ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • Founder’s Page
  • AARC PRESIDENT DAN ALCORN
  • About the AARC
  • NEW AARC Lecture Series – 2024/2025
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • BILL SIMPICH ARCHIVE
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • FBI ELSUR
  • Gallery
  • JFK Assassination Records – 2025 Documents Release
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership
  • In Memoriam
  • JFK Commemoration Lecture Series – 2024

Copyright AARC

Investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld and of the members of the party accompanying him

Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations from April 1953 until his death in a plane crash in September 1961.

Courtesy of Dr. Susan Williams

United Nations General Assembly

Seventy-sixth session
Agenda item 131

Letter dated 25 August 2022 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the General Assembly

I have the honour to refer to General Assembly resolution 74/248 concerning the investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld and of the members of the party accompanying him on flight SE-BDY on the night of 17 to 18 September 1961.

In accordance with paragraph 1 of resolution 74/248, in March 2020 I reappointed Mohamed Chande Othman as Eminent Person to continue to review the information received and possible new information made available by Member States, including by individuals and private entities, to assess its probative value and to draw conclusions from the investigations already conducted. Owing to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in December 2020 the General Assembly decided, with my support, to extend the mandate of the Eminent Person, and also requested me to report to the Assembly before the end of the seventy-sixth session on progress that had been made.

I recall that I had previously appointed Mr. Othman as Eminent Person for successive periods in 2018 and 2017, pursuant to General Assembly resolutions 72/252 and 71/260, respectively, and I reported to the General Assembly on progress made in 2019 (A/73/973) and 2017 (A/71/1042). I also recall that I had previously appointed Mr. Othman as Head of the Independent Panel of Experts, established in accordance with Assembly resolution 69/246.

I renew my profound gratitude to the Eminent Person. The United Nations is indebted to him for this exemplary and consequential work in the pursuit of the full truth concerning the tragic event.

I am encouraged that the Eminent Person has received significant new information and that further advancements in the body of relevant knowledge have been made, following the review of many thousands of pages of records and forensic tests and consultation with experts. I note that such new information includes the areas of probable intercepts by Member States of relevant communications; the capacity of the armed forces of Katanga, or others, to have conducted a possible attack on flight SE-BDY; the presence in the area of foreign paramilitary and intelligence personnel; and further new information relevant to the context and surrounding events of 1961.

As in the 2019 report, the Eminent Person assesses that it remains plausible that an external attack or threat was a cause of the crash. I take note of the conclusion by the Eminent Person that it would not be reasonable at this point to reach a conclusion as to the cause of the tragic event based on presently available but incomplete information. At the same time, I am encouraged by the conclusion of the Eminent Person that, given the growing body of evidence, there remain only a limited number of hypotheses to explain what occurred on that fateful night.

I wish to express my gratitude to Member States, independent high-ranking officials appointed by Member States (Independent Appointees) to conduct reviews of their intelligence, security and defense files and private individuals and entities for their cooperation with the Eminent Person and their willingness to provide additional information.

I am encouraged that key Member States have committed at a high level to full cooperation and provided assurances that search requests have or will engage appropriate security, intelligence and defense agencies, and that Independent Appointees from a number of Member States have provided, and may provide in future, additional information. I am also encouraged by the significant information that has been provided to the Eminent Person by private individuals and non-governmental entities.

At the same time, the Eminent Person notes that: (a) no significant information has been provided by key Member States since mid-2017; (b) it is almost certain that further relevant information exists, including radio or other communications; (c) Member States have yet to discharge their burden of proof to show that they have conducted a full review of their records and archives resulting in full disclosure; (d) Independent Appointees may need more time to provide information; and (e) it would be neither judicious nor responsible to reach a conclusion without the benefit of all potentially material information, in circumstances where such information has been shown to be almost certain to exist.

Accordingly, I support the recommendation of the Eminent Person that the United Nations appoint an independent person to continue the work undertaken pursuant to the current mandate of the Eminent Person. I also support the Eminent Person’s recommendation that key Member States be again urged to appoint or reappoint Independent Appointees to determine whether relevant information exists in their security, intelligence and defense archives. More broadly, I call on Member States to ensure comprehensive access to all archives and provide relevant information, more than 60 years after the tragic event, and agree with the proposal of the Eminent Person that potential modes of disclosure and conditions of confidentiality be offered to Member States, without necessarily requiring that relevant information be disclosed in full or publicly.

I also support the Eminent Person’s recommendation that all Member States be encouraged to make assistance available to the independent person, including forensic analysis or other research.

Finally, I support the recommendation of the Eminent Person that the United Nations continue to work towards making key documents of the Dag Hammarskjöld investigation publicly available through a dedicated online collection, including documents pertaining to the 1961 United Nations Commission on Investigation, the 2013 Hammarskjöld Commission, the 2015 United Nations Independent Panel of Experts and the 2017 and 2019 reports of the Eminent Person, as well as his present report.

It remains our shared responsibility to pursue, with renewed urgency, the full truth of what happened on that fateful night in 1961. We owe this to Dag Hammarskjöld, to the members of the party accompanying him and to their respective families. We owe this also to the United Nations. I consider this to be our solemn duty and I will do everything I can to support this endeavour.

I call on the General Assembly to remain seized of the matter and to endorse the report of the Eminent Person and his recommendations, as discussed above.

(Signed) António Guterres

DOWNLOAD AND READ THE COMPLETE REPORT HERE:

N2244798

 

Filed Under: News and Views

Publication Spotlight: Uncovering Popov’s Mole: THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY VOLUME IV by John M. Newman

Who was the Soviet mole in the CIA?  Newman’s arguments will, I am sure, dominate all future discussions of this surprisingly important political question. 

— Peter Dale Scott

The publication of Uncovering Popov’s Mole represents an unprecedented examination of the decades-long search, within the CIA, for a mole working for the KGB. Unlike a British mole working for the KGB in MI-6 (Kim Philby), who publicly fled to Moscow to avoid capture, the mole in the CIA was never exposed or identified up to the present day. This volume presents an entirely new hypothesis on the authority and objectives of the mole–working within the CIA’s Office of Security–and reveals a dramatic new context in relation to understanding Lee Harvey Oswald’s 1959 defection to the USSR.

The molehunt wrought catastrophic consequences to the Agency for more than two decades. When viewed as a calculated misdirection, being run by the mole himself, what does that mean in relation to the utilization of Oswald as bait? There are staggering ramifications, the scope and depth of which may take years to come to light.

However, Newman’s work makes clear how the mole in the Security Office deflected attention from himself by convincing the chief of CIA counterintelligence, James Angleton, that Oswald could be used as bait to find the mole working in CIA’s Soviet Russia Division. Furthermore, Uncovering Popov’s Mole shows how Angleton unknowingly provided all of the Agency’s sensitive secrets to the mole in the Office of Security–as he had previously to Kim Philby.

Uncovering Popov’s Mole is the fourth volume in Dr. Newman’s series on the life, public service, and assassination of President Kennedy: Volume I, Where Angels Tread Lightly; Volume II, Countdown to Darkness; Volume III Into the Storm; and Volume IV, Uncovering Popov’s Mole. Soon to be published: Volume V, Armageddon.

These projects reexamine sacred orthodoxies, introduce vital new facts, and challenge many commonly accepted assumptions and interpretations. Dr. Newman’s ongoing work demystifies our hidden history and illuminates the darkest passages of America in the Cold War.

New doors are about to open. Newman’s works are history in the making.

RELATED: UNCOVERING POPOV’S MOLE SUPPLEMENT

Dr. John Newman: Adjunct Professor of Political Science at James Madison University; Major U.S. Army Intelligence (Retired); Military Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency, Lieutenant General William Odom. Newman’s other works include JFK and Vietnam (second edition pub. 2017), Oswald and the CIA, Quest for the Kingdom: The Secret Teachings of Jesus in the Light of Yogic Mysticism.

 

ORDER UNCOVERING POPOV’S MOLE BY CLICKING HERE

 

Customer Review

Alan Dale
5.0 out of 5 stars Oswald’s story didn’t start on 22 November 1963

Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on November 22, 2022

Verified Purchase

Every development in the history of deep JFK assassination research corresponds to a moment in time. As a work-in-progress, we are today building upon 59 years of records acquisition, data collection and analysis. It is what fuels our advancement and compels us to question our certainties and revise our beliefs; and it is in this context (more than 18 months ago), while overlaying a particular subset of travel records on top of event chronologies that this volume revealed itself.

Those who are deeply interested in the JFK story will have become accustomed to sifting through detritus. On the subject of alleged commie, alleged lone nut, alleged presidential assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, in no other area are we quite so inundated with major claims made by minor figures. In contrast to what some have declared about poor hapless misfit, Lee Oswald, being of no interest or value to either the KGB or CIA, we no longer have to speculate about some aspects of that debate. Uncovering Popov’s Mole is the first work to report and identify the trusted Minsk KGB defector, IJDECANTER, who gave unprecedented, privileged information to both the FBI (Flash Run) and the Agency about Marina and Lee Oswald’s time together in the Soviet Union.

Discussion of Oswald’s defection, his alleged familiarity with sensitive U-2 information, his proximity to the U-2 while stationed at Atsugi and, in particular, the probability that his role as defector was being managed as bait in a super-secret but authorized operation, must include some consideration of the following questions: What explanation can there be for action being undertaken within CIA, prior to Oswald’s defection, which changed the standard process of routine dissemination so that none of the relevant paperwork generated by that event went to the various desks of the Soviet Russia Division? Why, instead, were those documents diverted to the Office of Security? If this action was not initiated by Counterintelligence chief, James Angleton, to whom so many have concluded, perhaps prematurely, that all mysterious roads must lead, then who else had the authority to conceive and conduct this operation? And, finally, not merely who, but why? Why was this action undertaken? The answers being offered in this book may surprise.

To get to the answers to those questions, Dr. Newman leads us on a very deep dive into the mid-1950s through 1975, with moles and mole hunts, defectors and liars, traitors and scoundrels and fools all along the way. There’s also quite a bit that will inform our reluctant but appropriate admission: there were giants and Grand Masters, on both sides, at work as adversaries on the Cold War chess board, Ivan Agayantz, Pete Bagley, and Sergei Kondrachev most notably among them.

Uncovering Popov’s Mole is not an only child. For several decades, Professor Peter Dale Scott and a devoted group of JFK assassination researchers have focused on what was visible in the bright mid-day sun being reflected off the chrome of President Kennedy’s limousine in Dealey Plaza, and also upon what has been hidden, deliberately, inside the instantly enveloping darkness of very real and very deep Cold War history.

The focus of Dr. Newman’s body of work represents a major commitment to review the available documentary record, and to identify as many as is possible of the primary and secondary Cold War players on both sides. The case being made within these pages is that, as of 31 October 1959, Lee Oswald was an essential part of a false mole hunt that was specially crafted by the mole to mislead the Counterintelligence (CI) staff, deflect attention away from himself, and focus instead upon the Agency’s Soviet Russia Division. This was done under the cover of appearing to be a legitimate mole hunt, necessarily initiated in response to Pyotr Popov’s 1958 warning that the Soviet authorities had acquired complete technical details of the U-2 spy plane.

It’s a helluva ride. Five stars. Highest recommendation.

 

Praise for Uncovering Popov’s Mole

 

With his trademark attention to the fine details of the files, John Newman here unravels the mystery of Popov’s mole, or how the edifice of US Cold War intelligence was rotten at its core. Then as now, hubris ruled the official view of Russia, leading then to the debacle in Vietnam and now to the brink of general war.

—James K. Galbraith

The University of Texas at Austin

 

A spy thriller worthy of Le Carré—John Newman has done it again. Using his formidable skills as an intelligence analyst, he leads us through the CIA’s wilderness of mirrors into America’s heart of darkness. His groundbreaking research turns decades of conventional wisdom on its head, and reveals the answer to one of the greatest mysteries of the Cold War—the true identity of the KGB’s high-level mole in the CIA.

—Eric Hamburg

produced the film Nixon and is a former aide to Senator John Kerry and Representative Lee Hamilton

 

Major Newman dissects two battles fought behind the scenes during the tensest moments of the Cold War, one fought at CIA over indications that the agency had a KGB mole in its ranks, and one fought at the Pentagon over the role of nuclear weapons in America’s confrontation with the Soviet Union. In the process, Major Newman will leave readers with a brand-new understanding of 11/22/63 and its aftermath.

—Larry Haapanen

is the former editor, Kennedy Assassination Chronicles

 

John Newman has documented the complicated story of the USSR vs. USA “spy wars” throughout the 1950s and early 1960s in a way that makes this complicated subject eminently understandable. For me, it is now a very dramatic story, and a very human one, as well—featuring both honorable defectors, and dishonorable fake defectors, all from the USSR—and their motivations. Complicating the tale is a story of incompetence and deceit within the Central Intelligence Agency, amidst the never-ending search for the Soviet mole within the CIA. Newman reveals, for the first time, the virtually certain identity of the true Soviet mole within America’s spy agency—and the reasons why this individual was never discovered during his lifetime. John Newman is convinced that the fake defection of Lee Harvey Oswald to the USSR in 1959, an unsuccessful attempt to indirectly uncover the Soviet mole’s identity—was part of an elaborate “fake mole hunt” within the CIA, engineered as an intentional deflection by the Soviet mole himself! Finally, the author explains the unfolding spy wars saga in parallel with the simultaneous key developments in the nuclear arms race between the world’s two superpowers—something I have never seen anyone else do.

— Douglas Horne

former Chief Analyst for Military Records, ARRB

Filed Under: News and Views, Uncategorized

‘What are they hiding?’: Group sues Biden and National Archives over JFK assassination records

NBC News|Marc Caputo

October 19, 2022, 6:00 AM

The country’s largest online source of JFK assassination records is suing President Joe Biden and the National Archives to force the federal government to release all remaining documents related to the most mysterious murder of a U.S. president nearly 60 years ago.

The Mary Ferrell Foundation filed the federal lawsuit Wednesday one year after Biden issued a memo postponing the release of a final trove of 16,000 records assembled under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, which Congress passed without opposition in response to Oliver Stone’s Oscar-nominated film “JFK.”

The JFK records act, signed by President George H. W. Bush, required that the documents be made public by Oct. 26, 2017, but President Donald Trump delayed the release and kicked the can to Biden, who critics say continued the policy of federal obfuscation that has existed since Kennedy was assassinated Nov. 22, 1963, in an open motorcade at Dealey Plaza in Dallas.

“It’s high time that the government got its act together and obeyed the spirit and the letter of the law,” said the vice president of the nonpartisan Mary Ferrell Foundation, Jefferson Morley, an expert on the assassination and the CIA.

“This is about our history and our right to know it,” said Morley, the author of the JFK Facts blog.

Morley’s sentiment is shared by fellow historians, open government advocates and even some members of the Kennedy family, who usually don’t comment on the assassination.

“It was a momentous crime, a crime against American democracy. And the American people have the right to know,” said Robert Kennedy Jr., the son and namesake of JFK’s brother. “The law requires the records be released. It’s bizarre. It’s been almost 60 years since my uncle’s death. What are they hiding?”

Most experts believe that the unreleased or heavily redacted records almost certainly don’t include irrefutable proof that shows others were complicit in the murder of Kennedy along with accused shooter Lee Harvey Oswald.

What the records would shed more light on, they say, is a seminal period in American history linked to JFK’s presidency and assassination: Cold War operations by U.S. intelligence agents, U.S.-Cuba relations and the plot to kill dictator Fidel Castro, and the war on the Mafia waged by then-Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, who was assassinated five years after his brother.

The hidden documents, however, could also show something potentially more sinister: CIA contacts with Oswald while Kennedy was still alive, which the CIA has repeatedly covered up, according to experts like Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, a former CIA agent who is critical of the agency and has lectured about JFK’s assassination at Harvard University.

“What I think happened, in a nutshell, is that Oswald was recruited into a rogue CIA plot,” Mowatt-Larssen said. “This group of three, four or five rogues decided their motive [was] to get rid of Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis because they thought it was their patriotic duty given the threat the country was under at the time and their views, which would be more hard-line or more radically anti-communist and very extreme politically.”

In a statement to NBC News, the CIA said it is adhering to the JFK records act and Biden’s memo, which called for the release of the documents by Dec. 15. The National Archives and Records Administration, the agency in charge of the JFK documents, also said it’s complying with the law and the procedures Biden outlined.

But the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in San Francisco federal court, argues that the federal agencies haven’t followed the law and that both Biden’s executive order and Trump’s previous delay violated the 1992 statute, creating new loopholes and avenues for further unjustifiable postponements after six decades of opacity.

The suit asks a judge to declare Biden’s memo void and disclose the records as Congress intended 30 years ago. Biden’s memo blamed the coronavirus pandemic for slowing the disclosure process, an argument rejected by the foundation’s attorney, Bill Simpich.

“It’s a ‘dog ate my homework’ argument,” Simpich said. “This case is all about delay. The agencies always have new and better excuses.”

The foundation fears that agencies haven’t made enough progress in the year since the memo was issued in meeting the basic rules of disclosure under the JFK records act, necessitating the lawsuit.

The 16,000 documents are among the most sensitive records concerning JFK’s assassination. About 70% of them are controlled by the CIA, followed by the FBI, which is in charge of about 23% of the records, according to Morley’s count.

The suit alleges the federal government unlawfully redacted 11 specific records, including: a 1961 memo to reorganize the CIA after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in Cuba, personnel files of three CIA officers tied to Oswald, a 1962 Defense Department “false flag” plan to stage a “violent incident” in the U.S. that would be blamed on Cuba, records relating to the Castro assassination plot, and a JFK document removed from Watergate burglar E. Howard Hunt’s security file.

The foundation is also asking the court to order the National Archives to find records that are “known to exist but that are not part of the JFK Collection.”

One of those records, according to the lawsuit, concerns George Joannides, who was the chief of covert action at the CIA’s Miami station and “served as case officer for a New Orleans-based CIA-funded exile group that had a series of encounters with Lee Oswald in 1963.” The lawsuit accuses the CIA of wrongly withholding files related to Joannides from the National Archives.

In another instance, the lawsuit asks the court to compel the public release of taped recordings of a man named Carlos Marcello, who allegedly told a cellmate that he was involved in JFK’s assassination. Transcripts of the recordings exist, but the foundation wants to hear the recordings to “fully evaluate the veracity and significance of these conversations.” Marcello died in 1993.

The foundation says the timing of the lawsuit is coincidental to Trump’s fight over classified records with the Justice Department and the National Archives, an agency that is seldom in the news but now plays a central role in the investigation of records stored at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida after he left office.

JFK assassination historian David Talbot, a Trump critic, said he sees an irony in the two cases.

“They decided to pillory Trump over this issue because he’s a political enemy, but they’re guilty of violating records laws themselves with the JFK records act: Trump took documents the federal government owned, but they’re sitting on documents that belong to the American people,” said Talbot, the author of “Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years” and “The Devil’s Chessboard,” about the rise of the national security state.

A spokesman for Trump declined to comment.

Talbot said the agencies’ stonewalling and the Warren Commission’s disputed conclusion in 1964 that Oswald was a lone wolf has only led people to mistrust the government.

An expert on conspiracy theories, Joseph E. Uscinski, a University of Miami political science professor, says his polling and research have shown that a majority of Americans don’t believe Oswald acted alone, making it the most popular conspiracy theory in the country.

Uscinski said he’s hesitant to draw a direct line between lack of trust in the government and the refusal to release the JFK records, but he argued the feds essentially have themselves to blame.

“The whole argument about documents is stupid. The CIA is wrong. All of this should have been released a long time ago, and it’s shameful the government has yet to do so,” Uscinski said. “At the same time, there’s not a document sitting in a government vault somewhere that says, ‘We did it.’”

[Special thanks to Bill Simpich, Larry Schnapf, Mark Adamzyk, Jefferson Morley and Rex Bradford]

 

RELATED: Jefferson Morley on CNN

 

Filed Under: News and Views

Rolando Cubela: 19 January 1933 – 23 August 2022

Rolando Cubela, Cuban revolutionary who became involved in a CIA plot to assassinate Castro –

Fidel Castro and Rolando Cubela during a more convivial time in their relationship.

He was equipped with a poison-filled pen but plans were aborted after Kennedy’s assassination and some suspected he was a double agent. He was a Cuban revolutionary leader who played a vital part in the Cuban Revolution, having been a founding member of the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil and later the military leader of the DRE’s Escambray Mountain front,[1] achieving the rank of Commander, the highest military rank in the Revolutionary Army. After the Revolution succeeded in 1959, Cubela became Cuba’s envoy to UNESCO. Under the cryptonym AM/LASH, Cubela became “an important asset” of the Central Intelligence Agency, and worked with them on plots to assassinate Fidel Castro.[2] In 1966, Cubela was arrested for plotting the assassination of Castro, and sentenced to 25 years in prison. Released in 1979, he went into exile in Spain.

Cubela was born in Cienfuegos, Cuba, on 19 January 1933,[3][4] though many sources incorrectly cite 1932.[5][6] In 1955 Cubela was a founding member of the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil (DRE), and was one of eight members of its Executive Council.[7] In 1956 Cubela was part of a DRE group which attempted to assassinate Santiago Rey Perna, a member of President Fulgencio Batista‘s cabinet; Perna was absent at the time of the attack and the group instead assassinated Antonio Blanco Rico,[8] head of Cuban military intelligence.[5] The incident prompted Chief of National Police Rafael Salas Canizares to assault the Haitian embassy in Havana, where some revolutionaries were seeking political asylum; Canizares and ten revolutionaries were killed.[8] After the assassination, Cubela went into exile in the United States in late 1956, returning to Cuba in 1958.[5]

In mid-1958, Cubela was disputing leadership of the Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil with Eloy Gutiérrez Menoyo. Menoyo had developed the Escambray Mountain front which was the center of DRE activity after the failed March 1957 coup attempt in Havana; but Menoyo had joined the DRE more recently whilst Cubela was a founding member. Cubela was ultimately recognized as DRE military leader, and Menoyo left the organization.[1] Menoyo formed the Segundo Frente del Escambray, a group that continued the fight against Batista. Years later, after the triumph of the Revolution, many of the Segundo Frente members fought against the new regime of Fidel Castro.[9] Cubela leading the DRE was wounded in the Battle of Santa Clara.[5]

After the Cuban Revolution, Cubela was appointed Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Government in 1959, and in October was elected head of the Federación Estudiantíl Universitaria. Cubela made significant contributions in the early months of the revolutionary government to the reconciliation of the different revolutionary groups, and in 1960 to the merger of various youth and student groups.[5] In summer 1960, Cubela met an old friend, Carlos Tepedino, who was by then working for the CIA under the cryptonym AMWHIP.[5] After Cuban leader Fidel Castro had – in Cubela’s view – betrayed the revolution and established a communist dictatorship, Cubela became disenchanted and started plotting with the CIA and other opponents of the Castro regime to try to end Castro’s government and return to a non-socialist course for the country.[9]

Cubela later became “an important asset” of the Central Intelligence Agency under the cryptonym AM/LASH, and worked with them on plots to assassinate Fidel Castro.[2] In October 1963, Cubela met with Desmond Fitzgerald, head of the CIA’s Special Affairs Staff, in Paris, over the objections of some SAS staff who considered Cubela a possible dangle or at least a security risk.[10] At another Paris meeting, on 22 November 1963, Cubela received a “poison pen” – a fountain pen with a hypodermic needle to be used to inject Castro with a poison.[11] Nevertheless, Cubela was insisting on a meeting with US Attorney General Robert Kennedy before proceeding with the assassination of Castro. The CIA cautious of “plausible deniability” stalled. In June 1965, however, the Agency terminated its relationship with Cubela “for reasons related to security”.[12]

On 28 February 1966, Castro summoned Cubela to his office, and had him arrested for plotting to kill the head of state. The prosecution did not refer to Cubela’s pre-1964 CIA contacts or activities, including the 1963 poison pen episode, limiting evidence to 1964–5 activities.[13] After Castro petitioned the court to avoid the death penalty, Cubela was sentenced to 25 years in prison.[14] After his pardon by Castro and his release in 1979,[15] he went into exile to Spain, and became a physician.[16][page needed] He spent the last years of his life in Miami, Florida, where he did not participate in the political activities of the Cuban exile community.[17]

He died on 24 August 2022 at a hospital in Doral, Florida, United States.[18]

— From Wikipedia

Filed Under: News and Views

MUTE STONES: A Timely Essay by Professor David R. Wrone

David R. Wrone|21 August, 2022

Mute Stones

There are times, however few, when even mute stones can teach lost folk and even inform wizen pols. They can in crisis impart an appeal for urgent reform and urge the politicos to apply balm to make whole our wounded Gilead our plighted country.  Once in an odd, serendipitous moment in the nation’s capital I wandered into an instance where stones carried a mighty lesson.  But the age-old problem raises its head of whether anyone in their helter-skelter busy life saw it.  That is a hard question to answer.

One day in February 1970, in Washington D. C. this idea came crowding through my mind as I looked through a dusty window on the 2nd floor of an old brick building at 918 F Street that had that had just become a new home for the office and many records of the peripatetic Assassination Archives and Research Center, an organization concerned with political murders.  I was looking into an over one-hundred-year-old alley whose silent stones held a history with great political meaning.

Late in the evening of April 14, 1865, a horse had come thundering over those very cobble stones bearing a dybbuk with a broken leg, the sleazy and narcissistic actor John Wilkes Booth.  Earlier at 10:15 an addled Fate had ruled his actions when he had snuck into Ford’s Theater presidential box; There sat Abraham Lincoln. He could slip in because the throat of the guard who had been ordered to sit outside the door had become parched and whiskey pulled him from his chair to go down stairs to the bar to quaff his thirst.

Booth fired a single, terribly wounding, .44 caliber bullet from his Derringer into the head of Lincoln, jumped to the stage floor from the box seat, but caught his leg on some drapery, and landed badly on the boards, breaking his femur. Lincoln died the next morning at 7:22, the time ever after used by horologists to set display time pieces.

When news reached the far away Illinois prairies shocked friends who had known him for 25 years and had held him in the highest esteem were stunned.  In one village, Clinton, where he had from time-to-time on a legal circuit practiced law, a wealthy land owner citizen uttered ‘“Our Christ-like leader” has fallen.’ The Irish revolutionary editor of the paper that Lincoln had weekly mailed to him in Washington was beside himself with grief. And, a child wept in the street.  On the far away battlefields in Virginia when the news came of the wretched act, desperate generals feared for a moment they could not hold in check their maddened troops, who fain would revolt and march on the capital to destroy what they (falsely) perceived to be a rebel dastardly coup d’état launched with the killing of the man whom they adored beyond all measure.

Booth had hobbled to the theater’s back door, pushed through it, mounted his tethered horse, and galloped down the alley to F street, turned right to pass 918 and escaped. 12 days later with Modoc tenacity Union soldiers had finally trapped the Wiskanupic* in a rustic wooden tobacco barn in Virginia.

To drive him out they set it afire. One Sgt. Boston Corbett of the 16th N. Y. Cavalry sighting through the belching flames and roiling smoke of an opening in the plank wall slats spied him.  A decidedly odd man, certifiably Jesus-mad, who a few years before in the midst of anguish over unchristian sexual urges, in his room had with scissors snipped off his offending private parts.  Through the fire he shot and killed the assassin.

Today, Washington has not forgotten this man Lincoln who had saved the nation; several businesses now thrive on the coin that they pluck from tourists by exploiting his death and Booth’s flight. Where profit is, therefore is their country and morality is an orphan. Around the District also there are several places and memorials devoted to coining Lincoln, for what is the nation’s savior worth if not to make them some money.

Several statues are dedicated to him. One infused the soul of the recently arrived new Wisconsin Congressman Fighting Bob LaFollette who as he looked up at it, vowed to buckle on his armor and burnish his shield to fight the good fight for a better world. Like Horatio’s fabled stand at the bridge, he would years later come home wreathed in glory, on his shield. to a state wrapped in sorrow.

Odds and ends of the Lincoln assassination clutter several of the district’s 100 museums and art galleries. Here a pistol, there a fragment.  In one a blood- stained cloth from Lincoln’s autopsy that a corrupt Navy medical officer assisting in the 1963 autopsy of President John F. Kennedy said he saw with blood on it; he peddled to the beguiled nation as his excuse for lying along with a pox of Navy admirals about why he burned the first draft of JFK’s autopsy in his home fireplace. He did not want JFK’s blood-stained document around for the ages to see and ponder and gawk at.

For the second draft he also used stuff from the local newspaper (!) that apparently Naval medical schools must have taught him, a singularly act and every fact in it in gross error.  He also as well as invented, just conjured these Oswald damming facts. He missed two of the bullet wounds (!). His corruption arose when he had heard the claimed assassin L. H. Oswald had been shot and fortuitously the military knew there would be no cross examination of their role in the autopsy.  So, in addition to medical knowledge he had crime detection knowledge, a Sherlock Holmes in green medical scrubs

We must note the place of the hanging of the gang that conspired with Booth occurred in the district area with several of the soldiers guarding the group Menominee Indians from Wisconsin who had months earlier been “piped into service” and rushed to the battle front in a week without training of any kind.

To focus merely on Lincoln’s murder though is a diversion from the bloody realty that help define the nature of the District of Columbia, which I think must be the most violent actual and celebrating one on earth.  There were several assassinations. Ambassador Orlando Leterrier was blown up on embassy row, President James Garfield was shot and killed at the railroad station on 12th street. The nation suffered no loss for he was a man without moral compass and a common murderer who when his staff told him the Sioux Indians were starving from his troops having cooped them and then denied rations, famously remarked “let them starve.”

* * *

Puerto Rican nationalists blew up five Congressmen.  A statue to Martin Luther King, Jr., murdered by persons unknown stands on the mall, paintings of assassinated President McKinley killed in Buffalo hangs in galleries as Mammon worshippers’ a fond tribute to a fellow swine. Near the far side of the polluted Potomac River rests the graves of President John Kennedy and his brother Robert each shot by unknown persons in faraway cities.

In the District are statues marking some of our many wars, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Revolution. There are 17 memorials and statues to military around the area, a massive war building in the Pentagon and several forts. Also, there are so many statues to generals and other professional soldiers sprinkled around the several score are sometimes referred to as a cast iron regiment.

There is also to be found a statue to Daniel Boone driving a knife into a Shawnee Indian and a political propaganda frieze of future VP Richard Johnson in a battle killing the Indian leader Tecumseh who had dared to retain a fragment of his original land for his beleaguered tribe. (RJ’s role was a simple federal lie, someone else did and he just took the glory, after all he was a general. His troops with unalloyed joy mutilated dead Indians and cut off body parts for souvenirs—fingers, ears, jawbones, scrotums, skin for strops, etc.

In the capitol dome are friezes of one of history’s most despicable persons, Hernan Desoto.  He landed with a force in the southern area of the future nation with a military force and proceeded to war against Indians.  He fed his war dogs on Indian prisoners of war.

There are numerous sites where anti-war protests, war riots, crowed control by armed force have occurred.

There is one to Andrew Jackson who is infamous as a war leader for his sneak into then Spanish Florida capturing a Creek Indian chief who had just saved an American officer from execution and freed him.  Jackson hung the pagan savage.  He later as president in D. C. beat off a deranged attacker whose pistols aimed at him unfortunately misfired.

There are various statues in the Statuary Hall that qualify.

In addition, in the Archives we have the heads of 100,000 Indians and of many more skeletons.

 

 

 

*Wiskanupic is a Menominee Indian word for a force of evil--a bearded snake!! that comes out of the ground and does wrong.

Filed Under: News and Views

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • 63
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Donate your preferred amount to support the work of the AARC.

cards
Powered by paypal

Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Warren Commission
  • Garrison Investigation
  • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
  • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • LBJ Library
  • Other Agencies and Commissions
  • Church Committee Reports

Recent Posts

  • RFK Jr. asked Obama to probe ‘two gunmen’ theory, called for reexamination of his father’s assassination: new files
  • PRESIDENT’S PAGE
  • Planned Attack on Lady Gaga Concert in Brazil Is Foiled, Police Say
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • NEW: Records Related to the Assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy
Copyright 2014 AARC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Tools