25TH jfk
Lest We Forget
David R. Wrone December 18, 2022 no. 1
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
JFK Paths
In the late morning of December 15, 2022, news stations round the nation came alive with a report that the National Archives had released 3,000 pages of formerly held top secret documents linked to the 1964 federal investigation of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, which occurred on November 22, 1963, at 12.30 p.m., on the public street in the dreary city of Dallas, Texas. Imagine! They became public nigh on to 60 years and three generations afterwards.
Almost immediately a responsible critic noted a disturbing feature in the archival press release that might trip up the scholars not aware of the issue. 50% of the documents had been released in an earlier release. See, publication exposing this in Clayton Ogilvie, “Recent and Present: JFK Document Release Overlap of December 2022.” NH pvt, digital: Christmas Eve, 2022.
The news consumed press and public with speculation on whether new factual nuggets on the murder would be turned up; many hoped with special concern that in the mass sinister data would be found on the background of Lee Harvey Oswald the official sole assassin of JFK. Some sought to find revelations on dark forces operating through the deed of the 24-year-old book handler when he fired a claimed three shots out of the eastern most window of the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas where he worked. All commentators though to the last man and woman parroted the official conclusion that was as certain to them as the pull of gravity: Oswald by himself and without any help slew JFK.
But grim reality shows an Oswald as claimed assassin to be a great diversion from grim reality. Among the many, two key factors stand out, one minor and one major. The minor aspect of JFK’s murder relates to the number of documents available for coming to terms with the death. With the recent addition of the massive number of pages in the INV file Archives, one would not know from the paucity of announced released pages that the total quantity that rests in public and private archives and libraries is 20,000,000 pages. The number is carefully honed, fully articulated, and quite sound. And, reviewers of this most recently released batch largely do not mention even a page of them.
In addition to not addressing the mass of information already available, the greeters of the new information also in a major fault did not discuss the relation of official evidence on the young man’s guilt. He just killed him. Let me show how in basic and well-known error this is.
I shall take as my approach merely the evidence levied against Oswald associated with the 6th floor of the Depository universally proclaimed as valid and definitive. The official accounting for Oswald’s activities that day inside the Depository, a Baron Munchausen scenario par excellence, can be divided for discussion into five components.
For space concerns I shall look only into part of the sixth-floor facts, and present the official as well as true evidence. Federal and local authorities mustered them to confirm there he lurked and from there he shot. The true nature of that sixth-floor evidence though carries enough weight to show beyond question that Oswald had nothing to do with the assassination and officials corrupted the facts.
R = 912 pp. Warren Report, often viewed by the unwashed with the same respect as would be given a 67th Book of the Bible. WCH = evidentiary volumes. WC = Warren Commission. F = forgery or deliberately false.
DPD = Dallas police.
Window:
For Oswald to have killed JFK, he had to be standing in the open window shooting him with his Carcano 6.5mm bolt action repeating rifle. This is an iron factor in the charge of assassin levied against him. The Commission as well as police and federal investigators so concluded.
- However, it is not true. The official evidence in x1312 WCH taken almost immediately after the shooting depicts the window as it was at the time. There is only three inches opening between the lower frame and the foot wide sill. To shoot JFK riding 61 feet beneath the window and close to the curb one could only do so on a perch firing down through double class panes. The glass is not broken.
- The WC overcame this exculpating fact by simply masking it in the R, and deploying a fake scenario, p. 199. The officials staged a reenactment corrupt to the fact rather than appeal to the actual evidence for they had to be able to show Oswald shot JFK through the open window. Needs must. F
The WC prints a full half page photo of the window open three feet (!) presented in the veritable teeth of its own evidence as the opening at 12:30 the 22nd. It attached the rifle atop a tall tripod stationed on the floor before it. The Carcano points through the window. This is supposed to be what occurred Nov. 22. It is a forgery. F
- More however. The barrel’s angle of downward depression from the horizontal is approx. 5-10 degrees. It has to be this shallow of a degree to fit the sighting claim of the only witness the WC could find out of 750 persons on the plaza and surround external to the building. [of the 750, 60 said the shots came from the grassy knoll to the west, 7 others saw bullets hit sod and sidewalk, street and building; they were dismissed because said WC, FBI, DPD, Oswald was in the Depository and CBS among others said they were a case of the madness of the crowds]
He claimed to have seen Oswald in the window. To hit JFK who is riding relatively close to the base of the Depository the rifle would have to be strongly cocked, the barrel deflected down many degrees. Again, we observe, this is a knowing and deliberate corruption of the facts. F
- Additionally, we observe the rifle sticks out the window, again to match the exterior witness’ comments. This is improbable. Regard. No one shoots deer, elk, turkey or other game from a blind or stand, by first waving the rifle in the air outside. You shoot from inside the stand. In military training that I am familiar with, it was seen as wrong and irrational.
In the instance of the famous Soviet WWII woman sniper who shot 309 Nazis plus a few of their rotten Romanian and Galician mercenaries, she did not shoot with the rifle sticking out in the open. In this 22nd case if it had happened so it would have endangered the rifleman by alerting JFK’s guards, which would seem to be a mighty pertinent consideration not to do so. You shoot from inside the window.
- External to the building there were two pertinent motion pictures taken at the exact time of the shooting. One depicted the window. Navy photographic specialists, FBI photographic specialists, and private photo experts all determined without a whisker of doubt that the window was empty; neither Oswald nor a rifle was in the window. The FBI said in a lab report that the “witness” was in fantasy land. This cannot be gainsaid.
To overcome this definitive fact excluding Oswald from being in the window, the WC simply wrangles Oswald there by making the film invisible in the R. This is a type of blatant evidence forgery. F
The FBI to assist the WC with a happy way around the Oswald exculpating fact, simply doctored the evidence but cutting out from a frame used as an exhibit the evidence of time and of JFK below in the street and presented the truncated hoax as true fact. It now sleeps corruptly in WC files as the reality. {FBI #29] This is another forgery. F
And the witness? In addition to the film capturing the vacant window the other film by Abe Zapruder shows the witness viewing not the Depository building straight ahead of him as he testified under oath to be doing, but rather peering over his shoulder to his far right [!}, away from the building, a fact WC lawyers, we know from their records, knew. F
Additionally, and a wooden stake to the heart, the external witness also lied at police lineups. He was twice shone a lineup with Oswald in it. On the first viewing he swore under oath the man he alleged to have seen in the window was not Oswald. After being told by the Secret Service that the man was a communist [which he was not] and after seeing Oswald twice on television [!], he, a self-important man with mind riddled by extreme conservative ideology orientation, then picked the red out of the lineup.
Each is proof of perjury of the other. P
He was also near blind and according to WC attorneys in private conversations (to Meagher & also at NYC critic meeting, among other instances) he could barely make out even the fuzzy frame of the window, let alone any window occupant. F
To have the witness reenact [the WC R is mainly a mass of reenactments passed off as original facts] his viewing the WC positioned him on the street at his viewing site. The WC closed the windows of the front of the Depository with only the witness required selection they needed left open R. F Even then, he sitting as he said at the time and staring at the building, got the wrong window, one permanently closed and sealed, which became evidence he saw Oswald. R
In the R the WC said Oswald fired the rifle. There is, though, no evidence to that. In normal investigation of gunfire crime, the barrel is swabbed with a cotton ball to detect if debris can be found from a transiting bullet. If it had been fired the swab picked up indications. A Bureau agent years later under oath in a court hearing said it was not swabbed. At any rate, I failed to find in WC records any indication of a swab. F
A central fact in the charge against Oswald was the claim his fingerprint was found on the underside of the barrel. WC and WCH. The police reported they took, or lifted as they say, a print, but it did not match the circumstances of a regular lift—no lifting dust as is normal, appeared, no tape covered the alleged place as is standard procedure, it was from a flat object, the barrel round, it turned up in Washington ten days later [!], it was mailed [!] by Dallas police to the FBI lab.
The Dallas police specialist much later in testimony revealed he had made copies from the hands of Oswald when just arrested and provided no accounting for them. F From the DPD attitude it seemed to consider it nobody’s business but theirs. WC later stamping it as authentic rested on a statement it was Oswald’s print based on a generated document that came weeks later mailed into its offices [!}by a clerk in FBI offices who had no training, experience, or ability. And, he was not under oath. The document is undecipherable; I never heard of or met anyone—commoner, law enforcement expert, or specialist– who could make sense of the strange appearing gobbledygook on it. WCH. F
But three years later in a court room, before a judge and jury, and under oath, an FBI print specialist said of the rifle that its metal was so poor it could not take prints. There were no prints and in fact could not be. Oswald print claim is a fraud. F.
The rifle had major mechanical problems. WCH
The telescopic sight was for a left-handed shooter, Oswald was right-handed. It also wobbled a bit and the cross hairs were not clear. If used by a shooter it would miss a sighted target, which CBS-TV solemnly announced actually improved Oswald’s aim. [sic]
Repairs had to be made before it could be test fired. WCH
- The WC tried and failed [by the true evidence] to maintain that Oswald had the shooting ability and character flaw to have shot and hit JFK. It used a bogus reenactment to deceive the world. It spurned the exculpating evidence.
I.
The WC and its investigators used a team of expert military and private rifle marksmen—America’s finest–to simulate the alleged shooting feat it had assigned to Oswald to show it was in fact possible for Oswald with that Carcano to shoot from the 6th floor and hit and kill JFK as they charged. It was patent office hokum and yet proclaimed as proof indisputable that Oswald, therefore, did it.
They shot at a target with conditions said to be like the alleged firing scenario used by Oswald—a true copy the WC said, as it had to be, to be valid as evidence. And, it was passed off as more proof he killed JFK.
- The target they shot at was closer than JFK was on the 22nd..
- The paper target set up was larger than JFK’s head and thus easier to see and hit.
- Only one of the several was able to work the mechanism in the required time to squeeze off three shots—and that was done without witnesses, only his FBI Agent word.
- Their target was not true to motion, JFK had been in a moving limo.
- The reenactors practiced afore test shooting, whereas Oswald did not and had no recorded genuine instance of having ever shot the rifle or any rifle in the last three years, let alone worked it in the speed required. None.
- In Russia he was a joke as a shooter. He was such a poor shot hunting with his buddies with a shot gun he could not hit a near rabbit and his companions had to shoot for him. Instead of marksmen the WC, to duplicate, should have pulled utter strangers off breadlines.
- False premise. The rifle used to reenact was not Oswald’s rifle of the 22nd, but one repaired and modified, stabilized. Incredible. His as original would have damaged the shooter’s eye and could not have been fired.
- The reenactment must be seen as F.
II.
The WC also excluded matter that showed Oswald’s character to be positive and not disposed to kill. For examples: a) The local FBI office before the 22nd said to one of the mindless Dallas citizen fascist commie hunters who tried to have Oswald known as a commie by informing on him as a red that he was “alright.” b) He lectured against the anti-democratic system in Russia and blessed the U. S. at an Alabama Jesuit college seminar. c) He spoke in New Orleans to warn a group against a coming danger to overthrow America. Etc. d) He carried CIA and FBI identification numbers. [Wrone files with numbers, ms.] e) Soviet persons who knew him, saw him universally as a decent human: e.g., Prof. Ernst Titovets in his Oswald: Russian Episode. (Minsk, 2010) and to me. The WC did not seek them out, for as commies they would lie, unlike Americans.
The WC though presented it in the R that, as found, it was a good rifle.
Three spent shells were found on the floor. R Analysis revealed ejector marks clearly proved they had been ejected from a different rifle than the Oswald rifle, which is a conspiracy. WCH Ignored by the WC. F
Moreover, the DPD, FBI, WC performed forensic tests on Oswald to ascertain if he had fired the rifle. There were three.
When that rifle was fired it left a chemical cloud blowback that drifted onto the face of the shooter embedding bullet defining chemical elements in his pores. Applied paraffin to the cheek would lift any traces off. They first submitted the paraffin matter to a chemical wash in police laboratory and it was negative; Oswald had by this test not fired the rifle.
The FBI then took the matter to Washinton and applied a Spectrographic, or light wave that picked up he waves from each distinct element. It fought the release of the test results.
The WC then arranged to have the cheek matter tested in a nuclear reactor in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Seven control subjects were used. They fired the Carcano, paraffin tests were nuked and showed they had fired the weapon. Oswald’s matter nuked showed he had not. He had not fired a rifle that day. The FBI admitted his innocence in its administrative memos. [Wrone, FBI serials.] To overcome this the WC lied saying in its R that the tests were inadequate, saying they could not prove he fired the weapon, when in fact the tests proved he did not—the negative.
end