ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • About the AARC
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • President’s Page
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership

Copyright AARC

George Michael Evica: The Assassination Chronicles 1995 — 1998

Courtesy of JFK Lancer and The Mary Ferrell Foundation

“George Michael was a versatile thinker who was not hesitant to explore new pathways. He had an intuitive sense of direction when it came to identifying important areas that were outside the well-worn consensus of the time. I remember him fondly.”
 — John M. Newman

George Michael Evica

Autumn Too Long: A Remembrance

by Charles Robert Drago

Objectivity, I am pleased to admit, is simply unimaginable when I contemplate the life and legacy of George Michael Evica.

At his insistence, George Michael became my indispensable friend, mentor, spiritual guide, and, all too soon, my spirit guide.  From the day we met in the ’90s at the First Research Conference of “The Third Decade”, beloved Professor Jerry Rose’s JFK assassination scholarly journal published at the State University of New York, Fredonia, he and his beautiful, brilliant wife Alycia welcomed me into the heart of their family.  I returned the favor.  For the rest of their earthly lives, we were inseparable.  And so we remain today.

I cannot begin to thank my friend and colleague Alan Dale for editing and bringing to electronic print this far from complete yet marvelously representative collection of George Michael’s research papers.  Allow me to quote briefly from them here.

George Michael is (I write and speak of him in the present tense; he is with us not just in spirit, but as spirit) a polymath of the highest order.  Among his areas of expertise which he shared in the classroom as well as on the printed paged are Myth and Ritual in Literature, Genre Studies in Literature, Literary Criticism, Consciousness Development and the Symbolic Process, Linguistics, Film Studies, Creative Writing, Investigative Reporting, and Investigative History. He also pursued Advanced Studies in Linguistics and Anthropology at Columbia University (1957-1960) and Advanced Studies in Myth and Literature at Hartford Seminary Foundation (1971-73).  All of these disciplines inform his JFK-related endeavors, in the aggregate a furious storm of influences unmatched before or since.

It is all but forgotten that George Michael organized and hosted the first national conference on the JFK Assassination in October, 1975, at the University of Hartford.  Jim Garrison participated and made certain to celebrate him for his incomparable work.

My stupefaction and, to be blunt, outrage that, among a significant majority of serious (self-styled and otherwise) JFK assassination researchers, George Michael’s Kennedy-related literary oeuvre remains neglected, minimally understood, and in some instances unknown, cannot be overstated.  The abandonment of this accumulated institutional knowledge has resulted in inferior duplication of effort that contribute mightily to the delay and to date denial of justice for the murdered president and the countless millions who make up the collateral damage of the Dealey Plaza attack.

What then of justice? Have we any reason to expect the guilty to be punished, the disease to be eradicated? The novelist Jim Harrison:

“People finally don’t have much affection for questions, especially one so leprous as the apparent lack of a fair system of rewards and punishments on earth … We would like to think that the whole starry universe would curdle … the conjunctions of Orion twisted askew, the arms of the Southern Cross drooping. Of course not; immutable is immutable and everyone in his own private manner dashes his brains against the long suffering question that is so luminously obvious. Even gods aren’t exempt; note Jesus’ howl of despair as he stepped rather tentatively into eternity.”

In “A Certain Arrogance,” George Michael’s final book length assassination study, he presents compelling arguments to support the conclusion that the conspiracy that took JFK’s life was supra-national in origin and execution.  He summarized his revelation thusly: it was facilitated, he declared, by “a treasonous cabal of hard-line American and Soviet intelligence agents whose masters were above Cold War differences.”

I closed my Introduction to “A Certain Arrogance” with the following meditation:

November is a cruel month, and one that figures all too prominently in the life and times of George Michael Evica.

It was on a brilliant, unnaturally warm November morning in 2007 that loved ones laid to rest my friend and mentor, my confidante and comrade-in-arms, my spiritual guide and now my spirit guide.

As I carried the incongruously small urn that contained his physical remains, my thoughts drifted to another November day, when George Michael and I had found ourselves in Dealey Plaza at dusk, far from the madding crowd.  Light was filtered thinly through brittle leaves and sorrow.  And I asked if he too sensed the presence of unquiet spirits.

As usual, George Michael was years ahead of me.  He said that he had experienced the same feelings on many occasions in that place.  He spoke at length, his voice subdued yet redolent with conviction, about his certainty that the fight against the forces that struck John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the same forces that today prowl the killing fields of the Middle East and Africa and Asia and the Americas, endures into the next world.

The calm of Saint John’s churchyard where he rests represents but a temporary respite.

I am drawn to the words of novelist James Lee Burke, who showed us that he understands this immutable truth when he wrote the following ruminative passage for his fictional Cajun detective Dave Robicheaux:

“Down the canyon, smoke from meat fires drifted through the cedar and mesquite trees, and if I squinted my eyes in the sun’s setting, I could almost pretend that Spanish soldiers in silver chest armor and bladed helmets or a long-dead race of hunters were encamped on those hillsides.  Or maybe even old compatriots in butternut brown wending their way in and out of history … gallant, Arthurian, their canister-ripped colors unfurled in the roiling smoke, the fatal light in their faces a reminder that the contest is never quite over, the field never quite ours.”

  *   *   *   *   *   *

The Assassination Chronicles

SUMMER 1995: Vol. 1, Issue 2
This Dirty Rumor
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1319#relPageId=19
WINTER 1995: Vol. 1, Issue 4
The Assassination Chronicles Has A New Editor
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1321#relPageId=4
Perfect Cover: A Theory of What Happened on November 22, 1963
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1321#relPageId=29
SPRING 1996: Vol. 2, Issue 1
Behind the Lines — Notes from the Editor
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4254#relPageId=9
A Rifle Symposium by GME, Anthony Marsh and Martha Moyers
(And We Are All Still Mortal: Thomas Dodd and Lee Harvey Oswald)
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4254#relPageId=19
SUMMER 1996: Vol. 2, Issue 2
Jim Garrison: In History and Film
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4255#relPageId=6
Behind the Lines — Submission Guidelines
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4255#relPageId=47
FALL 1996: Vol. 2, Issue 3
Behind the Lines — This Dark Direction: A Statement of Purpose
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4256#relPageId=5
WINTER 1996: Vol. 2, Issue 4
Behind the Lines — November 22, 1963: November 22, 1996
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4257#relPageId=7
SPRING 1997: Vol. 3, Issue 1
Behind the Lines — Questions
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4258#relPageId=5
SUMMER 1997: Vol. 3, Issue 2
Gerald Ford’s Terrible Fiction
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4259#relPageId=33
WINTER 1997: Vol. 3, Issue 4
Behind the Lines — 1997 JFK Lancer Conference Summary and Thanks
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4261#relPageId=4
The 81 Promises: Contexts of the Crime
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4261#relPageId=8
SPRING 1998: Vol. 4, Issue 1
Amnesty: The Initiative’s Origins
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4262#relPageId=7
SUMMER 1998: Vol. 4, Issue 3
Evica Retires As Editor and Conference Chair
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4264#relPageId=3

RELATED:

Publication Spotlight: George Michael Evica’s A Certain Arrogance: The Sacrificing of Lee Harvey Oswald and the Wartime Manipulation of Religious Groups by U.S. Intelligence

 

 

Filed Under: News and Views

30 December 2022: Mandate to renew the UN Investigation into the death of UNSG Hammarskjöld

Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations from April 1953 until his death in a plane crash in September 1961.

Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations from April 1953 until his death in a plane crash in September 1961.

Courtesy of Susan Williams:

On 30 December 2022, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution A/77/L.31, which authorises the renewal of the UN’s ‘Investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld and of the members of the party accompanying him.’ It further authorises the reappointment of the Eminent Person, Judge Mohamed Chande Othman, to lead the investigation.

The Resolution was initiated by Sweden and co-sponsored by 141 Member States (out of 193). The US and the UK did not co-sponsor the resolution.

The Resolution follows Judge Othman’s latest report (A/76/892), which is readily available on the UNA Westminster webpages on developments relating to the Hammarskjöld plane crash (along with various other significant documents and updates).

 

In this latest report, Judge Othman writes:

‘…I respectfully submit that the burden of proof to conduct a full review of records and archives resulting in full disclosure has not been discharged at the present time. Indeed, information received from other sources under the present mandate underscores that it is almost certain that these Member States [that is to say, the USA, the UK, and South Africa] created, held or were otherwise aware of specific and important information regarding the cause of the tragic event. That information is yet to be disclosed.’  

In case of interest, the passing of the Resolution by the GA can be watched on UNTV. It takes about three minutes from 1.04.40: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k14/k14tlsg06p

 

RELATED:

Do Spy Agencies Hold Answer to Dag Hammarskjold’s Death? U.N. Wants to Know

Investigation into the conditions and circumstances resulting in the tragic death of Dag Hammarskjöld and of the members of the party accompanying him

Filed Under: News and Views

2017, 2018, 2021, 2022, and now, June of 2023; some things seem not to change

 Prescient, you say? Uh-huh.

Following is from my Malcolm Blunt book, The Devil is in the Details, Chapter Seven, Quilted Patterns, published November 2020. The conversation took place in late November of 2016:
MALCOLM BLUNT: … I think one of the most important things, Alan, when you check the records, you go through the Warren Commission records – the working papers and the working notes of John Hart Ely – you find in the subtext of some of the drafts where he discusses the fact that there may have to be material alteration in Lee Harvey Oswald’s biography.
ALAN DALE: Material alteration.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Material alterations, yep.
ALAN DALE: And his name is John Hart Ely.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Yep.
ALAN DALE: So why would there, why would there have to be material alterations?
MALCOLM BLUNT: Well, we get back to the same thing: because some things just don’t fit.
ALAN DALE: Time after – it’s not just one thing; it’s time after time after time after time.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Some things just don’t fit.
ALAN DALE: Well, that’s a drag, that’s a drag. I’m holding a document that you shared with me. It’s CIA document 104-10331-10129; it’s JFK document, Agency originator CIA, from…withheld – we’re not supposed to know, although you have an educated guess about the woman…
MALCOLM BLUNT: Mmhmm.
ALAN DALE: …responsible for writing this – and it’s addressed to J. Barry Harrelson. Now who was J. Barry Harrelson?
MALCOLM BLUNT: He was chief of the Historical Review Group.
ALAN DALE: Inside the Agency.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Inside the Agency. They were in charge of cooperating with the ARRB and getting stuff released.
ALAN DALE: Yeah. And some of them were proactive a little bit, or at least not completely, you know, obstructionist, right?
MALCOLM BLUNT: Yeah. I think there were people there who were generally trying to get stuff put out there, yeah.
ALAN DALE: Mmhmm. So, the piece of correspondence to which this cover sheet refers is from within the Agency to someone in the Historical Review Group of the Agency.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Mm.
ALAN DALE: And it’s dated December 21st 1995, so it’s towards the beginning era of the ARRB.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Mmhmm.
ALAN DALE: And – may I read this just for a moment?
MALCOLM BLUNT: Sure, yeah.
ALAN DALE: Just for the record, Senator.
MALCOLM BLUNT: For the record, yeah.
ALAN DALE: I want to read this into the record.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Yeah.
ALAN DALE:
SUBJECT: JFK – Postponed Release Dates.
I looked over the Board’s press release of December 20th 1995 which you faxed to me this morning. You asked me whether the Board had the power to set future “release dates” of postponed documents, as stated in the final paragraph of page 2.
Based on my review of the JFK Act, the Board’s statement that it is their responsibility to set “postponed released dates” is not quite accurate. When the Board decides to postpone a document, it also sets a date or condition for future disclosure (JFK ACT Sec 9(3)(B)). At that time the originating agency and the Archivist review the document again (JFK ACT Sec 5(g)(1)). Although it is obviously the Board’s hope that the document ultimately gets released in full, the Agency and the Archivist will have the power to continue to postpone release if necessary. Any decisions to continue postponement, however, must be supported by a written unclassified statement that will be published in the Federal Register.
As you are well aware, all records shall be released in full by 2017. However, even then, the Agency can always appeal to the President. Postponement is possible beyond 2017 if the President certifies that it is necessary to prevent an identifiable harm to military defense, intelligence, law enforcement or foreign relations and that harm outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
In sum, it would be more accurate to state that the Board is setting future “review” dates, and not “release” dates.
I hope this answers your question. If you have any further questions let me know.
MALCOLM BLUNT: I think that’s a very interesting communication, because it gives an insight into Agency thinking on the release of documents. They don’t quite see it the way that we see it. We think…
ALAN DALE: [laughing]. Yeah. No, they’re on a different side.
MALCOLM BLUNT: …that everything is going to be released in 2017 – there might be a few appeals to the President – but they see it slightly different.
ALAN DALE: Mmhmm.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Slightly differently, yeah.
ALAN DALE: So even though that was written – it’s in-house, from inside the Agency to another part of the interior of the Agency…
MALCOLM BLUNT: Yeah.
ALAN DALE: It’s from 1995, but it’s still relevant, you know, it still has meaning to us.
MALCOLM BLUNT: Sure.
ALAN DALE: Here we are on the threshold of 2017, but there’s nothing, no reason to think that the policy is…
MALCOLM BLUNT: Well, it just gives us, you know, an insight into their perspective.
ALAN DALE: Mmhmm.
MALCOLM BLUNT: You know, they don’t quite see it as, you know, 2017 releases, they see it as a possibility that the can could be kicked further down the road. That’s what I’m seeing there. For certain, for certain, you know, documents and certain materials.
[Note: This is exactly what happened. Following a successful appeal to President Donald Trump to postpone full release of all remaining JFK assassination records, there was a review date set for 6 months after the scheduled release date of 26 October, 2017; The next review of currently withheld documents is scheduled for 2023]
Transcript by Mary Constantine.

ORDER THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS HERE

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: Assassination records, CIA, JFK, JFK records, John F. Kennedy, Kennedy assassination. John F. Kennedy

15 DECEMBER 2022 JFK RECORDS RELEASE

JFK Assassination Records – 2022 Additional Documents Release

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2022?page=264

 

JFK Assassination Bulk Download Files

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/jfkbulkdownload

Filed Under: News and Views, Uncategorized

White House Announcement RE JFK Records 15 DECEMBER 2022

Memorandum on Certifications Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

SUBJECT:      Certifications Regarding Disclosure of
Information in Certain Records Related to the
Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

Section 1.  Policy.  As set forth in the Presidential Memorandum of October 22, 2021 (Temporary Certification Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy) (2021 Memorandum), in the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note) (the “Act”), the Congress declared that “all Government records concerning the assassination of President John F. Kennedy . . . should be eventually disclosed to enable the public to become fully informed about the history surrounding the assassination.”  The Congress also found that “most of the records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are almost 30 years old, and only in the rarest cases is there any legitimate need for continued protection of such records.”  In the 30 years since the Act became law, the profound national tragedy of President Kennedy’s assassination continues to resonate in American history and in the memories of so many Americans who were alive on that terrible day; meanwhile, the need to protect records concerning the assassination has weakened with the passage of time.  It is therefore critical to ensure that the United States Government maximizes transparency by disclosing all information in records concerning the assassination, except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.

Sec. 2.  Background.  (a)  The Act permits the continued postponement of disclosure of information in records concerning President Kennedy’s assassination only when postponement remains necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Since 2018, executive departments and agencies (agencies) have been reviewing under this statutory standard each redaction they have proposed that would result in the continued postponement of full public disclosure, with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) reviewing whether it agrees that each redaction continues to meet the statutory standard.  In my 2021 Memorandum, the Archivist of the United States (Archivist) explained that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the ability of agencies, including NARA, to conduct this review and comprehensive engagement, and the Archivist recommended that I temporarily certify the records for continued postponement for a limited period.  In the 2021 Memorandum, I directed the completion of an intensive 1-year review of each remaining proposed redaction to ensure that the United States Government maximizes transparency by disclosing all information in records related to the assassination, except in cases when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.

(b)  Pursuant to my direction, agencies have undertaken a comprehensive effort to review the full set of almost 16,000 records that had previously been released in redacted form and determined that more than 70 percent of those records may now be released in full.  This significant disclosure reflects my Administration’s commitment to transparency and will provide the American public with greater insight and understanding of the Government’s investigation into this tragic event in American history.

(c)  In the course of their review, agencies have identified a limited number of records containing information for continued postponement of public disclosure.  NARA has reviewed these proposed redactions and has coordinated with relevant consulting agencies, where appropriate, to ensure that the proposed redactions meet the statutory standard for continued postponement.  The Acting Archivist has recommended certifying a small subset of the reviewed records for continued postponement of public disclosure.

(d)  The Acting Archivist has further indicated that additional work remains to be done with respect to a limited number of other reviewed records that were the subject of agency proposals for continued postponement of public disclosure.  The Acting Archivist believes such additional work could further reduce the amount of redacted information.  The Acting Archivist therefore recommends that I temporarily certify the continued postponement of public disclosure of the redacted information in these records to provide additional time for review and to ensure that information from these records is disclosed to the maximum extent possible, consistent with the standards of the Act.

Sec. 3.  Certification.  In light of the proposals from agencies for continued postponement of public disclosure of information in the records identified in section 2(c) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, and the Acting Archivist’s recommendation, I agree that continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is warranted to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, I hereby certify that continued postponement of public disclosure of these records is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  All information within these records that agencies have proposed for continued postponement under section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act shall accordingly be withheld from public disclosure.  Further release of the information in these records shall occur in a manner consistent with the Transparency Plans described in section 7 of this memorandum.

Sec. 4.  Temporary Certification.  In light of the proposals from agencies for continued postponement of public disclosure of information in the records identified in section 2(d) of this memorandum under the statutory standard, the Acting Archivist’s request for an extension of time to continue review of those records, and the need for an appropriately thorough review process, I agree with the Acting Archivist’s recommendation regarding temporary postponement.  Temporary continued postponement of public disclosure of such information is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act, I hereby certify that all information within these records that agencies have proposed for continued postponement under section 5(g)(2)(D) of the Act shall be withheld from public disclosure until June 30, 2023.

Sec. 5.  Release.  Any information currently withheld from public disclosure that agencies have not proposed for continued postponement shall be released to the public by December 15, 2022.

Sec. 6.  Review.  (a)  From the date of this memorandum until May 1, 2023, relevant agencies and NARA shall jointly review the remaining redactions in the records addressed in sections 2(d) and 4 of this memorandum with a view to maximizing transparency and disclosing all information in records concerning the assassination, except when the strongest possible reasons counsel otherwise.  Any information that agencies propose for continued postponement of public release beyond June 30, 2023, shall be limited to the absolute minimum under the statutory standard.  Agencies shall not propose to continue redacting information unless the redaction is necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.  In applying the statutory standard, agencies shall:

(i)   accord substantial weight to the public interest in transparency and full disclosure of any record that falls within the scope of the Act; and

(ii)  give due consideration that some degree of harm is not grounds for continued postponement unless the degree of harm is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

(b)  If, by no later than May 1, 2023, NARA agrees that a proposed redaction meets the statutory standard for continued postponement, the Archivist shall recommend to the President, no later than May 1, 2023, that continued postponement of public disclosure of the information is warranted after June 30, 2023.

(c)  If, by no later than May 1, 2023, NARA does not recommend that a proposed redaction meets the statutory standard for continued postponement, agencies shall, no later than May 15, 2023:

(i)   withdraw the proposed redaction; or

(ii)  recommend to the President, through the Counsel to the President, on a document-by-document basis, that release of the information continue to be postponed, providing an explanation for each proposed redaction of why continued postponement remains necessary to protect against an identifiable harm to the military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, or the conduct of foreign relations that is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

(d)  In the development of the recommendations described in this section, as questions arise about particular proposed redactions, NARA shall consult, as appropriate, with relevant agencies as described in section 5(d) of my 2021 Memorandum.

(e)  At the conclusion of the review described in this section, any information withheld from public disclosure that agencies do not propose for continued postponement beyond June 30, 2023, shall be released to the public by that date.

Sec. 7.  Transparency Plans.  As part of their review, each agency prepared a plan for the eventual release of information (Transparency Plan) to ensure that information would continue to be disclosed over time as the identified harm associated with release of the information dissipates.  Each Transparency Plan details the event-based or circumstance-based conditions that will trigger the public disclosure of currently postponed information by the National Declassification Center (NDC) at NARA.  These Transparency Plans have been reviewed by NARA, and the Acting Archivist has advised that use of the Transparency Plans by the NDC will ensure appropriate continued release of information covered by the Act.  Accordingly, I direct that the Transparency Plans submitted by agencies be used by the NDC to conduct future reviews of any information that has been postponed from public disclosure, including information in the records described in sections 2(c) and 3 of this memorandum.

Sec. 8.  Publication.  The Acting Archivist is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

                               JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR.

Filed Under: News and Views

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 48
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Newsletter Signup

    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Send checks to:
    AARC
    930 Wayne Ave.
    Unit 1111
    Silver Spring, MD 20910

    Office: (844) JFK-2017

    Menu

    • Contact Us
    • Warren Commission
    • Garrison Investigation
    • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
    • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
    • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
    • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
    • LBJ Library
    • Other Agencies and Commissions
    • Church Committee Reports

    Recent Posts

    • Memphis Conference 13 – 15 April
    • A New Essay by Professor David R. Wrone (No. 1)
    • A New Essay by Professor David R. Wrone (No. 2)
    • Board Denies Parole for Sirhan Sirhan, the Assassin of Robert F. Kennedy
    • Malcolm X’s daughter to sue CIA, FBI, New York police over assassination
    Copyright 2014 AARC
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Tools