ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • Founder’s Page
  • AARC PRESIDENT DAN ALCORN
  • About the AARC
  • NEW AARC Lecture Series – 2024/2025
  • The Talbot-Croft Archive
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • BILL SIMPICH ARCHIVE
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • FBI ELSUR
  • Gallery
  • JFK Assassination Records – 2025 Documents Release
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership
  • In Memoriam
  • JFK Commemoration Lecture Series – 2024

Copyright AARC

JFK Researchers Appeal for Justice in Federal Court

Courtesy of Bill Simpich, Rex Bradford, Jefferson Morley and JFKFacts:

Ninth Circuit to examine district court’s faulty interpretation of JFK Act

CHAD NAGLE
JULY 01, 2024

Entrance to the courthouse of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco (Curbed SF)

The nonprofit Mary Ferrell Foundation (MFF), which maintains the largest online repository of records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, filed suit against President Biden and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in October 2022, charging the defendants with failure to enforce the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act (“JFK Records Act” or “JFK Act”).

The JFK Act, a sweeping law Congress passed unanimously in 1992, mandates the public release of all assassination-related material in the government’s possession. Thirty-two years after it was passed, thousands of records are still withheld.

In January 2024, Chief Judge Richard Seeborg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all but three of MFF’s claims — i.e., litigation over (1) congressional JFK records, (2) destroyed JFK records, and (3) archival finding aids.

The plaintiffs believe Judge Seeborg has made serious errors of judgment and now challenge his decision. On May 28, MFF filed an interlocutory appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, asking the appellate court to address issues the lower court dismissed or ignored, even as the lower court settles the surviving claims.

CONTINUE READING AT JFKFACTS.ORG

 

 

Filed Under: News and Views

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Donate your preferred amount to support the work of the AARC.

cards
Powered by paypal

Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Warren Commission
  • Garrison Investigation
  • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
  • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • LBJ Library
  • Other Agencies and Commissions
  • Church Committee Reports

Recent Posts

  • The Talbot-Croft Archive: Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
  • 20 MAY, 2025: JUDGE JOHN TUNHEIM Opening Statement to the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets
  • 20 MAY, 2025: DAN HARDWAY Opening Statement and Testimony to the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets
  • RFK Jr. asked Obama to probe ‘two gunmen’ theory, called for reexamination of his father’s assassination: new files
  • PRESIDENT’S PAGE
Copyright 2014 AARC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Tools