came to SS field offices, even if it came anonymously, it was reported to headquarters in Washington. Protective Research Service (PRS) would be notified. They are now called protective Research Division (PRD). If the threat came by letter it was sent to PRS for fingerprint analysis and phraseology studies.

The HSCA asked about threats to JFK in the Chicago area in November 1963.

Martineau visibly stiffened. “I can recall no threat that was signficant enough to cause me to recollect it at this time” he said. In contrast to the wealth of detail which flooded his earlier recollections, his answers became vague and less responsive.

Martineau explained that just prior to a Presidential visit, there would be a meeting of the office agents and detail assignments would be handed out. In the instance of the President’s intended visit on November 2, 1963 Martineau did not recall any particular surveillance involving Cuban or Latin types, nor did he recall any all-night interrogation of any suspects in the Chicago office.

“All night interrogation”-? What is that about?

Martineau recalled nothing about the Mosley information until HSCA staff read a portion of a Secret Service memo (q.v.) written by SA Ed Tucker (and which Martineau signed as “Approved by”) which outlined the SS 1963 interest in Mosley, whom it appears was an informant. He only recalled that Mosley was a “police buff, a James Bond type who knew where there was a stock of automatic weapons which some Cubans were trying to buy. “They were Chicago bus drivers….I don’t know what happened in connection with the information and at no time do I recall talking to the FBI about it.”

Martineau briefly discussed the SS filing system as he recalled it. Chicago office files were prefaced by 2-1+#. While the prefix “CO” indicated a Chief’s office or Washington file and CO+S meant special.

Washington headquarters would issue the actual # on these. All Presidential threats were CO#’s. S (Special) could appear on office files which meant that copy [was] sent to Washington.

While the interviewers did not ask flat out if he knew about the circumstances which former agent Bolden mentioned Martineau was questioned about the matter of Thomas Arthur Vallee and the alleged Cuban/Latin types which Bolden mentioned. The paucity of documents in this case make it difficult to pin down a witness on details or even recollection of past events which the Service seems to treat as a “non-event”.

Martineau should be reinterviewed as any documents come to light which touch on Presidential threats in Chicago since, during/between, October 25- November 2, 1963.

He did remember SA Tom Kelly calling him from Dallas – 11/22/63 – regarding Oswald’s rifle ordered from Klein’s in Chicago. He said in those days the Secret Service in Chicago was not open on weekends so Kelly called him at home. He then called SA Tom Strong and asked him to check Klein’s Sporting goods for information on the rifle. Strong told him that the FBI had beaten them to Klein’s and got the records.

Martineau was shown a picture of Thomas Arthur Valle, who was arrested in Chicago by CPD on information from Secret Service. He didn’t recognize the picture and had no present recollection of a case like Vallee.

I think Mr. Maurice Martineau is lying about something.

Document # 180-10089-10262 is a 6 page report dated 09/20/63. It is titled “President Kennedy’s attendance Milford, PA and Stewart Air Force Base on September 24, 1963.” This is the start of the Midwest tour! This originates from the Warren Commission. There are two HSCA routing slips here. One is dated 3/14/78. It has handwritten on it “S.S. Report – JFK Attendance at Pinchot Institute for Conversation Studies. Rowley, James JFK – Itinerary for trip.” The second “S.S. Report – JFK trip to Las Vegas Conversation Center Itinerary. JFK – trip to Miami.”

This last one has team #4 encircled.

This survey was conducted by SA Ernest E. Olsson, SAIC Robert Powis, and SA Alfred Wong on September 17-20, 1963.

Security was handled by the Pennsylvania State Police, the U.S. Forest Service, Special Fire Police from Milford, PA and surrounding communities, and Agents of this Service.

At Stewart Air Force Base, N.Y. the U.S. Air Force and Agents of this Service will effect the President’s security. Only authorized personnel with reason to be present will be allowed near the Presidential area.

At the Pinchot Estate, security will be placed in effect at 10:00 A.M. on September 24, 1963.

All personnel having access to immediate Presidential areas will be identified as follows.

Forrest Service Officers not in uniform – green lapel badge imprinted with bearer’s name

Fire equipment personnel – red lapel badge imprinted with bearer’s name.

Pennsylvania State police – plain clothes detail – tan lapel clips.

Agents of this Service will wear their distinctive lapel pins.

Speaker’s platform guests will wear a white lapel badge imprinted with bearer’s name.

SAIC of the Protective Research Service indicated that there were no known subjects in this area at this time.

Inquiry in Milford revealed that one Gifford C. Emery is a member of the Neo-Nazi party of George Lincoln Rockwell; that he has two brothers names Bruce and James. All three are presently employed as laborers by the Forest Service on the Pinchot Estate and during the past week have been working in the immediate vicinity of Grey Towers. The work was suspended for the day and if they entered with the general public they were to be kept under close observation. The above was told to the PRS by telephone on September 19, 1963.

SAIC Behn rode in the Presidential limousine on all movements and will remain in close proximity to the President at all times.

All activities of the press and photographers will be controlled by Mr. Salinger and Mr. Hatcher.

There were 232 people involved in security for the President on this trip, only 12 of whom were Secret Service.

The following people participated in this survey,

Major John J. Pezzent.

Capt. Vincent R. Scolere

Lt. Norman P. McFadden

Sgt. Harold W. Casper

Mr. Frederick Herbst, chief, Milford Fire Police

Mr. Ross Stump, Chief, Branch of Operations, Regional Office, U.S. Forest Service, Upper Darby, Pa.

Col. Lancaster, Base Commander, Stewart Air Force Base.

Lt. Col. S.A. Steere, Director of Operations, Stewart Air Force Base.

Mr. Paul deForrest, Commander, OSI, Stewart Air Force Base.

Gerald Behn approved and signed.

Document # 180-10090-10027 is a one page outside contact report dated 3/13/78. Seymour Weitzman is in the Psychiatric ward of the VA. Hospital in Banham, Texas and has been confined there for sometime. Any contact with this witness should go through the Hospital director before any conversation with the witness.

Document # 180-10090-10123 is a 30 page report. It is dated 08/31/64. It is titled “Plan to meet requirements for expanded protection of the President”. Apparently, this is also known as the Dillon report, so named after Treasury Secretary Dillon. This includes a two page cover letter to Kermit Gordon, Director, Bureau of the Budget.

Advance agents will be increased from one to six. 5 additional agents for 24 hour coverage and operation of the Protective-Security and Research-Countermeasures Units. The PRS system will now be automated.

They also want to use 5 agents as liaison officers with other intelligence agencies. The reasons given were, “The assassination of President Kennedy demonstrated beyond any doubt that the exchange of information among the intelligence community concerning persons potentially dangerous to the President was inadequate.” also “But we are convinced that liaison officers are required. This is so not only because we are doubtful that the present flow of information is complete but also because it is the only way we can hope to get information or follow-up material quickly.” Doubtful the information is complete?

Document # 180-10093-10022 is a two page interview summary of Louis Sims.

Mr. Sims entered the Secret Service in April 1961 and was assigned to the Chicago field office until January 1964. Louis Sims served three years with the U.S. Army Intelligence, Ft. Holabird, Maryland prior to entering the Secret Service. He attended Treasury School and Secret Service School in Washington, D.C. Sims stated he was attending the Secret Service school at the time of the proposed Presidential visit to Chicago on November 2, 1963.

Sims stated that he could not remember the dates but he recalls that it could have been any time up to a year prior to the assassination, he was assigned to conduct a surveillance on a subject that was either Puerto Rican or Cuban. He does not remember any specific details other than it involved gun running and appeared to be a very sensitive investigation. He stated that the names Echevarria and Manuel Rodriquez were familiar; but he couldn’t place them. Sims also stated that there may have been a grocery store involved in the surveillance.

Sims stated that he had no recall of any threat relative to the Presidential visit to Chicago in April 1963.

April? I thought they were interested in November 2, 1963.

Sims stated that he knew Abraham Bolden well. He considered Bolden an average agent. Sims sat at the counsel table at both of Bolden’s trials. Sims stated that the evidence against Bolden was overwhelming and the U.S. Attorney General’s office had been involved in the investigation for a good while.

In describing the check-ups on individuals considered as threats, Sims stated that checks were made at six month intervals. There was a criteria to follow and also the agents used their impressions. They then made their recommendations as to whether the subject was still a threat or not. The agent in charge made the final decision.

Document # 180-10093-10118 is a one page outside contact report dated 04/18/77. A Mr. James Richard Dougherty, Sr. called. He served three years in Lewisberg, Pa. re, conspiracy to defraud Federal government (1966-69). He was under psychiatric care, diagnosed “psychotic”.

Document # 180-10097-10345 is an eleven page report synopsis of David Ferrie’s grievance hearing against Eastern Airlines. There are some interesting items here.

Apparently G. Wray Gil and Guy Bannister were representing Ferrie.

Roland P. Fournier, Seargant, New Orleans Police Force Juvenile Bureau, testified regarding the complaint made by Mr. and Mrs. Alexander Landry of their runaway boy, Alexander, who was apparently discovered at the home of Cpt. Ferrie. It was discovered that several boys who were members of Ferrie’s CAP (Civilain Air Patrol) squadron often stayed at Ferrie’s house and several were sexually molested by Ferrie. Alexander Landry was not returned to his parents until they signed a statement that they would not press charges against Ferrie. The person acting for Ferrie in this regard was Sergio Aracha Smith of the Cuban Revolutionary Front.

Isadore Yager, member of the grievance committee of the AMA (American Medical Association) in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana testified regarding complaints received by the office of the AMA regarding Ferrie’s attempts to pose as a medical doctor. Ferrie told Yager that he had several PhD degrees; was on the faculty of the Tulane Medical School and was doing research in the department of physiology of a very sensitive nature — all of which proved to be false when Yager checked it out.

Fournier was recalled and testified about Landry’s run away from home. During a search of Ferrie’s home Fournier found priestly robes and a chalice, pills, medical syringes, blood pressure gages, and a passport for another run away Albert Cheramie. He also found the notarized statement for the release of Landry which had been turned over to the Cuban Revolutionary Front. Fournier referred the connection with the runaway of Al Landry to the District Attorney, Austin Anderson. The case was never prosecuted. It was later learned that Gil had once employed Anderson in his office some time before.

J. R. Espenan testified in regard to Ferrie’s Falcon Squadron. He learned that the Squadron was not officially chartered. He got Ferrie’s charter and had it checked at the main office of the CAP in the Masonic building in New Orleans.

Since the central office did not have any record of the squadron, Espenan withdrew his son’s membership. Espenan also noticed that the signature on the charter appeared to have been traced. (i.e. faked).

Ferrie interjected that the group was not chartered but had been certified in 1961 as a private non-profit organization, to which Eastern Airlines attorneys answered that Ferrie was nonetheless passing the organization off as an official USAF CAP squadron.

Espenan also stated that uniforms were readily available for purchase at Abe’s on Canal Street or in Roland’s Sporting Goods. He said many of Ferrie’s squad members had retained their uniforms from official squadrons when they transferred to Ferrie’s.

Ronald Huber, Souther Research investigator who handles various aspects of the Ferrie investigation, testified regarding the authenticity of the degree awarded by Phoenix University in Bari, Italy. A letter form the Italian and American counsuls

of Naples, Italy, states that the University was not credited and was believed to be giving out bogus degrees. Southern Research Investigators was retained by Tolan Investigators in New York, which was retained by Eastern Airlines.

Ferrie’s doctoral thesis for Phoenix University was “on an aspect of the psychology of vision – the use of hypnotherapy in retinitis.” Don’t you just love that?

And he took and oral exam for the degree! BAW HA HA! He did most of his work through correspondence.

Document # 1870-10099-10491 is an eight page summary report of an interview with SA William Greer.

Greer’s proximity to President’s goes back to 1944 when as navy seaman he was attached to the Presidential yacht U.S.S. Potomac during the third term of F.D.R. When he left the Navy on September 18, 1945 he had planned to enter the Secret Service and did so on October first of that year. He became part of the uniformed force at the White House.

During Wolrd War II Greer said the Secret Service took over the actual driving functions at the White house. Prior to that time the President had his own personal chauffeur. Secret Service handled the presidential protection and back up car but not until the war did they actually drive the President’s vehicle, according to Greer.

A day or two after the attack on Truman, Greer was transferred as an agent to driver.

In 1963 Greer was listed as agent/driver for President Kennedy on three trips in November: Chicago on 11/2; Miami on 11/18 and Dallas on 11/22.

Greer said that the standard procedure was for the [the document says Social Security but this must be an error. I think it is fairly obvious we are talking Secret Service. What would the Social Security have to do with moving Secret Service cars around? So I am corecting it. ] Secret Service to ship the cars out by C-130 cargo plane prior to Air force One. Greer always travelled with the President and took over the driving functions when they arrived at their destination. Greer said that he was only vaguely aware of most of the routes. He followed a pilot car or lead car, usually driven by a local police official which also contained the Advance (Secret Service) Agent and the local SAIC.

Greer had no independent recollection of going to Chicago on November 2, 1963. He claimed his trip book would verify it and he has three books salted away in the attic and it was too much trouble at the time for him to go rooting around in a cold crawl space looking for them. He assured us he would xerox the material we needed and forward it to Washington.

Greer stated that he was never informed by the Secret Service or Gerald Behn, head of White House Detail, about the existence of any threats in any of the cities that they visited. He complained that he was not too well informed about local conditions by the Advance man or SAIC of the local office, except in the case of Dallas, he recalls. In Chicago, he was scheduled to drive President Kennedy. He recalls the trip was cancelled at the last minute but doesn’t recall the particular reason.

The HSCA staff commented, “Like many people we have talked to about the Chicago trip, he confused the reason for JFK’s previous trip cancellation, i.e. the Cuban Missile Crises, with the assassination of President Diem in Viet Nam.”

Greer again requested time to look at this “trip book” for verification of his whereabouts on 11/2/63.

There is then an interesting deletion of a document that is supposed to be open in full, “In regard to the Miami trip of November 18, 1963 Greer says he was in Palm Beach with the President and went to , then to Miami.” That’s exactly how it appears. Whatever was after the word “to” has been whited out. It is a four or five letter word, a name of a place judging by the sentence.

Greer said SS 100 X, the President’s car, was specially designed for the Chief Executive. It had a seat in back which could elevate 8 1/2″x9″.

Greer does not know if it was elevated in Dallas. He was puzzled about the Single Bullet theory. He does not see how one bullet could have caused both Kennedy and Connally such extensive wounds.

On November 22, 1963, Willaim Greer got up around 6:00 a.m. having gotten to bed at midnight on the 21st. He had breakfast and went down to the place where the cars were being guarded. SS 100x was enroute to Dallas by plane so in Ft. Worth he drove a leased Lincoln. There was talk about putting the bubbletop on.

(N.B. We have excellent pictures of the bubbletop, both in sections and on the President’s vehicle which we obtained from former SA Sam Kinney in Palm Springs, Florida.) but it was decided that since the weather was improving, not to do so. Greer says that Kenny O’Donnell made the final decision. He reminded us too that the trip was political and the President loved exposure to crowds.

Greer recalled that he flew from Ft. Worth to Dallas in air force #1 with the President’s party. After the arrival of Dallas’ Love field he readied the car for the motorcade. Agent Roy Kellerman who was Assistant Special Agent in charge of the White House Detail rode in the front seat with Greer. His function was personal protection of the President and manning the short wave radio, which was set on a channel equivalent to Dallas Polcie Channel #2. There was no window seperating the front and back seats of SS 100x, but Greer said because of the crowd and motorcycle noise he could not hear conversation in the back seat between the Kennedy’s and the Connally’s.

He drove at speeds which ranged from ten to thirty miles an hour although when he made the turn into Elm Street from Houston his speed was slowed to about three to five miles per hour. “We were almost stopped,” Greer said. He recalls approaching an overpass on a downhill run. He was attentive to overpasses, especially when people were on them. He vaguely recalls that there were people on this overpass and he was concentrating on them when the first shot came. The first shot sounded to him like a backfire. He did not react to it. After the second shot he turned to his right and saw blood on Governor Connally’s shirt. At the same moment he heard Kellerman say, “We’re hit. Let’s get out of here,” or words to that effect. He said he immediately accelerated and followed the pilot car to Parkland hospital. He was unaware that Clint Hill had jumped from the follow-up car to his vehicle. He says he doesn’t even recall looking in the mirror `til they got to the hospital. Kellerman was talking on the radio to the Squad car and others.

At this point Greer got out and assisted Kellerman and others in removing Governor Connally and President Kennedy to stretchers into Parkland Emergency.

[The document says “Agent Eliot Hill”, this must surely be an error of some kind. Surely they are talking of Clint Hill. I will again correct it] Agent Clint Hill had covered the President’s head with his coat so Greer did not see the massive head wound nor the one in the throat. He guarded the door of the emergency room. He recalls embracing Mrs. Kennedy and saying something about wishing he could have been more evasive or avoided the tragedy. She reassured him with some kind words. It was an emotional scene.

Asked if he noticed the Texas School Book Depository, Greer said he watched people, not buildings. He would note, for example, a person on the street with his hand in his pocket. When they got to Houston from Main Street, he felt relieved. He felt that they were in the clear, the crowds were thinning and while he didn’t relax, he did begin to feel relieved just before the shots came. Greer does not recall the third and final shot. He heard nothing from the back of the car; his mind shut it out and he concentrating on driving at a high rate of speed to Parkland Hospital. He had to weave in and out of other freeway traffic on the way.

At Parkland he recalls that his function was to guard the Emergency Room and keep intruders out. Some press were putting on white coats and trying to get in. Greer does not recall the incident about an unidentified FBI agent trying to get into the emergency room. He said this might have occured when he was temporarily releived.

When the doctors pronounced President Kennedy dead Greer was handed the President’s clothing, wallet and watch, which he took back to Washington. He directed agent Rybka at Andrews Air Force Base to put the shopping bag in his locker at the White House. A few days later he returned Kennedy’s watch and wallet to Ken O’Donnell.

Mrs. Kennedy asked Greer and Kellerman if they would drive the ambulance to bethesda Naval hospital for the autopsy.

Greer recalls going into the autopsy with Kellerman. He described the scene for the writers but was not aware of the identies of all of the people there. He did remember Dr. Burkley and General McHugh. He remembers the two FBI agents Sibert and O’Neill and their acquisition of the fragments from President Kennedy’s head.

Greer recalls Kellerman going to a telephone and talking to someone about a bullet found in Dallas. The doctors turned Kennedy over and found the bullet hole in his shoulder. He indicated a point on his right shoulder which approximated the spot. He said one of the doctors inserted a metal probe in Kennedy’s back, which only went in a short way.

Greer says he asked the doctor if the bullet in [the] back could have worked itself out during heart massage. The doctors continued to take X-rays, looking for lead, but they couldn’t find where the bullet went.

Greer said that after the autopsy he and Kellerman drove the body back to the White House.

Greer later talked to Governor Connally, who incidentally thanked him for saving his life. Connally told Greer that he distinctly recalled three shots (Greer says he never heard the third shot) and Connally further stated that he was shot with a seperate bullet from President Kennedy.

Greer went home at 4:00 a.m. on November 23rd. He was asleep at 8:00 a.m. when the White House called. They wanted the St. Christopher medal which was in President Kennedy’s wallet now in Greer’s possession to place in the coffin. He dressed and went to the White House and gave the medal and wallet to Kenny O’Donnell. He attended a brief family service. He returned home to get more rest because he was scheduled to drive President Johnson. He drove Johnson to the Capitol and on the following day to the funeral.

Greer saw Gerald Behn, head of the White House Detail and submitted a signed copy of a report on his activities in Dallas on 11/22/63 to the White House Detail.

Greer was asked why Behn did not make the trip, he said he didn’t know why. It was never discussed in his pressence.

Belford V. Lawson wrote an addendum, “I distinctly remember reacting with shock and surprise when Mr. Greer stated to both Mr. Kelly and myself that, in the case of the President’s visit to Dallas on November 22, 1963, he had no prior knowledge whatsoever of the path of the motorcade route or of any conditions on and surrounding the route that might affect his driving. He simply entered the Presidential limousine and followed the car in front of him.”

Document # 180-10104-10331 is a six page summary report of an interview with SA Joseph Noonan.

Noonan had participated in Presidential Protection duties in connection with the planned visit of President John F. Kennedy to Chicago on November 2, 1963.

Noonan had no direct involvement with the Vallee case. He was aware of the action taken by Agents Tucker and Strong which resulted in Vallee’s arrest on 11/2/63 by the Chicago Police.

Noonan was involved in the Mosley case. Noonan explained that Mosley came to the attention of the Secret Service about a year or two prior to this incident. He came into the Chicago office and talked to acting SAIC Martineau about a counterfeiting case. Noonan recalls that SA Robert Motto worked undercover and was attempting to make a “buy”. The surveilance led them to an alley on the North side of Chicago where a Mack Sennet scene ensued. Noonan said that unknown to him Mosley had a gun on his person. Several agents and Chicago detectives were covering. Noonan was looking in a side window of the garage where the “buy” was being discussed. One of the Chicago police spotted the gun on Mosley and shouted “look out he’s got a gun.” The polcie officer fired a shot and all hell broke loose. Noonan said he cocked his pistol and was about to fire when his scarf fluttered in the wind and caught between the trigger and the frame causing a misfire. He said he felt like a fool but was happy he didn’t discharge the weapon because he might have shot agent Motto by mistake.

Wait it gets better

At about 2 a.m. in the morning a woman stuck her head out of the window and took their picture with a flash camera. She informed them that she knew who they were and was calling the police.

This incident did not sour Noonan on Mosley’s status as an informant but made him aware of Mosley’s sense of the theatre and he was wary in the subsequent encounter.

At or about the time of the Kennedy Assassination in Dallas on 11/22/63, Mosley again approached Martineau with information about some Cubans in Chicago who were looking to buy automatic weapons for use against Castro’s Cuba. Asked why Secret Service was involved in gun-running, Noonan said that Mosley had informed them that the Cubans had made threats against the safety of the President, “which President?” he was asked. Specifically, President Johnson (which would put it after 11/22/63). Noonan explained that Mosley had told them that the Cubans said they were well financed and that “if Johnson got in their way in an attempt to invade their homeland he would be taken care of like Kennedy was,” or words to that effect.

Again, SA Robert Motto was pressed into service and used undercover primarily to see if he could get the Cubans to articulate threats against the President. If in the process of making a buy he could audit their threats, then Secret Service would be on solid jurisdictional grounds.

Noonan said he and other agents were uneasy that the Cubans might have some ties to the Central Intelligence Agency and they called Assistant Chief Paul Paterni in Washington and asked him to check on this possibility. Paterni assured them shortly thereafter that it was all right to proceed with their investigation.

A little while later they received a call from Headquarters to drop everything on Mosley and Echevarria and to send all memos, files, and their notebooks to Washington and not to discuss the case with anyone. (emphasis added.)

Noonan describes circumstance in connection with the Mosley/Echevarria case which closely parallel circumstances writer Edwin Black described in his error-filled article in the 1975 “Chicago Independent” -(q.v) except that Black used the incidents he describes in an amalgram relating to threats against Kennedy in November 1963.

Noonan was in 1978 in charge of Intelligence operations for the Chicago office.

Document # 180-10104-10481 is a seven page summary of an interview with Gerald Behn.

Mr. Behn entered the Secret Service in September 1939 and retired in January 1967. He did not at any time serve in any branch of the U.S. military forces.

After admission to the service, Mr. Behn was assigned to the Detroit SS office, then to the Washington, D.C. SS office, and then attended Treasury School in New York City. The school consisted of a combination of lectures and on the job training. He was assigned to the White House detail in 1941 and was elevated to the position of SAIC-WHD in September of 1961.

As SAIC of the WHD, he supervised three shifts of seven agents each which together maintained consecutive round-the-clock watch over the White House premises and protectees. The protectees included the President, First Lady, and their children, plus supervision of the official vehicle garage. The WHD ranged in size under Mr. Behn from the basic 21-man shift force to approximately 50 agents.

In January of 1965, Mr. Behn was assigned to the position of SAIC of Special Service, a reservoir of SS agents for use on out of town trips. His final position with the SS was as SAIC of Special Services, a division which investigated “tort claims, violations of the Gold Act, and auto acts.”

In his position as SAIC-WHD in 1963, Mr. Behn held supervisory responsibility for field protective operations for the Chicago (11/2), Miami (11/18) and Dallas (11/22-2) trips in that month.

Chicago

Mr. Behn was unable to recall anything about the President’s cancellation of his planned appearance on 11/2. He did not remember hearing about either the trip or its political purpose. He did remember that SA Dave Grant was the advance agent from the WHD to Chicago for the 11/1 trip. Yet, he did remember that Maurice Martineau was the acting SAIC of the Chicago office at the time of the trip. (Someone wrote in a question mark after that.)

Miami

Mr. Behn was unable to recall that information about an alleged active threat in or near the Miami area had been communicated to the FBI and SS by the Miami Police as a result of a MPD electronic surveillance operation. The name of Joseph Milteer, who was the source of this information, meant nothing to Mr. Behn. Mr. Behn was also unable to recall any discussions of an active threat with SA Lubert deFreese, the WHD advance agent into Miami, or with John Marshall and Robert Jamison, the SAIC and senior agent, espectively, in the Miami office.

Another area in which Mr. Behn’s memory did not serve him was that of Cuban activism. On the 12-11-63 Final Survey Report (FSR) on the Miami trip, which was written by deFreese and approved by Mr. Behn, mention is made of Miami office SA Aragon’s anticipated report on the Miami Cuban situation. That report was submitted by Aragon on 12/30/63. Mr. Behn had no recollection of seeing the Aragon memo or discussing the situation with him.

” Another area in which Mr. Behn’s memory did not serve him…” that’s an interesting bit of commentary by HSCA staff.

Mr. Behn observed, however, on the basis of his reading of the last sentence of the 11/15/63 Preliminary Survey Report (PSR), and on the basis of memory, that a motorcade was to be used in Miami on the 18th only “in the event of inclement weather”. He added that the actual use of the helicopters to transfer the Presidential party from the airport to the American hotel was not a reaction to an alleged active threat but was simply the result of the original plan.

Now that was odd. Use a motorcade only in inclement weather? Are people supposed to be lining the streets in the pouring rain?

Dallas

Mr. Behn recalled controversy over alternative speech sites arising between (1) Jerry Bruno, the President’s civilian political advance man, (2) Winston Lawson, the WHD advance agent in Dallas, and (3) Ken O’Donnell, White House Appointments Secretary.

Well, as we should all know the conflict was not among these people but these people versus John Connally.

Behn was unable to recall discussing the selection of the speech site during an 11/5 meeting with Bruno. He was able to recall that Bruno had been in Texas for two or three weeks before the trip plans were resolved. Behn’s recollection was not refreshed by the information that Bruno preferred the Women’s Building because it was easier (than the Trade Mart to secure against acts of harrassment directed against the President and because its large size permitted the admission of a diverse democratic Kennedy following for which there was no room at the mart. Note that Bruno has written in his book Advance Man that he had at one time obtained Behn’s assent to the selection of the speech site.

However, Mr. Behn did recall that he discussed speech site selection with Lawson who ventured the opinion that in matters of security there would not be much difference between the Women’s building and the Mart. Mr. Behn said that he reported Lawson’s opinion to Mr. O’Donnell.

According to Mr. Behn, Ken O’Donnell was the person who made the final decision to go to the Mart. This decision came after a long period of uncertainty about whether to make the trip at all, given the political conflicts of Texas between liberal and conservative Democrats. Mr. Behn was unable to recall that the White House sent Bill Moyers to Texas to work on the problem. Behn did recall that O’Donnell announced a decision favoring the Mart. Behn stated that the announcement was made between the 5th and 9th of November. Behn concluded by saying that Lawson went down to Dallas 3 or 4 days after O’Donnell made the announcement. It is not clear as yet whether Lawson was told to go to the mart prior to departing for Dallas.

Protective Research Service, November, 1963.

Mr. Behn’s account of the procedures in PRS at this time discloses the great extent to which the PRS was the central focus of protective operation. Information from the field about active or potential threats to the president were refferred to PRS directly from the local office before they were referred to the Chief of the WHD. The SAIC-WHD would receive reports from the field only from WHD advance agents. He and the SAIC-PRS would then discuss the matter with the overall chief of the SS, Mr. James Rowley.

Mr. Behn does not recall that PRS distributed information to Winston Lawson about the October 1963 heckling and harassment of Adlai Stevenson in Dallas, Texas, nor can he recall that any information was distributed prior to the 11-21/2 Texas trip about Dallas area right wing extremist Edwin Walker.

The reason he cannot recall was because no such information was given to him from PRS.

Mr. Behn specifically stated as to both the Walker and the Stevenson incident, that “no one in PRS passed it on.” When asked if he himself warned any agent about either Walker or the Stevenson incident, he said that he did “not remember any discussion with any agent.”

The Assassination

Mr. Behn was in Washington at the time of the assassination. He described the communication system linking Washington with Dallas as follows:

WHD-HQ was in touch with the ongoing motorcade through the Dallas switchboard of the Signal Corps, whose warrant officers carried the necessary codes. Any message from WHD-HQ to the motorcade per se had to be relayed through the Corps switchboard; however, the motorcade agents were able directly to contact WHD-HQ.

After the shooting, SA Roy Kellerman called from a telephone at Parkland Hospital and stated that “JFK was shot” and that “it didn’t look too good.” The phone connection remained open until after the President left Parkland.

As for the evidence of the crime which was brought back from Dallas, Mr. Behn stated that he was in the chain of custody of CE 399, the bullet found on what was allegedly the Presidential stretcher, by SA Richard Johnsen. Behn received the bullet from Johnsen, then turned it over to the FBI.

On the evening of 11/22 Mr. Behn went with President Johnson to Spring Valley and then went home to get some sleep, and returning to Spring Valley on 11/23. He did not see Kellerman, Greer, or Hill until far later. Mr. Behn recalled that the film and X-rays of the autopsy were sent over to PRS at the Executive Office Building.

Mr. Behn was not able to recall any disciplinary action taken against any SS agent, nor could he recall that an in-house investigation was undertaken by the SS. He acknowledged that the writing of reports filed by each SS agent about his 11/21-2 activities was not normal procedure, but did not remember whether the agents were prompted to get them to accelerate their completion of the reports. He did not remember that the Dillon Committee resulted in 1964-65 in any changes in SS operations.

Document # 180-10105-10305 is a four page interview summary of Charlotte A. Klapowski, an employee of the Chicago Secret Service Field Office.

She typed the reports of the field agents.

Ms. Klapowski stated that she believes there were about 17 agents and 3 stenos in the Chicago office when she first started. She stated that relative to the Advance reports, she would only be involved in typing the Final Survey Reports. The advance agent would dictate the report andf she would type it.

She had no recall of the proposed Presidential visit on November 2, 1963 or its cancellation. She had no recall of any threats or arrests relative to the proposed November 2nd visit. She had no recall about any threats during her twenty years in the Chicago office. She stated that she was not privy to this information as a clerk.

She had no recall on the name of Thomas Arthur Vallee or of doing any reports relative even though we have them in our possession. (I love that.)

Document # 180-10109-10358 is missing

Document # 180-10112-10218 is a four page document dated 12/14/77. It contains a list of addresses of former and then (in the time of the HSCA) Secret Service personnel, including Bennet, Behn, Berger, Boring, Grant, Greer, Kinney, Keller man, Lawson, Lawton, McIntyre, Ready, Sulliman, Kelly, Aragon, Bailey, Coughlin, Jamison, Marshall, Martineau, Griffiths, Kollar, Sorrels, Howlet and deFreese.

Document # 180-10017-10149 is a two page letter from the lawyers representing Eastern Airlines to Captain V.G. Rowland. This is an effort to persuade Cpt. Rowland to talk to another Eastern Airlines employee, one J. Hall, a co-pilot to get him to identify Alexander H. Landry as a jump seat pass rider with David Ferrie.

Document # 180-10118-10032 is a one page list of CO-2 files requested from the Secret Service from a list of PRS subjects obtained from JFK’s trip files for the years 1963. There are twelve names listed.

1.) Stanley Berman – gate crasher (no import)

2.) Carl Brookman – on record with FBI subversive activities in Nazi Party and possible association with the Communist PArty. Has firearms.

3.) William Robert Bennett – disabled veteran

4.) John Francis Donovan – extrovert with mailgram

5.) Johnnie Mae Hackworth – letter writer, religious fanatic, makes threats against President: arested 1955, 1960, and 1964.

6.) Jozef Mlot Mroz – picketer “Polish Freedom Fighter”

7. Barney Grant Powell – threatened Truman, extreme temper, violvent man with assualt background. Use of firearms.

8.) Peppi Duran Flores – USAR, firearms use. threatened LBJ. Says he is a Communist and pro-Castro.

9.) Wayne L. Gainey – claimed KKK authorized him to kill the President in 1963. Teenager.

*10.) John William Warrington – mental; 5 letters threatening JFK for his association with M.L. King, Jr. says he will by lying in ambush in Florida; 11/18/63.

Later writes threat to RFK. FBI #9-45448.

11.) [First letter missing] arvin Langdon Parker – mental; pretensions of being a JFK staff member.

12.) Joseph Jesse Gilliam – WH visitor; friendly; mental

Only file deemed important potential threat was Warrington’s. Copies of threat letters and S.S. reports were requested and put into system with this synopsis.

Document # 180-10118-10033 is a xerox of 4 pages from a notebook. I believe it is handwritten notes from the Secret Service. I’ll try to reproduce it as best I can

CO-2 Secret Service Files reviewed 4/20/78

Maradiaga, Carlos – CO2-34732 #2 12-13-63

All that exists is a computer abstract “12-13-63 FBI, L.A. furnished info that subj & wife subject #2 were allegedly in country to kill some President. Interviewing

SA on 2-19-65 stated info appeared false.”

Nicaraguan citizen INS #A8452350

Armstrong, Newton CO2-34773 11-23-63

FBI relayed info that Thomas Keinholy [I’m guessing at the last four letters of the last name] reported that Armstrong employed at GD, made a statement that the Pres. should be assassinated. Armstrong was interviewed & denied making any threatening statement against any President.

Source of problem seems to be suicide of son, Jr. Armstrong believes he was murdered by Mayer Robin Goodenough, Max Asslo, & Prof. Stanley Pinceti – communists opposed to him belonging to John Birch Society. Sent telegram to JFK about sending troops to Cuba & to RFK about having FBI invsetigate son’s death.

SS conducted follow up interview up until 4/25/66 to check on mental state. Conclusion mental state was not deterioting Armstrong has made no threats that have been brought to the SS attention & case closed.

BREITNER, THOMAS C. CO2-34099 11-29-63

Came to SS attention due to correspondence he has initiated to several city, county, UNIv. officials, wrote 10 pp. “Criminal Activities of the CIA Within Bounderies of the U.S.”. Also wrote letter re: assassination investigation from info obtained from news article. No further action beyond interviewing him and finding him sane and no threat.

BOWERS, EDWARD BERT CO2-34173 11-27-63

Subject stated to officers, while in custody for breaking an entering, “I think Oswald did right thing & and I would have done the same thing if I had the chance.” Admitted to statement but made in anger. Appeared normal. displayed no interest in LBJ. Said he continue to be criminal. On 11/29/67 it was recommended that quarterly investigations be discont. since he would be confined until 1970, had no interest in presidency & didn’t exhibit hostile tendencies.

KING. GEORGE J. JR. CO2-26104 #6419

He was heard in August 1963 discussing the possibility of killing the Pres. He was arrested same month for illegal sale of machine guns.

King is extreme right wing, hates Jews, was arrested by ATF O’Neil for illegal possession of firearms. Emotionally unstable. Arrested 2-29-68 again. This time for CCU, John Bircher, Christian Def. League, Am Nazi PArty, Christian Defense League.

There were 9 FBI files pulled on him.

MACHADO, QUINTIN PINO CO2-35800 #14090 4-14-61

Last update Referred by FBI [it looks like FBO, but I’ll assume they’re talking about the FBI] 1-3-66 last report 7-21-66. Subj. is generally armed and should be considered dangerous. Subj was described by associate as a fool of questionable intelligence. A SS informant stated that if the Kennedy asassination proved to be a Cuban plot of conspiracy or Castro had anything to do with the assassination that undoubtedly the subj would be used to carry out any action. Subj. was on Cuban Embassy staff in D.C.

*Get copy of whole file

Letter re Kennedy trip 4/61 to Pan Am Union Bldg.

NAGELL, RICHARD CASE @ Joe Cramer @ Robert Nolan

CO2-32030 #878, 950, 1118 assassination file cont.

Nagel wrote to FBI stating he requested to speak to a SS agent 11/22/63 re urgent matter. He says he was never contacted & wants incident matter of record.

He attempted to rob bank 9/20/63 & been in jail since. Said he’d known LHO & wife socially & did not want to be associated with assassination PRS check recommended.

Claims to have been CIA informant. Contacted Jim Garrison during investigation. Was Int officer in Army, wounded 3 times in Korean War, definetley indicating mental instability. Has tried to commit suicide. Marina Oswald was shown his photo – no recognition.

Document # 180-10118-10038 is missing.

Document # 180-10118-10041 is a six page Secret Service report on John William Warrington. It is written by SA Arnold K. Peppers of the Tampa, Florida office. It covers the period of October 18-23, 1963. It’s status is pending.

Synopsis- This file covers investigation of five threatening letters addressed to the President, postmarked Oct. 15, 16 and 17, at Tampa, Florida and as signed, “R. L. Scates”. John William Warrington has been identified as the author of these letters and was arrested October 18, 1963, at Tampa, Fla., for mailing an extortion letter to a local bank president. Subject is currently under $50,000 bond and confined to the Tampa City Jail on the extortion charge. Subject claims a recent on “trial visit” from the VA hospital, Gulfport, Miss., and the Jackson office is requested to review his file for background information.

Mr. Warrington wrote a letter to Postal Inspector C. M. Griffith on October 17, 1963 that stated that the Postmaster was in danger of having a dynamite accident unless he purchased protection against such an accident for $1,000. The letter instructed Griffith to send ten $100 bills to Room No. 5, Albany Hotel, 1104 1/2 Franklin St. Tampa, Florida, and not to notify the FBI. While reviewing that letter another letter arrived dated October 18, 1963 nearly identical to the first.

Handwritten analysis of those two letters with the five sent to the president showed they were of common authorship.

On the evening of October 18, 1963 Secret Service agent Arnold K. Peppers received word from FBI agent Neil Welch, ASAIC, in the Tampa office that Warrington was arrested and in custody for sending yet another extortion letter to the President of the First National Bank of Tampa, Florida. Warrington told the FBI that the money raised in these extortion schemes was to be used to assassinate the President.

All extortion letters and the letters to the President had the same return address Room 5 of the Albany Hotel.

Warrington stated that he wanted to write five extortion letters to five bank presidents, that the money raised would be used to assassinate President Kennedy on his November 1963 Tampa visit. Warrington hated President Kennedy because he went to Harvard and all Harvard men are Communists.

SA Lee Ballinger of the FBI advised that Warrington had papers that indicated that he was recently released from the Veterans Hospital of Gulfport, Mississippi, and that in June of 1961 Warrington was sentenced to 20 years for similar extortion letters in Jacksonville, Florida. It is unkown if he escaped from Gulfport, Missippi.

On October 23, 1963 Warrington was interviewed in the jail. He is described as an American white male, 53 years, 170 pounds, 5 feet 9 1/2 inches, medium build, ruddy complexion, blue eyes, thin greying hair, slightly stooped.

The subject appeared rational. He admitted to being in and out of mental hospitals for the last 15 years. He has been diagnosed as schizophrenic, paranoid type.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Joe Backes, ARRB Summaries: Page 9A.

 

The 10th Batch

(Part 1.)

by Joseph Backes


Released January 15, 1996

Well, it is June 1, 1996 as I write this. Okay, so I’m a bit late. I copied these in April at the National Archives II.

These documents were listed in the Federal Register on Monday December 4, 1995. p. 62066-62068.

The FBI documents.

1.) Document # 124-10003-10063

2.) Document # 124-10018-10356

3.) Document # 124-10018-10365

4.) Document # 124-10018-10491

5.) Document # 124-10018-10498

6.) Document # 124-10026-10413

7.) Document #124-10027-10028

8.) Document # 124-10027-10033

9.) Document # 124-10027-10161

10.) Document # 124-10027-10232

11.) Document # 124-10027-10233

12.) Document # 124-10035-10116

13.) Document 3 124-10037-10125

14.) Document # 124-10053-10346

15.) Document # 124-10058-10009

16.) Document #124-10058-10084

17.) Document # 124-10058-10085

18.) Document #124-10058-10086

19.) Document # 124-10058-10311

20.) Document # 124-10058-10403

21.) Document # 124-10073-10368

22.) Document # 124-10073-10383

23.) Document # 124-10079-10223

24.) Document # 124-10087-10334

25.) Document # 124-10143-10002

26.) Document # 124-10144-10082

27.) Document # 124-10159-10038

28.) Document # 124-10160-10008

29.) Document # 124-10160-10412

30.) Document # 124-10170-10009

31.) Document # 124-10170-10034

32.) Document # 124-10173-10008

33.) Document # 124-10178-10003

34.) Document # 124-10193-10067

35.) Document # 124-10228-10385

36.) Document # 124-10228-10416

37.) Document # 124-10239-10385

38.) Document # 124-10241-10124

39.) Document # 124-10243-10077

40.) Document # 124-10243-10078

41.) Document # 124-10243-10386

42.) Document # 124-10254-10419

43.) Document # 124-10256-10179

44.) Document # 124-10260-10408

45.) Document # 124-10267-10400

46.) Document # 124-10269-10256

47.) Document # 124-10270-10014

48.) Document # 124-10270-10190

49.) Document #124-10272-10033

50.) Document # 124-10275-10359

51.) Document # 124-10275-10486

52.) Document # 124-10276-10104

The CIA Documents.

1.) Document # 104-10015-10049

2.) Document # 104-10015-10258

3.) Document # 104-10015-10263

4.) Document # 104-10015-10316

5.) Document # 104-10015-10350

6.) Document # 104-10015-10353

7.) Document # 104-10015-10356

8.) Document # 104-10015-10384

9.) Document # 104-10015-10392

10.) Document # 104-10015-10398

11.) Document # 104-10015-10412

12.) Document # 104-10015-10415

13.) Document # 104-10015-10416

14.) Document # 104-10015-10417

15.) Document # 104-10015-10428

16.) Document # 104-10016-10036

17.) Document # 104-10016-10040

18.) Document # 104-10016-10045

19.) Document # 104-10017-10003

20.) Document # 104-10017-10012

21.) Document # 104-10017-10038

22.) Document # 104-10017-10053

23.) Document # 104-10017-10065

24.) Document # 104-10018-10002

25.) Document # 104-10018-10028

26.) Document # 104-10018-10029

27.) Document # 104-10018-10031

28.) Document # 104-10018-10032

29.) Document # 104-10018-10046

30.) Document # 104-10018-10049

31.) Document # 104-10018-10056

32.) Document # 104-10018-10074

33.) Document # 104-10018-10084

The HSCA Documents.

1.) Document # 180-10071-10165

2.) Document # 180-10074-10079

3.) Document # 180-10074-10394

4.) Document # 180-10074-10396

5.) Document # 180-10074-10397

6.) Document # 180-10078-10384

7.) Document # 180-10078-10493

8.) Document # 180-10080-10131

9.) Document # 180-10080-10231

10.) Document # 180-10080-10497

11.) Document # 180-10082-10452

12.) Document # 180-10082-10453

13.) Document # 180-10082-10454

14.) Document # 180-10083-10419

15.) Document # 180-10087-10136

16.) Document # 180-10087-10137

17.) Document # 180-10087-10138

18.) Document # 180-10087-10191

19.) Document # 180-10089-10262

20.) Document # 180-10090-10027

21.) Document # 180-10093-10022

22.) Document # 180-10093-10118

23.) Document # 180-10097-10345

24.) Document # 180-10099-10491

25.) Document # 180-10104-10331

26.) Document # 180-10104-10481

27.) Document # 180-10105-10305

28.) Document # 180-10109-10358

29.) Document # 180-10112-10218

30.) Document # 180-10117-10149

31.) Document # 180-10118-10032

32.) Document # 180-10118-10033

33.) Document # 180-10118-10038

34.) Document # 180-10118-10041

35.) Document # 180-10125-10075

36.) Document # 180-10125-10076

37.) Document # 180-10125-10077

38.) Document # 180-10125-10078

39.) Document # 180-10125-10079

40.) Document # 180-10125-10080

41.) Document # 180-10125-10081

42.) Document # 180-10125-10082

43.) Document # 180-10125-10083

44.) Document # 180-10125-10084

45.) Document # 180-10125-10085

46.) Document # 180-10125-10086

47.) Document # 180-10125-10087

48.) Document # 180-10125-10088

49.) Document # 180-10125-10089

50.) Document # 180-10125-10090

51.) Document # 180-10125-10091

52.) Document # 180-10125-10092

53.) Document # 180-10125-10093

54.) Document # 180-10125-10094

55.) Document # 180-10125-10095

56.) Document # 180-10125-10096

57.) Document # 180-10125-10097

58.) Document # 180-10125-10098

59.) Document # 180-10125-10100

60.) Document # 180-10125-10101

61.) Document # 180-10125-10102

62.) Document # 180-10125-10103

63.) Document # 180-10125-10104

64.) Document # 180-10125-10105

65.) Document # 180-10125-10106

66.) Document # 180-10125-10107

The FBI documents review.

Document # 124-10003-10063 is a three page document. It is dated 03/03/64. It is from the SAC, Cleveland to Director, FBI. Page three is missing. It refers you to 105-82555-2428. “Enclosed for the Bureau are ten copies of a letterhead memorandum suitable for dissemination summarizing the appearance of subject’s mother MARGUERITE OSWALD, February 24, 1964, on the KYW Radio, Cleveland, Ohio, program known as HARV MORGAN’s “Contact”. The tape recording of this program was given to the Cleveland FBI by Mr. PERRY BASCOMB, the general manager of Radio Station KYW and consists of two sets of two-7″ reels (total of four-7″ reels of tape)

In addition, the Bureau is being furnished two-7″ reels of tape recording made prior to the actual program, in which arrangements for the program are being discussed with Mrs. OSWALD.

The Boston office also received copies of the LHM (letterhead memorandum).

“These two sets are being furnished the Bureau, one for their files and one for the President’s Commission”.

Does the Cleveland office think that the Bureau is going to pass on to the Commission a copy of the tapes or did the Cleveland office give a copy directly to the Commission? In either case did these tapes get to the Commission? Where are these tapes? Has anyone ever heard these tapes or has anyone heard this program? Maybe someone in the research community was old enough to have cared and possibly made a recording of this program. Maybe that someone has a copy of this program and would be willing to share it?

Apparently a NELSON KARL called in on the program. The 1963 Cleveland Telephone directory reflects a NELSON G. KARL, Attorney, Engineers Building, (Cleveland). The Cleveland FBI files reflect that PSI CHARLES FRIEDLEY on May 5, 1954 made available a postal card postmarked April 21, 1954 which announces that on April 24, 1954 a Mr. Nelson Karl, representing the Cleveland Civil Liberties Union, was a speaker at a public meeting held at 6411 St. Clair Avenue, Cleveland. The discussion was about Senator McCarthy, “The McCarthy Row” and “McCarthy – Saint or Sinner”.

The Cleveland FBI is unsure if Nelson G. Karl is Nelson Karl , “However, for the purposes of the letterhead memorandum, he is self described in such a manner as to provide a sufficient characterization of himself.” I liked that.

The Boston office will make arrangements with Radio Station WBZ, Boston, Massachusetts, to obtain the tape recording of BOB KENNEDY’s [no, this isn’t RFK]

program “Contact”, on which MARGUERITE OSWALD was to have appeared Wednesday, February 26, 1964, or possibly March 2, 1964. “It is noted that Mrs. OSWALD claims to have knowledge of something wonderful that happened to subject which has never been made public. Arrangements should be made to obtain two recordings of the program, one for the Bureau,…” the sentence is continued on page three which is missing.

Document # 124-10018-10356 is a two page document dated 11/27/63. It is from the SAC in Los Angeles to Director, FBI. Page two is missing. This is a report from an informant, who is still protected, that LILLIAN FISHER, Redondo Beach, California, had made a remark that Earl Warren would be assassinated at the funeral of President Kennedy. This remark was characterized as “without foundation”. The informant determined that the statement was based on pure conjecture rather than fact due to Fisher being emotionally upset over the….”, one supposes President Kennedy’s death but one cannot be certain as the text ends here and is continued on page two which is missing.

Document # 124-10018-10365 is a one page document from SAC, LA to Director, FBI. It is dated 11/24/63. “[Redacted] orally advised that District Board, SCDCP, held emergency meeting afternoon of November 23, instant, to assess implications of assassination and establish temporary party line for members of SCDCP. Entire District Board agreed that no effort at this time should be made to defend alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, or “Scream Frame-Up.” District Board also concluded that CP should expect increased McCarren Act and ultra-right activities but that no immediate danger existed for pickup by federal authorities of CP members.”

Document # 124-10018-10491 is a two page document dated 11/25/63. It is from SAC, Miami to Director, FBI. “PCI [Redacted], desk clerk, Imperial hotel, Miami, hotel catering to Negroes, stated guest at hotel, one JIMMY COMER, shoe shine boy on Miami Beach, told PCI on November 22 shortly after President Kennedy assassinated, beach gangster known to him as JIMMY BLUE EYES, entered shoe shine parlor and remarked “they should have gotten whole family including Robert Kennedy.” Comer was interviewed in an attempt to identify person who made the remark. Comer refused to identify the person.

Keep in mind that Comer did not make the remark, nor did the PCI. The PCI heard this from Comer who heard it from “a gangster”.

Document # 124-10018-10498 is a one page document dated 11/27/63 from SAC, Richmond to Director, FBI. This document requests that the locations of American Nazi Party members ROY JAMES and EVE JUNE HOFF on November 22, 1963 be verified. Major ALAN J. WELCH, ANP hdqs, in Arlington, VA. stated that James was at the ANP Barracks, 6150 Wilson Boulevard, and Hoff was at ANP hdqs. on Nov. 22, 1963.

This went to Dallas, Chicago, Philadelphia and Richmond.

Document # 124-10026-10413 is a one page document dated 9/14/64. It is from the SAC, Philadelphia to Director, FBI. The subject is a racial disturbance in Philadelphia, Pa. August 28-31, 1964. Re: Philadelphia airtel, 9/7/64; Bureau teletype, 9/11/64; and Philadelphia teletype, 9/12/64.

Well, it certainly seems to be an assassination document (that’s sarcasm folks).

It says enclosed are eight copies of a letterhead memorandum. Of course, they are not enclosed.

Dissemination of the enclosed LHM is being made to ONI, OSI, INTC, and Secret Service.

Well what the hell is the information? The LHM is not here.

Document # 124-10027-10028 is a two page document dated 11/30/63. It is from SAC, Chicago to Director, and SAC, Dallas. On Nov. 28, Col. Jack Reilly, Director of Special Events, Office of Mayor, City of Chicago advised SA Hubert M Hart that he had received information from Tony Perez. Perez recounted that JOHN ROSSEN had been meeting with FPCC in Rossen’s theater immediately prior to the assassination of President Kennedy and that these meetings had lasted until 3 or 4 in the morning. Reilly desired that the FBI interview Perez.

Perez was interviewed by SA’s Herbert K. Stallings and Robert R. Glendon on Nov. 29, 1963. Perez said he did not have first hand knowledge of alleged FPCC meetings with Rossen. Perez had learned that these meetings were taken place at the Senate Theater, Madison and Kedzie, Chicago. Perez had debated Rossen at Northwestern University about two years ago. Perez represented the Chicago Council for a Democratic Cuba which has opposed the FPCC line as apologists for Castro.

Perez was unable to provide sources of info on Rossen’s activities with exception that he gave name of a person identical with CG [Redacted] Dash C as person who would best know activities of Rossen. CG [Redacted] Dash S has been interviewed previously re activities of Rossen and assassination of President with negative results this regard.

Document # 124-10027-10033 is a three page document dated 11/30/63. It is from SAC, Chicago to Director, FBI. This was shared with Dallas, Las Vegas, St. Louis, and San Antonio. Page two and three are missing. On Nov. 29, 1963 CG [Redacted] Dash C, characterized as a private investigator and reliable, advised SA Robert J. Thompkins, jr. that during December of 1963 he was engaged in investigating Ben Jaffe, who is presently the subject of AR case under the CIP program in Chicago, however, Jaffe resides in Las Vegas and is the owner of the Tropicana Hotel. “He advised that he conversed with Rev. Bill Beeny of St. Louis, Missouri, concerning Jaffe while in Del Rio, Texas in December of 1963…” The rest is on the missing pages.

Document # 124-10027-10161 is a two page document dated 1/15/64. It is from SAC, Newark to Director, FBI. There was a 30 day mail cover placed on Walter Lowenfels, Weymouth Road (Box 204B RD #2 Mays Landing) Weymouth, New Jersey. Mr. Lowenfels had apparently received correspondence from Dallas, Texas. An informant whose identity is still protected advised that Lowenfels was judging a contest and the letter from Dallas arrived after the closing date for the contest. Another informant observed Lowenfels at the latter’s home on 12/1/63 reading and judging poetry which had been mailed from points all over the U.S.

Apparently someone from Parkland Hospital had mailed his/her entry in on Parkland Hospital stationary and/or envelopes.

Lowenfels was a member of the Southwest club, 2nd Congressional District, Communist Party Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware.

The only other mail received by Lowenfels from Texas came from John W. Stanford, 118 West Rosewood, San Antonio, Texas on December 2, 28 and January 4. 1964. San Antonio was requested to check on Stanford.

Doesn’t this imply if not state that all mail coming from Parkland and going to Parkland was being intercepted, monitored and possibly opened?

Document # 124-10027-10232 is a two page document dated 02/05/65. The second page is missing. It is memorandum from A. Rosen to Mr. Belmont. This concerns allegations made by Dick Gregory. Sherman Harris, Investigator for the Anti-Defamation League, Atlanta, furnished information relating to the assassination on Feb. 1, 1965 which he received from an unidentified ADL employee in Miami, Florida. This employee obtained the information on January 18, 1965 during a conversation with Dick Gregory, “the rabble-rousing Negro comedian”.

“In the letter to Harris, it was reported Gregory stated that the assassination of President Kennedy was master minded by J. Edgar Hoover and H. L. Hunt. Gregory allegedly tried to substantiate these charges by displaying photostatic copies of affidavits and fallacious and misleading press releases and public statements. The ADL employee noted Gregory did not display any concrete facts to support his charges according to employee.

“Gregory claimed the Warren Commission had two reports on the assassination and knew of the Director’s and Hunt’s participation; however, they did not release the true facts as “chaos” would result. Gregory alleged the Director was one of the plotters due to a falling out with the Kennedys and the former Attorney General had been appointed to “watch over him” and slowly “ease him out” of the FBI. Gregory claimed to have positive proof H.L.Hunt financed the Black Muslims but such proof was “confidential.” Gregory also alleges the FBI has him under constant surveillance and will someday in the near future put an end to his life. Further, that prior to the assassination President Johnson was aware of the plot but was powerless to stop it because to do so would admit the FBI and the “Intelligence hierarchy” controlled the country.”

Document # 124-10027-10233 is a one page document dated 02/02/65. It is from SAC, Atlanta to Director. “Enclosed herewith is a 5-page document received on 2/1/65 from SHERMAN HARRIS, Investigator, Anti-Defamation league, 41 Exchange Place, Atlanta, Georgia. HARRIS stated that the enclosed document reflects results of an interview by an ADL employee in Miami, Florida with Negro comedian DICK GREGORY. HARRIS did not reveal the name of the ADL employee in Miami who interviewed GREGORY. He stated that the charges made by GREGORY as reflected in the enclosed document are so ridiculous that he is embarrassed that an ADL employee would forward the material to the Atlanta Regional Office. He stated he was furnishing this material to the Bureau so that the Bureau will be aware of the activities of GREGORY in this regard. He requested that no one outside the Bureau be advised that he had furnished the Bureau this material.”

Of course, nothing is enclosed.

Document # 124-10027-10011 is a one page document dated 11/25/63. It is from SAC Newark to Director, FBI. The subject is the Nation of Islam. Enclosed to the Bureau are nine LHMs in captioned matter, also two to Chicago, one to New York and two to Phoenix. Sources utilized are NK [Redacted] and NK [Redacted].

NK means Newark, New Jersey. These sources contacted SA Guy Randolph Beck.

Naturally, the enclosures are not here. However, this has something to do with Elijah Muhammad. There are numbers in parenthesis next to his name which appear twice, which are also in parenthesis. The first number is (1-100-6989), I’m guessing that it’s an 8, and again (1-105-5593). I don’t know what these numbers mean.

Document # 124-10035-10116 is a 100 page document dated 12/02/63. 97 pages are missing. It is from Leo F. Pedrotty to Director, FBI. Page one tells that copies of this document were destroyed 12/16/76. This is handwritten and typed.

Maybe this might explain why 97 pages are missing, I doubt it as the RIF was more recently created. This document is about an interview with Col. Jack Reilly on November 28, 1963 and an interview with Tony Perez on November 29, 1963.

These documents are called FD 302.

[Redacted] advised SA Robert J. Tompkins, jr. that during December of 1960 he was investigating the activities of BEN JAFFE. Jaffe is presently the subject of an Anti-Racketeering case under the Criminal Intelligence Program in Chicago. Jaffe resides in Las Vegas and owns the Tropicana Hotel. During this investigation [Redacted] had a conversation with Rev. BILL BEENY of St. Louis, Missouri concerning BEN JAFFE while in Del Rio, Texas in December, 1960. He advised that he read in the Chicago “Tribune” newspaper dated November 27, 1963 that the same Rev. BEENY of St. Louis, Missouri, reportedly a candidate for governor of Missouri, had offered a home and job to Mrs. Lee Oswald.

When this was supposed to be I don’t know. One for John Armstrong.

Document # 124-10037-10125 is a 96 page document. It refers you to 105-82555-761. It is dated 12/02/63. It is basically another copy of document # 124-10035-10116. It is missing 93 pages.

Document # 124-10053-10346 is a one page document from SAC, NY to director, FBI. It is dated 12/12/63. This came from SOLO.

“RE NY airtel, 12/6/63 concerning a letter from GUS HALL, General Secretary CPUSA, to Soviets evaluating President Lyndon Johnson.”

“On 12/12/63, NY [redacted]-S also furnished a copy of this letter which informant said was prepared by GUS HALL on 12/5/63, for transmittal to Soviet Union. for info.”

“SOLO” and “Re NY airtel 12/6/63” were previously redacted. The informant symbol number is still redacted.

Document # 124-10058-10084 is a two page document dated 02/23/67. It is from SAC, Kentucky to Director, FBI. William S. Morris, General manager, Phillips Hotel, and Jackson County, Missouri, Public Administrator and former confidential source this office phoned to advise that David Ferrie was a guest at Phillips Hotel a few months ago using Dallas, Texas, as an address. Garrison’s office called the hotel inquiring into toll calls made by Ferrie while he was a guest. Hotel refused unless subpoenaed. Morris forgot the matter until hearing of Ferrie’s death.

Morris advised he would make available to FBI any information his hotel records contain because he believed that the FBI might be interested in this matter.

Document # 124-10058-10085 is a one page document date 2/27/67. It is from W. A. Branigan to W.C. Sullivan. David Lewis, a bus station express handler, (what the hell is that anyway?) has made claims that he has the names of five persons allegedly involved in plotting the assassination of President Kennedy. Lewis has also stated he told the New Orleans D.A.’s office that he met Lee Harvey Oswald. A man who lived with Lewis for a time advised the FBI he never learned from Lewis that Lewis had any knowledge of the Kennedy assassination or was acquainted with any Cuban refugees.

George Clark Johnston lived with Lewis in Apartment C, 1407 Conti street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Document # 124-10058-10086 is a one page document dated 02/21/67. It is from SAC, New Orleans to Director, FBI. This is the same information as above except we learn that Johnston is a PCI whose reliability is undetermined. Johnston saw Lewis commenting on television in regards to the Kennedy assassination and the Garrison investigation.

Document # 124-10058-10311 is a four page document dated 11/30/63. It is from SAC Chicago to Director, FBI. This is another copy of document # 124-10027-10028. Actually, it is only a two page document but there are 2 copies of it so that is why the RIF says 4 pages.

Document # 124-10058-10403 is a six page document dated 1/30/63. It refers you to FBI 62-109060-1407. It is from SAC Chicago to Director. 4 pages of which are missing. Two pages are copies of page one. What there is of this document is a copy of document # 124-10027-10033.

Document # 124-10073-10368 is a duplicate of document ## 124-10058-10086.

Document # 124-10073-10383 is a duplicate of document # 124-10058-10084.

Document # 124-10079-10223 is a one page document dated 12/04/63. It is from SAC New York to Director, FBI. This document is about James Talbot. According to NY 2471-S* (surprisingly this informant symbol number was not redacted out.) Mr. Talbot of Dallas, Texas was in contact with the office of “The Worker” in New York City. Mr. Talbot identified himself as a “friend of Mr. Jackson”.

Talbot suggested that “The Worker” put out an extra on the assassination. Talbot said he was on a city bus on 11/22/63 and saw President Kennedy’s motorcade about three minutes before he was shot. Talbot suggested that the special edition of “The Worker” should blame the “right-wing”, John Birch Society, and the groups around General Walker for the assassination.

On 11/27/63, NY [redacted] obtained the following information at CPUSA headquarters in New York City: About two weeks ago, one James Talbot, Dallas, Texas, sent a check for $38.00 to CPUSA headquarters payable to GUS HALL. PHIL BART, CPUSA Organizational Secretary, directed FANNIE TOOHEY, CPUSA, Clerical Employee to make out a receipt for the money and hold it. BART indicated that he had some misgivings about having accepted this money from an unknown person, particularly since that person was from Dallas, in view of the President’s assassination there.

Document # 124-10143-10002 is a four page document dated 11/27/63. It is from SAC Los Angeles to Director. This is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10356. 2 pages are missing.

Document # 124-10144-10082 is a two page document from 11/25/63. It is dated 11/25/63. It is from F. J. Baumgardner to W. C. Sullivan.

“On the evening of 11/24/63 I called our New York Office and told then that Lee Oswald had been corresponding with certain party leaders and instructed our New York Office to make every effort to obtain any such correspondence.

At 3:55 PM 11/25/63 ASAC Roney of our New York Office called and furnished the following information.

NY [redacted]-S advised this date that upon examining old dictation notebooks used by her at Communist Party headquarters she discovered notes of a letter dictated early to her in September, 1963 by Arnold Johnson to a Mr. Oswald. Informant stated that in her shorthand notes no date appears nor does the full name of Oswald appear nor does his residence address appear. The body of the letter appears as follows.

“Dear Mr. Oswald: Your letter of August `63 to Elizabeth Gurley Flynn was turned over to me for reply. Since I received your letter of September 1 indicating you are moving to Baltimore, I suggest that when you do that, that you get in touch with us here and we will find some way of getting in touch with you in that city.

While the point you make about your residence in the Soviet Union might be utilized by some people, I think you have to recognize that as an American citizen who is now in this country you have a right to participate in such organizations as you decide, but at the time since there are a number of organizations, including the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which are of a very broad character and often it is advisable for some people to remain in the background not the underground.

I assume that this is pretty much of an academic question now and we can discuss it later. Arnold Johnson, Director, Information and Lecture Bureau.”

Roney said the New York Office has the notebook which contains this shorthand letter and is retaining it. He said up to this time the New York Office has not been able to locate any correspondence in its files between Oswald and Party leaders in New York.

Document # 124-10159-10038 is a duplicate of document # # 124-10018-10498. There are two copies of this one page report here.

Document # 124-10160-10008 is a one page document. It is dated 11/27/63. It is from SAC Baltimore to Director, FBI. BA [redacted] on Nov. 26, 1963 advised that (I think it’s George Meyers) Chairman, CP, MD. Dash D.C. District, during CP Dist. Board meeting at Baltimore, MD. at approximately ten thirty p.m. stated that he had to leave to go to New York. Meyers confidentially informed [redacted] he had to go to New York because it was important, Meyers said he had some information and a number of letters he had to turn over to N.Y. because of his communications with Texas and Tennessee. Meyers expected to return to Baltimore November 27, 1963.

Document # 124-10160-10412 is a duplicate of the above.

Document # 124-10170-10009 is a 36 page report. It is dated 12/12/63. It is from Charles S. Harding to Director FBI. 34 pages are missing. This is from Atlanta. Handwritten is “copies noted as destroyed 12/20/76”. This contains information from NY 3245-S*, “The disclosure of which source could be detrimental to the national defense.”

Oh, c’mon!

On the other page of this are the identities of informants.

Identity of Source Identity Where located

AT T-1 is NY [redacted] NY 134-3911A-322

AT T-2 is NY 2784-S Characterization of

Frances Goldin

AT T-3 is NY 1086-S Characterization of

Anton Novak

AT T-4 is NY 3245-S*

Document # 124-10170-10034 is a 25 page report dated 12/03/63. 22 pages are missing. It is from SAC New York to Director, FBI. John ABT advised the New York office that his client Arnold Johnson wants Abt to make available correspondence between Lee Harvey Oswald and the CP, USA. The correspondence was turned over to Johnson by Abt at his office 320 Broadway, NYC, on 12/3/63.

The original copies of the material made available are being furnished to the Bureau as enclosures via an Eastern Airlines shuttle pilot. Details as to the Eastern Airlines flight will be furnished the Bureau on the night of December 3, 1963. Xerox copies are being furnished to the Dallas Office for its information and other copies are being retained by the NYO.

The material furnished by Abt is described as follows,

Photographic copy of poster “Read The Worker If You Want To Know About Peace, Democracy, Unemployment, Economic Trend.”

On 12/2/63 NY[redacted] advised that Arnold Johnson as of that date located correspondence concerning Oswald and that it was being sent to George Meyers. This material was turned over to SA Joseph V. Waters. Johnson explained that Oswald’s letter was handled routinely. Oswald was sent a routine package that contained a number of pamphlets.

Well, this document raises a few questions. First, how did Abt get the correspondence between Lee Harvey Oswald and the Communist Party, U.S.A. in first place? Why is he advising the FBI New York Office and making copies, if not the originals, available to them? It is certainly new to me that Abt would be advising the FBI of anything.

Document # 124-10170-10094 is a 34 page report from Charles S. Harding to Director, FBI. 32 pages are missing. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10170-10009.

Document # 124-10173-10008 is a duplicate of document # 124-10170-10034.

Page two is missing. Page one and page three are all that are here, as is the case with document # 124-10170-10034.

Document # 124-10178-10003 is a two page report dated 02/23/67. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10058-10084.

Document # 124-10193-10067 is a three page report dated 12/04/63. Page two is missing. It is from SAC New York to Director, FBI.

“GUS HALL staying at the Chelsea Hotel, NYC, stated he would not visit CPUSA headquarters during the present week for “security reasons”. He stated further that he felt there will be an ultra right attack against the CP in view of the alleged involvement of Lee Harvey Oswald with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

“On the same date, Arnold Johnson told Hall that there were three letters from Lee Oswald which he had answered. He recalled one date 8/28/63 to Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and one to himself on 9/1/63. Johnson indicated that there apparently was one sent some time previously.

“As to the disposition of Oswald’s letters, Johnson could not specifically recall, but it was his belief that he sent them to George Meyers, because Meyers is in charge of the Southern Region of the CP. To the best of his knowledge, Johnson told Hall, that all the Oswald letters came from an address in New Orleans.”

Hall instructed Johnson to phone George Meyers immediately and instruct him to bring to NYC any and all correspondence concerning Oswald he might have in his possession. This information came from NY 2010-S*.

Document # 124-10228-10385 is a one page document dated 11/27/63. It is from SAC, Richmond to Director, FBI. This is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10498.

Document # 124-10228-10416 is a 99 page document dated 12/02/63. It is from Leo E. Pedrotty to Director, FBI. This is a duplicate of document # 124-10035-10116. 96 pages are missing

Document # 124-10241-10124 is a duplicate of document # 124-10058-10084.

Document # 124-10243-10077 is a 4 page document dated 11/30/63. It is from SAC, Chicago to Director, FBI. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10028.

Document # 124-10243-10078 is a six page document dated 11/30/63. 4 pages are missing. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10033.

Document # 124-10243-10386 is a one page document dated 12/12/63. It is from SAC, New York to Director, FBI. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10053-10346.

Document # 124-10254-10419 is a two page document dated 1/15/64. It is from SAC, Newark to Director, FBI. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10161.

Document # 124-10256-10179 is a one page report dated 02/21/67. It is from SAC New Orleans to Director, FBI. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10058-10086.

Document # 124-10260-10408 is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10233.

Document # 124-10267-10400 is a three page document dated 11/30/63. It is from SAC Chicago to Director, FBI. Two pages are missing. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10033.

Document # 124-10269-10256 is a one page document dated 11/27/63. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10498.

Document # 124-10270-10014 is a six page document dated 11/30/63. 4 pages are missing. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10033.

Document # 124-10270-10190 is missing the ARRB Final Determination Notice.

it is an eight page document dated 11/27/63. 4 pages are missing. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10356.

Document # 124-10272-10033 is a two page document dated 11/25/63. It is from SAC Miami, to Director, FBI. The second page is missing. This is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10491.

Document # 124-10275-10486 is a three page document dated 11/30/63. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10033. Two pages are missing.

Document # 124-10276-10104 is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10498.

The CIA records.

Document # 104-10017-10015 is a one page document dated 12/03/63. It is from Mexico City to Director, CIA.

“LIFEAT reports John Rettie has agreed drive his mistress Vanda Sumers to Dallas 11 December for purpose arranging her Mexican papers. (Comment: Apparently renewal tourist card). Rettie presently undecided re: spending holidays at family home of Wilton Hall in Anderson, South Carolina as wishes cover Khrushchev visit to Cuba early January 1964 if this takes place.”

Document # 104-10015-10049 is a one page CIA report dated 10/24/63. It is from the CIA to the Department of the Navy.

This originates from T. Ward:dd in Unit WH/3 Mexico.

The subject is Lee Henry Oswald.

“Reference is made to CIA out teletype No. 74673, dated 10 October 1963, regarding possible presence of subject in Mexico City. It is requested that you forward to this office as soon as possible two copies of the most recent photograph you have of subject. We will forward them to our representative in Mexico, who will attempt to determine if the Lee Oswald in Mexico City and subject are the same individual.”

Hughes signs for CI/OPS/WH, though that is typed in, Roll signs for SR/CI/A and Bernard E. Reichardt signs for Ac/WH/3, though this too is typed. “In draft” appears in parenthesis for Hughes and “draft” is written before Roll. Roll is in parenthesis.

Jane Roman signs for CI/Liaison and L.N. Gallary signs for C/WH/R.

Now we know from John Newman’s work that Jane Roman signed off for something that she knew was untrue in the two different descriptions of Oswald in the two different October 10, 1963 cables. We have other cables from the Mexico City station requesting photos from CIA on this same issue of whether or not this Lee Henry Oswald is the Lee Harvey Oswald who “defected” to Russia. It is important to keep in mind this is the month before the assassination. So since the CIA is behind this lie why are they asking for photos of Lee Henry Oswald from the Navy Dept.?

Document # 104-10015-10258 is a one page cable dated 11/30/63. It is from Mexico City to Director, CIA.

This document refers to the stations double agents not having any contact with Soviets since the assassination. This was due to the Soviets who had planned future meetings for period beginning around December 1. Agent LIJENNET-1 is out of touch with Soviet C/O and that another agent LINILE-1 is out of the country.

LIJENNET-1 will have meeting Sov on eve [redacted], LITEASE-1 has met [redacted], LISTEED-1 about [redacted], will have LINILE-1 meet Sov early [redacted], have separately advised HQS re: station’s proposal re LINEB-1 meeting.

The above redactions are given the substitute language of “designated meeting times”.

The station requests instructions on what tactic if any that double agents should take. Also same for agents, LIGRAVE-1, and LICUFF-1. LICANNY may also have opportunity to meet Sovs if station wants.

Document # 104-10015-10263 is a one page cable dated 11/23/63. It is from CIA to Mexico City.

“Arrest of Silvia Duran is extremely serious matter which could prejudice ODYOKE freedom of action on entire question of PBRUMEN responsibility.”

PBRUMEN means Cuban.

“With full regard for Mexican interests, request you ensure that her arrest is kept absolutely secret, that no information from her is published or leaked, that all such info is cabled to us, and that fact of her arrest and her statements are not spread to leftist or disloyal circles in the Mexican government.”

Document # 104-10015-10316 is a one page cable dated 11/23/63. I believe it is from CIA to Mexico City. “Send staffer with all photos to HQS. on next available flight. Call Mr. [Scelso] at 652-6827 on arrival.”

Document # 104-10015-10350 is a four page cable dated 11/26/63. It is from COS to Director, CIA. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10162 from the 5th Batch.

Document # 104-10015-10353 is a two page cable dated 11/26/63. It is from Mexico City to CIA. Ambassador Mann feels he is not being fully informed on the Oswald/Rubenstein cases. A CIA file number has been redacted. This is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10406 in “The Eighth Batch”.

Document # 104-100015-10356 is a one page cable from Mexico City to CIA. It is dated 11/26/63. This is a report from the FBI that Lee Harvey Oswald stayed at the Hotel Del Comercio, Shagun 19, Tele: 46-60-51, on 27 September 1963.

Oswald left this hotel on 1 October. That was underlined. There is some handwritten marginalia on the document, something about Oct. 2, the rest I can’t make out.

Document # 104-10015-10384 is a two page cable from CIA to FBI. It is dated 11/27/63.

“1. Duran’s name is now reported to be Sylvia Tirado de Duran aka Sylvia de Tirado.

“2. Interrogation of Duran by Mexican authorities revealed that the passport that Oswald showed her was still valid for travel to USSR. He said he wanted to return there with his wife, to remain permanently. Duran had the impression that Oswald had, or thought he had, made arrangements in Washington whereby instructions would be sent to the Soviet embassy in Mexico to issue his Soviet entry visa in a manner which would eliminate his having to visit the Soviet Embassy. When his real or imagined instructions failed to work smoothly he became rude to the Soviets.

“3. Duran’s impression is that Oswald is simply a “Comrade” who could not live comfortably under the rigors of capitalism and wished to return to his spiritual home in the USSR.

“4. Duran does not know whether Oswald received visas for the USSR or Cuba, but said that if he had she had nothing to do with it. If Oswald spoke to anyone else in the Cuban embassy, she is unaware of it.

“5. Following is additional information on Duran. In June 1962 a usually reliable source in Mexico City reported that Jose Revueltas, then a leader of the Liga Leninista Espartaco (Leninista Spartacus League), a Mexican dissident Communist Group, said that Duran was “strongly drawn” to this group.”

This originates from Virginia Renshaw, WH/3/Mexico, ext. 5940. There is this CI/SIG/O’Neil_________. It is left unsigned. I believe that Birch O’Neil is supposed to sign here. Birch D. O’Neal is in charge of the Counterintelligence/Special Investigations Group. So, why is it O’Neil with an i, instead of an a? Why the misspelling? Perhaps just a common error. Then under that space is C/WH/3___________. This is for our “Mr. John Scelso”. It too is unsigned.

Jane Roman is typed over CILIA. Counterintelligence liaison?

And L. N. Gallery is typed over CWH/R.

I think this is an interesting document.

Document # 104-10015-10392 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. It is dated 11/27/63. This is a trace on car license plate numbers.

1. Texas plate TA 582 registered to F. Morgan Danels, 6714 Morningside Drive, Houston, Texas, for 1956 Imperial Club Coupe. No record ODENVY or HDQS Files.

2. Texas plate KR 5773 registered to Mermino Duarte Martins, San Antonio Dalinde, Tuxpan 23, Mexico D.F., for 1963 Buick 2 door Sports coupe. No record ODENVY or HDQS files.

These license plates were at the Cuban embassy 21 and 24 Nov.

This is signed by William Hood, who is signing for J.C. King as the releasing officer and “John Scelso”, C/WH/3 as the authenticating officer.

Document # 104-10015-10412 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director. It is dated 11/27/63. “Regret station files contain no info pertinent para three ref other than FLUTTER reports which available WAVE. hope obtain more info from COB Merida on next visit Mexi.”

Document # 104-10015-10415 is a three page cable from Mexico City to Director. It is dated 11/27/63. This is Ambassador Mann’s cable to Secretary Rusk, reporting on three developments. He wrote a letter the previous day, Mexi 7072. This is a duplicate of document # 104-10105-10191 in “The Seventh Batch.

Document # 104-10015-10416 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated 11/27/63. it is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10094 in “The Seventh Batch”.

Document # 104-10015-10417 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated 11/27/63.

“Subject plans of Jorge Tamayo Castillejos to go to Cuba November 25, 1963 pada Mexico City 26 November 63 . Source close personal contact with Tamayo.”

Document # 104-10015-10428 is a two page memorandum from Winston M. Scott to Clark D. Anderson, Legal Attache. It is date 11/27/63. I think this is a duplicate but I can’t find it. Anyway, Scott is informing Anderson of all of the telephone intercepts referred to as “conversations from technical operations of this office”. These include a telephone calls starting on September 27, 1963 to October 3, 1963. There are seven conversations the transcripts were attached in this document to Anderson. They are, of course, not attached in the version of the document released by the ARRB.

“a. A telephone call to the Soviet embassy made at 1037 hours on 27 September 1963 by a man outside (Hombre Fuera-“HF” to an Hombre Dentro-“HD”). The man outside said he needed “unas visas” to go to Odessa.

“b. A telephone call to the Soviet embassy made at 1605 hours on 27 September 1963 by Silvia DURAN of the Cuban embassy saying there was an American citizen at the Cuban embassy requesting a Cuban visa in transit to the USSR. She was asked to leave her telephone number (11-23-47).

“c. A telephone call to the Cuban embassy made at 1626 hours on 27 September 1963 by an unidentified man in the Soviet embassy for Silvia DURAN. They discuss the visa application for the “American” who with his Russian wife wanted to go via Cuba to the USSR. The Soviet says he has had no reply from Washington, etc.

“d. A telephone call to the Soviet embassy made at 1151 hours on 28 September 1963 by Silvia DURAN of the Cuban embassy who puts on an unidentified northamerican man who tells the Soviet that he was just at their embassy and wants to give them his address. The Soviet tells him to return to the embassy with the address.

“e. A telephone call to the Soviet Military Attache at 1031 hours on 1 October 1963 by an unidentified man speaking broken Russian who was asked about a telegram which they were to send to Washington. Unidentified man said he was at the Soviet embassy “last Saturday”. Soviet told him to call 1?-60-55. It’s probably 15-60-55.

“f. A telephone call to the Soviet embassy at 1035 hours on 1 October 1963 by the same man who called previously (23 September 63) and spoke broken Russian. He said his name was Lee OSWALD and wanted to know if they had heard anything. Soviet said no.

“g. A telephone call to the Soviet Embassy (Military Attache) at 1539 hours on 3 October 1963 by an unidentified man requesting a visa. (By the context of other conversations by OSWALD and the fact that this caller spoke in broken Spanish and English rather than Russian which he used previously, it is possible that the caller is not OSWALD)”

Well, that’s interesting. Winston Scott is saying on November 27, 1963 that someone might have impersonated Lee Harvey Oswald in October, on 3 October to be precise, more than a month before the assassination. Smells like a smoking document to me. OW! It’s on fire! Ouch! OW! OWWWW!

Document # 104-10016-10036 is a the page document from DCD, CIA to DDO/PIC, CIA. It is dated 11/29/63. The first page is a routing and record sheet. It is from H. S. Spilman of the Domestic Collection Division extension 2271. It went to Anna Langford at DDO/PIC on January 6, 1976. “Per our telecon of 5 January. The attached was surfaced during a search under another subject heading. It has been sanitized and may be released if the portions enclosed in brackets are deleted.”

Was surfaced? Oh well, apparently they don’t teach grammar at spook school.

Fortunately, the ARRB opened up the bracketed information.

Handwritten in is “1:4 Please pass onto Pam & Judy. I hope this turned up in the task force review. ” Then there are the initials F.C.R.

Page two is a letter from the Acting Chief of the Contact Division to Chief of the Chicago office. A contact in the cook county sheriff’s office furnished the following. Apparently Chicago took over the running of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. In February `63 a secret meeting of the Committee was held at 907 South Spalding, Chicago under the direction of Richard Criley, Secretary of the Chicago chapter at this meeting the assassination of the President of the U.S. was discussed.

The rifle was purchased in March 1963. The document rather surprisingly does not refer to Klein’s of Chicago. The Sheriff’s office has not yet established that Oswald was at the February meeting. However, they have strong suspicions that Oswald was in Chicago in April and was “responsible for firing the offices here of UPI”. What does that mean “firing the offices here of UPI”?

The document mentions Sheriff Ogilive’s animosity towards the FBI. The contact was ordered to investigate this himself, to approach the FBI “officially” and ask for information on The Fair Play For Cuba Committee. If refused, to continue the investigation anyway.

The guy writing this report, Robert P.B. Lohman, tries to get the contact to submit his materials to the FBI. The contact replied he had to do as ordered. The contact rather smartly asks does the CIA have anything on The Fair Play For Cuba Committee. Lohman responds that the CIA is not an investigating agency, that the FBI had jurisdiction over internal security matters and that everything we had was classified.

“For the record, we have nothing in our files concerning Lee Harvey Oswald.”

Yeah, and Rush Limbaugh is a thin, intelligent guy.

Document # 104-10016-40 is a three page document dated 11/28/63. The first page is a routing and record sheet. This basically says that information has been shared with the legal attache, which would be Mr. Clark D. Anderson and the desire to control that information ie. no dissemination.

Document # 104-10016-10045 is a 2 page document dated 11/28/63 from W.C. Curtis to Director, CIA. The first page is a routing and record sheet. It has Scott’s and White’s name stamped on it. The cable reports on a rumor that Oswald had deposited $5,000 in a bank in the United States.” this rumor was told by Mr. Clark D. Anderson to Scott and Mann. Apparently it was circulating on Mexican TV and or radio. They are worried that Alverado may have heard this and this was the basis for Alverado’s sum of $5,000 in his story.

Document # 104-10017-10003 is a three page report dated 12/03/63. It is from Mr. Clark D. Anderson to Ambassador. A Mr. Luis Fernandez Gonzalez, from Honduras appeared at the U.S. embassy in Mexico City. He states that on September 28, 1963 he met an American male named John White on the street in front of the Hotel Reforma. Since then he has seen photographs of Lee Harvey Oswald and now believes White strongly resembles Oswald.

Fernandez claimed that he knew one Saul Lopez, whom he described as the Press chief of the National Liberation Movement in Mexico.

On September 29, 1963, he accompanied JOHN WHITE and SAUL LOPEZ to Cuernavaca, Morelos, traveling in Lopez’s 1959 Ford Galaxie (and here’s the best part of the story) “they spent the day at the Hotel de la Selva swimming and entertaining themselves. Fernandez claimed that this trio did not register at the Hotel de la Selva, but merely spent the day there.” White and Lopez then went on to Monterrey, Nuevo Leon in Lopez’s automobile..

Fernandez was in Mexico illegally without documentation and wanted the U.S. embassy to help him get to Miami, Florida. This the embassy refused to do.

Fernandez stated on December 2, 1963 that he was without funds, had no gainful employment, and it was noted that he was exceedingly filthy, heavily bearded, and had every appearance of a penniless tramp.

No action was taken on this story of Fernandez, who was seen as an opportunist.

Document # 104-10017-10012 is a one page document dated 12/03/63. It is from CIA to JMWAVE. This is another document that intrigues me. It is another reference to a “Raul” working in the Cuban embassy.

“AMKNOB-1 SW message received WAVE 30 Nov. reflected foll:

“A. Following WAVE co instructions, A-1 sent cable with follow-up letter to Raul at CIS address HAVA upon A-1 return Mexi;

“B. A-1 waited 15 days without receiving answer to letter sent Raul;

“C. A-1 contacted PBRUMEN embassy 22 Nov attempting reestablish contact with Raul. A-1 talked via telecon with girl named Silvia who claimed be sec of Consulate. Silvia denied knowing Raul.

“D. 22 Nov A-1 sent another cable PBRUMEN CIS address requesting meeting.

“E. 25 Nov A-1 received urgent wire from Raul sent from Tacubaya, DF, DTD 23 Nov which acknowledged receipt A-1 wire and requested A-1 wait for Raul.

“F. A-1 said “He terribly moved by horrible assassination President” and facing such acts must redouble strength fight red crime.

“G. A-1 said Oswald face familiar and may have seen him PBRUMEN or Mexi. A-1 will further advise.

“H. a-1 convinced GOC employs killers and assassins.”

Document # 104-10017-10038 is a two page cable dated 12/02/63. It is from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is a request for a name trace on Nicholas Villalpando Cortez. Mr. Cortez runs a small grocery store opposite the Soviet embassy and thought he saw Oswald in late September `63 expounding the virtues of communism and said he was getting a visa to go to Cuba. The document refers to the possible identification of Oswald as erroneous. This is offered without explanation. Cortez offers to help in any way in can to the U.S. embassy and it sounds like they are interested in recruiting him.

Document # 104-10017-10053 is a one page cable dated 12/06/63. It is from Mexico City to Director. This is about the interrogation of Alverado Urgarte. The question of LCFLUTTER not yet broached with Alverado Urgarte. The Nicaraguan inspectors are taking him out tonight for a good meal.

Document # 104-10017-10065 is a two page cable dated 12/05/63. It is from Mexico City to Director, CIA.

“Peter K. Woodhead arrived, met by DCOS and got through customs with no problem.” Woodhead is a false name.

This document gives the location of the safehouse where the interrogation of Alverado took place. “After careful study with legal attache have decided hold interrogation at apartment No. 3 Calle Merida 166, which was used by KUCLUB personnel for aegenerate L.P. This completely backstopped by being rented for `visiting Americans’. No future plan to use apartment by station. Apartment building has no watchman. No adjoining apartments or buildings. Messrs. Clark Anderson and Joe Garcia of legal attache studied apartment on night of 4 December and approves of use.

“Plan is to have Anderson and Garcia pick up Alverado and bring him to apartment. Mexican police will accompany to apartment but will not repeat not enter building. Anderson alone will interpret for Woodhead.

“Will have Rescigno in a bedroom to monitor and record interrogation. Rescigno will not be blown to Anderson, Garcia or to Mexicans.”

Rescigno is another false name.

Document # 104-10018-10002 is a one page cable dated 12/09/63. It is from CIA to FBI.

“Richard Beymer, American Movie Actor was in touch with Cuban embassy, Mexico City.

“1. The Mexico City News of 5 December 1963 carried a picture of Richard Beymer, American movie actor, who was a delegate to the film festival being held in Acapulco.

“2. Beymer was in touch with the Cuban embassy in Mexico City on 2 December, and a person believed to be Beymer was in touch with the embassy on 30 November. He wanted to speak to Silvia Duran, who was not at the embassy. Another employee told him that no reply had been received from Cuba.

“3. This office has no information on Beymer.”

This is signed by Jane Roman, as the releasing officer, L.N. Gallery, as the authenticating officer, and a B. I. R. or B.E. R handwritten in.

Document # 104-10018-10028 is a one page record and routing sheet dated 12/10/63. It is from RID/AN, CIA to CI/RA, CIA. There is handwriting that looks to me like “This didn’t pick up entire subject line.”

Document # 104-10018-10029 is a duplicate of this records and routing sheet.

Document # 104-10018-10031 is another duplicate.

Document # 104-10018-10032 is another duplicate.

Document 3 104-10018-10046 is a one page cable dated 12/10/63. It is from JMWAVE to Director, CIA.

“AMSUM-4 interviewed Pedro (Alvarez) Gandarilla and wife Graciela (Sanchez) Manduley night 9 Dec 63 and asked them to identify if possible spread of 6 names, including several variations name Saavedra found WAVE files, all of whom supposedly friends of sister Celia (Sanchez).”

2. Subjects unable identify any variation of name Saavedra as friend of Celia (Sanchez), nor did they know any Saavedras at all. Pedro (Alvarez) Gandarilla outspokenly cooperative. Wife Graciela (Sanchez) cooperative but sensitive to questions concerning her family and possible she may withhold info concerning her family.”

Okay, anyone know who Saavedra is or why that persons or persons are important.?

Document # 104-10018-10049 is a duplicate of document # 104-10018-10028.

Document # 104-10018-10056 is a one page record and routing sheet. It is from sometime in 1963. The date is not given. It is from CIRA/RS to IP/FI

Document # 104-10018-10074 is a 6 page document. Two pages of which are missing. It is dated 12/13/63. It is from Chief of Station, JMWAVE to Chief of the Special Affairs Staff. Page one is a record and routing sheet. This is about the possible use of the “DRE tape” which is the radio debate Oswald had with Carlos Bringuier.

The debate is characterized as centering “On Cuba and Communist subversion throughout the Western Hemisphere, including Fair Play for Cuba Committee activities in the US. Oswald clearly comes out the loser for lack of factual accuracy and logical argumentation.”

Yeah for the home team.

This is another attempt to use Bringuier and this radio debate for political propaganda purposes. A little more muted than the attempt on the day of the assassination. They want to send it to Latin American countries noting that it has been sent to radio stations in the southeastern part of the United States.

The reel to reel audiotape was sent to NARA in 1992.

Document # 104-10018-10084 is a one page document. It is dated 13 December, 1963. It is from Winston Scott to Mr. Clark D. Anderson.

Attached are two copies of the Mexican report on the interrogation of Silvia Duran during her second arrest. No, they aren’t really attached. Why break a pattern? There is some CIA file number redacted. There have been a number of CIA file numbers redacted on the bottom of several documents.

The HSCA documents.

Document # 180-10071-10165. This is a four page document. It is a summary of an interview of Secret Service Agent John David Ready. Ready’s address is given as 25191 Derby Circle, Laguna Hills, Calif. He’s probably moved. They give his social security number 714-498-3580. In 1978 he was assigned to Nixon protection. The HSCA investigator was Harold Rose. Ready was interviewed at the Secret Service office in San Clemente.

Ready was appointed to the Secret Service in 1961 and assigned to the White House detail, with temporary details at Hyannisport and Palm Beach. He remained on the White house detail until 1968. In between 1968 and 1978 he was assigned to the San Diego office for V.P. Agnew protection, Dr. Kissinger protection, Watergate and the White house tapes, and then the Nixon service. A very interesting career.

Ready stated that he had never done an advance for the President while on the White House detail.

On the November 18, 1963 Miami trip, upon arriving he was informed of a death in his family and and returned to Washington, D.C. He did not recall any threat to the President and did not recognize the name of Joseph Milteer.

Ready was asked about how information from the PRS is passed on. Ready said he assumed such information would be passed onto the advance agents.

In regards to the Dallas motorcade Ready stated that he was assigned to the right front running board of the presidential follow up car opposite Clint Hill. He stated that his job was not to watch the President but to watch the crowds and buildings. He stated that he had no specific recall of making any observation of the TSBD. He thought the first shot was a firecracker thrown from behind them. He said that the second and third shots were closer in time than the first and second shots. He heard someone say either, “He’s hit,” or, “He’s shot,” but doesn’t remember when it was said, relative to the second or third shot.

Ready stated that he jumped off of the running board to go to the President’s vehicle but was called back by Agent in Charge Emory Roberts. He had been watching the right side and was not aware of Clint Hill running to the presidential limousine.

After entering the hospital, he was assigned to the door leading to the area where they had taken the President. Ready did not have any recall of the FBI agent making a scene when trying to get into the room where the President was. He was told to ride the follow up car behind Vice President Johnson to Love field and as they were getting ready to leave he heard that the President had died. On arrival at Love field, Vice President Johnson boarded Air Force 1 along with the Vice Presidential detail of Secret Service agents. Agent Ready boarded the back-up plane.

Rose asked Ready if he was aware of a trip ever being canceled because of a threat. He stated that he never performed Protective Service for any President or any other White House official who would have allowed a trip to be canceled because of a threat.

Document # 180-10074-10079. This is a five page document. It is a summary of an interview with Thomas Lem Johns. Mr. Johns was employed as a Special Assistant to HEW Secretary Joseph Califano. He retired from the Secret Service in May of 1975 after serving 21 years. He also had two years with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax unit of the Treasury. Mr. Johns became a Treasury agent in Birmingham, Alabama his home town and transferred over to the Secret Service after two years as an A & TT agent. His first station was Birmingham, Alabama. After 2 and 1/2 years he was transferred to Chicago. There he worked under Paul Paterni, later an Assistant Chief of the SS. He spent 1957-1959 in Chicago and then was transferred to the White House Detail. He worked that detail until 1960 when he was transferred to Atlanta.

During 1960 to 1963 Johns was called back to serve on the White House Detail in connection with protection matters at Middleburg, Virginia and Hyannisport, Massachusetts in connection with President John F. Kennedy and his family.

When LBJ was Vice President he, at first, only wanted two agents assigned to him. After 1962 this was revised and the Vice Presidential detail was expanded.

Johns was put on the Vice Presidential detail working under Stuart Knight and Rufus Youngblood.

In November 1963 Johns was at the LBJ ranch in Perdenales, Texas and was helicoptered with other agents to San Antonio to meet the Vice President’s party. They traveled onto Dallas-Ft. Worth with the group. It was Johns’ assignment on November 22nd to ride in the follow-up car. He normally rotated each day with Rufus Youngblood to ride in the Vice President’s car. The follow-up was hard topped and the doors opened from the rear. “I was blind on top and couldn’t see behind me,” Johns said. “I heard two shots. They seemed close together. They were shots, not backfires, or firecrackers. Our car was moving very slowly and my door was open so I jumped out on the street. Before I could begin to move towards the VP’s car I heard the third shot. The first two sounded like they were on the side of me towards the grassy knoll but then that’s because of the confinement of the backseat and opening to that side plus the fact that people [were] falling to the ground on the grassy slope made me feel that the shots were from that direction.

I never got a fix on the third shot because I was running towards LBJ’s car, which was now some distance away from us and picking up speed. I was left on the street with no way to get back in our car. A passing car with White House photographers

in it came by and one of them recognized me. He said, `Hey, there’s Lem Johns. let’s give him a ride.’ They stopped and picked me up and we drove to the Trade Mart, which was the next stop. I heard from a Dallas police officer that the President had been shot and taken to Parkland hospital. He drove me there on his three wheeler.”

When Johns arrived at Parkland Hospital, he talked to Rufus Youngblood who told him to find Kenny O’Donnell and see what was happening with the President. He ran into Emory Roberts, another agent, who told him that the President was dead. He eventually brought O’Donnell to see Rufus and LBJ. “O’Donnell told the Vice President that Kennedy was dead and that they should take Air Force One and go back to Washington.” Rufus (Youngblood) told him (Johns) to get transportation for Love Field and round up the Vice President’s group. He (Youngblood) apparently gave the same task to other agents, because when Johns got back with the route information he saw that the others had taken LBJ and left. Johns left for Love Field himself, picking up Cecil Stoughton, the photographer, on the way.

Johns said that President Johnson talked to Bobby Kennedy on the phone and was told by Bobby to get sworn in there in Dallas. They then called Federal Judge Sarah Hughes who came and administered the oath. Johns helped remove seats for the coffin to be placed in the rear cabin of Air Force One. After they returned to Washington, Johns remained with the President’s detail throughout the funeral.

Document # 180-10074-10394. This is a seven page document. It is from the “numbered files” record series. These are all interviews or interview summaries of Secret Service personnel. This particular one is dated 02/28/78. It is an interview of Robert J. Jamison. What is most fascinating about all of these HSCA documents is that the ARRB Executive Director, Mr. David Marwell looked at all of them. How can I tell? Well, there is a charge out record document. I have never seen such a document before. Marwell’s name is written in, the JFK Assassination Review Board, etc. Mr. Marwell looked at this material on September 19, 1995.

Mr. Robert J. Jamison was interviewed at his residence, 41 Apple Blossom Lane, Asherville, North Carolina on February 28, 1978. He was interviewed by Mr. Belford Lawson.

Mr. Jamison was appointed to the Secret Service in 1951. Mr. Jamison served in the U.S. Navy, in the War Department, and in the Miami office of the U.S. Customs before entering the Secret Service. He remained in the Miami office of the Secret Service until his transfer to the Washington Field Office in 1965.

“Mr. Jamison experienced difficulty in recalling detailed information of any kind about conditions of any kind in the Miami office in 1963.” Helpful little guy, isn’t he?

“However, he was able to remember that there were between five and seven agents in the office in that year, including SAIC Marshall, Sa’s Bailey, Nugent, McCord, Aragon, and clerical aide Curry; that Palm Beach was within the Miami Office’s jurisdiction; and that when the President vacationed in Palm Beach, SAIC Marshall would advance and secure Palm Beach, leaving Jamison in charge of day-to-day matters in Miami.”

Jamison mentions that Marshall was in Palm Beach when Milteer was brought to the attention of the Secret Service by the Miami Police Department shortly after 11/9/63.

Jamison mentioned that they took seriously actual and potential threats from the Miami Cuban community. “He did not mention the Secret Service coverage of the flag-presentation ceremony by the Brigade 2054 widows or the JFK-Orange Bowl speech but he did recall that Spanish speaking SA’s “handled” information about Cuban activity.” It’s supposed to be 2506, not 2054, 2506 was the Brigade of Cuban exiles involved in the Bay of Pigs.

Jamison had another amnesia fit and, “could not remember specific procedures used by the Miami office to regulate inter-agency liaison contacts.” Jamison did recall, ” we considered all areas a source of information” and “we passed it on to the PRS depending on where the subject was.” PRS is the Protective Research Service, a division of the Secret Service.

On President Kennedy’s November 18, 1963 trip to Miami, Jamison, “confidently asserted that he recalled the trip per se, but was able to recall only generalities concerning Secret Service protective procedures rather than specific facts about protective operations and other aspects of the trip.” Jamison stated that he had no

recollection about the contributions (or lack thereof) to Presidential protection made by SA Lubert de Freese, the White House Detail Advance Agent into Miami; John A. Marshall, the SAIC of the Miami Office; Miami Police Intelligence Division Sgt. Charles Sapp, the officer who informed the Secret Service about FBI/MPD informant Willie Somersett’s work in obtaining anti-JFK active threat information from PRS subject Joe Milteer; by Somersett; or Milteer.

I am surprised by the next paragraph of this document. The HSCA interviewer in a most uncharacteristic move for a federal investigator into the JFK assassination confronts this “memory loss” of Mr. Jamison. “Questioning about the reasons for the deficiencies in his memory elicited various types of admissions. Some admissions represented Jamison’s adoption of postures of ignorance, (emphasis added) e.g. `All I know is that he (the President) was in safe and out safe.'”

Jamison pointed out the bureaucracy of the procedures which would include information going to the local SAIC, the White House Detail advance agent, the SAIC of the WHD, the PRS, the PRS advance man, and any field office with jurisdiction over a related subject. Jamison remembered telling WHD Advance agent de Freese what to do, but could not remember what he told him.

Jamison also adopted personal attitudes during his frequent memory loses, examples include, “I can’t say without knowing particulars”, “I don’t know and I can’t recall”, “I’ve been retired seven years and I’ve just dismissed all my protective experience from my mind.”

Again, the interviewer surprises me by trying to get some useful information from Jamison. “Under the conditions created by the virtually complete loss of memory on Jamison’s part, questioning was developed which invited Jamison to comment on hypothetical protective situations.” Specifically, he was asked to determine whether on November 18, 1963, if he had been exclusively in charge, would he have transported the President from the airport to the speech site at the hotel by helicopter or motorcade? Memorandum before him some written by Jamison himself made it clear that the threat on Nov. 18, 1963 was posed by a mobile, unidentified rifleman shooting from a window in a tall building with a high power rifle fitted with a scope. Jamison had “no recall” of these facts even with his own recollection was refreshed by his own memoranda.

Jamison refused to comment on this hypothetical, saying that “it would be strictly conjecture” and that “I can’t say what I’d do without all the facts.”

Yet again Lawson, not settling for this asked Jamison, “whether he was intentionally restricting the scope of his answers because of instructions received from his past superiors in the Secret Service. Jamison admitted that he had been debriefed by Chief Inspector Krill before leaving the service and at that time was told he was “not supposed to discuss” the internal operations of the Secret Service.

However, Jamison stated that he, “was not now feeling any constraint” and that “if I recalled any facts they would be yours since you have a job to do.”

Jamison recalled that at “some point in 1965” it was standard operating procedure in the Secret Service for rooftops of buildings along a motorcade route to be checked out, for personnel in buildings along the route to be kept closed by officers posted for that purpose. However Jamison could not recall whether these standards were in effect in 1963.

Jamison was assigned to protect Marina Oswald on the Monday following the assassination. This is confusingly described in the text of the document as the “Marine Oswald detail”. This document states that manpower for the detail was taken from various SS field offices around the country.

This is not true.

Peter Dale Scott discovered that the order to protect the Oswald’s came prior to the murder of Lee Harvey Oswald on Sunday, not on the Monday following the assassination. James Martin testified to the Commission that he was the Resident Manager of the Six Flags Motel from May of 1962 to January 1, 1964. He stated he became acquainted with Marina on November 24, 1963. He was called by the Tarrant County sheriff on Sunday. Lew Evans, the sheriff, called, “about 11 o’clock in the morning, and they wanted a room where they could question the Oswald family.”1

This is crucially important! This call to sequester the Oswald family away from the press and other investigators occurs before Lee Harvey Oswald is killed by Jack Ruby, “even though the Secret Service had no standing authority for such action and was only authorized by Lyndon Johnson to do so on compassionate grounds after Lee Harvey Oswald had died on Sunday afternoon.”2

Jamison was selected for this duty by Miami SAIC John A. Marshall. The document refers one to the Investigative report filed by Marshall on this for more information.

Jamison remained on the detail from the end of November until the conclusion of Marina’s Warren Commission testimony in February of 1964. Jamison was not with her while she resided at a motel but joined her later when she resided “at the Martin residence”. Well, she was secluded at The Inn of the Six Flags in Arlington, Texas, that was the hotel. Jamison remembered that SA’s named Copadze (more misspelling, it’s Gopadze) Howard, Dickerson and Sheridan were on the detail with him.

Jamison’s replies to questioning about whether he personally elicited information from Marina, especially about the Oswald-Walker incident, were `not that I recall”. Jamison pointed out that the FBI had investigative jurisdiction and hence “always interrogated Marina in a separate room.”

Document # 180-10074-10396 is an eleven page summary of an interview with Winston G. Lawson. This is a copy of document # 180-10074-10397 with the notable exception of some handwritten notation to correct the text. This was done by Belford Lawson of the HSCA staff on March 26, 1979. He writes, “007066 was missing from the system. I substituted a xeroxed copy from Team IV files. All corrections are my own and accurate.” 007066 is the HSCA agency number for this document. It is interesting that it went missing at some time for some reason.

On the 5th page Belford Lawson inserts “The Final decision to go to the Trade Mart” in between “route” and “was” thus clarifying this sentence, “He (Lawson) indicated that the selection of the Trade Mart as the speech site and destination for the motorcade took place prior to the mapping out of the route was made at Washington and at very least involved Gerald Behn (WHD chief) and Ken O’Donnell, Presidential Appointments Secretary.”, to read as “He (Lawson) indicated that the selection of the Trade Mart as the speech site and destination for the motorcade took place prior to the mapping out of the route. The Final decision to go to the Trade Mart was made at Washington and at very least involved Gerald Behn (WHD chief) and Ken O’Donnell, Presidential Appointments Secretary.”

On page 6 under (d-2) The Main – Elm – Houston Turn, (The idiots can’t even get the turns right.) Belford inserts corrections so it reads, “The alternative would have been to continue west on Main without turning onto Houston and to proceed on Main under the triple overpass to a point west of the overpass and then to take Industrial Boulevard to the Trade Mart.”

On page 10 Belford Lawson inserts a correction so that it reads, “Mr. (Winston) Lawson recalls that surge of the presidential limousine almost resulted in a collision with the lead car.” Much better than using the one three letter word “hit” which was crossed out..

Page 11 is missing in this copy but is there in document # 180-10074-10397.

Document # 180-10074-10397 is an interview of Winston Lawson. This interview takes place on January 31, 1978. The document gives Lawson’s address as 6408 Twin Court, Springfield, Virginia. I believe the interview took place at House Annex #2, thought I am unsure what that refers to. There is a telephone number listed 703-971-3936.

Lawson worked as an agent for CIC in the U.S. Army at Ft. Holabird, Maryland. Lawson’s duties apart from investigations and interviews included the maintenance of filing systems.

Lawson went to the Secret Service School for 5 weeks. In the areas of Presidential protection, the lessons were delivered in the form of lectures by White House Detail lecturers Robert Bouck and Howard Henderson. The lectures touched upon such subjects as weapons training, but were based primarily upon an official WHD Advance Manual, used within the WHD and compiled from materials written from year to year by different authors.

“Mr. Lawson was unable to recall anything about the specific content of any of the lectures or any of the materials contained in the lectures or in the WHD Advance Manual.”

“The principal focus of SS training in the area of Presidential Protection was on-the-job training.” Oh, great.

Lawson explained that the Daughters of the American Revolution Hall in Washington, D.C. was used as a demonstration site for training sessions in advance work.

In September , 1963 Lawson served as chief advance agent for a Billings, Montana Presidential trip and in October 1963 as chief advance agent for a Little Rock, Arkansas trip.

Lawson pointed out that as advance agent he relied both upon PRS and on local agents for information about active subjects. Specific information about a subject who was considered an active threat could be found in the files of either the PRS or the local SS office Lawson explained that advance agents customarily relied on the local office agents more than on the PRS because the local agents usually had firsthand knowledge of the subject and were in a position to check and recheck the family, friends, and other associations of the subject.

On pre-departure contact with the PRS, Lawson had many conversations with Floyd Boring and Roy Kellerman, who were the two chief assistants of the WHD, but they did not discuss PRS matters.

Now there is something damn odd here. Lawson stated that his pre-departure contact with PRS indicated that no reports were available from PRS about any threat subjects developed on the basis of President Kennedy’s visit to Texas for the funeral of Representative Sam Rayburn in 1961.

Why would threat subjects be limited to developments from President Kennedy’s attendance of Sam Rayburn’s funeral? What this says in deceptive language is that there were no active threat subjects to President Kennedy in the whole state of Texas for two whole years, 1962 and 1963, at least in the Secret Service PRS files, and if there were they were not shared with Lawson.

Lawson stated that he learned about the October 1963 attack in Dallas on Adlai Stevenson “only by his own reading.”

Lawson recalled that he arrived at night in Dallas and was met by a local agent, then went to a local office, where meetings began for the purpose of planning the itinerary in light of manpower available and of threat levels. Constant meetings also began with the Dallas Police Department. Initially, however, the SS only paid a courtesy call and avoided making a specific early commitment about plans.

According to Lawson’s Warren Commission testimony (IV p. 322), Lawson arrived in Dallas on Tuesday Nov. 12, 1963 at approximately 7:30 PM. He was accompanied by Jack Puterbaugh and Chief Warrant Officer Bales from the White House Communications Agency.

Mr. Lawson could not identify any person or persons as responsible for the decision to use a motorcade in Dallas, but he “thinks the decision was made in D.C.” This is classic bull meant to confuse and disorient. Lawson knows better.

I’m going to limit my commentary as I am working on a book on the advance preparations for the Dallas trip. To offer it here will needlessly extend the length of my document by document review of the material the ARRB releases. However, as I am fascinated by this subject and unlike the Mexico City related documents know something about this particular aspect of the case I may feel compelled to add information.

When asked whether there was controversy about the selection of the luncheon site he responded that the Secret Service “found what we found at the Fair Grounds, at the Trade Mart, and then phoned back.”

Well, what the hell is that supposed to mean?

Lawson characterized the Trade Mart as “newer” as having “many more doors, a guard system, a card system for identifying visitors, and catwalks of the Hyatt House type with open balconies. The interviewer noted that Lawson did not describe the features of an alternative site and compare it to the Trade Mart.

There is another strange sentence, “He (Lawson) indicated that the selection of the Trade Mart as the speech site and destination for the motorcade took place prior to the mapping out of the route was made at Washington and at very least involved Gerald Behn (WHD chief) and Ken O’Donnell, Presidential Appointments Secretary.”

A question mark is written in the marginalia next to this. As written this makes no sense. There is a conscious and deliberate effort in the whole story of preparations for the trip to state that the decisions were made in Washington, rarely if ever matching any one decision with any one specific individual. I think what Lawson is trying to say is that the Trade Mart was selected as the luncheon site prior to the mapping out of how to get there from Love Field. This is logical as you need a destination first, then you work out the best way to get there. However, exactly what he is trying to say was decided in Washington is unclear. If it were true that matters were being decided in Washington there is very little reason for Lawson to be in Texas, very little reason for the decision of a luncheon site not to be made prior to Lawson’s arrival, very little reason for Jerry Bruno and later Bill Moyers to go to Dallas. The problem was John Connally who is not mentioned at all by Lawson in this document, and not mentioned at all by Lawson by name. The Governor’s office is referred to, and the Governor is referred to in reference to removing him from the car at Parkland but Lawson makes no mention of John Connally in the context of Dallas trip preparations and Trade Mart selection.

In what appears to be a contradiction Lawson claimed that he could not identify any one person or organization as conspicuously preferring or trying to influence the selection of the Trade Mart, yet, on the same page states that Jack Puterbaugh, a civilian political advance man for the Democratic National Committee recommended the Trade Mart. Puterbaugh accompanied Lawson to Dallas, stayed at the same hotel as Lawson, attended many of the same DPD/SS planning meetings, and was also in charge of the protocol of the motorcade, the arranging of the seating and vehicle sequence for Congressmen and other dignitaries in the motorcade.

Lawson was “not able to recall” the influence (if any) on motorcade planning of local press representative Felix McKnight or of Democratic State Chairman Eugene Locke.

Lawson informed the HSCA in this interview, ” that the motorcade route was not automatically determined by the prior selection of the Trade Mart, but was mapped out subject only to the requirements that (1) the motorcade pass through downtown Dallas and (2) that the motorcade proceed from Love Field to the Trade Mart.”

These conditions rules out a direct route from Love field to the Trade Mart that would have taken no more than five minutes.

Lawson in this interview stated that he did not accompany Mr. Sorrels on the tour of the route which they each say that they made together on November 14. Second, Mr. Lawson stated that he “does not recall” that the route traveled by Sorrells included Dealey Plaza, since it was not certain on the 14th that the Trade Mart would be the destination.

Here’s what Mr. Lawson said in CE 769, p. 2 in volume 17 p. 619, “SAIC Sorrells and I drove one of the proposed routes from the airport to the Trade Mart at the approximate speed probably to be taken during the motorcade, and looked over other security factors along the route.”

So Lawson lied. Lie one, he did not drive with Sorrells; lie two, okay he didn’t drive the motorcade route President Kennedy took on Nov. 22, he said he took “one of the proposed routes” but the HSCA did ask him that, and he did too drive to the Trade Mart on one of the proposed routes with Sorrells, his own memorandum says he did. And what were the other proposed routes, and what was the destination of these other routes?

Mr. Lawson stated that the purpose of the turn was to place the motorcade on the freeway because this afforded greater security than the alternative. The alternative would have been to (1) to continue west on Main over the triple overpass to a point west of the overpass then (2) Take Industrial Boulevard to the Trade Mart . However, Mr. Lawson did not recall whether the alternative was suggested.

On Nov. 18 the route had been selected, a tour of the route was taken by Lawson Sorrells, and DPD Assistant Chiefs Batchelor and Lumpkin. Discussions were on “crowd” control, and an interest in “filing in the gap” of time between the landing of AF-1 at Love Field and the time of the speech, and a “prime concern with things falling from overpasses”. Mr. Lawson also went to a private club in the late afternoon of the 18th. Lawson commented that Puterbaugh was in contact with Washington at this time and was (1) “probably” “getting instructions” “from the Democratic Party” on resolving matters of protocol at the local level; and (2) was “possibly” getting instructions on this matter from Betty Harris (Elizabeth Fosling Harris) who was Puterbaugh’s primary local contact.


Go to Part Two

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Joe Backes, ARRB Summaries: Page 8.

 

The Ninth Batch

Released December 28, 1995

by Joseph Backes


On December 28, 1995 the Assassination Records Review Board released 5 FBI documents. A sixth document #124-10010-10011 was attached for reference.

     Document # 124-10023-10234
     Document # 124-10023-10235
     Document # 124-10023-10236
     Document # 124-10023-10237
     Document # 124-10023-10238
     Document # 124-10010-10011 (attached for reference.)

These documents were really what was supposed to be part of “The Second Batch” that was voted to be released on July 17 and 18 of 1995. The Review Board also attached the previously redacted version of the document with the newer version of the released document. These documents involved an FBI connection with the Federal Police of Switzerland. This persons name is not released. The name of the Swiss official has been withheld and any code or numerical identification of the person was withheld pursuant to a vote the Board took on December 13. These documents were released December 28, 1995 and sent to me by the Board on January 10, 1996.

The release of these documents completes “The Second Batch”. It took five months to get “The Second Batch” released! While I greatly admire the Board’s tenacity in getting these documents released I am appalled at how much of the Board’s time was chewed up in doing so. I worry about future appeals and if the Board will be around to see the issue resolved and the documents released. D.A. Connick is a similar issue.

And now the FBI is at it again with 13 documents that they appealed to President Clinton to keep secret. (Now being May of 1996.)

Chairman Tunheim believes that these pre-assassination FBI records on Lee Harvey Oswald are important. They are supposed to reveal what steps the U.S. government took to determine what Lee Harvey Oswald was doing after he left the United States in 1959 and if someone was impersonating him. He praised the Swiss government for allowing their release.

The Board gave out the previously redacted version and the new and improved version without as much black ink. In fact, Chairman Tunheim used one of these documents, # 124-10023-10235, the previously heavily redacted and the new and improved version, as a kind of show and tell at the American Historical Association annual conference in Atlanta.

This particular document details an effort to find the Albert Schweitzer College in Switzerland. It was located in Churwalden. I had previously thought Churwalden was in Finland. I regret the error.

Document # 124-10023-10234 is a one page document dated July 27, 1960. It is from the Legat in Paris. It refers to the Bulletin to State Department 6/3/60.

The text states, “This is to advise that pertinent information was furnished to the Swiss Federal Police on 6/16/60 and they were requested to conduct investigation in Switzerland in accordance with the Bureau’s request.

“This was discussed with [redacted] of the Swiss Federal Police on 7/21/60. He advised that this investigation is pending.

“This will be followed and the Bureau will be advised.”

Previously the first and second paragraphs were completely redacted solely to hide the name of the Swiss citizen.

Document # 124-10023-10235 is a one page document from the Legat in Paris to Director, FBI. It is dated 9/27/60. It refers to the Paris letter 7/27/60.

The text states, “This case was discussed with [redacted] of the Swiss Federal Police on 8/12/60 and 9/22/60. He advised that considerable investigation had been conducted to locate the Albert Schweitzer College in Switzerland, since this college was previously unknown, and their was no official record of its existence in the Federal Government records in Bern. He stated that they have now located the Albert Schweitzer college at Churwalden, Switzerland,and that investigation is currently being conducted in accordance with the Bureau’s request.

“This will be followed with the Swiss Federal Police, and the Bureau will be advised.”

Previously, the entire two paragraphs of text were redacted.

Document # 124-10023-10236 is a one page document from the legat in Paris to Director, FBI. It refers to Paris letter 9/27/60.

The text states, “The Swiss Federal Police furnished the following report on October 1, 1960.

“The investigation at the “Albert Schweitzer college” located at Churwalden, Switzerland, revealed that OSWALD actually had announced his planned attendance at this school for the course beginning in the fall of 1959. Inquiry at the college revealed that he has not arrived there up to the present time. He had originally written a letter from Moscow indicating his intention to attend there. A letter which was addressed to him at this address by his mother was returned to her since his whereabouts are unknown to the college. The Swiss Federal Police advised that it is unlikely that he would have attended the course under a different name. The Swiss Federal Police advised that courses for the fall of 1960 commence on October 2, 1960, and that it is possible that the school may now receive further correspondence from Oswald. At the present time, there is no record of a person possibly identical with the subject who is registered for the courses beginning October 2.

“The Swiss Federal Police advised that if further information comes to the attention of the Albert Schweitzer College, they will be advised and they in turn will advise us.”

Almost all of the document was previously redacted.

Document # 104-10023-10237 is a one page document dated 11/03/60. It is from the Legat in Paris to Director, FBI. It refers to the Paris letter of 10/12/60. The text states, “The Swiss Federal Police furnished the following additional information on 10/24/60.

“Subject enrolled for the 3rd (?) trimester (20 April – July 1960) by Letter dated 19 March 1959; his address was then indicated as: MCAF, MACS – 9, Santa Anna, California, USA. He exchanged further requested papers. His last letter to the college dates of 19 June 1959; it contained the deposit of $25 dollars towards the school fees and he expressed his satisfaction at being accepted at the college and anticipated joy at the coming sojourn at Churwalden. The college authorities have not heard from OSWALD since, and he has not turned up for the course.

“Through subject’s mother, Mrs. Marguerite OSWALD, 1410 Hurley, Fort Worth, Texas, who by letters dated 6 April and 6 June 1960 inquired about the whereabouts of her son, the college learned that OSWALD had gone to Moscow in November 1959 and lived there at the Hotel Metropole.

“If any news should be received by the Albert Schweitzer College in Churwalden about Lee Harvey OSWALD, you will be duly informed.” “Any further information received from the Swiss Federal Police will be furnished to the Bureau.”

Surprisingly, most of the document was not redacted previously, only the Document # 124-10010-10011, which was included for reference, is a document familiar to the assassination research community. It is dated June 3, 1960. It is to the Office of Security from John Edgar Hoover, Director, FBI. The text states, “Reference is made to Foreign Service Dispatch Number 234 dated November 2, 1959, concerning subject’s renunciation of his American citizenship at the United States Embassy, Moscow, Russia, on October 31, 1959.” Also mentioned is the Fain report dated May 12, 1960. That’s the one entitled “Funds transmitted to Residents of Russia”. Hoover notes that Marguerite C. Oswald received a letter back from the Albert Schweitzer College. She stated that subject had taken his birth certificate with him when he left home. The famous paragraph quoted from this document is, “Since there is a possibility that an impostor is using Oswald’s birth certificate any current information the Department of State may have concerning subject would be appreciated.”

That paragraph is certainly important but has been overshadowed by other questions.

How is the FBI able to obtain information about the contents of Oswald’s correspondence? Well, they opened his mail. What was the Director of Naval Intelligence’s opinion of this? He got a copy of this.

This release was a small one. I will have more on the latest releases soon.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Joe Backes, ARRB Summaries: Page 7.

The Eighth Batch

Released 12/20/95

by Joseph Backes


In February I received from Tom Jones and Debra Conway of The Assassination Chronicles most of what the ARRB released on December 5th.

This package did not include the HSCA documents that were released. I have spoken with Mr. David Lifton via email. He informed me that he was the one who copied these documents. I know that I copied everything for December at Archives II, yet the HSCA docs listed as part of this release were nowhere to be seen. I have not seen anything about these documents not being released.

I am in the process of writing a letter to the ARRB about documents they released not winding up at Archives II. I hope to have an answer for this soon.

It did include the opened pages from “The Lopez Report”. This is a sizable release. The Board met in a closed meeting on October 24, 1995. This was published in the Federal Register on Nov. 7, 1995. The ARRB issued a press release Nov. 6, 1995 on this.

I cannot really comment on the pages of “The Lopez Report” that the ARRB released as I do not have “The Lopez Report” as it was released by the JFK Act.

The FBI documents

   1.)  Document # 124-10005-10133
   2.)  Document # 124-10018-10362
   3.)  Document # 124-10018-10489
   4.)  Document # 124-10020-10093
   5.)  Document # 124-10027-10000
   6.)  Document # 124-10027-10021
   7.)  Document # 124-10027-10029
   8.)  Document # 124-10027-10032
   9.)  Document # 124-10027-10044
   10.) Document # 124-10027-10059
   11.) Document # 124-10027-10072
   12.) Document # 124-10027-10144
   13.) Document # 124-10027-10147
   14.) Document # 124-10027-10375
   15.) Document # 124-10027-10395
   16.) Document # 124-10058-10367
   17.) Document # 124-10079-10122
   18.) Document # 124-10143-10067
   19.) Document # 124-10145-10290
   20.) Document # 124-10145-10295
   21.) Document # 124-10151-10053
   22.) Document # 124-10159-10393
   23.) Document # 124-10170-10462
   24.) Document # 124-10173-10250
   25.) Document # 124-10178-10400
   26.) Document # 124-10183-10144
   27.) Document # 124-10228-10329
   28.) Document # 124-10234-10272
   29.) Document # 124-10239-10247
   30.) Document # 124-10243-10082
   31.) Document # 124-10245-10456
   32.) Document # 124-10248-10316
   33.) Document # 124-10264-10156
   34.) Document # 124-10264-10160
   35.) Document # 124-10272-10037

The FBI document review
Document # 124-10005-10133 is a one page teletype from the SAC in Buffalo to the Director and SAC, Chicago. Stanley Babula advised that his former neighbor, Carl Hanold, thought that someone should shoot the President, two years ago. This was when they both lived in Chicago.

A waste of paper.

Document # 124-10018-10362 is a four page cable from SAC, Miami to Director and SACS, Dallas and San Antonio. Ernest Aragon, U. S. Secret Service agent advised that about midnight Nov. 24-25 he received information from SS in San Antonio that a long distance telephone call had been placed by Jose San Antonio Cabaca in Mexico City to Dr. Emilio Nunez Portuondo in Miami. The conversation was in Spanish. The gist was “plan of Castro carried forth. Bobby is next. Soon the atomic bombs will rain and they will not know from where.”

Page two is missing. Page three informs that Portuondo was former Cuban delegate to the United Nations during the Batista regime. Page four is missing.

Document # 124-10018-10489 is a one page airtel to the Director from SAC, Buffalo. A follow up on Hanold. Useless.

Document # 124-10018-10490 is even more on Hanold. Two pages are the same. One is much clearer to read, the other is impossible to read. Useless.

Document # 124-10027-10000 is a three page cable from SAC, Mobile, Alabama to Director, SACS, Dallas, El Paso, Memphis, New Orleans, and New York. Father Maurice Ouellet is identified as a source for the Mobile office. He is the Pastor of St. Elizabeth’s Mission at Selma.

Mobile wants to draw to the Bureau’s attention the fact that Medgar Evers’ assassin was also an ex-marine and the type of rifle used is similar to one used by the alleged assassin of President Kennedy. Both suspects in above assassinations ex-marines and MO similar in the killings. “The Bureau and all offices might consider the possibility of [an] organization which blends itself to any situation for the further of agitation, which is known as quote Marxists unquote and its ultimate goal could be the assassination of individuals who are prominent or who might be engaged in any controversial movement.”

God that’s interesting. Sounds like what Oliver Stone referred to as “the Beast” in the Nixon screenplay.

Document # 124-10027-10021 is a one page cable from SAC Buffalo to Director and SAC Chicago. This is virtually the same as document. # 124-10005-10133.

Document # 124-10027-10029 is a one page cable from SAC Los Angeles to Director on Richard Anderson, aka, Jim Lowe who is associated with the American Nazi party. As with the Hanold documents this is the FBI coming up with possible suspects. Useless.

Document # 124-10027-10032 is a one page cable that identifies Barry Hoffman as a source within the Permanent Student Committee for Travel to Cuba. Gordon Hall the sponsor of Hoffman’s trip saw in a newspaper where authorities were looking for the roommate of Lee Harvey Oswald when Oswald lived in Greenwich Village, N.Y.C. According to Hoffman the description matches that of Philip Luce.

I remember reading an article someone did on Lee Harvey Oswald in Greenwich Village. There were three articles, “Steven H. Landesberg and the Greenwich Village Hoax” by Stan C. Weeber in The Fourth Decade Vol. 2 # 2 January, 1995 p. 14-18; Sheldon Inkel writes a letter to the editor commenting on the article and adding new information The Fourth Decade Vol. 2 # 3 p. 27; Jack White writes a similar letter to the editor on the Landesberg story in The Fourth Decade Vol. 2 # 4 May, 1995 p. 31.

Document # 124-10027-10044 is a two page teletype from SAC, Chicago to Director and SAC, Dallas. This document reports that Ebelia Echevarria has furnished information to the Chicago field office.

Document # 124-10027-10059 is listed as a five page report from SAC, Boston to Director, FBI. I only have two pages. I seem to be missing three pages from this. It seems to be titled “UNSUB: Approximately 30-Year Old Female American Tourist of Interest to KGB for Possible Recruitment.” They ref WFO letters to Director 10/25/63, 1/1, 13 and 18/63. Reference is also made to a report of SA Darrel B. Currie dated November 24, 1963 and airtel of the same date to the Director. This concerns an investigation of Priscilla Johnson. “On Nov 6, 1963 Miss Dorothy Pernal [I think the first letter in her last name is a P] Personnel Office, Little Hall, Harvard University, advised that her records failed to reflect the name of Priscilla Johnson as an employee of Harvard University.” A check with Miss Lucy Robinson, Corporation Office, Harvard University on the same day showed that Priscilla Johnson was not connected with Harvard as either a student or member of the faculty.

“On November 14, 1963 by means of a pretext telephone call to the Brattle Inn, 48 Brattle Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, SA Currie learned that Johnson was residing at the Inn and “doing some work at Harvard” [quotations in original].

“On November 19, 1963, Merle Fainsod, Proffesor of Government and Director of the Russian Research Center at Harvard university, an established source, stated that Priscilla Johnson has been provided office space at the Russian Research Center, 16 Dunster Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, but has no official connection with the Center. Fainsod said the research center has been made available to her in connection with literary work she has in mind. He said he had no idea how long she would remain at the center and said he could provide no other background or biographical background on her.”

Now I found this amazing and probably impausible, “With reference to the case entitled “Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, November 22, 1963, Dallas, Texas, Assaulting a Federal Officer” Miss Priscilla Johnson was interviewed at the Brattle Inn, Cambridge, Massachusetts from 11:30 am November 23, 1963 to 1:30 am November 24, 1963 by SA’s Darrel B. Currie and James T. Sullivan. of the Boston office.”

This woman was interviewed for 26 solid hours straight!!??? BULLSHIT! This can’t be right.

“The purpose of the interview of Priscilla Johnson was to obtain information regarding Lee Harvey Oswald. Incidental thereto and without indicating possible Bureau interest in her as a suspect in the captioned case, she was advised that inasmuch as she is a potential witness, that biographical and background data on her would be desirable…” She did supply some background on herself. However the rest of what should be 5 pages is missing. It is interesting that the information she provided on herself is the part of the report that is missing, is it not?

The Bureau considered Priscilla Johnson a suspect in the assassiantion of President Kennedy? That is what the document says. Amazing.

Document # 124-10027-10072 is a three page cable from SAC, Cincinnati to the Director and SAC’s Dallas, New York, and Cleveland. It is identical to several documents released in “The Fourth Batch”, like Document #124-10006-10342. The text is virtually identical. So add another duplicate. 6 documents in the 11 released on October 19, 1995, which I call “The Fourth Batch”, are all copies of the same document.

     1.) Document # 124-10006-10342
     2.) Document # 124-10035-10065
     3.) Document # 124-10170-10064
     4.) Document # 124-10232-10345
     5.) Document # 124-10243-10367
     6.) Document # 124-10244-10077

Now we have a seventh.

Document # 124-10027-10144 is interesting in several respects. First, several postponements due to the Board’s decision to protect informant symbol numbers do not give a date of next review on the formal determination notice form, postponement 1, 4, and 6. The document itself is a 2 page airtel from SAC, Cin to the Director and SACS Dallas, New York, Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

It says enclosed are 8 copies for the Bureau and two each for the various SACS of an LHM covering visits of Arnold Johnson to the Ohio Valley area. The SACS will be given copies of the informants reports. Documents that refer to other documents are always useful. It also refers to a future meeting that FBI personnel will have in regards to their informants.

Document #124-10027-10147 is a duplicate of document # 124-10184-10256 released on October 19, 1995, except it doesn’t include the airtel and the duplication of page one of the letter dated December 16, 1963.

Document # 124-10027-10375 is a two page cable from SAC Los Angeles, to the Director and SACS Dallas and Mobile. It is a report on Richard Anderson, aka Jim Lowe. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10029.

Document # 124-10027-10395 is said to be a 9 page report. I have only two, they are the first page of the report and page three.

It is from W. A. Branigan to W. C. Sullivan.

A check with the Identification Division of the Marine Corps showed he had no criminal arrests. Wouldn’t his court martial arrest for throwing a drink in that sergeants face show up here? Further commentary on this document would be incomplete without the other pages.

Document # 124-10058-10367 is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10032. Document #124-1–58-10367 has two pages, however, they just repeat the same page so it is really only one page.

Document # 124-10079-10122 is a four page document, that like the above document repeats pages. So, it is really only a two page document. Worse than that page one is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10490, page two is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10489.

Document # 124-10143-10067 is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10000. They repeat the document so you get two copies of the same report.

Document #124-10145-10290 is a two page report. Page one is a duplicate of document #124-10018-10490, page two is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10489.

Document # 124-10145-10295 is a one page airtel, a duplicate of Document # 124-10005-10133.

Document # 124-1051-10053 is a four page document, duplicating a two page report. This regards an investigation pursuant to information furnished by a Secret Service source on Homer Echevarria. The source is named Jesus Martinez. Not much here.

Document #124-10159-10393 is an eight page report from SAC Miami to the Director and SACS Dallas and San Antonio. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10018-10362. As with Document # 124-10018-10362 page two and four of the report are missing.

Document # 124-10170-10462 is a 5 page report. PAGE 1-3 are a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10147. Page 4-5 are a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10144.

Document # 124-10173-10250 is a two page teletype that is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10032. There appears to be a problem in that the RIF said two pages. Are they including the RIF itself? Sometimes they have done that.

Document # 124-10173-10250 is a two page report. Page two is missing. Page one is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10032.

Document # 124-10178-10125 is a four page document. Page 1-3 are exactly the same and duplicate document # 124-10027-10029. The fourth page is new. It is a teletype from SAC Los Angeles to Bureau, SACS Dallas and Mobile. It is on Richard Anderson. It gives an address and a physical description.

Document # 124-10178-10400 is supposed to be 11 pages it is only two. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10018-10362. Pages 2, 4 and whatever else there was supposed to be to make eleven pages are missing.

Document # 124-10183-10144 is a three page report . It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10000.

Document# 124-10183-10170 is a one page document. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10032.

Document # 124-10228-10329 is a two page report. Page one is a duplicate of Document # 124-10018-10490. Page two is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10489.

Document # 124-10234-10272 is a six page report because it duplicates a three page report on Father Maurice Ouellet. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10027-10032.

Document # 124-10239-10247 is a two page report. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10005-10133.

Document # 124-10243-10082 is a four page report duplicating a two page report. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10032.

Document # 124-10245-10456 is a three page report on Ouellet. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10000.

Document # 124-10248-10316 is a two page report. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10018-10362.

Document #124-10264-10156 is a 12 page report. It is 4 copies of the report on Father Ouellet. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10000.

Document # 124-10264-10160 is a one page report on Richard Anderson. It is a duplicate of document # 124-10027-10029.

Document # 124-10272-10037 is a two page report. It is a duplicate of Document # 124-10018-10362.

The CIA Documents

    1.) Document # 104-10015-10002
    2.) Document # 104-10015-10004
    3.) Document # 104-10015-10007
    4.) Document # 104-10015-10018
    5.) Document # 104-10015-10028
    6.) Document # 104-10015-10029
    7.) Document # 104-10015-10045
    8.) Document # 104-10015-10064
    9.) Document # 104-10015-10065
   10.) Document # 104-10015-10083
   11.) Document # 104-10015-10085
   12.) Document # 104-10015-10107
   13.) Document # 104-10015-10116
   14.) Document # 104-10015-10123
   15.) Document # 104-10015-10124
   16.) Document # 104-10015-10130
   17.) Document # 104-10015-10168
   18.) Document # 104-10015-10202
   19.) Document # 104-10015-10207
   20.) Document # 104-10015-10217
   21.) Document # 104-10015-10218
   22.) Document # 104-10015-10219
   23.) Document # 104-10015-10221
   24.) Document # 104-10015-10222
   25.) Document # 104-10015-10224
   26.) Document # 104-10015-10229
   27.) Document # 104-10015-10231
   28.) Document # 104-10015-10236
   29.) Document # 104-10015-10246
   30.) Document # 104-10015-10251
   31.) Document # 104-10015-10252
   32.) Document # 104-10015-10253
   33.) Document # 104-10015-10254
   34.) Document # 104-10015-10256
   35.) Document # 104-10015-10257
   36.) Document # 104-10015-10260
   37.) Document # 104-10015-10262
   38.) Document # 104-10015-10265
   39.) Document # 104-10015-10266
   40.) Document # 104-10015-10267
   41.) Document # 104-10015-10268
   42.) Document # 104-10015-10270
   43.) Document # 104-10015-10271
   44.) Document # 104-10015-10272
   45.) Document # 104-10015-10273
   46.) Document # 104-10015-10274
   47.) Document # 104-10015-10275
   48.) Document # 104-10015-10276
   49.) Document # 104-10015-10277
   50.) Document # 104-10015-10278
   51.) Document # 104-10015-10283
   52.) Document # 104-10015-10284
   53.) Document # 104-10015-10285
   54.) Document # 104-10015-10286
   55.) Document # 104-10015-10287
   57.) Document # 104-10015-10288
   58.) Document # 104-10015-10289
   59.) Document # 104-10015-10290
   60.) Document # 104-10015-10291
   61.) Document # 104-10015-10292
   62.) Document # 104-10015-10293
   63.) Document # 104-10015-10294
   64.) Document # 104-10015-10295
   65.) Document # 104-10015-10296
   66.) Document # 104-10015-10297
   67.) Document # 104-10015-10299
   68.) Document # 104-10015-10301
   69.) Document # 104-10015-10306
   70.) Document # 104-10015-10307
   71.) Document # 104-10015-10308
   72.) Document # 104-10015-10309
   73.) Document # 104-10015-10310
   74.) Document # 104-10015-10312
   75.) Document # 104-10015-10313
   76.) Document # 104-10015-10315
   77.) Document # 104-10015-10317
   78.) Document # 104-10015-10318
   79.) Document # 104-10015-10319
   80.) Document # 104-10015-10320
   81.) Document # 104-10015-10322
   82.) Document # 104-10015-10323
   83.) Document # 104-10015-10324
   84.) Document # 104-10015-10325
   85.) Document # 104-10015-10326
   86.) Document # 104-10015-10327
   87.) Document # 104-10015-10328
   88.) Document # 104-10015-10329
   89.) Document # 104-10015-10332
   90.) Document # 104-10015-10333
   91.) Document # 104-10015-10334
   92.) Document # 104-10015-10335
   93.) Document # 104-10015-10336
   94.) Document # 104-10015-10337
   95.) Document # 104-10015-10338
   96.) Document # 104-10015-10340
   97.) Document # 104-10015-10341
   98.) Document # 104-10015-10347
   99.) Document # 104-10015-10349
 100.) Document # 104-10015-10351
 101.) Document # 104-10015-10352
 102.) Document # 104-10015-10354
 103.) Document # 104-10015-10355
 104.) Document # 104-10015-10357
 105.) Document # 104-10015-10361
 106.) Document # 104-10015-10363
 107.) Document # 104-10015-10366
 108.) Document # 104-10015-10367
 109.) Document # 104-10015-10368
 110.) Document # 104-10015-10369
 111.) Document # 104-10015-10370
 112.) Document # 104-10015-10371
 113.) Document # 104-10015-10391
 114.) Document # 104-10015-10393
 115.) Document # 104-10015-10406
 116.) Document # 104-10015-10407
 117.) Document # 104-10015-10409
  118.) Document # 104-10015-10419
 119.) Document # 104-10015-10426
 120.) Document # 104-10015-10427
 121.) Document # 104-10015-10429
 122.) Document # 104-10015-10430
 123.) Document # 104-10015-10434
 124.) Document # 104-10015-10437
 125.) Document # 104-10015-10438
 126.) Document # 104-10015-10439
 127.) Document # 104-10015-10440
 128.) Document # 104-10015-10441
 129.) Document # 104-10015-10442
 130.) Document # 104-10015-10443
 131.) Document # 104-10015-10445
 132.) Document # 104-10015-10446
 133.) Document # 104-10015-10447
 134.) Document # 104-10015-10449
 135.) Document # 104-10016-10002
 136.) Document # 104-10016-10003
 137.) Document # 104-10016-10004
 138.) Document # 104-10016-10008
 139.) Document # 104-10016-10009
 140.) Document # 104-10016-10010
 141.) Document # 104-10016-10018
 142.) Document # 104-10016-10028
 143.) Document # 104-10016-10029
 144.) Document # 104-10016-10031
 145.) Document # 104-10016-10038
 146.) Document # 104-10016-10039
 147.) Document # 104-10016-10041
 148.) Document # 104-10016-10043
 149.) Document # 104-10016-10046
 150.) Document # 104-10016-10049
 151.) Document # 104-10017-10015
 152.) Document # 104-10017-10016
 153.) Document # 104-10017-10020
 154.) Document # 104-10017-10026
 155.) Document # 104-10017-10028
 156.) Document # 104-10017-10029
 157.) Document # 104-10017-10030
 158.) Document # 104-10017-10032
 159.) Document # 104-10017-10054
 160.) Document # 104-10017-10059
 161.) Document # 104-10017-10060
 162.) Document # 104-10017-10064
 163.) Document # 104-10017-10066
 164.) Document # 104-10017-10067
 165.) Document # 104-10017-10070
 166.) Document # 104-10017-10071
 167.) Document # 104-10017-10083
 168.) Document # 104-10017-10085
 169.) Document # 104-10018-10011
 170.) Document # 104-10018-10013
 171.) Document # 104-10018-10039
 172.) Document # 104-10018-10043
 173.) Document # 104-10018-10044
 174.) Document # 104-10018-10047
 175.) Document # 104-10018-10053
 176.) Document # 104-10018-10054
 177.) Document # 104-10018-10057
 178.) Document # 104-10018-10058
 179.) Document # 104-10018-10066
 180.) Document # 104-10018-10067
 181.) Document # 104-10018-10068
 182.) Document # 104-10018-10069
 183.) Document # 104-10018-10078
 184.) Document # 104-10018-10079
 185.) Document # 104-10018-10081
 186.) Document # 104-10018-10085
 187.) Document # 104-10018-10086
 188.) Document # 104-10018-10097
 189.) Document # 104-10018-10098
 190.) Document # 104-10018-10100
 191.) Document # 104-10018-10101
 192.) Document # 104-10018-10102
 193.) Document # 104-10018-10105
 194.) Document # 104-10018-10107
 195.) Document # 104-10018-10109
 196.) Document # 104-10018-10110
 197.) Document # 104-10052-10087
 198.) Document # 104-10062-10002

The CIA document review
Document # 104-10015-10002 is a one page document. It is a request from Ann Egerter, CI/SIG to Headquarters, RI to see the 201 personality file on Lee Harvey Oswald. It is largely duplicated on p. 463 of John Newman’s Oswald and the CIA. There is some extra information here, however. There seems to be something attached so that it would xerox onto the bottom of the form. It is not part of the 201 file request form. It states “CITIZENSHIP & PASSPORTS-“, then under that, “OSWALD, Lee Harvey” and Harvey is underlined, then under that, “Dept. of State Instruction A-173, Apr 13, 1961;”, then under that, “Embassy’s D-806, May 26, 1961, same subject.”, then under that, “Pls order for D. Lynch, SR/CI/P, 1044AJ (mail address).

Document # 104-10015-10004 is a two page document. It is from CIRA/RS to IP/AN, IP/EDI, and IP/FI. It is titled “Undated copies of transcripts, handwritten memoranda and notes and other miscellaneous items pertaining to Oswald previously held by the LA division in Project Oswald”.

Sounds intriguing doesn’t it? “Project Oswald”? Now what could that be?

One page is a routing and record sheet which the RIF, basically, completely describes. The second page is information on Synder and McVickar. It says, “McVickar, John Anthony, Appointed 28 June 1959 as Second Secretary and Consul at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow date of departure unknown but was in Washington (presumably after home leave) on October 1, 1961. He was promoted on 18 March 1960 to FSO/class 4, but this did not alter his duties in Moscow.” Interesting, apparently he had duties separate from being a Foreign Service Officer, which is what I believe FSO stand for.

Synder is described as, “Appointed 28 June 1959 as Second Secretary and Consul at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow (the same date and rank as McVickar). Synder was promoted to FSO/4 in 1958, therefore outranked McVickar. Date of departure from the U.S.S.R. not known, but he was in a new foreign post (presumably after home leave, and possibly time in Wash) on 3 Sept. 1961.”

There is another paragraph that states, “The last reference in the Oswald material to Synder was on 10 July 1961, after which McVickar signed letters to Oswald. The last reference to McVickar was 24 July 1961 at which time he signed a letter to Oswald.”

Document # 104-10015-10007 is a 21 page edited text of the Dorticos-Armas conversation. This was sent to “Scelso”. Dorticos is Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado, President of Cuba. Armas is Joaquin Hernandez Armas, Cuban Ambassador to Cuba. About half of the text is spent with the two yelling at each other, “Can you hear me?” . Finally, they talk about the arrest of Silvia Duran.

Dorticos, “Is it true that some blackmail boys, which you mention in your confidential report here, from the federal police of that country attempted to force Silvia Duran to say, with promises of leniency, that we had offered money to ‘the American’.” Armas responds no, nothing about money.

But don’t you just love how President Dorticos describes who and what he is talking about?

There are definitely pages missing here, not so much by the document and RIF. I believe they are correct. However, there are two systems of numbering the pages. Centered on the bottom of the first page is the number 32. This page seems to be a combination of two pages. A symbol list is given so we know who is talking, and below that is a rather small CIA official routing slip about the size of today’s “post-it-notes”. To the right is the number 10 and below that is the number 201-289248 which is Lee Harvey Oswald’s 201 number. So we get pages 10-30 by that system and pages 32-52 the other way. What might have come before and after is unknown.

Page 19 of the 21 ( aka page 50 or page 28) is nearly impossible to read. This is not a conversation between Dorticos and Armas. It is between HF and Luisia, whoever they are, they are not listed in the symbol key. There is the number 2 in the upper left hand side, and a number 3 on the upper left of the last two pages. These last three pages concern this HF-Luisia conversation.

Document 104-10015-10018 is a two page report. It is a letter from the Deputy Director for Plans to the Director of the FBI. This was also directed to the attention of Mr. Papich. This concerns Ramon Cortez and the Transcontinental Corp. There were many documents that relate to this in the 39 documents released in September; Document #104-10015-10013, Document # 104-10015-10015, and Document #104-10015-10019.

The letter gives information about Cortez. The second page refers to Project AM/CONCERT, which is apparently what this is about. Cortez is described as a personal friend of Che Guevara. Cortez according to the letter, makes trips to the United States and Canada to buy pieces of tanks and other materials as if they were for Mexico. The goods are shipped to the Transcontinental Corp in Mexico City and then onto Cuba.

Document # 104-10015-10028 is a one page handwritten note. It is dated July 11, 1967. It looks like it might be a note to Anne Egerter. It is to an “Anne.”

Document # 104-10015-10029 is another one page handwritten document. It is from CI/RA/E. It is signed Jean M (something, I can’t make it out.) It states, “This document is evidently the request for the chronology attached-per the note in the blue ball point by “RBR” and the notation in red on the 5 + 7 on top which states work began at 1030 hours, 4 Aug ’67. Note it is not the transmittal document as the dates is July ’67 and the chronology goes to Feb ’68.” It is dated September 22, 1975.

Document # 104-10015-10083 is a one page report from the JM/WAVE station to the Director, “No WAVE traces Jack Ruby alias Abe Rubenstein who identified by newsmedia as murderer of Lee Oswald.” There is a signature at the top right. It looks like J. Moughan which might be the signature in the above described document.

Document # 104-10015-10085 is a two page report from JM/WAVE to Director. The RIF title for the document is, “Miami Cuban exile community has started its adjustment to realities of world politics in aftermath of Pres. Kennedy’s death. The rest of the report is almost entirely illegible.

It mentions a Manuel Rodriguez of 5319 Columbia, Dallas, Texas.

Document # 104-10015-10045 is a one page routing and record sheet. It is from RID/AN to CI/LS, CI/OPS, CI/IC, SR/CI, Mr. Scelso, Annette(?), SR/CI/K/TR, and 2BO3 Annette. It is dated 9/10/63.

Document #104-10015-10064 is a one page report from Director to Mexico City. CIA wants to know if Lee Oswald wanted to fly to Cuba right away, or have his wife join him there in Mexico and then leave for Cuba, or did he plan to return to the States first and then leave for Cuba later. CIA speculates that Oswald wanted to make a quick escape after assassinating the President. Mr. Scelso’s “name” appears over that of “by authority of Thomas H. Karamessines ADDP”. This reminded me of Document # 104-10004-10199, from “The Third Batch” where it stated “The report also states that information on U.S. citizens trying to contact Soviet bloc embassies is always passed onto the Deputy Director for Plans, or his assistant and permission must be obtained to pass such information onto other government agencies. Only in absolute emergencies is the Mexico City Station authorized to pass such information directly to the FBI offices in the U. S. Embassy.”

Now if “Mr. Scelso” can do things under the authority of the Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, and “Mr. Scelso” is a pseudonym, then that is very interesting.

At a small conference in Boston, Massachusetts at MIT October 1, 1995 John Newman said in response to a question about whether he feels Oswald did it alone or was it a CIA operation, ” First of all I don’t have a definitive answer to your question… An institutional plot, and by that I mean a board meeting, the head people of the CIA sitting down and saying let’s whack Kennedy and set Oswald up as the patsy, I think that’s out the window now. Why in the hell would they plan to kill Kennedy and use one of their own people and write cables to the FBI, Navy, and the State Department and sign their names on the bottom of them? That would draw attention to themselves. So, I think that that idea, in other words the extent to which Oswald is being used and involved in all of these low level CIA operations is in a sense exculpatory in terms of the “institutional plot” theory. However, the type of information that I have shown you tonight I think is entirely consistent with the theory, and I say just that, a theory, that a renegade faction or a bad apple, or two or three set up Oswald. He was the perfect patsy by virtue of all of the sensitive offices that held files on him and the type of operations that he was becoming involved in.”

Needless to say I disagree. So, by the way, did Dan Alcorn and Jim Lesar afterwards at a local Chinese restaurant. The CIA did lie to the FBI, Navy and State Dept. with the October 10, 1963 cable, and did sign their names, and in many cases false names, to the bottom of documents as part of some as yet unknown and undefined deception story that involved Lee Harvey Oswald. This was the whole gist of John’s presentation. Whether this deception story was part of a, or the conspiracy to kill President Kennedy is unknown at this time and should not be ruled out. It certainly should not be ruled out until all of the data is in. I was struck by John’s argument against the “institutional plot” theory when he said why would they use one of their own guys? Is this Mr. Newman confirming that Oswald was a CIA man of some type?

I think John Newman should take another look at the Mr. “Scelso” question in regards to this deception story and what kind of names are being signed on these dcouments whatever the ramifications of the deception story might be.

Document # 104-10015-10065 is a one page document from Director to Mexico City. It is a cable concerning tracing the license numbers of cars issued to Carol J. Soles, Richard J, Aranda, and Harry Lee Saffe. It is dated November 24, 1963. Mr. “Scelso” appears over the typed name of Mr. Karamissenes. “Scelso” is also the authenticating officer. CIA is awaiting information from ODENVY on other plates mentioned in Mexi 7030 and 7043. Mexi 7030 is Document # 104-10015-10092 from “The Third Batch”.

Document # 104-10015-10107 is a one page document from CIA to Mexico City. The Mexico City station is reporting that it has photos of the same unidentified American type who is possibly Oswald entering Cuban Embassy on October 15. This cannot be Oswald as he supposedly left Mexico City on October 3. Lee has a room at the Dallas YMCA on October 3, 1963. (See WC Vol. 20 p. 197 Hullen Exhibit 12.) Oswald is hired by the TSBD on October 16. The document also states it is attempting to establish when Oswald entered and left Mexico. They also requested a photo of Oswald so that the station can check all recent coverage for identity.

Document # 104-10015-10116 is a one page document from CIA to Mexico City. It says it is from Curtis to Lloyd K. Desmond. CIA requests verbatim transcript in English of all Oswald intercepts and other take which could relate to him. They want it all without worrying about how long it is. “Feel free to abandon cablese and reliance on references and express and explain yourself fully.”

The document also mentions that Jose Rodriguez Molina is not involved in assassination and has been released.

“Scelso” appears in the upper right next to orig.

Document # 104-10015-10123 is a one page cable from CIA to Mexico City. An FBI agent, Eldon Rudd (See James P. Hosty “Assignment Oswald” (Arcade Publishing: New York) 1996 p. 36) left with two copies each of 6 photos of the person suspected of being Oswald on special flight for Dallas. The document itself does not state Rudd’s name or even mention the FBI. There are 4 postponements in the document, 1.) ODENVY, 2.) GALBOND, 3.) Curtis, 4.) PBRUMEN. However, these aliases are to be re-reviewed in December. “He carrying envelope with 1 copy each photo for airmail special from Dallas to Galbond at home as per telecon with Curtis. 1 copy each these photos plus copy each two photos showing same person exiting PBRUMEN embassy forwarded in HMMA 22533 leaving regular pouch tonight.” They then ask if HQ wants them to send a staffer with additional photo. The answer is yes.

Document # 104-10015-10124 is another one page cable. It is from Mexico City to CIA director. It is dated November 23, 1963. Some of the text from the Sept 28 intercept is given. They believe that the unidentified person is Oswald but the tape is reported erased prior to receipt of the second call. This was sent to “Scelso”.

Document # 104-10015-10130 is 7 pages. It is from the Deputy Director of Plans, Richard Helms to the Director of the FBI, Mr. Hoover, attn: Mr. Papich. This is the transcripts of the Sept. 28 and Oct. 1 intercepts. In the second paragraph of the cover letter to Hoover they state that the person who identified himself as Lee Oswald is the same in both calls. Forwarded as attachment B are transcripts of three phone calls, Sept 27, Oct. 1 and Oct. 3. CIA believe that Oswald went to the Soviet Embassy to try to get a visa to go to Russia and live, and that failing that he went to the Cuban Embassy to try to get a transit visa so he could go to Cuba and wait for the granting of the Soviet visa. The CIA says that Silvia Duran agrees with this conclusion.

Document # 104-10015-10168 is a one page cable dated November 29, 1963. It is probably from Mexico City to CIA. It says it is from COS and to Immediae DIR, then RYBAT GPFLOOR. It deals with Alvarado.

Document # 104-10015-10202 is a one page cable to Curtis from Knight. CIA wants Mexican authorities to arrest Silvia Duran and question her.

Questions may be provided to Mexican authorities but but no Americans should confront Silvia Duran or be in contact with her.

Document # 104-10015-10207 has two pages. One is a record and routing sheet. The second is a cable containing biographic and background information on Gilberto Alverado Ugarte.

Document # 104-10015-10217 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City station. Someone feels that “Erthyroid 3” should go to Mexico even though Alvarado may be in Mexican hands. “Scelso” appears over where a signature should go above “by the authority of Richard Helms”.

Document # 104-10015-10218 is a one page cable from CIA to the White House: ATTN: Mr. McGeorge Bundy, the FBI and Dept. of State attn: Mr. U. Alexis Johnson. This cable reports on the reactions of Cuban Embassy personnel to Silvia Duran’s arrest. “John Scelso” appears twice in the document.

Document # 104-10015-10219 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City requesting information on interrogations of Duran and Alverado. J. C. King is the releasing officer. “John Scelso” appears at upper right next to orig.

Document # 104-10015-10221 is a three page cable from the CIA to the White House, State and the FBI. This is in regard to anonymous calls made to the office of the U.S. Naval Attache in Camberaar, Australia by a man who claims to have had knowledge about a Soviet plot to kill President Kennedy. This also originates with “Scelso”.

Document # 104-10015-10222 is a one page cable from the Director, CIA to Mexico City. CIA is whining that time is of the essence in reporting what the Mexicans are learning from Alvarado and Duran. This too originates from “John Scelso” C/WH/3. R. W. Herbet signs off for J.C. King as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10224 is a one page cable. Again, “John Scelso” appears at upper right. This cable went to White House, State, and FBI. Silvia Duran, who was rearrested was released on November 28, 1963. She will remain under close surveillance. “Scelso” also appears over space where a signature should be for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10228 is a one page cable form CIA and was sent to the White House, State Dept, and FBI. First sketchy report on Alverado interrogation is that he is telling the same story. One difference is he did not recognize Silvia Duran when he did to CIA personnel. Mexican official doubts Alverado’s story and will begin work to “break” him. “Scelso” appears twice, once upper right at orig. and above “by authority of Richard Helms”.

Document # 104-10015-10229 is a 12 page cable from CIA to the White House, State Dept. and the FBI. It is a translation of a report by the Mexican police on interrogation of Silvia Duran, her husband Horacio Duran and others. “Scelso” appears twice on p. 12 over the releasing officer, J.C. King and J. M. Whit- (something). It appears to have originated from B. Reichardt in WH/3/Mexico.

Document # 104-10015-10231 is a two page cable. This is a wild one. This originates from “John Scelso” C/WH/3. It is dated November 29, 1963. It went to the White House, State Dept. and the FBI. A report alleging that there was advance knowledge on the assassination of President Kennedy. On November 4 1963 a U.S. Army PFC. Eugene B. Dinkin, went AWOL from his unit HQ Co. U.S. Army general depot, Metz, France. He was scheduled for a psychiatric examination that same day. He apparently entered Switzerland using a false Army identification card with forged travel orders. On November 6 and 7, 1963 he appeared in the press room of the United Nations office in Geneva and told reporters he was being persecuted. He voluntarily returned to his unit on November 11, 1963.

On November 26, 1963 a Geneva journalist named Alex Des Fontaines who was a stringer for TIME-LIFE and was a correspondent for Radio Canada was reported to be filing a story about Dinkin’s story. Dinkin said that “they” were plotting against Kennedy and that “something” would happen in Texas. The last paragraph of the cable is interesting, “All aspects of this story were known, as reported above, by U. S. Military authorities and have been reported by Military attache cable through Military channels.”

Well, what are we to make of this?

Document # 104-10015-10236 is a one page memorandun for record from Birch D. O’Neal, C/CI/SIG to “Scelso”. It is about a discussion with Papich of the FBI on the interrogation of Alverado. Apparently “Mr. Scelso” has the telephone extension 5613.

Document # 104-10015-10246. It is a one page document. I have never seen a document quite like this one. It is part of, what I beleive are several pages of something cataloging telephone conversations and summarizing the content of those phone conversations. In other words, this one page does not look like page one. I think it is a phone conversation between Rafael Lozano and Dudley Doust.

Document # 104-10015-10251 is a one page cable from CIA to Mexico City. It is very similar to Document # 104-10015-10176 from “The Third Batch” which is a cable from CIA to presumably the Mexico City station. It requests that double agents not initiate discussion on the assassination but to be alert and report any comments on the assassination. Document # 104-10015-10251 tells the stations double agents that they cannot direct pointed questions to C/O’s but should be alert to and reprot any comments on the assassination. They should not make any reference to Oswald, Duran or Alverado et. al. or to investigative matters beng taken. “Scelso” signs off as releasing officer for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10252 is a one page cable from CIA to Mexico City. “HQS has received report on day of President’s Kennedy’s assassination Cubana aircraft delayed its departure Mexico City five hours 1700 to 2200 awaiting important passenger who arrived Mexico City airport in private twin motor aircraft at 2130 hours Mexi time. Passenger transfered directly to Cubana plane without going through customs or immigration. Traveled in pilots cabin to Havana. Request you attempt identify and determine reason unusual actions at airport.”

“Scelso” signs off as the releasing officer for J.C. King. Desmond Fitzgerald C/SAS signs off as the authenticating officer.

Document # 104-10015-10253 is a one page cable from CIA to White House, Dept. of State, and the FBI. Alverado admited in writing that his whole story was false. It originates with “John Scelso” C/WH/3. “Scelso” appears as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10254 is a one pagge cablefrom Director to (?). “Scelso” originates again. CIA wants to know how confession was obtained by LIETEMPO from Alverado. I love it, they actually ask, “Was Alverado mistreated? Much?” Another interesting piece is paragraph 4, “The question of whether Oswald acted solely on his own has still not been finally resolved.” This is on November 30, 1963. “Scelso” appears as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10256 is a one page cable from Mexico City to CIA. Tapes of conversations of Cuban ambassador pouched on November 29 by RYBAT. This was shown to “Mr. Scelso”.

Document # 104-10015-10257 is a two page cable from Mexico City to CIA dated November 30, 1963. It relates to Alverado story. This was shown to “Scelso”.

Document # 104-10015-10260 is a two page cable from Mexico City to CIA. It is a cable on Alverado’s background. This was shown to “Scelso”. It is a duplicate of Document # 104-10015-10116.

Document # 104-10015-10265 is a one page cable from Mexico City to CIA. Sylvia Duran and her husband have already been arrested. Presently under interrogation by Mexican authorities. Lic. Luis Echeverria will try to keep CIA informed and will try to keep arrest secret.

Document # 104-10015-10266 is a 2 page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It reports on the entrances and exits at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico, especially of Kostikov’s. Interestingly we get initials instead of signatures. GEG is the authenticating officer and WCC is the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10267 is a one page cable. In January of 1963 Silvia Duran was seen in two cars with Texas plates. The cable asks for information on these plates.

Document # 104-10015-10268 is a one page document. I can’t really tell who it is from or sent to. William C. Curtis appears at the top left. It is dated November 23, 1963. P-8593 appears three times. It is information from U.S. consulate Nuevo Laredo following at 1900 hours Mexico time to Ambassador.

A.) HARVEY OSWALD LEE ENTERED MEXICO AT NUEVO LAREDO ON 26 SEPT.

B.) SAID AGE 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION PHOTOGRAPHER, RESIDENCE NEW ORLEANS, DESTINATION MEXICO CITY.

C.) MEXICAN TOURIST CARD NO. 24085

The document states he left by auto on October 3, 1963.

Paragraph 4 is interesting, “WILL ASK LITEMPOS TO CHECK HOTELS IN MEXICO CITY TO TRY TO CHECK ON OSWALD OR LEE’S ACTIVITIES IN MEXICO.”

Did they deliberately mangle Oswald’s name? Were they taking no chances and covering themselves to check two names? I have never seen it Harvey Oswald Lee before.

Document # 104-10015-10270 is a one page document similar to the one above in style. The legat in Mexico was advised of Duran’s arrest. He had not heard of it so this was taken as a good sign of Echevarria’s control of the situation.

Document # 104-10015-10271 is a one page report to CIA on a man with a green ford California 1963 license plate KVU 191 who parked near the Soviet Embassy.

Document # 104-10015-10272 is a one page report. Analysis completed on SOVEMB LIENVOY 18 Nov. thru 21 Nov. No items pertaining to Oswald. This is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10073 released Nov. 21, 1995.

Document # 104-10015-10273 is a one page report from G. P. Gestetner to Director CIA. It is a summary of local contacts of Ivan Gavrilovitch Alferiev.

Document # 104-10015-10274 is a two page cable from R. L. Easby to Director, CIA. Echeverria told COS Duran (was) completely cooperative and gave written statement attesting to two visits by Oswald.

Document # 104-10015-10275 is two pages. This is a telephone transcript. It is in Spanish. The relevant portion is translated into English. Someone informs somebody else that Oswald has been shot. The translator somehow feels as thought the one reporting the news of Oswald’s shooting, “… had a smirk on his face.”

Document 3 104-10015-10276 is a one page cable is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10064.

Document # 104-10015-10277 is a handwritten note to COS. It is dated November 24, 1963 “My suggestion is to do nothing with it here yet.” I believe this has something to do with Silvia Duran.

Document 3 104-10015-10278 is a one page cable identifying owners of certain car license plates. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10065.

Document # 104-10015-10283 is a one page cable from Mexico City to CIA. Re: Stations LIFEAT coverage of the residence of Soviet Cultural Officer Svyatoslav Fedorovich. Kuznetsov. Identified KGB. No calls whatever Nov 18-21, 1963. One personal to wife Nov. 22.

Document # 104-11105-10284 is a one page cable from Mexico City to CIA. Kazantsev, Konstantinov, and Shchuchkin were similarly watched. No calls in or out for coverage 1640-2000 hours Nov. 23, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10285 is a one page cable similar to the two above. LIPAWN-1 22 Nov. audio product, of target SOVMILAT Alexsandr Georgiyevich Sidorov, of no pertinence.

Document # 104-10015-10286 is a two page cable from Mexico city to CIA. This reports on a phone intercept between Yugoslav Ambassador Gustav Vlahov and Soviet Ambassador Bazarov. At one point Vlahov says, “I knew that he was wounded even before the Americans”, referring to President Kennedy.

Document 3 104-10015-10287 is a four page cable. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10273.

Document # 104-10015-10288 is a three page report on unreported local contacts with Kostikov. On the top left of the first page it looks like Oswald has a P file. Oswald is circled, there is a capitol P- but no number, there is then another P-7455. I think there is a redaction here. Yet, the documentation says it is open in full. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10080. The Oswald P- does not appear on document # 104-10015-10080.

Document # 104-10015-10289 is a two page cable from R. L. Easby to director, CIA. It reports that Oswald ordered the rifle from Kleins, ordered in name Alek Hidell but sent to P.O.Box under Oswald’s name, when arrested Oswald had Selective Service card in his possession in name Alek Hidell, this name appeared on F.P.C.C. leaflets in New Orleans although Oswald name also appeared underneath. The FBI had not established as of noon November 23, 1963 whether Hidell exists or alias used by Oswald. There have been no Mexi traces of Hidell or variants. They are checking possibility that person photographed entering Soviet embassy October 1 and 4 and Cuban embassy October 15 might be Hidell. They are supplying Mexicans multiple copies of FBI photos of Oswald and station photos of unidentified man appropriately cropped for hotel investigation.

Well, this is very interesting. Oswald left Mexico October 3, right? So, it cannot be Oswald on October 4 and 15, right? What is the “hotel investigation” supposed to be?

Document # 104-10015-10290 is a three page cable from R. L. Easby to Director, CIA. Silvia Duran and her husband were taken into custody at her home with members of her family who were having a party. All taken to jail. She attributed the reason for her arrest to a cousin whom she does not like who told authorities about Oswald visits to the embassies. She does not know where Oswald stayed while in Mexico.

Document # 104-10015-10291 is a one page cable quoting Mexican daily paper “Excelsior” of Nov. 25, 1963. It’s the classic line of Oswald in Mexico City. Paragraph 2 quotes an AP story of Sept. 7, 1963, quoting Castro, “We are prepared to fight them and answer in kind. United States leaders should think that if they are aiding terrorist plans to eliminate the Cuban leaders, they themselves will not be safe.”

Document # 104-10015-10292 is a one page cable of a phone intercept translation. No word expressed over phone of assassination. Oswald P; It appears to be a semicolon instead of a dash.

Document # 104-10015-10293 is a one page cable from Mexico to CIA. I don’t understand this document so I’ll quote it. “According LIFIRE DIP couriers ref Mexi for Cuba 12 Nov. via Cubana 465, returned Mexi 18 Nov. via Cubana. According LIENVOY, they probably left for New York on 23 Nov. via Aeronaves flt 451. Anayev (phonetic) of Sov consulate New York phoned Sovemb 23 Nov. asking for info which flight couriers taking. comment: this only infrequently occurs. Asst. consul Kostikov handled the call from New York”.

Document # 104-10015-10294 is a two page cable from G.F. Gestetner to Director, CIA. It is titled, “Movements in and out of Soviet embassy by Kostikov and Alferyev”.

Document # 104-10015-10295 is a two page cable from Mexico City to CIA. The legat in Mexico advises that resident in Laredo of his organization is trying to get all details re: method of travel of anyone who might have traveled with Oswald and any similar info on Oswald or “Alek Hidell”. All flights from Nuevo Laredo and Monterey to and from Mexico checked, no evidence of air travel. Similar checks are being done on Jack Rubenstein, alias, Jack Ruby. Also, attempting to get data on where Oswald stayed in Mexico. The first job is difficult as Mexican immigration records are horrible.

Document # 104-10015-10296 is a two page cable from Mexico City to CIA. It repeats info on Cabaca and Portuondo in document # 124-10018-10362. It adds that the information came from William Durkin, a narcotics rep. who received it from a member of the Police Bank of Mexico, who is one of two Interpol reps. here.

Both callers are well known anti-Castrotites. Cabaca now under interrogation by police. FBI notified and they will contact Portuondo. Cabaca’s arrest reported in papers.

Document # 104-10015-10297 is a one page cable reporting on Alverado allegation and requesting a name trace. This is the beginning of the Alverado story investigation.

Document # 104-10015-10299. This looks like a small post-it-note. It says, “Silvia Duran knew where Oswald was staying in Mexico. Could we get this address from her?” It is dated November 25, 1963.

Document 3 104-10015-10301 is a one page document giving background and other information on Alverado.

Document # 104-10015-10306 is a one page cable. It states simply, “Ref: Dir 74830 Pls pouch photo Oswald.” It is dated October 15, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10307 is a one page dispatch. It is from Chief of Station of Mexico City to the Chief of the Western Hemisphere Division. “Attached are copies of the only photographs obtained from LIEMPTY on 1 October 1963, which appear to be an American. The same man visited the Soviet embassy on 4 October 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10308 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director. “According to VOA (Voice of America) Lee H. Oswald, age 24, has been arrested in Dallas possibly in connection assassination of President Kennedy. Request priority pouch photo of Oswald so that station can check LIEMPTY coverage for iden. Forwarding soonest copies of only visitor to Sovemb (Extremely interesting, 28 is typed and crossed out and a 1 is places above it,) Oct who could be indentical with Oswald.”

Document 3 104-10015-10309 is a one page telegram from the Foreign Service of the U.S. to the Sec. of State. It is dated Nov. 22, 1963. The Foreign Minister said that on his instructions the border between Mexico and the U.S. had been closed to all persons not personally and well known to the Mexican Government and hence above suspicion.

Document # 104-10015-10310 is a one page document. It looks like it is from Win Scott to J. C. (King?). “Reference is made to our conversation of 22 November in which I requested permission to give the Legal Attache copies of photographs of a certain person who is known to you.” Copies of these photographs were flown to Dallas by the Naval Attache. At a vertical right angle underneath the typed “Best Wishes” is written “Eldon Rudd of L.A. office took letter. S” Then in similar handwriting, “File: Lee Henry Oswald P-”

Document # 104-10015-10312 has two pages. It is from the Navy Dept. to U.S. Embassy Mexico city. It is a copy of a photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald. It is the October 1956 Marine induction photo. There is handwriting that says it was received November 26, 1963. The second page is a xerox of the letter envelope. It has a postmark of Washington, D.C. 5PM. It is addressed to Mr. Winfield Scott, Embassy of United States of America, Mexico City, Mexico. It is from the Navy Department, chief of Naval Operations, Washington, 25 D.C.

Document # 104-10015-10313, these are telephone transcripts and all three pages are in Spanish.

Document 3 104-10015-10315 is a one page cable from CIA to Mexico City requesting reports on Soviet embassy activity and reactions to assassination.

Document 3 104-10015-10317 from CIA to Mexico City. “No need send staffer with photos. We have asked Navy for photos again, but Mexi can see Oswald’s picture sooner on the press wire. We have just reemphasized to ODENVY (FBI) HQRS the sensitivity of photos.”

Document # 104-10015-10318 is a one page cable requesting information on Kostikov, specifically, any travel outside Mexico City apart from those to Tijuana, Ensenda, and Mexicali in March and September 1963 and Veracruz 6 Jan 63; hour by hour whereabouts 22 November and all details his activities during November; names and background not already reported; any unusual activity involving KGB and Soviet Embassy personnel 17-30 November.

Document # 104-10015-10319 is a one page cable stating, “Kostikov traveled in September with Ivan Gavrilovich Alfereyev (201-236701) who in close contact Cuban diplomats during February 1962 tdy quito. Request reporting and coverage Alferyev as with Kostikov.”

Document # 104-10015-10320 “ODENVY says that photos of man entering soviet embassy which Mexi sent to Dalals were not of Lee Oswald. Presume Mexi has doubled checked dates of these photos and is also checking all pertinent other photos for possible shots of Oswald.”

Document # 104-10015-10323 is a one page cable from R. L. Easby to Director CIA. This is a list of persons who flew Mexico to U. S. (Wouldn’t a list of the reverse be more important?) who might be identical with Lee Oswald.

A. Mexicana flt. 800 to Chicago 1 Nov, Lee Martin
B. Same flt 12 Nov., Wilford Oswalt
C. Branif flt. 50 to San antonio 8 Nov, William Oswald

Unexplained is who these people are, what they look like and why the CIA would think they look like Oswald.

Document # 104-10015-10323 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is a copy of document # 104-10015-10123, however this copy has no postponements while document # 104-10015-10123 has 4. You figure it out.

Document # 104-10015-10324 is a two page cable. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10124.

Document # 104-10015-10325 is a two page cable from G. F. Gestetner to Director , CIA. It reports no other travel by Kostikov. It seems to be a response to document # 104-10015-10318.

Document # 104-10015-10326 is a telephone transcript of call to Soviet Embassy 11 Nov 63. It is three pages, dated Nov. 23, 1963. part of the cable is in Spanish. Douglas J. Feinglass is identified as the translator because he is credited as being the one who thinks the “Northamerican” spoke terrible, hardly recogniziable Russian.

John Newman mentioned Mr. Feinglass’ name at MIt in his presentation given October 1, 1995. John then referred to a document released by the Review Board: “Now in this stack of documents there is a much better version of Mr. Feinglass’ name, who is described as a transcriber, I actually believe that that is a pseudonym, it is probably Mr. Parasol (sic?) would be his real name, and we know that from various sources as a transcriber. But I would like to draw your attention to the marginalia in this newspaper article, you can see it in the lower left hand portion of the page. It says here, ‘the caller from the Cuban Embassy was unidentified until headquarters sent traces on Oswald and…’ do you see what it says after that, ‘voices compared.’! (See Document # 104-10125-10001 from the 39 CIA document released in September, 1995.)

How do you compare voices in a transcript? No, you need the intercept. You need the tape. You can compare statements in a transcript. Not voices.

“Douglas J. Feinglass” is a name along with “John Scelso” that is fictious and the research commuity should keep an eye out for these fictitious names in these documents.

Document # 104-10015-10327 is two pages. It is dated November 23, 1963. One page is a routing and record sheet. The r & r sheet has handwriting that looks like it could be “Scelso’s” that says, “To do memo of conversation of this date with Echevaria. I advise Echevaria later that the Roderiguez Molina arrested-Dallas has nothing to do with Kennedy assassination”.

The cable is a request from Echevaria to the COS for all information on Rodriguez Molina. Cable originates from R.L.E., who is also the authenticating officer. W.C.C. is the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10328 is a cable from CIA to Mexico City requesting a review of all LIENVOY tapes and transcripts since September 27. CIA requests soonest dispatch, staffer if necessary, full transcripts and original tapes if available.

Document # 104-10015-10329 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It requests dates and activities of Oswald’s most recent stay thru 22 Nov. in U.S. It is from G. F. Gestetner.

Document # 104-10015-10332 gives information on cars that appeared at the Cuabn Embassy Oct. 21, and 24, 1963. It is a duplicate of Document # 104-10015-10092.

Document # 104-10015-10333 is a three page cable from Mexico city to Director, CIA on the movements of Kostikov. Information came from LIMITED. It starts with Nov. 18.

Document # 104-10015-10334is a one page cable fromJeremy L. Niarcos to MFR. It is titled “Mexico City Station support activities assignments this date re: assassination.” It is dated 11/22/63. This is a horrible copy of the original document and barely legible. It reports the activities of LIEMPTY, the following three seem to be part of LIEMPTY, LICALLA, LIMITED, LILYRIC, and there seems to be another, a fourth, that ends with ENDE. LIEMBRACE and LIFEAT do not subdivide, at least not in this document, and appear to be as important as LIEMPTY.

Someone, “Scelso”?, likes what LIEMBRACE is doing?

Document # 104-100015-10335 is a five page cable from Mexico City to Director. It is titled “Transcript of call to Soviet Embassy, probably Oswald”. Most of the document is in Spanish. Interestingly, in reference to the October 1, 1963, phone call to the Soviet Embassy someone has written in “Long Distance?”

Document # 104-10015-10336 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. I love this document. A complete recheck of all visitors to Cuban Embassy August through first half November shows no evidence of Oswald visit.

Document # 104-10015-10337 is a two page cable basically reporting that all is normal at the Soviet Embassy on the morning of November 22, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10338 is a three page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. A reporter from the newspaper Novedades asked for Soviet Embassy statement on the asassination.

Document # 104-10015-10340 is a one page cable. It is information on Silvia Duran and request that she be arrested and held by Merxican authorities. There is a lot of handwriting by “Scelso” ? It list’s Oswald’s P files as P-8593.

Document # 104-10015-10341 is a one page cable from Lawrence F. Barker to COS. It is a memo for COS. Barker requests that the Mexican government be asked to put a police cordon around the Cuban Embassy and require all visitors to identify themselves.–entering and exiting.

Document # 104-10015-10347 is a nine page cable from L.F. Barker to Director, CIA. It is information obtained from an interview with Alverado Ugarte. This is Alverado Ugarte’s whole story, which is a total lie.

Document # 104-10015-10349 is a one page cable from G.F. Gestetner to Director, CIA. The Mexican Secret Service initiated heavy surveillance of Soviet Embassy starting the afternoon of Nov. 23, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10351 is a one page cable from L. F. Barker to Mana, and Director. An update on Ugarte, who now claims to be a Communist Party penetration agent for the Nicaraguan government. The text doesn’t exactly tell you that but that is what they are talking about.

Document # 104-10015-10352 is a one page cable from W.C.Curtis to Director, CIA, dated November 26, 1996. Ambassadoe Mann has suggested to State Department that an ODENVOY [FBI] officer be sent to Mexico to give him more details of Oswald/Rubenstein cases.

Document # 104-10015-10354 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is also addressed to Brent and Knight. It is dated November 26, 1963. Alverado’s story is being checked as thouroughly as possible. He has been moved to a safe address.

Document # 104-10015-10355 is a one page cable from COS, Mexico City to Director, CIA. Dr. Jose Guillermo Aguire of Mexico told following to Pete Moraga USIS officer on 26 November. Maria Rodriguez widow of Lopez said a son in law of hers who lives in New Orleans was well acquainted with Lee Oswald. He runs a Spanish language school and is anti-Castro. According to Maria he has taped conversations with Oswald.

Document # 104-10015-10357 is a 15 page interview of Silvia Tirado Duran. Most of the document is in Spanish. Also included are two photos each of Silvia Duran and Horacio Duran Navarro.

Document # 104-10015-10361 is a nine page translation of conversation between Hernandez Armas and President Dorticos.

Document # 104-10015-10363 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated 26 November, 1963. It is about Alverado Ugarte. It asks for a name trace. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10297.

Document # 104-10015-10366 is a six page report on an interview of Alverado Ugarte.

Document # 104-10015-10367 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated November 26, 1996. The Mexican Secret Service initiated heavy surviellance of Soviet Embassy starting the afternoon of Nov. 23, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10368 is a four page cable from mexico City to Director, CIA. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10162.

Document # 104-10015-10369 is a two page report from Mexico City to the Director, CIA. It is dated 11/26/63. This is a wierd one. LICENT 0-1 said 25 November that Ana Veleria Szekely Duno Tendler and husband David Duno Tendler left Mexi for Dallas. This is being reported because Valeria and her mother Elizabeth Shelly are close to Judith Ferreto Segura. A letter from (?) ester Chapa Tijerina to Peking, China mentioned that Shelly had been accepted by Chinese-Latin America Society of Friendship to work in China. The Chinese said that it is too cold to come in the winter so they suggest coming in the spring instead.

Now what does this have to do with anything?

Document # 104-10015-10370 is a one page document from Mexico City to the Director, CIA. Alverado Ugarte now claims to be a Communist Party penetration agent.

Document # 104-10015-10371 is a one page document from Merida (whatever that is) to Director, CIA. it is a cable dated 11/26/63 stating that Cubemb phoned MMariano Garcia Perez and Jose Lian Martin. I really can’t make much sense of this one. Something about a meeting being changed.

Document # 104-10015-10391 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated 11/27/63. The CIA wants neither Silvia Duran nor the Cubans to get the impression that Americans are behind her arrest, “want Mexican authorities to take responsibility for whole affair.” It is a duplicate of document #104-10015-10187.

Document # 104-10015-10393 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA, dated 11/27/63. This is from Richard Helms. It has “Curtis from Knight” in it.. Helms basically tells Mexi that Ambassador Mann is pushing the Alverado Ugarte case too hard and that it could create a flap with the Cubans which could have serious repercussions. It is a duplicate of document #104-10015-10186.

Document # 104-10015-10406 is a two page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. Ambassador Mann feels he is not being fully informed on Oswald/Rubenstein matters. FBI chief feels Ambassador’s request is a lack of confidence in him. COS likes the FBI chief and tried to assure him that that is not true.

Document # 104-10015-10407 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA dated 11/27/63 reporting that Alverado Ugarte’s story is being checked as thoroughly as possible, he has been moved to safe address and closer surveillance is being placed on Silvia Duran.

Document # 104-10015-10409 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. The FBI found out that Oswald stayed at the Hotel Del Comercio.

Document # 104-10015-10419 is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10195.

Document # 104-10015-10426 is a one page letter. It says on the RIF that who wrote it and who was to recieve it are withheld, however, it looks like it was written by Win Scott and sent to J.C. King. It says, “Dear JC”, it’s only a guess that it is J.C. King. I could be wrong. The letter concerns John Horton’s visit. Horton is returning to D.C. and Scott is sending copies of material with him, items mentioned in a cable to JC today. Today was November 27, 1963.

Document # 104-10015-10427 is a one page cable from Win Scott to Clark D. Anderson. This is a document reporting that Maria Rodriguez viuda de Lopez said she has a son-in-law living in New Orleans who was well acquintated with lee Oswald. The son-in-law is a Cuban named Arnesto Roderiguez who allegedly has a tape recorded conversation with Lee Harvey Oswald. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10355.

Document # 104-10015-10429 is a one page memorandum from Win Scott to Clark D. Anderson, Legat Attache. A copy of Ambassador Mann’s cable of 26 November 1963 is passed onto the legat.

Document # 104-10015-10430 is a duplicate of document # 104-10015-10426.

Document # 104-10015-10434 is a 9 page report titled “Lee H. Oswald/Soviet activities in Mexico city 18-24 November 1963 to include info on V.V. Kostikov and I.G. Alferiev.” It is dated November 27, 1963. It is a two page memo with seven page attachment. It was sent to Hoover through Papich. It lists those entering and exiting and some telephone calls. I see nothing of great importance in it.

Document # 104-10015-10437 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated 11/28/63. This originates with “John Scelso” FBI is reporting from “reliable indications” that Oswald was in New Orleans on September 19, 1963. Lee was in New Orleans applying for unemployment insurance on September 17 so if Alverado’s story is correct Oswald had to have flown to Mexico to receive his payoff on September 18. CIA now wants Mexi to regard Alverado as fabricator and tailor interrogation accordingly. “John Scelso” signs off in place of Richard Helms as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10438 is a two page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated 11/28/63. It is titled, “Mexi evaluation of Alverado story may have been seriously warped by a piece of misinformation which has crept into this case.”

I love that title. This too originates from “Scelso”.

“We have just heard by phone from Kingman… that Lee Oswald made a bank deposit of $5,000 dollars in the United States after he got back from Mexico on 3 October 1963.” This would tend to corroborate Alverado’s story. Kingman thinks that Curtis got the information about the bank deposit from an FBI man named Clark. The CIA knows of no bank account and has never heard of one. The FBI has never heard of this story. “A check of banks already made affirms that Oswald could not have made such a deposit.” That line is somewhat crossed out. FBI asks for source of this rumour. “Scelso” signs for Helms as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10015-10439 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. It originates from “John Scelso”. “To supplement our position as outlined in ref, we wish to stress there should be no let down in your effort to follow all leads and investigate all facts which bear on this case. We have by no means excluded the possibility that others as yet unknown persons may have been involved or even that other powers may have played a role. Please continue all your coverage of Soviet and Cuban installations and your liaison with Mexicans.” “Scelso” is the releasing officer.

Now what case are they referring to, the assassination or this Alverado story?

Document # 104-10015-10440 is a one page cable from CIA to the White House, State Dept. and the FBI dated 11/28/63. A British journalist named John Wilson, also known as John Wilson-Hudson, gave information to the American Embassy in London which indicated that an American gangster type named Ruby visited Cuba around 1959. This originates with “John Scelso”. Wilson was working in Cuba and was jailed by Castro before being deported. Wilson met an American gangster named Santos [Trafficante]. Trafficante could not return to the U.S. as there were several indictments against him so instead he lived in relative luxury in a Cuban prison. According to Wilson Ruby was a frequent visitor to Trafficante. Wilson says he once testified to the Eastland Committee of the U.S. Senate sometime in 1959 or ’60.

Document # 104-10015-10441 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. CIA tells Mexi not to turn Alverado over to the Mexicans. CIA wants to be informed if FBI attempts to sway the station to turn Alverado over to the Mexicans one way or the other. CIA believes Alverado may be a Nicaraguan agent. Erthyroid 3 has gone to Mexi as is to be available to Nic Embassy. FBI man Larry Keenan now in Mexi and sent to follow up leads on entire assassination. Station is advised to cooperate with him fully. “Scelso” signs of as releasing Officer for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10442 is a three page cable from CIA to the White House, FBI and Dept of State. Further interrogation of Alverado on the night of 26 November showed he was familiar with the Cuban Embassy in Mexico and the employees there. This is probably why the CIA was worried about Alverado. They knew his story was bogus but what he might know of the employees inside the Cuban Embassy would be of great concern to them. This cable originates from “John Scelso”. “John Scelso” signs off for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10443 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. FBI liaison officer oficially requests on behalf of FBI that Alverado be turned over to Mexican authorities. FBI says it understands that the Mexicans have a polygraphing capality and FBI requests that CIA have Alverado polygraphed by the Mexicans. CIA agrees to do this. “Scelso” signs off for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10445 is a one page cable from CIA to the White house, FBI and the Dept. of State. It is dated 11/28/63. This is official notice that Alverado has been turned over to Mexican authorities for further interrogation. The Nicaraguan Intelligence Service is dispatching a senior official to help in the interrogation. This originates with “Scelso” and “Scelso” signs for Helms.

Document # 104-10015-10446 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated 11/28/63. This originates with “Scelso”. The Document is in a response to a request for a special kind of man who speaks Spanish. The CIA responds that “No fluent Spanish speaking FLUTTER man available at all.” The RIF did not use FLUTTER and did not seem to distinquish fluttter from fluent. LC/FLUTTER seems to be some operation.

Document # 104-10015-10447 is an eight page telegram from Ambassador Thomas Mann to U. Alexis Johnson and Secretary Dean Rusk. Mann describes that after reading Oswald’s dossier he thought that Oswald must have gotten an assignment to do the assassination from someone somewhere as it seemed out of character for Oswald to do this on his own. Oswald seemed, to Mann, to be lazy, going from job to job and rebellious against society. Mann said this view of Oswald was strengthened by Oswald’s attempt to get a transist visa through Cuba, then an immigration visa to Russia so he could settle down in Odessa. Mann could not figure out why Oswald would want to live in Odessa unless he knew he would be living the good life once he got there. Mann did not think Khrushchev would hire Oswald but Castro would. Castro is, “the Latin type of extremist who reacts viscerally rather than intellectually and apparently without much regard for risks”. The Alverado story fits Mann’s views of Cubans. Mann also remembered the AP story about Castro threatening U.S. officials.

Mann is an extremely reckless individual who is wildly theorizing. He is accepting everythng as fact and wants swift movement. He thinks of himself as some kind of Dick Tracy.

Actually this goes back to an old argument of who is in charge the CIA chief of Station or the Ambassador. President Kennedy ordered that it be the Ambassador.

Document # 104-10015-10449 is a one page cable from Managua, Nicaragua to Director, CIA. “Station requested ERYTHROID-1 cooperation Mexi thru Major Jerez and if possible by sending ERYTHROID-3 Mexi. E-1 said Alverado in Mexi without ERYTHROID authority and passed off suggestion use Jerez but agreed immediately send E-3.”

I do wonder what ERYTHROID is.

Document # 104-10016-10002 is a one page cable from Manuaga to Director, CIA. It is dated 11/28/63. MANA wants to know if it is still desirable for E-3 to travel. If not they ask permission to inform Erythroid that Alverado is in hands of Mexi authorities.

Document # 104-10016-10003 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. “Request OPIM authorization turn Alverado over to LITEMPOS. This was seen by “Mr. Scelso”.

Document # 104-10016-10004 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA dated 11/28/63. This was seen by “Mr. Scelso”. Mr. Clark D. Anderson, legal attache told COS and Mann of rumor that Oswald deposited $5,000 dollars in a bank in the United States. Apparently this rumor was on Mexican radio and television. COS did not hear this on Mexi TV or radio. Feels sure that it was on Mexi radio or TV and Alverado may have heard this and incoprorated it into his story.

Document # 104-10016-10008 is a two page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA dated 11/28/63. All pertinent information from LIENVOY on Oswald case has been furnished to legat. COS is worried that the source of the informatiojn may leak out.

Document # 104-10016-10009 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. “Believe it would be useful to have Spanish speaking LCFLUTTER operator available Mexi certainly for Alverado and possibly for others. If HQS agrees please arrange soonest and advise.” This was the request that document # 104-10015-10446 is a response to.

Document # 104-10016-10010 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. Echevaria grateful that Alverado is being turned over to Mexican government.

Document # 104-10016-10018 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. “Cite Mexi 7188” is about all that is here.

Document # 104-10016-10028 is a one page memo from Win Scott to Clark D. Anderson. It is dated 11/29/63. “Attached is a ten-page statement of information obtained by Gobernacion during first detention of Subject.” Then there is the typical confidential source stuff. Naturally, it isn’t attached.

Document # 104-10016-10029 is two pages. One is a record and routing sheet. it is from CIRA/RS to IP/AN. It is a list of Consular personnel (Soviets) in Helsinki in October 1959. It strikes me as odd that this is in the midst of documents relating to Mexico City. The only Soviet official accredited to Finland as a soviet Consular official in October 1959 was GOLUB, Grigoriy Yevgenyevich (201- in SR/Bio). Golub stated that he was only person of officer rank in the consular section in May 1959. He had once had a part-time assistant, Mikhail Petrovich LYUBIMOV, who had departed sometime between Feb. and May 1959. The only help he had if any was purely secretarial. Sources consulted: AELADLE list of RIS personnel in Helsinki, Checklist of Soviet Officials Abroad (years 1955, 1956, 1959, 1960, 1961), 201 file for GOLUB, Grigorily Yevgenyevich “Lindy”. This is undated but before April 1, 1964.

Document # 104-10016-10031 is a three page document. One page is a small sheet. It is to Anne J. It is handwritten. “See (bottom?) document in 50-6-129/3 on this subject. I don’t know what FBI did in Nov. 64, but the (garro’s) house been talking about this for long time & she is said to be extremely bright.” There is then some typing, “Mr. White: 1. LA memo said they checked info Mexi-5621 and found it unsubstantiated. 2. Mr. Scott asked me to send this cable. 3. We will try to confirm or refute Mrs. G. D P.’s info and follow up.” Then the handwriting has a line from above the typing down and says, “She is also nuts”.

The other pages discuss Elena Garro de Paz, Elena Paz, (the daughter) and Debra Garro de Guervero Galvan. This two page report is titled, “Mexican Communists who had contact with Oswald and has not appeared in Warren Commission write ups in the press”. Elena and Deb are first cousins of three young Mexicans named Duran: Rueben, Horacio, and Lynn. Horacio is the husband of Silvia Duran. The document discusses the “twister” party. Horacio Duran works at “El Dia” newspaper. This was important news to someone as there is handwriting that says, “His employment, finally”.

Document # 104-10016-100036 is a one page cable from Managua to Director, CIA dated 11/23/63. It describes how ERYTHROID-3 is arriving. E-1 and E-3 have only been told that Alverado may have some info bearing on GPFLOOR. E-3 knows Alverado well and Alverado’s work with ERYTHROIDS. E-3 is much more likely to solve riddle than LCFLUTTER.

Document # 104-10016-10039 is a two page cable from COS Mexico City dated 11/28/63. It is a duplicate of document # 104-10016-10010.

Document # 104-10016-10041 is a duplicate of document # 104-10016-10009.

Document # 104-10016-10043 is a one page cable from R. L. Easby to MANA.

Easby is delighted to have ERYTHROID-3. A telephone number is given with dircetions that E-3 should ask for Mr. Daniels, identifying himself as Alberto Suarez.

Meeting to take place in lobby of Plaza Hotel. Time to be set by phone.

Document # 104-10016-10046 is a duplicate of document # 104-10016-10002.

Document # 104-10016-10049 is a one page cable from COS, Mexico City to C/research & Analysis. It is dated 02/25/70. That’s right, 1970. Odd, isn’t it? This is a dispatch from COS, Mexico City to Chief, WOMUSE/ Research & Analysis. There is a space on the dispatch marked Info and that says Chief, WH Division. The Subject is “Forwarding of personality file on Lee Harvey Oswald (201-289248)”.

The text reads, “Action Required: For inclusion in Subject’s Headquarters 201 file.”

“Forwarded herewith are the complete Mexico City personality files on Subject. Much of the material herein is no doubt available at Headquarters, but it is believed that your staff may find a complete review of the field file of interest and of historical significance.” There was an attachment, 6 volumes h/w. Where a signature would normally go on a business letter there is “for/John A. Probert”.

Document # 104-10017-10015 is missing.

Document # 104-10017-10016 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated 12/03/63. Richard Beymer, (phonetic) American called Cuban embassy from Acapulco 2 Dec. Unknown person speaking English, probably Brewer, called from Acalpulco 30 Nov Also. Asked for Silvia Duran who not there. Louisa Calderon told Beymere no response from Cuba yet. (Source LIENVOY). 2. Probably newspaperman awaiting visa for Cuba. No record Mexi. Request traces. FBI not advised.

Document # 104-10017-10020 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA dated 12/03/63. LITEMPO/4 asked for trace on U.S. Citizen Gilberto Lopez. Lopez arrived Mexico on 23 November en route to Havana. He has dissapeared. No record of trip to Havana. Subject left Mexi for havana on 27 Nov via Cubana (only passenger aboard) source LIFIRE.

Document # 104-10017-10026 is a two page cable from Madrid to the Secretary of State. This has a record and routing sheet. It is dated December 7, 1963. A local Reuters correspondent called to inform Embassy of a story that will run in Spanish-language New York weekly, “El TIEMPO”. Spanish police have detained since November 23, 1963 one Enrique Pascual Ruedolo Gongora, Cuban national, aged 45 who arrived that day from New York. Ruedolo has confessed plotting to kill President Kennedy.

CAS check that yes such a man is being held, however, Spanish police say he arrived November 29 and to the best of their knowledge has no connection with assassination. He apparently was expelled from U.S.

Document # 104-10017-10028 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA dated 12/07/63. LITEMPO/4 advised COS on 7 Dec that Alverado will be returned to Managua by TACA flight Number 773 departing Mexico at 0930 hours on 8 December. Please advise E-3.

Document # 104-10017-10029 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. E-3 returning MANA PAA flt 501, Dec 7, requests advise wife to meet him. Well, isn’t that sweet?

Document # 104-10017-10030 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated 12/07/63. The first line says “Subject LCFLUTTER indicated he fabricating facts of his story.”

Well, after reading more documents on Alverado than I ever wanted to I learned that Alverado has some connection to a CIA operation ERYTHROID and possibly to another operation LCFLUTTER. Remember, document #104-10016-100036 told us of Alverado’s work with ERYTHROID. Now Alverado is referred to as an LCFLUTTER. The first sentence of the second paragraph says, “When shown photos of Oswald during testing, deception patterns were evidenced.” I wonder where they got the photos from, and what kind of photos they were, were they of Oswald? What kind of testing did they submitt Alverado to?

Document # 104-10017-10032 is a one page cable. This is the name trace on Gilberto Policarpo Lopez.

Document # 104-10017-10054 is a two page document from American Embassy Portauprince, Hati to the Department of State. The DeMohrenschildt’s were interviewed on the morning of December 4, 1963. This includes a record and routing sheet. Nothing to startling in the interview, pretty much the standard official story from DeMohrenschildt.

Document # 104-10017-10059 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated December 5, 1963. LICALLA, LILYRIC and LIENVOY coverage of Kostikov and Alferye thru 30 Nov indicate no particular deviation of their mode activities, no travel outside Mexi.

Document 104-10017-10060 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. LITEMPO-4 reported to COS late 4 December that Gilberto Lopez crossed Laredo, Texas on 23 Nov, registered in Roosevelt Hotel Mexico City on 25 Nov. Departed as only passenger on Cubana flight on night 27 Nov. for Havana. LITEMPO-4 has a good photograph of Lopez taken at airport on departure. LITEMPOS runs airport so data re flights to Cuba available to them. Station did not report LIFIRE data to LITEMPO-4.

Document # 104-10017-10064 is a four page cable from COS Mexico City to Chief WH Division dated 12/05/63. There is a record and routing sheet. There are two pages summarizing known data on Lopez. This is signed by Willard C. Curtis. There is a xerox that seems to be for a phot but it did not come out.

Document # 104-10017-10066 is a one page cable from Willard Curtis to Memo for files. It is dated December 5, 1963. On December 3, 1963 LITEMPO/4 reported that one Gilberto Lopez U.S. Citizen who arrived in Mexico on 23 November 1963, “looked suspicious”. Lopez had a limited 15-day tourist card issued in Tampa , Florida, on November 20, 1963. Mexican government had “lost” him and were looking for him.

Document # 104-10017-10067 is a one page document from Michael C. Choaden to Willard Curtis. It is dated 12/04/63. This is a memorandum. The subject is, “New York Times article on OSWALD was accurate”, “was accurate” is handwritten in, the rest of it was typed. Carl Migdail visited Mr. Choaden on the morning of December 4, 1963. He brought with him a cutting from the Dec. 3, 1963 West coast edition of the NYT. The article was about Oswald’s stay in Mexico, “and went into great detail about where he stayed and who he saw.” Migdail asked if it was accurate. Choaden did not comment. Migdail felt certain that the NYT got its information from Luis Farias’ file. Well, who the hell is Farias?

Document # 104-10017-10070 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. E-3 is remaining in Mexico City until interrogation of Alverado is completed. E-3 will return with Alverado but not prior to December 7, 1963.

Document # 104-10017-10071 is a one page cable from Managua to Director, CIA. It is dated December 4, 1963. E-1 just read telelgram from E-3 announcing arrival and bringing Alverado today December 4. Need confirmation by 2:00 Pm as special handling and security precautions required.

Document # 104-10017-10083 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. “Station holding all reels from 22 November 63 for both Cuban and Soviet Embassies. Unless advised to contrary, station will erase routine tapes Soviet Embassy keeping normal two week lag. Can retain Cuban tapes as long as HQS. wishes.” I do think this means that they still had the Sept – October 1963 intercept tapes in December of 1963.

Dopcument # 104-10017-10085 is an eight page report on the interrogation report on Gilberto Alverado Lopez. It is dated December 5, 1963. It includes a record and routing sheet. It says it is from RI/AN to CI/RA. There is then a dispatch.

The dispatch states that the Alverado story is a lie and that a copy of this report was given to the FBI locally. I have two copies of this cable for some reason. The report is in Spanish.

Document # 104-10018-10011is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. It is dated. December 12, 1963. This originates from “John Scelso”. “Please do not erase any Soviet or Cuban tapes until further notice.” “Scelso” signs off for Helms. A very important document.

Document # 104-10018-10013 is a one page record and routing sheet. It is from RID/AN to CI/RA. Sorry, I don’t really know how to read these R & R sheets so I can’t tell what particular document accompanies this.

Document # 104-10018-10039 is a one page memorandum. It is dated December 10, 1963. It is from Registry to Winston Scott. It is titled “Internal station report on the travels of Vincent Lee. This concerns Lee’s travels between December 1962 and January 1963. The source is LIFIRE. Lee traveled from Mexico to Cuba on December 28, 1962. A passport number is given. Lee traveled from Cuba to Mexico on January 21, 1963. Elizabeth Mora’s travels are also listed.

Document # 104-100018-10043 is a five page report form DDP to Director, CIA, FBI atn: Sam Papich. The subject is Mexican Interrogation of Gilberto Alverado. This document is barely legible. They wanted to point out that local CIA agents did not use FBI credentials in interviewing Alverado. “Our officers use no credentials in Mexico City” Badges?! We don’t need any stinking badges!

Document # 104-10018-10044 is a one page document from the JMWAVE station to Director, CIA. It is dated December 10, 1963. “Jentons currently in Columbia on leave on provate business where inspecting mining property in interior of country. Prior departure informed us would be impossible contact because of uncertain itinerary. Plans return Miami late evening 11 Dec.” This was in a response to a request as to where Jetons was and how he could be contacted.

So who is Jentons and why is this an assassination record?

Document # 104-10018-10047 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated December 10, 1963. Six tapes on which interrogation of Gilberto Alverado done by Peter K. Woodhead being pouched by HMMA-22600 on 12 December. Copies given to legat.

Document # 104-10018-10053 is a one page cable from CIA to the White House, Department of State, and the FBI. It is titled, “Cable concerning the Lee Harvey Oswald case.” It is dated December 18, 1963. This document originates from “John Scelso”. Richard Thomas Gibson, U.S. citizen who was once associated with the F.P.C.C. was interviewed in Paris, France by U.S. consular officials to see if he had an information on Lee Harvey Oswald. He gave two stories.

One, in late summer 1962, while working for the F.P.C.C. in New York, Gibson got a letter from a Lee Bowmont in Ft. Worth, Texas enclosing a photo and a newspaper clipping on activity similar to F.P.C.C., and asking for information on F.P.C.C.. Gibson thinks he sent a routine reply enclosing literature on F.P.C.C.. At the time he did not assume that Lee Bowmont was an alias, but he feels it might have been Lee Oswald. Two, in Summer 1962, Gibson received a group of Trotskyites among whom may have been Lee Oswald. Gibson has no special reason for thinking this. “Scelso” signs off for Richard Helms as the releasing officer.

Document # 104-10018-10054 is a one page cable from CIA to White House, Department of State, and the FBI. It is dated December 18, 1963. This origiantes from “John Scelso”. Ricardo Santos, third Secretary of the Cuban Embassy of the Hague, had a pro-Castro brother in the United States. Efforts to identify this brother and confirm the report have so far not been sucessful. Dutch authorities believe that such a brother does exist but they have no further info. They are trying to identify him too. “John Scleso” signs off for Richard Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10057 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated December 20, 1963. This originates with Charlotte Bustos. This is a request that station photograph entire station file on Valeriy Valdimirovich Kostikov. Also request station subjective comments on file and relationships to other Soviets Mexi. This analysis would accompany photos if possible. “Little in HDQS on Kostikov and your info and study will be vital contribution to our presentation to Warren Commission.” Well, that’s interesting. It looks like Anne Egerter signed for Birch D. O’Neil. The handwriting is very small. “Scelso” signs off for Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10058 is a one page document from Mexico City to Director, CIA. Kostikov file being pouched, unable to remove true staffer names from file routine sheets, memos, etc.

Document # 104-10018-10066 is a two page dispatch from Chief of Western Hemisphere Division to COS Mexico City. This originates from OC/WH/3 [John Scelso]. This is the first time I saw an “O” in front of the “C”. It is basically a pat on the back to the wonderful job the Mexico City station did after the assassination. They report that Lee Oswald denied ever being in Mexico City except to Tiajuana which seem to confirm Hosty’s account of Oswald being asked about this. It is signed by Oliver G. Galbond.

Document # 104-10018-10067 is a 3 page document, one record and routing sheet and a two page memorandum. It is dated December 19, 1963. It is from R. L. Bannerman D/Security, CIA to the Deputy Director for Plans. Attention: [John Scelso] This is an important document. Subject White House Support (Security Aspects for Funeral of President John F. Kennedy) “During the period 24 through 27 November 1963, the Office of Security made available to the United States Secret Service and the Division of Security, United States Department of State, over one hundred professional personnel to assist in providing maximum protection for chiefs of state, heads of government, and chiefs of special delegations attending the funeral services for the late President John F. Kennedy.

“This support included handling of arrivals and departures at Dulles, Friendship, Andrews Air Force base, and National Airports; providing security escorts for dignitaries during all activities in the Washington, D.C. area; observation and control of crowds along the route of the funeral procession and during the services at Arlington National Cemetary; plus physical security surveys and maintenance of 24-hour watches at residences of visiting dignitaries. In addition, Office of Security personnel on standby at headquarters provided armed personnel for details, conducting name tracing and file reviews, and kept appropriate Agency officials and components advised of pertinent developments.

Requirements for Security Officers with language capabilities covering ten countries for assignment to foreign dignitaries and delegation. One “crank” message and four alleged threats were investigated and satisfactorily resolved. Office of Security personnel also assisted State Department and Secret Service agents in spotting and questioning suspicious appearing individuals along the route of the funeral procession.

Office of Security personnel operated under the cover of the agency to which they were assigned. Many of the individuals assigned have had prior experience in the protection of high level officials. The entire operation was conducted with a minimum of difficulties and represents a fine example of inter-agency cooperation.”

Well, shit. If this document doesn’t interest the hell out of you, then you really shouldn’t be in this research game. Exactly what role did “John Scelso” play in the security for the funeral of President Kennedy, if any? Who were these people from the CIA’s Office of Security? Doesn’t this document raise about a thousand questions? Were Jacqueline or Robert Kennedy aware of any of this? Was LBJ? Prior experience in protecting high level officials? Who exactly and where? Dallas?

Document # 104-10018-10068 is a 4 page document dated December 16, 1963. A car belonging to Hermino Duarte Martins. jr. was at the Cuban Embassy during the time that Lee Oswald was there. Also, information was received that one Robert Edmond Gallant, an inmate of the Santa Clara Prison Farm in California had been active in the anti-Castro underground in Mexico for the past six years under the name of General Roberto De Edmondo Cortes where it was said he had a secret army of 3,500 men throughout Mexico. He described this force as an anti-Castro force concentrating on Cuabn Communists in Mexico. He claims to have a “secret agent” working in the Cuban embassy here and alleges that Lee Oswald was in the Cuban embassy on July 12, 1963 to obtain a visa to Cuba. He claims that Oswald stayed in Mexico City for about a week and supposedly travelled here by airplane. Gallant was arrested by Mexican authorities and deported to the U.S. where he was wanted on forgery charges in California. The Mexi station has no corrobative information to substantiate any part of Gallant’s story.

A copy of the two sections of the Mexican tourist card (FM-8) utilized by Oswald in entering and leaving Mexico are enclosed. Unlike most of the material mentioned as attachments this one actually is.

Document # 104-10018-10069 is a one page document from the Deputy Director of Plans to Director, FBI. It is dated December 12, 1963. Att: Sam J. Papich. “Attached for your perusal are the written comments of KGB defector Peter Deryabin on some aspects of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.” He defected ten years previously. “Scelso” appears near the bottom of the page.

Document # 104-10018-10078 is a three page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. Duran arrested second time 27 Nov. interrogated 28 Nov. and released 29 Nov. She was asked her relations with number of individuals and owners of cars she was seen in during January ’63 surveillance by LITAINTS.

Document # 104-10018-10079 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City. It is dated 12/16/ 63. This originates with “John Scelso”. This concerns Silvia Duran’s statement that Aparicio has a telephone # 141299. Mexi asks who is Aparaicio and whether he has this telephone number. Mexi requests hqs to identify voices of various Soviets to whom Oswald spoke on the telephone or who dealt with his case with Silvia Duran. “John Scelso” signs off for Richard Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10081 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated December 12, 1963. The FBI is pushing to wind up its investigation of Mexi aspects of the case and wants the results of the interrogation of Silvia Duran and her husband during their second arrest. Hqs thinks she may not have been interrogated at all on her second arrest. This originates with “John Scelso” and he signs for Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10085 is an 11 page report containing the second interrogation of Silvia Duran by Mexican government and questions of Mexi station. This is from COS, Mexico City to Chief Western Hemisphere Division. It is dated December 12, 1963. It contains a record and routing sheet. The actual report in Spanish is attached.

Document # 104-10018-10086 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to Mexico City dated December 13, 1963. It originates from “John Scelso”. ODENVOY investigation shows car of F. Morgan Danels with plate TA 582 which Mexi reported outside Cuban Embassy on 21 Oct. had not been outside Texas around that date. They attach no special significance to this and are still checking owners of other cars. “John Scelso” signs off for Richard Helms. Document # 104-10018-10097 is a one page cable from Director, CIA to

Mexico City dated December 13, 1963. It originates with “John Scelso”. “Upon receipt you may resume usual practice of keeping Cuban and Soviet tapes two weeks and then erasing.” Well I think this again proves that tapes of the Soviet and Cuban embassies taken during the Oswald visit existed after the assassination. The cable goes on to say do not erase tapes made between Nov 22 and present. However, these are not as relevant or as important as the Oswald-Soviet Embassy-Cuban Embassy intercept tapes. “John Scelso” again signs off for Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10098 is a two page cable from Director, CIA to the White House attn: McGeorge Bundy; Department of State attn: U. Alexis Johnson; and the FBI. This originates from “John Scelso”. This is a summary of the main points of Silvia Duran’s second arrest. Silvia Duran denied being a member of The Lenin Sparticist League or The Mexican Communist Party. She did not believe in the ideas of either group except for their support of Cuba. She cliamed she was not affiliated with The Cuban Institute for Friendship with Peoples. She said she had no connection with the Soviet embassy and visited it only twice.

She recalled Lee Oswald and said he did not wear glasses. She knew of no red haired negro in the Cuban embassy. No new people had arrived to work at the Cuban embassy around the time that Oswald was there.

She admitted one 15 day trip to Cuba in 1961. She denied asking the Cuban ambassador to send her to Cuba after her first arrest.

“John Scelso” signs off for Richard Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10100 is a one apge cable from Director, CIA to The White House attn: McGeorge Bundy; Department of State attn: U. Alexis Johnson; and the FBI. This originates from “John Scelso”. It is dated December 12, 1963. “On 25 November 1963, according to a very sensitive source, Cuban Ambassador to Paris Harold Guillermo Gramatces Y Leyte Vidal said he ahd received cabled intructions from Havana to make no comment at all on the assassination of President Kennedy and to tell the Cuban consulate in Paris to do the same. “Scelso” signs off for Helms.

Document # 104-10018-10101 is a one apge dispatch from COS Mexico City to chief of the Western hemisphere Division. It is dated December 12, 1963. Attached are copies of the six tapes of the interrogation of Gilberto Alverado. This document is very similar to document # 104-10018-10047. In the interrogation the legat acted as interpreter for Mr. Peter K. Woodhead. Copies of the tapes were given to the legat. The originals are being held in Mexico City Station.

Document # 104-10018-10102 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated December 12, 1963. Since 12 December is Mexican holiday COS unable to reach either LITEMPO/4 or Echevarria.

Document # 104-10018-10105 is a two page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. Mexican newspaper Excelsior carried story on December 9, 1963 of Vincent Lee and his exchange of letters with Oswald. “Following to Jeremy Benadum from ‘ODENVY Source’ known to COS and to Urquhart (at HQS). Source is U.S. citizen communist and member of American communist group in Mexico in good standing. Source’s close friend Elizabeth Callet de Mora (Betty Mora) American negress, communist who now naturalized Mexican and wife of Francisco Mora (Mexican communist) had been called to Cuban embassy and told to forget that she saw Vincent Lee in Cuba in December 1962 and January 1963.

“Betty Mora and her husband are really frightened because they both believe Lee and Oswald had close relationship and probably Lee was in on the “planning” of Oswald’s assassination of President Kennedy.

Station files show that Vincent Lee travelled to Cuba from Mexico on 28 December with U.S. passport. Lee returned to Mexico City from Havana on January 21, 1963. Mrs. Mora travelled to Cuba on 30 December 1962 with courtesy passport and returned on same flight as Vincent Lee on January 21, 1963.

Document # 104-10018-10107 is a two page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. It is dated December 11, 1963. This apparently is an attachment to a cable HMMA 22604. There is a name that I can’t really make out that sent the cable to KUDOVE. The cable pertains to Lee Oswald’s application for Cuban visa and Cuban “line” that “Northamerican reactionaries wished to make Cuba—victim of their criminal designs.” Have made no repeat no local dissemination of this material. Source LICASA1.

The second page has the “C/S comment: underscored above is correct station number originally disseminated as 7437. There is handwritting that states, “please correct”.

Document # 104-10018-10109 is a one page cable from Clark Anderson, legal Attache to the Mexican Ambassador. “Enclosed herewith is a memorandum concerning the captioned matter in which you may be interested.” Now we shouldn’t know what this referred to but fortunately someone wrote in “Further investigation of Oswald’s stay in Mexico.

No, nothing was really enclosed.

Document # 104-10018-10110 is a one page cable from Mexico City to Director, CIA. “Current use [of] tapes about six dozen per week for both Cuban and Soviet embassy lines. Depending on length of time HQ wants tapes held suggest six dozen be pouched each week until notice received erase tapes. Is there something particular which Mexi should watch for or should tapes and or transcripts be pouched hqs.”

Great little document, isn’t it?

Document # 104-10062-10002 is a five page dispatch from COS Mexico City to Chief EE Division. What is the EE division?

Oddly, the RIF number is typed 0-0-0 with 104-10062-10002 handwritten in.

Page one is largely blank with some handwriting on it. It says, “This original was highlighted by mistake. The #10 in the upper right-hand corner was inadvertently added recently.”

This is a request for the renewal of the BESMOOTH project for the period January 1 through 31 December 1964. The cost of which will be $13,566.00. Reference F forwarded a comprehensive review of Woodrow D. Gabbott’s activities during the past year. Reference E forwarded the Station’s request for project amendment and renewal. It is signed by Willard C. Curtis.

This four page report has SECRET/KAPOK on the top of each page. I wonder what that means? I am duplicating these four pages in their entirety as best as I can as I have never seen anything quite like this document. And I know that I don’t know what to really make of this.

SECRET/KABOK
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF PROJECT BESMOOTH 
A.      Current Objectives
          Woodrow D. GABBOTT continues to carry out the first objective of
the BESMOOTH Project, the monitoring and translating of LIFEAT / LITMUS and
other LIFEAT / BEDOX materials.  The second objective, processing of this
material, is performed by the two NYXIS officers in the Station.  Regarding
the third objective, the assessment and approach to potential recruitment
targets (official BEDOX personnel), the Station has made one unsuccesful
approach to BEKNAVE and is planning an approach to the subject of HMMA-22460,
8 November 1963.  Several other leads, including BESEAL and the BEDOX
Comercial Counselor, are the direct results of LIFEAT processing and/or
development by Gabbot.  As regards the fourth objective, the development of
sources in contact with BEDOX officials, we have recruited BECATCH (see below
under Changes) and continue to look for other appropriate leads through
LIFEAT and personal contacts.

B.     Changes 
          GABBOTT   -  GABBOTT has married.  He is still in the process of
obtaining rentista status.  Per HMMA-22487, 21 November 1963, the Station has
suggested that GABBOTT's tour in Mexico be prolonged for the immediate
future.

          BECATCH  -  During the project year, BECATCH was recruited
primarily to access and develop the Subject of HMMA-22460.  He has refused to
accept a salary, but has openly shown a desire for assistance in obtaining a
scholarship for his son to study in PBPRIME.  Unfortunately, do to his age
and illness, plus the fact that he does not live in Mexico City, he has been
of only limited value to date.  The Station still hopes that it will be able
to further activate BACATCH.

C.     Intelligence Production 
          Most of the positive intelligence has been credited to the LIFEAT
Project.  Contact between GABBOTT and BESEAL has resulted in two
disseminations, IIMM-7144 and HMM-7996, which have been credited to Project
BESMOOTH.


SECRET/KABOK


SECRET / KABOK

-2-

     D. Effectiveness

          Project BESMOOTH is the mainspring of the BEDOX effort in Mexico.
 LIFEAT materials and GABBOTT's contact with BEDOX officials have been
instrumental in initiating operations against a BEDOX official (BEKNAVE) and
a local access agent (BECATCH).  Without this support appartus, a BEDOX
effort in Mexico would be greatly handicapped.  New leads now under
development establish the continuing need fro the BESMOOTH Project.

     E.  Problems
          1.  Various problems concerning the handling of GABBOTT, none of
the[m] insuperable, have been set forth in detail in HMMA-22487.  The Station
has gone on record in that dispatch in stating that GABBOTT's continued
seervice in Mexico would be acceptable.

          2.  GABBOTT's occassional marital striffe presents a theoritical
security hazard.  As pointed out in HMMA-22487, however, the Station believes
the situation, although it must be closely watched, is not likely to become a
matter of real security concern.

   3.  There are no other immediate problems, security or otherwise.


     F.  Liason

          None.

     G. Interagency/Coordination

          None.  ODACID and ODENVOY are recipients of ceratin information
obtained through the Project.

     H.  Plans.

     The Station plan remainsto continue to use all BESMOOTH Project
facilities to recruit BEDOX officials.  As noted above, our primary target at
the present time is the Subject of HMMA-22460, followed by the BEDOX
Commercial Counselor and possibly BESEAL.  GABBOTT will not be used to make
recruitment approaches.

 SECRET / KAPOK
     




SECRET /  KAPOK

-3-

     I.  Costs.  
          1. Past Project Year - From 1 January 1963 to 1 November 1963,
expenses ammounted to $10,296.00.  For the remainder of the project year we
expect to expend an additional $900.00 amking a total expenditure of
approximately 
$11,196.00 for the full project year.

          2.  For the period 1 January 1964 through 31 December 1964, we
request $13,566.00 broken down as follows:

     Compensation                                     FY 64               FY
65               Total
     Woodrow D. GABBOTT                   $3,650.00          $3,650.00
        $7,300.00
     Travel (including possible home
     leave for GABBOTT and his
      dependents)                                      $400.00
              $400.00              $800.00
     Housing Allowance                            1,236.00
             1,236.00             2,472.00
     KUBARK Contribution to 
     GABBOTT Retirement Annuity            750.00                750.00
             1,500.00
     Operational Expenses                          750.00
               750.00              1,500.00

                       Totals                              $6,786.00
             $6,786.00         $13,566.00

     Note:  The increase of almost $2,00.00 per year is due largely to
$1,500.00 to cover KUBARK's contribution to GABBOTT's retirement fund and
additional monies for home leave benefits.







SECRET  /  KAPOK          





SECRET  /  KAPOK         

              Project:  BESMOOTH                   Station  Mexico City
              

              Case Officer:                              Chief of Station:                               

                                     Phineas F. SLINKARD
                              Willard C. CURTIS

The HSCA Documents

     1.) Document # 180-10060-10435
     2.) Document # 180-10060-10436
     3.) Document # 180-10060-10437
     4.) Document # 180-10060-10438
     5.) Document # 180-10060-10439
     6.) Document # 180-10060-10440
     7.) Document # 180-10060-10441
     8.) Document # 180-10060-10442

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • …
  • 81
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Donate your preferred amount to support the work of the AARC.

cards
Powered by paypal

Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Warren Commission
  • Garrison Investigation
  • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
  • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • LBJ Library
  • Other Agencies and Commissions
  • Church Committee Reports

Recent Posts

  • 20 MAY, 2025: DAN HARDWAY Opening Statement and Testimony to the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets
  • RFK Jr. asked Obama to probe ‘two gunmen’ theory, called for reexamination of his father’s assassination: new files
  • PRESIDENT’S PAGE
  • Planned Attack on Lady Gaga Concert in Brazil Is Foiled, Police Say
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
Copyright 2014 AARC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Tools