ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • Founder’s Page
  • AARC PRESIDENT DAN ALCORN
  • About the AARC
  • NEW AARC Lecture Series – 2024/2025
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • BILL SIMPICH ARCHIVE
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • FBI ELSUR
  • Gallery
  • JFK Assassination Records – 2025 Documents Release
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership
  • In Memoriam
  • JFK Commemoration Lecture Series – 2024

Copyright AARC

Paul Schrade holds no animosity towards convicted RFK killer Sirhan, still pressing for evidence into possible second shooter

In this Thursday, May 31, 2018, photo, Sen. Robert Kennedy aide Paul Schrade holds an evidence photo of gunman Sirhan Sirhan’s revolver with the eight expended shell casings found in the chamber, and the Weisel, Goldstein, and Kennedy bullets, at his home in Los Angeles. When a gunman open fire toward Sen. Robert Kennedy, the first bullet missed the senator and struck Kennedy aide Paul Schrade in the head. Schrade woke up the next day and found out the Democratic presidential candidate was dead. Today, Schrade believes the Los Angeles Police botched the case and failed to investigate possible leads about a second gunman. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)

by: José Gaspar

Posted: Aug 27, 2021 / 08:26 PM PDT / Updated: Aug 27, 2021 / 08:26 PM PDT

Sirhan Sirhan, the man convicted of killing Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, was granted parole Friday. Sirhan was convicted of shooting and killing the presidential candidate and wounding five others at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles.

Kennedy had just delivered a speech after winning the California primary. He was gunned down in a hotel hallway moments later.

RFK assassin moves closer to freedom with help of 2 Kennedys

Among those shot that night by Sirhan was Paul Schrade, a current board member of the Dolores Huerta Foundation. At that time Schrade was with the United Auto Workers and part of the Kennedy campaign.

“They thought I was dead,” said Schrade in a phone interview with 17 News. “A friend of mine from a different union came and put a voter straw hat over my head because he thought I was dead, but then he checked my pulse and found I wasn’t.”

Schrade believes Sirhan was not the one who shot and killed Kennedy and that a second gunman was involved. For the past 52 years, Schrade has been working to bring to light evidence he said proves Sirhan was not the one responsible for killing Kennedy.

“Who was this guy they were covering up? Who was so important for the district attorneys to keep covering up for 52 years that shot RFK?” said Schrade.

Despite being shot by Sirhan, Schrade adds he holds no animosity toward him.

“I don’t excuse him for what he did, but I don’t excuse the LAPD and the district attorneys for 52 years of saying he’s guilty when he is not,” said Schrade.

READ MORE at KGET

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Filed Under: News and Views

Sirhan Sirhan gets parole on 16th attempt; governor can review

By Ray Sanchez and Cheri Mossburg, CNN

Updated 6:21 PM ET, Fri August 27, 2021

(CNN) Sirhan Sirhan, the man convicted of assassinating Sen. Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, was recommended for parole on Friday. After 53 year in prison, the 77-year-old inmate’s fate is now in the hands of California’s governor.

Two of Kennedy’s surviving sons, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Douglas Kennedy, supported his release during Sirhan’s 16th appearance before the parole board.
Sirhan arrived at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in May 1969 after being convicted of first-degree murder and assault with intent to murder.
“I’m overwhelmed just by being able to view Mr. Sirhan face to face. I think I’ve lived my life both in fear of him and his name in one way or another. And I am grateful today to see him as a human being worthy of compassion and love,” Douglas Kennedy, who was a toddler when his father was gunned down in 1968, said during the virtual hearing.
Sirhan smiled.
“I do have some love for you,” Douglas Kennedy told Sirhan, who nodded and lowered his head.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has favored Sirhan’s release in the past, wrote in support of parole. He said he was moved when he first met Sirhan — “who wept, clinching my hands and asked for forgiveness” — and offered to be “a guiding friend for him.”
The two-person panel recommended parole, but said the decision is not yet final. Despite the recommendation for release, the board’s decision could be reversed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who will review the case to determine if the parole grant is consistent with public safety, a process that could take a few months.

READ MORE AT CNN

Filed Under: News and Views

NEWS: AARC Seeking Documents relating to D.H. Byrd, Werner von Alvensleben, Jr. and the Doolittle Report.

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

1. This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5
U.S.C. § 552, as amended, challenging the failure of the Central Intelligence
Agency (“CIA”), to fulfill the request of the Assassination Archives and Research
Center (“AARC”) and James H. Lesar for documents relating to David Harold
Byrd, Werner von Alvensleben, Jr. and the Doolittle Report.

2. This case seeks declaratory relief that defendant is in violation of the
FOIA for failing to fulfill plaintiffs’ request for records, and injunctive relief that
defendant immediately and fully comply with plaintiffs’ request under the FOIA.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3. This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and
personal jurisdiction over the parties pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). This
Court also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Venue
lies in this district under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).

4. Plaintiff AARC is a non-profit, non-stock corporation, organized in 1984
under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. AARC is committed to
collecting, preserving and making available to the public research materials
relating to political assassinations and related subjects; conducting research and
seminars in the field of political assassinations, and publishing and disseminating
scientific and public information concerning political assassinations and related
subjects. As part of its research and public information functions, AARC uses
government records made available to it under the FOIA. AARC’s archive
contains the largest collection of materials on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in private hands.

5. Plaintiff JAMES H. LESAR is a private citizen and attorney and serves as
President of the AARC. Mr. LESAR has devoted decades of study and research as
to the circumstances of the assassination of President Kennedy.

6. AARC has invested considerable organizational resources in publishing
on the internet large quantities of released U.S. government documents related to
political assassinations and related subjects.

7. The CIA’s failure to comply with the FOIA harms AARC’s ability to
provide full, accurate and current information to the public on matters of high
public interest. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(c). Absent this critical information, AARC
cannot advance its goal of informing the public on the documentary record on
critical public issues related to political assassinations and related subjects.

8. AARC will analyze the information it receives that is responsive to its
request and will share it with the public through memoranda, reports, press
releases. letters, emails, videos and social media. In addition, AARC will
disseminate any documents it acquires from its request to the public through a
website that AARC has founded, www.aarclibrary.org . AARC’s website and the
website of AARC’s partner organization Mary Ferrell Foundation, www.maryferrell.org contain hundreds of thousands of pages of documents AARC has acquired from multiple FOIA requests.

9. Defendant CIA is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(f).
Defendant is the federal agency with possession and control of the requested
records and is responsible for fulfilling AARC’s FOIA request.

STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
The Freedom of Information Act

10. The FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, requires agencies of the federal government
to release requested records or information to the public unless one or more
specific statutory exemptions or exclusions apply.

11. An agency must respond to a party making a FOIA request within 20
working days, notifying that party of at least the agency’s determination whether
or not to fulfill the request and of the requester’s right to appeal the agency’s
determination to the agency head. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(i).

12. An agency must respond to a FOIA appeal within 20 working days,
notifying the appealing party of the agency’s determination to either release the
withheld records or uphold the denial. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(ii).

13. In “unusual circumstances,” an agency may delay its response to a
FOIA request or appeal, but must provide notice and must also provide “the date
on which a determination is expected to be dispatched.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(B).

14. The FOIA also requires each agency to promulgate regulations
specifying a fee schedule for the processing of FOIA requests and establishing
procedures and guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees. 5 U.S.C. §
552(a)(4)(A). Under the FOIA, agencies should produce documents at no charge
to the requester or at a reduced charge if “disclosure of the information is in the
public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not
primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(iii).

15. This Court has jurisdiction, upon receipt of a complaint, “to enjoin the
agency from withholding agency records and to order the production of any
agency records improperly withheld from the complainant.” 5 U.S.C.
§ 52(a)(4)(B).

16. The FOIA provides a mechanism for disciplinary action against agency
officials who have acted inappropriately in withholding records. Specifically,
when requiring the release of improperly withheld records, if the court makes a
written finding that “the circumstances surrounding the withholding raise
questions whether agency personnel acted arbitrarily or capriciously,” a
disciplinary investigation is triggered. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(F).

FACTS GIVING RISE TO PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

17. On July 4, 2020, AARC and Mr. Lesar sent a FOIA request to the CIA
seeking documents relating to David Harold Byrd, Werner von Alvensleben, Jr.
and the Doolittle Report. Letter from Daniel S. Alcorn, Esq. to CIA, FOIA
Request (July 4, 2020) (attached as Exhibit 1). Specifically, AARC requested:

1. Search for and release all records or information in any format related to
David Harold Byrd (deceased) of Dallas, Texas. Mr. Byrd died on
September 14, 1986 (see attached obituary from the Dallas Times-Herald).
Mr. Byrd owned the Texas School Book Depository Building at the time of
the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963, and reportedly removed the
“sniper’s window” from the building after the assassination and displayed it
in his mansion. Mr. Byrd was an owner and financier of government
contracting companies including Texas Engineering Manufacturing
Company (TEMCO), E-Systems, and Ling-TEMCO-Vaught (LTV).
E-Systems was well known as a CIA contractor, so much so that in 1975
CIA solicited E-Systems to purchase its proprietary airline, Air America.
David Harold Byrd was also active in the oil business and varied other
business enterprises. David Harold Byrd co-founded the Civil Air Patrol
(CAP) in 1941 and served in command capacities in CAP until the early
1960’s. Civil Air Patrol is the official auxilary of the US Air Force. In the
1950’s Mr. Byrd served with Cord Meyer, Sr. on the national executive
board of CAP (Cord Meyer, Jr. was a ranking CIA executive).
2. Search for and release all records and information in any format related to
Werner von Alvensleben, Jr. (died 1998), of Mozambique (formerly
Portuguese East Africa). Mr. Alvensleben owned and operated the big
game hunting company named Safarilandia in Portuguese East Africa, later
Mozambique. According to released Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
records, Mr. Alvensleben served as a valued double agent for OSS during
World War II in Portuguese East Africa. OSS records state that Mr.
Alvensleben was a member of the Bavarian Military Police in 1933, headed
by Heinrich Himmler (the Bavarian Military Police became the Nazi SS,
according to OSS records). In 1933 Mr. Alvensleben was sent to Austria to
participate in the assassination of an Austrian official. Mr. Alvensleben was
arrested by the Austrians and imprisoned for this activity. According to
reports in the Dallas Morning News, Mr. Alvensleben was in Dallas, Texas
as a guest of David Harold Byrd in late 1963. Further, David Harold Byrd
was reported to be present at Mr. Alvensleben’s Safarilandia on November
22, 1963, the day of President Kennedy’s murder. Due to Mr.
Alvensleben’s service as a valued double agent for OSS in World War II, it
is likely that Mr. Alvensleben served as an asset of the CIA after the war, or
had contact with the CIA.
3. Search for and release all records and information in any format related to
the Doolittle Report of 1954 and its appendices A-D. The Doolittle Report
was the result of a commission established by President Eisenhower to study
the activities of the CIA and headed by General James Doolittle. The
Doolittle Report called for more aggressive CIA covert activities that had
previously been believed to be repugnant and contrary to American values.
Requesters seek full release of the requested materials. As shown in the
attached obituary of David Harold Byrd, General Doolittle and Mr. Byrd
were substantial friends who shared an interest in aviation from the early
years. Mr. Byrd and General Doolittle were Safari hunting partners on
several occasions.

18. US Postal Service Tracking confirms that AARC and Lesar’s July 4,
2020 FOIA request was delivered to CIA on July 9, 2020. CIA has not responded
to AARC and Lesar’s FOIA request.

19. AARC and Lesar have received no determination on their request.

20. As of the filing of this complaint, the CIA has not provided documents
responsive to AARC and Lesar’s request.

21. CIA failed to make a determination on AARC and Lesar’s FOIA
request within the twenty working days provided in 5 U.S.C.§ 552(a)(6)(A)(i). .

22. The requested records are highly relevant to several official
investigations, including the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of
Investigation, President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F.
Kennedy (The Warren Commission), the Senate Select Committee on Government
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (The Church Committee), and
the House Select Committee on Assassinations (The HSCA). As such, the
exception from search and review of operational files does not apply to these
records pursuant to 50 U.S.C. Sec. 3141(c)(3). The Church Committee
investigated the performance of the intelligence agencies in the investigation of
President Kennedy’s assassination and found it wanting. CIA is required to search
operational files and records for information responsive to plaintiff’s request.
Morley v. CIA, 508 F.3d 1108,1119 (2007).

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
CLAIM ONE
(Failure to Produce Records Under the FOIA)

23. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all preceding
paragraphs.

24. Plaintiffs properly asked for records within the CIA’s possession and/or
control.

25. Plaintiffs are entitled by law to copies of the records requested under
the FOIA, unless defendant makes an explicit and justified statutory exemption
claim.

26. The CIA has produced no records to AARC and Lesar.

27. Therefore, the CIA violated FOIA’s mandate to release agency records
to the public by failing to release the records as plaintiffs specifically requested. 5
U.S.C. §§ 552(a)(3)(A), 552(a)(4)(B).

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court:
(1) Declare that the CIA has violated the Freedom of Information Act by
failing to lawfully satisfy plaintiffs’ FOIA request of July 4, 2020;
(2) Order the CIA to promptly release all records responsive to plaintiffs’
FOIA request without charge for search or duplication fees;
(3) Order defendants to file a Vaughn v. Rosen index and permit
discovery;
(4) Award plaintiffs their reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs
reasonably incurred in this action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E); and
(5) Grant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and
proper, including but not limited to release of any secret appendices to the
Doolittle Report whether numbered or lettered or not.

Respectfully submitted,
__/s/_Daniel S. Alcorn_____
Daniel S. Alcorn
Counsel for Plaintiffs
D.C. Bar No. xxxxxx
Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx  XXX
Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx
Phone: (xxx) xxx-xxxx

James H. Lesar
Co-counsel for Plaintiffs
D.C. Bar No. xxxxxx
XXX Xxxx xxxxxx
Xxxx xx xxxx
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Phone: (xxx) xxx-xxxx
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DOWNLOAD AARC2 v. CIA complaint and exhibit Pacer

RELATED: CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION – 20 July, 2020

RELATED: COLD WAR CONTEXT – THE DOOLITTLE REPORT

RARE VIDEO: Courtesy of Vince Palamara – D. H. Byrd Interview from the 6th Floor of the TSBD

Filed Under: News and Views

Did a Black undercover NYPD detective unwittingly aid Malcolm X’s assassination?

Raymond Wood allegedly wrote a letter that proves he did. Historians don’t believe it.

Image without a caption
Reginald Wood Jr. presents new evidence in the 1965 assassination of Malcolm X during a February news conference in New York City. (David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

By

Sydney Trent
April 18, 2021 at 7:00 a.m. EDT

An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated the last name of Kelly Wood. The story also misspelled the middle name of Baba Zak Kondo. This version has been corrected.

On Feb. 20, Reginald Wood Jr., a bespectacled, balding man in a dark suit and striped tie, walked across the wooden stage to the podium at the Malcolm X and Dr. Betty Shabazz Memorial and Educational Center in Manhattan.

The place and timing were weighty with symbolism. The center had been built on the former site of the Audubon Ballroom, where Malcolm X was assassinated 56 years ago that very weekend. Wood was also speaking on the eve of the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in the killing of George Floyd last May. A heightened suspicion of law enforcement swirled in the air, just as it did after Malcolm was murdered.

Ben Crump, the celebrity civil rights lawyer who represents the family of George Floyd, sat with Malcolm X’s three daughters on the stage as Reggie Wood waved a letter and an envelope sheathed in plastic from the podium. A colorful mural of a towering Malcolm loomed in the background.

The letter, Wood said, had been written by his father’s first cousin, Raymond A. Wood. A Black undercover detective with the New York Police Department in the 1960s, Ray infiltrated civil rights groups to arrest and discredit their leaders.

Image without a caption
A confession letter is presented by Reginald Wood Jr. at a news conference in New York on Feb. 20. (David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

“This letter,” Reggie said somberly, “helps me to understand the pain and guilt that Ray felt over the last 55 years.”

Then he read aloud from the one-page typewritten document.

“I participated in actions that in hindsight were deplorable and detrimental to the advancement of my own black people,” Ray Wood allegedly wrote on Jan. 25, 2011.

His supervisors at the NYPD, the letter said, involved him in a plot to bomb the Statue of Liberty that led to the arrests of two key members of Malcolm X’s security team — just days before Malcolm was gunned down on the ballroom stage by three members of the Nation of Islam.

Ray, according to his cousin, had asked that the letter not be made public until after his death, which finally came Nov. 24 at age 87.

Ray’s seemingly regretful words from the grave, amplified by Crump’s endorsement, made immediate waves. Reggie appeared in a flurry of broadcasts; news stories multiplied.

Malcolm X’s family reveals letter they say shows NYPD, FBI assassination involvement

The letter fed long-held questions and conspiracy theories by implying that the NYPD and J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI knew when the assassination would go down and that they actively plotted to help make it happen. It also held out the possibility, both painful and tantalizing, that the life of Malcolm, a fearless champion of Black people, might have been saved.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. had already announced that his office would review the convictions of two Nation of Islam members in Malcolm X’s killing. On the stage with Wood, Crump called on Vance to begin a full reinvestigation into the assassination.

“This was orchestrated, and the only way we get to justice … is with the truth,” Crump said at the Feb. 20 news conference.

Image without a caption
Attorney Ben Crump speaks outside the Hennepin County Government Center earlier this month during the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who is charged with the murder of George Floyd. (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

He likened Malcolm’s murder to the deaths of Floyd and other Black people at the hands of racist police. “The past is prologue,” he said.

Yet in the weeks since, a growing chorus of Malcolm X experts, as well as the detective’s daughter, have questioned everything from the historical veracity of the letter’s contents to the way it was written and signed.

“I’m angry that this letter has gotten such a run, but I know why,” said Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, whose lifelong search for Malcolm’s killers was chronicled in the Netflix documentary “Who Killed Malcolm X?” Evidence presented in the film and pressure by the Innocence Project prompted Vance’s review.

Muhammad pointed to the recent Oscar-nominated HBO movie “Judas and the Black Messiah,” about the killing of Chicago Black Panthers leader Fred Hampton after Black car-thief-turned-FBI informant William O’Neal set him up.

The secret FBI informant who betrayed Black Panther leader Fred Hampton

“The ideological current right now in popular culture is to abolish the police,” Muhammad said. Reggie Wood “seized upon the political climate. He knew people wanted to believe it.”

In an interview with The Washington Post, Crump said the Hampton case and the nefarious practices of the NYPD and FBI in the 1960s are exactly why he thought the letter needed to be taken seriously. The targeting and surveillance of Black civil rights leaders then are echoed today in the FBI’s recent practice of labeling Black Lives Matter activists “Black Identity Extremists,” he said.

By providing Reggie a platform to share Ray’s alleged confession, “My intention was absolutely to present it in a public way so it couldn’t just be swept under the rug,” he said.

Crump said he and his team did not directly vet the letter’s contents but cautioned Reggie “to do a lot of research … to make sure you corroborate the things that are stated in the letter.” By turning over the letter to Vance’s office, Crump said he anticipates that others will investigate its credibility, too.

Referring to the men who may have been falsely convicted in Malcolm X’s death, Crump said, “if there is any chance that they can be exonerated and have their names cleared, then we should investigate everything.”

While she spoke at the news conference about the need to investigate “any evidence” surrounding her father’s assassination, Ilyasah Shabazz was not endorsing the letter’s credibility, said Ron Baldwin, a business associate authorized to speak on her behalf.

Image without a caption
Qubiliah Shabazz, from left, Ilyasah Shabazz and Gamilah Shabazz, daughters of Malcolm X, speak at the Feb. 20 news conference in New York. (David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

In releasing the letter, Reggie said he was trying to grant the dying wish of his cousin and help the Shabazz family and the nation find justice. He said he has grown weary of the accusations that he concocted it.

“People ask me the same questions 15 different ways,” he said in an interview from his home near Tampa. “All I know is what Ray told me.”

He said he fears he is in danger. “I notice weird people near my house. … Everything is strange to me now,” he said. “My wife is stressed out. … It’s crazy. People are not nice. They’re trying to find dirt on me.”

As he spoke, Reggie’s voice rose to an anxious crescendo, no longer the measured tones of the man who spoke on the stage just a few weeks earlier.

A Statue of Liberty plot

Ray Wood was a tall, broad-shouldered Air Force veteran in his early 30s when he joined the detective division of the New York Police Department in 1964.

He was immediately put to work as part of a cadre of Black undercover law enforcement officers who were used to gain entree into the inner workings of civil rights groups.

These police officers have been alternately described through the decades as heroes uncovering dangerous Black militant plots, traitors undermining the cause of Black equality or simply Black men taking advantage of opportunities during an era when well-paid employment was far scarcer for Black people.

The men, including Wood, were assigned to the NYPD’s Bureau of Special Services, known then as BOSS or BOSSI. The agency shared information with the FBI to undermine and discredit Black civil rights leaders.

Image without a caption
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X smile for photographers in Washington on March 26, 1964. They shook hands after King announced plans for direct action protests if Southern senators filibustered against the civil rights bill. (Henry Griffin/AP)

BOSSI preferred men with military training and intentionally did not send them to the police academy so that they would be less likely to use police slang or exhibit other telltale behaviors, said David Viola, an adjunct history professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York who has researched Wood’s role in the Statue of Liberty plot. Perhaps the most well-known among them, Black undercover BOSSI officer Gene Roberts, home from the Navy, infiltrated Malcolm X’s security team. Embodying the tensions of his role in that era, Roberts administered mouth-to-mouth to the leader as he lay dying at the Audubon.

On his first assignment, Ray Wood, going by “Ray Woodall,” insinuated himself into the top New York City echelons of the nonviolent Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). Then in late 1964, Wood was given a new mission: to follow up on a chance encounter with Robert Steele Collier, a pro-Communist Black revolutionary leader.

Collier invited two other Black activists to a subsequent meeting with Wood and soon the four started plotting to bomb the Statue of Liberty. On Feb. 16, Wood drove Collier to a parking lot in the Bronx where a Canadian militant said she had stashed the explosives the men had requested.

The trap sprung: NYPD officers jumped out of hiding and rushed to arrest the culprits. Canadian Michelle DuClos and the two other plotters — Khaleel Sayyed, 22, a Howard University engineering student, and Walter Bowe, a 32-year-old Black radical — were apprehended later. Wood’s cover was instantly blown; stories about the high-profile bust and Wood ran in the New York Times on Feb. 17, 1965, with a photo of the detective shot from behind.

At the trial that spring, Wood — who was quickly promoted to second-grade detective — testified that Bowe suggested the Statue of Liberty idea and the others signed on quickly. The activists argued that it was Wood who ensnared them in the plot.

Image without a caption
Raymond Wood at the Apollo Beach, Fla., home of his Reginald Wood, around 2013. (Courtesy of Reginald Wood)

In the letter Reggie Wood unveiled 56 years later, Ray Wood allegedly pushed a third scenario. Although Collier appeared to be the prime target at the time, Bowe and Sayyed were actually central to the scheme, which was designed by Wood’s supervisors and the FBI to weaken Malcolm X’s security detail at the Audubon by sidelining the two men, the letter asserts.

But is this true and would it have made a difference? Much of the dissension over Wood’s letter — and Reggie’s 123-page companion book, “The Ray Wood Story: Confessions of a Black NYPD Cop in the Assassination of Malcolm X” — centers on these questions.

And yet this is known: Just five days after Sayyed and Bowe were arrested and jailed, Malcolm X fell to the floor of the Audubon Ballroom, mouth gaping, fighting for his life.

Image without a caption
Followers tend to Malcolm X as he lies mortally wounded on the stage of the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem after being shot Feb. 21, 1965. (WCBS-TV via AP)

‘Dead already’

In the wake of John F. Kennedy’s assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, Malcolm X voiced the words that would give Elijah Muhammad cover to oust his charismatic protege.

In a speech in Manhattan, Malcolm X called the murder “a case of the chickens coming home to roost.” Muhammad, who had forbidden his members to speak about the assassination, suspended Malcolm for 90 days with no plans to reinstate him.

In March 1964, Malcolm announced he was leaving the Nation to start Muslim Mosque Inc. A few months later he founded the Organization of Afro-American Unity to encourage oppressed Black people around the world to join forces.

Traveling throughout Africa that year, Malcolm underwent a transformation as he encountered Muslims of all races. He abandoned the Nation’s virulently anti-White ideology and converted to Sunni Islam. And yet his international ambitions, which included charging the United States with human rights violations against African Americans at the United Nations, made his rising profile all the more concerning to the U.S. government, according to Les Payne and Tamara Payne in the book “The Dead are Arising.”

Image without a caption
Elijah Muhammad, founder and head of the Nation of Islam, right, introduces Malcolm X in Chicago on Feb. 26, 1961. (Paul Cannon/AP)

Malcolm X didn’t fear being killed: ‘I live like a man who is dead already’

Elijah Muhammad felt threatened by Malcolm, too. Malcolm X had learned of the leader’s affairs with women in the Nation and his many illegitimate children and had been sharing this knowledge within the Nation. After leaving the Nation, he began divulging Muhammad’s secrets in public. Rumors of Malcolm’s impending murder did not escape him.

“’I live like a man who is dead already,” he told reporters at the time.

‘A lowering of the guard’

According to Reggie’s account: Ray Wood was awakened on Feb. 21, 1965, by a phone call. A man on the other end of the line instructed him to leave and get in the back seat of a black Buick.

Inside were two White FBI agents. The men told Wood to go the Audubon Ballroom to observe and report back about Malcom X’s afternoon appearance. After balking at first — his cover had been blown after all — Wood chose a seat in the front of the room near the stage, according to Reggie.

Historians recount what happened next: Malcolm took his place on the podium, his voice weary. “As-Salaam Alaikum,” he said in greeting to his audience. Suddenly there was a commotion in the auditorium.

“Get your hands out of my pocket,” a man shouted.

Elsewhere, another man struck a match and lit a rolled-up sock, heaving the makeshift smoke bomb to the auditorium floor. Malcolm shifted his attention to the ruckus. Two security men in front of the stage moved toward the disturbance, deserting their posts. Members of the audience pivoted their heads. Malcolm raised his arms and stepped back from the wooden podium.

“Now, now, brothers break it up,” he said.

Just then a man with a sawed-off shotgun rushed to the podium, aimed at Malcolm’s chest and pulled the trigger. Malcolm fell. Meanwhile, two accomplices dashed to the edge of the stage. Talmadge Hayer fired a .45-caliber automatic into Malcolm’s ankle. The second gunman pumped his 9mm Lugar into both of Malcolm’s thighs.

The three gunmen turned to retreat through the chaos of the crowd. Two managed to escape but a Malcolm X bodyguard shot 22-year-old Hayer in the thigh, and he was surrounded in the street by an angry crowd before the NYPD hustled him into a squad car.

Inside on the stage, Roberts tried unsuccessfully to revive Malcolm. Japanese American activist Yuri Kochiyama famously cradled the leader’s head.

Amid the pandemonium, Reggie asserted in his book, a stunned Ray Wood was handcuffed and hurried away from the scene by the NYPD.

Hayer, also known as Thomas Hagan and Mujahid Abdul Halim, confessed to the killing but has maintained since his 1966 trial that the other two Nation members convicted in the murder, Thomas Johnson, also known as Khalil Islam, and Norman Butler, a.k.a. Muhammad Aziz, were innocent.

Image without a caption
Talmadge Hayer, 22, also known as Thomas Hagan and Mujahid Abdul Halim, is carried in police custody to Bellevue Hospital in New York on Feb. 21, 1965. Hagan was wounded earlier in the day at a Harlem rally where Malcolm X was assassinated. (John Lent/AP)

In 1977, Hayer fingered the four men by name that he said acted with him — the two other gunmen and two accomplices in the audience — but the information went nowhere.

Hayer served 45 years in prison before he was paroled in 2010. Johnson, paroled in 1987, died in 2009. Butler, 83, was paroled in 1985. The Innocence Project, along with attorney David B. Shanies, are fighting to clear Johnson’s and Butler’s names.

Evidence unearthed by Abdur-Rahman Muhammad and included in the Netflix documentary and by investigative journalist Les Payne in his book makes a compelling case that the actual murderers were members of the Newark mosque, rather than Malcolm X’s former Harlem mosque associates Butler and Johnson, who likely would have been quickly recognized in the ballroom. In the documentary, a close friend of William Bradley said the Newark mosque member, also known as Al-Mustafa Shabazz, was the man who fired the bullets that killed Malcolm X, echoing Hayer’s earlier assertion. Bradley’s alleged role was apparently an open secret in Newark, although Bradley denied it right up to his death in 2018.

Image without a caption
Norman Butler, 26, arrested in the slaying of Malcolm X, is escorted by detectives at police headquarters in New York on Feb. 26, 1965. (AP)

Ray Wood’s alleged letter focuses not on who killed Malcolm, but this: How were the assailants able to do it with such apparent ease? And did the FBI and the NYPD plot actively to help commit the deed?

Reggie and Malcom X expert Baba Zak Kondo point to a 1970s educational booklet about the Revolutionary Action Movement that said member “Kaliel Said” was helping Malcolm develop a “security wing.” But Muhammad said although RAM leaders talked militantly, the group was largely ineffectual.

Ray Wood died believing that he had played an unwitting role in exposing Malcolm, Reggie said.

Ray “felt very guilty when he was telling me about the situation with Malcolm X,” Reggie recalled in an interview with The Post. “He was holding back tears. … He said ‘If I had known, I would have done something.’ ”

By then, Ray Wood was in his 70s and living near Reggie and his family in Florida. He’d been diagnosed with stomach cancer in 2011, Reggie said at the news conference.

“Ray thought the end was near,” Reggie wrote in “The Ray Wood Story, “and he was adamant that the secret not die with him.”

Ray recovered from the cancer, and the letter he had supposedly written about his role in the assassination remained private for the next nine years.

Image without a caption
Raymond A. Wood (left) having Sunday brunch at the home of his cousin Reginald E. Wood in Apollo Beach, Fla., around 2013. (Courtesy of Reginald Wood)

After Ray Wood died last November, Reggie was torn about his next move, he said in the interview. He said he confided in a friend who had a connection to Ben Crump’s sister. Crump called Reggie back immediately and listened carefully as he shared his cousin’s story, he said.

“He had his people look into it and they said it was legitimate and that’s when he took it over from there,” Reggie said, contradicting Crump’s recounting of events.

Reggie said that the attorney advised him to put everything he knew into a “memoir” to release in tandem with the news conference.

In his interview with The Post, Crump said he told Reggie to amass the evidence in a way that would make it convincing to the public, but did not suggest that Reggie publish a book about it.

Abdur-Rahman Muhammad accuses Reggie of concocting the letter to reap a profit from “The Ray Wood Story,” which is being sold on Amazon for $19.99.

Reggie, who has owned a variety of small businesses, faced multiple lawsuits and liens between 1991 and 2018 for failure to pay his bills, court records show. He was convicted twice on criminal charges of writing bad checks, in 2000 and 2002.

Reggie said he decided to sell a book in part to help provide for his family’s protection if publicizing the letter endangered them. He also plans to use a portion of the profits, he said, to start a college scholarship fund for criminal justice students in Ray Wood’s name. And he noted that it is not unusual for small business owners to be sued unfairly.

“I’ve been an entrepreneur for many years and I’ve done good and I’ve done bad…but I still came out above water,” he said, attributing some of his legal troubles to the stress of keeping Ray’s secret for almost a decade.

Crump said that the book doesn’t strike him as a sufficient motive for Reggie to tell such a lie. “You put stuff out into the world to vet, if it’s not real, people are going to know it,” he said. “Why would you do that?”

Image without a caption
Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, one of the foremost experts on the Malcolm X assassination, near his home in Washington. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post)

But Muhammad and other experts on the assassination point out that the two Statue of Liberty plotters — so crucial to the letter — played minor roles in Malcolm’s security.

Sayyed was charged with guarding Malcolm’s empty house after the firebombing and not much more, the historians note. Bowe, who had recently left his role with Malcolm’s organization because the leader was insufficiently radical for him, played no role in Malcolm’s security at the time of the assassination, Muhammad said, pointing to a 1997 video interview with Bowe.

Viola noted that the men were brought into the Statue of Liberty plot incidentally by Collier. If law enforcement wanted to arrest Sayyed and Bowe in the days before the assassination, there were much simpler and more reliable ways to do it at a time when police were routinely violating Black men’s civil rights, he said.

“The idea of concocting this really elaborate scheme just to get them off the streets just doesn’t pass muster,” Viola said. And even if the letter is authentic, that scenario “was something that Ray Wood concocted in his head after the fact” — in other words, Ray’s own personal conspiracy theory. “We all remember history in a way that puts a better light on our involvement in it,” he said.

‘You are done’: A secret letter to Martin Luther King Jr. sheds light on FBI’s malice

Viola does not believe that the FBI would have instructed Wood to go to the Audubon after his cover was blown. Nor does David Garrow, author of the Pulitzer-Prize winning “Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference” and an expert on the FBI during the civil rights era.

First, Garrow said, the FBI did not give orders directly to NYPD undercover officers. “In J. Edgar Hoover’s world, that would have been a fireable offense,” he said.

Image without a caption
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover attends FBI graduation ceremonies in Washington on July 1, 1971. (Harvey Georges/AP)

As proof that Ray was at the Audubon when Malcolm was assassinated, Reggie points to a note by Kochiyama on March 6, 1965 that surfaced in 2011 in the archived papers of civil rights activist James Campbell and was featured in a 2015 Guardian article.

“Ray Woods is said to have been seen also running out of the Audubon; was one of two picked up by police. Was the second person running out,” the notes read. The first “was” had been crossed out and “is said to have been” was inserted, edits that make the document akin to hearsay, Garrow said.

In the book, Reggie said that Ray surmised that Thomas Johnson was later arrested in the murder to cover for the fact that Ray had been recognized and put in a police car.

But what would have been the purpose of having Wood there that day, especially since his involvement could have been directly linked to the NYPD? The NYPD had undercover policemen and the FBI had informants there already.

Image without a caption
Thomas Johnson, center, the third suspect in the slaying of Malcolm X, is escorted by Detective John Keeley at a New York police station on March 3, 1965. (Harvey Lippman/AP)

“I can only go by what he told me,” Reggie said. “I asked him ‘Why would they send you back in?’ I was confused about that, too.”

Then there is the matter of the way the letter was written, the Malcolm X experts said: Why, as a police detective who knew what was needed to make a case, would Ray have not had the letter witnessed and notarized and not included audio or video of his confession? Why would he refer to himself as an officer in the letter when he was a detective, an important distinction in police hierarchy?

And even if the letter were true and Sayyed and Bowe were part of Malcom X’s security, would their presence at the ballroom have made a difference?

It’s unlikely, historians say, because Malcolm himself was the greatest impediment to the strength of his security that day.

“Malcolm willed a lowering of the guard,” said Peter Goldman, a former journalist for Newsweek and the author of “The Death and Life of Malcolm X.” “The organizations he founded were new and fragile, and he was worried that the heavy police presence and heavy security … were deterring people from coming to his meetings.”

Malcolm X ordered his security team not to carry guns and not to search people at the door to the Audubon, Goldman and the other Malcolm X experts noted.

The lack of security, the hunger in the Nation to see Malcolm dead — all the FBI and the NYPD needed to do was wait, Goldman said. Through their surveillance, which included wiretapping, undercover detectives and top-level informants in the Nation, they had a front-row seat to the plotting.

“There was no need for them to get involved with killing Malcolm X. … They knew the Nation of Islam,” Goldman said. “They knew that Muhammad’s followers wouldn’t be daunted by security or police. They knew that they would walk through walls to do the Nation’s bidding.”

The FBI and the NYPD and their nefarious practices during the civil rights era and their echoes in the discriminatory treatment of Black people by law enforcement today rightly feed questions about the assassinations of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., Goldman said. He, Muhammad, Garrow and Viola all believe the FBI and the NYPD owe it to the nation to release all records related to Malcolm X, including electronic surveillance and informant files.

But sometimes, Goldman said, conspiracy theories are born of a reluctance to face the truth and a desperate wish that, somehow, our heroes — Malcolm X, MLK or the Kennedys — might have been saved, if only.

“My own theory is that it’s painful to think that this extraordinary guy died a trashy death in a dispute over Elijah Muhammad’s sex life,” he said. “I think if he were going to die, his admirers would have liked to have had him die heroically.”

Image without a caption
The body of Malcolm X lies in a casket at the Unity Funeral Home in New York on Feb. 24, 1965. A glass screen was placed on the casket during public viewing. (AP)

‘A hero’

On Feb. 26, six days after Reggie Wood read from the letter at the Shabazz Center, Ray Wood’s daughter Kelly Wood gave an interview to New York’s TV1.

“My father is not a coward. He would have never ever asked anybody to speak on his behalf after his passing,” said Kelly Wood, a well-spoken woman in her early 50s wearing a blue fur vest. “If he had something to say, he would have said it when he was alive. I’m certain of that.”

“My father was and still is a hero,” she said, as an archival photo of Ray and photos of father and daughter together flashed in the background on the screen.

Kelly said she was dismayed by Reggie’s decision to release the letter. She claimed that the signature was forged and that an envelope used to underscore its authenticity was “a fake.” Reggie Wood denies the charge, saying he hired an expert to verify the signature on the letter.

Kelly also questioned the allegations that her father was at the ballroom when Malcolm X was murdered. “They were not going to run the risk of having him there,” she said, adding that her mother told her that his handlers had ordered Ray to stay out of sight until the Statue of Liberty trial that spring.

She sympathizes with Malcolm X’s daughters in their pursuit of justice for their father, she said.

“My heart goes out to you,” she said. Still, she asked the Shabazz family to “find another way to get the answers that you need and the closure that you need.”

“I support you 100 percent,” she said, “but on this, with my father, I cannot.”

Perhaps her appearance lacked the stagecraft of Crump and the Shabazz daughters on the site where Malcolm X was murdered. Perhaps there’s too much distrust of law enforcement stirring the air. Perhaps Americans, as true now as then, just prefer a good conspiracy theory. But Kelly Wood’s interview barely made a ripple in the news.

Magda Jean-Louis and Tom Jackman contributed to this report.

READ MORE at THE WASHINGTON POST

Filed Under: News and Views

Professor John McAdams, 1945 – 2021

One wonders why these agencies were so obsessed with the critics, no?

Maybe we have mirror image attitudes here.  As the “critics” did not merely think they were trying to solve a crime, but rather were in a battle for the soul of America (which had become corrupt) . . .

. . . maybe some of the people in security agencies thought they were fighting for the soul of America, which had become besmirched by the corruption of conspiratorial thinking.

In other words, maybe people on both sides invested the issue with a huge moral significance, and therefore acted in ways that no sober citizens or unbiased investigators should have.

.John

*  *  *  *  * 

 

MARQUETTE STATEMENT ON THE PASSING OF DR. JOHN McADAMS

April 16, 2021
The Marquette University community mourns the loss of Dr. John McAdams, associate professor of political science. Dr. McAdams was a well-known American politics and public policy teacher at Marquette for nearly 45 years. A globally known scholar of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Dr. McAdams taught a popular course on the topic. He also published the book ‘JFK Assassination Logic: How to Think about Claims of Conspiracy in 2011.’
The Marquette community extends its deepest sympathies and prayers to Dr. McAdams’ family, friends, colleagues and students.”
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/education/2021/04/15/marquette-political-science-professor-john-mcadams-dies/7246026002/?fbclid=IwAR2dnBJZFwBIUm1Q6oDj0DK3kYN1KYLCEFowsRajuDUNFMZywHvAYTbTAvo
*  *  *  *  *
I found JM during my debate at Southern Illinois University to be fine person.
He was quiet in demeanor, well dressed, respectful, and drove hard his points.
The student organization that put the debate on was hobbled in funds by quirky SIU policies but got a decent audience.

He was informed on his positions and presented them well.

At a break I observed to him that the evidence of Oswald’s arrest noted a pick up was found unmanned and running  in the alley.  “Oh,”  he said, “they will have fun with that.”
He was patriotic as his comment revealed in debate.  All in all he would serve I thought well for dissenters from the official version to have in conferences as a whetstone –that is if you could get critics that knew the subject and were not part of the American nuttery.
He had actually read material–not like many of the worshipers of the Warren Report.
Dr. David R. Wrone, professor emeritus of history at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
*  *  *  *  *
I feel compassionately the loss of Professor John McAdams, who passed away at the age of seventy-five.  He had devoted quite a bit of his life to debunking things that he felt had to be debunked, and I would be lying if I said to you that I didn’t learn things because of his efforts; I learned quite a lot, actually.
I personally interacted with him on only a couple of occasions, and in each case I benefited from his courtesy and from his assistance.
Professor McAdams may have exemplified the profound truth that we all benefit from criticism. I would say that people who make declarations about their beliefs or make assurances about their interpretations of things based upon their own research, should be open to criticism, because that is the absolutely essential, absolutely essential, method by which information is refined so that knowledge is earned. Without rational criticism we are simply at war with each other as were our barbarous ancestors over opposing ideologies.
Alan Dale, executive director, Assassination Archives and Research Center

Filed Under: News and Views

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • …
  • 81
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Donate your preferred amount to support the work of the AARC.

cards
Powered by paypal

Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Warren Commission
  • Garrison Investigation
  • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
  • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • LBJ Library
  • Other Agencies and Commissions
  • Church Committee Reports

Recent Posts

  • 20 MAY, 2025: DAN HARDWAY Opening Statement and Testimony to the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets
  • RFK Jr. asked Obama to probe ‘two gunmen’ theory, called for reexamination of his father’s assassination: new files
  • PRESIDENT’S PAGE
  • Planned Attack on Lady Gaga Concert in Brazil Is Foiled, Police Say
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
Copyright 2014 AARC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Tools