ASSASSINATION ARCHIVES

AND RESEARCH CENTER

  • Founder’s Page
  • AARC PRESIDENT DAN ALCORN
  • About the AARC
  • NEW AARC Lecture Series – 2024/2025
  • AARC 2014 Conference Videos
  • Analysis and Opinion
  • BILL SIMPICH ARCHIVE
  • COLD WAR CONTEXT
  • CURRENT FOIA LITIGATION
  • Dan Hardway Blog: Sapere Aude
  • Destroyed Files
  • DOCUMENTS AND DOSSIERS
  • FBI Cuba 109 Files
  • FBI ELSUR
  • Gallery
  • JFK Assassination Records – 2025 Documents Release
  • Joe Backes: ARRB Document Release Summaries, July 1995-April 1996
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • The Malcolm Blunt Archives
  • MISSING RECORDS
  • News and Views
  • Publication Spotlight
  • Public Library
  • SELECT CIA PSEUDONYMS
  • SELECT FBI CRYPTONYMS
  • CIA Records Search Tool (CREST)
  • AARC Catalog
  • AARC Board of Directors
  • AARC Membership
  • In Memoriam
  • JFK Commemoration Lecture Series – 2024

Copyright AARC

White House Physician, Autopsy Eyewitness, questions President Ford about Missing Bullet

Courtesy of AARC Board member, Dr. Randy Robertson

In December of 2001 and January of 2002 during an interview with U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery historians, Dr. James Young, a physician who had worked with White House Physician Admiral George Burkley during the Kennedy administration, related that during the autopsy he had been given a bullet in an envelope by White House Medical Corpsman Chief Petty Officer Thomas Mills after his return from the White House garage to retrieve skull fragments from the rear of the limousine. Young described this bullet as jacketed, straight but with a bent tip and visually close in diameter to CE399, which he estimated to be ½ centimeter. Dr. Young voiced his concerns to the interviewers that he had never seen any reference to it in the Warren Commission investigation. The last thing he remembers is that he gave the envelope containing the bullet with the bent tip to Dr. Humes, the head autopsy pathologist, and that the bullet was never seen or documented after that.

What Price A Rose? A Navy Physician Remembers Nov. 22, 1963

In the interviews Dr. Young said that he had initially contacted White House Corpsman Chief Petty Officer Mills by telephone and Mills confirmed his recollection. Navy historians called Mills in an effort to verify Dr. Young’s claims. Mills told historian Jan Herman that he remembered the event but when pressed for details Mills stated that he didn’t want to talk about it even after the historians notified him that they represented the U. S. Navy Bureau of Medical and Surgery Office of Medical History. Significantly Mills did not repudiate Dr. Young’s claim, something that might well have been expected if Young had fabricated the episode and falsely implicated Mills in the process.

Dr. Robertson then contacted Navy interviewer Jan Herman who informed him that the interview with Mills had not been taped but that Mills tone of voice changed perceptibly when pressed for details of the episode. Herman also vividly remembered the Young interview because after having the tapes transcribed, Dr. Young then adamantly refused to sign the release form for the Navy to use them. In the hundreds of oral history interviews that Herman had conducted, Dr. Young was the only one who had refused to sign such a release. Dr. Young’s stated reason was that there were revelations contained within the interview which he did not want to be made public. This same sentiment was included in his earlier letter to President Ford. An additional FOIA request by Dr. Robertson for the actual tapes of the interviews was non-responsive as the tapes could not be found. Dr. Young died in 2008 due to complications following a stroke.

RELATED: Navy Medicine and President Kennedy’s Autopsy: Recollections from a former White House Physician

 

From the Mary Ferrell Foundation: “I would not care to be quoted on that.”

The Missing Physician

George Burkley, Assistant White House Physician at the time of this photo. He became JFK’s personal physician in July 1963.

The Warren Commission was faced with contradictions in the medical evidence. The Parkland Hospital doctors who treated the mortally wounded President described an entrance wound in the throat and a large occipital (rearward) wound in Kennedy’s head. The autopsy doctors declared the throat wound to be one of exit, and drawings they produced of Kennedy’s head wound showed it to be largely on the right side. At issue in these varying descriptions is whether shots came from the front or the rear.

One man was best suited to address these conflicting accounts – the President’s personal physician Dr. George Burkley. Burkley rode in the Dallas motorcade, was present at Parkland Hospital, rode Air Force One to Washington with the body, and was present at the autopsy, by some accounts running it. He signed the White House Death Certificate, wrote “verified” on a “face sheet” created during the autopsy, and took physical possession of JFK’s brain and tissue slides.

The Warren Commission never interviewed him.

Though Burkley was continually mentioned by other Commission witnesses, the only statements from the doctor himself to appear in the Warren Commission’s 26 volumes is CE 1126, a report Burkley wrote 2 days before the Commission was announced.

In 1976, Burkley’s lawyer William Illig contacted Richard Sprague of the HSCA, saying that his client had information that “others besides Oswald must have participated.” Sprague was ousted days later, and the reconstituted HSCA and its medical panel never took Burkley’s testimony. Instead, a short phone contact the following year was followed up yet months later, when the HSCA was done with all its public medical presentations, with an strange affidavit signed by Burkley. The affidavit, in which Burkley attested to his constant presence with Kennedy’s body from Parkland Hospital on, seemed almost solely devoted to refuting David Lifton’s as yet-unpublished Best Evidence.

The ARRB in the mid 1990s contacted the family of the now-deceased Burkley, and initially received verbal permission to obtain the lawyer Illig’s files. But Burkley’s daughter subsequently changed her mind and in the end declined to sign the necessary waiver.

Questions abound about Burkley’s handling of the now-missing brain of JFK, his role at the autopsy, and his involvement in the 1965 transfer of autopsy materials into the Kennedy family’s hands. Did the Warren Commission and HSCA avoid Burkley because they were afraid of what he would say? In a 1967 oral history, Burkley was asked whether he agreed with the Warren Commission’s view on the number of shots. Burkley’s reply: “I would not care to be quoted on that.”

Visit the Mary Ferrell Foundation HERE

 

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: Admirak Burkley, Bethesda Navy Hospital, Dr. Randy Robertson, JFK autopsy, Kennedy assassination

CIA Responds to AARC FOIA suit on CIA’s 1963 study of plots to assassinate Adolf Hitler

 

CIA records released in AARC v. CIA, C.A. No. 17-160 (Hitler Plots Lawsuit)

Earlier this year AARC filed suit under the Freedom of Information Act in Washington D.C. to obtain documents from the CIA related to its study of the July 20, 1944 plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler to develop a plan to overthrow Fidel Castro in Fall 1963.  The basis of the request is a formerly Top Secret Joints Chiefs of Staff memo dated September 25, 1963 found by Bill Kelly (attached).

The memo records a briefing by Desmond Fitzgerald, CIA’s head of anti-Castro operations.  Fitzgerald tells the Joint Chiefs that CIA is studying the plot to kill Hitler in depth to come up with an approach to dealing with Castro. The timing of this study is contemporary to the lead-up to President Kennedy’s assassination, and government bodies that have investigated the JFK assassination have been concerned that such activity may have caused or been linked to the President’s assassination. Doc 1, pg. 3 JCS Briefing, 25 September, 1963

AARC filed a FOIA request in 2012 with CIA asking for information related to the CIA’s study of the Hitler plot to deal with Castro.  CIA initially stated they could find no records, then retracted, and said they were still looking.  After lengthy delays, CIA reverted to its earlier position and stated it could find no records.  AARC filed suit in federal court.

Last Friday, CIA reversed itself once again and produced six documents responsive to AARC’s request.  A 76 page March 1964 document includes an in depth analysis of the 1944 Hitler assassination plot in the context of an upcoming 20 year anniversary of the attempt on Hitler’s life, and explores alternative propaganda strategies for blaming the failure of the assassination attempt on Communists.  The other released records are related to the CIA’s processing of AARC’s request.

Significantly, there is no information released about the CIA’s study of the Hitler assassination plot in Fall 1963 to develop a plan to dispose of Castro.  We are to believe that the Hitler plot was important enough to be the subject of in depth written analysis at CIA due to an advancing 20th anniversary, but that an in depth study of the plot in Fall 1963 in order to topple Fidel Castro has left no writings.  This is highly unlikely, and AARC will vigorously litigate CIA’s failure to produce the important records.

Werner von Alvensleben (pictured at right on the cover of Baron in Africa by Brian Marsh)

In another pending FOIA case, Jim Lesar is pursuing information about an OSS double agent and convicted Nazi assassin, Werner von Alvensleben, who was reported by the Dallas Morning News to be in Dallas in late 1963 as a guest of the owner of the Texas School Book Depository building, D.H. Byrd.  Byrd was reported to have been at von Alvensleben’s Safari hunting preserve in Portuguese East Africa on November 22, 1963.

Hunting publications report that von Alvensleben’s favorite hunting rifle was the 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Schonauer, known as the “World’s Finest Rifle”.  Warren Commission member John McCloy questioned the FBI’s firearms expert as to whether the ammunition found in the Texas School Book Depository building could have been fired from a Mannlicher-Schonauer.  The FBI expert was not familiar with that rifle and could not answer.  Reportedly, Mannlicher-Carcano and Mannlicher-Schonauer ammunition is virtually identical.

According to OSS records, von Alvensleben circulated a manifesto on the July 20 plot to assassinate Hitler among Germans in Portuguese East Africa in 1944, incurring the ire of German officials.

AARC Board member Dan Alcorn contributed to the article.

 

CIA records released in AARC v. CIA, C.A. No. 17-160 (Hitler Plots Lawsuit) on Aug. 18, 2017: DOWNLOAD

Joint Chiefs of Staff meeting minutes 9-25-63: DOWNLOAD

Robert A. Frazier testimony; Warren Commission Vol. III, pg. 399:

 

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: Castro, D.H. Byrd, Hitler, JFK, July 20th plot, Mannlicher-Schoenaur, Werner von Alvensleben

How Shenon and Sabato came to Fake News in JFK’s Murder

August 15, 2017   Arnaldo M. Fernandez

JFKFacts.org

After more than fifty years and zero quantum of proof since the JFK assassination, Philip Shenon and Larry J. Sabato insist on the out-worn hypothesis “Castro sorta done it” while reporting how the CIA came to doubt the official story.

From a batch of documents recently released on line by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), they have cherry-picked an unauthored 1975-CIA memo that specifically:

• “Noted the failure of the CIA, FBI and the Warren Commission to interview a key witness in Mexico City—Silvia Duran, the Mexican woman who worked in the Cuban consulate and was reported to have had the affair with Oswald.”

• “Offered a detailed theory [about] how Oswald (…) may have been inspired to assassinate the president if, as seemed probable, he read an article on Monday, September 9, in the local newspaper, that suggested Castro was targeted for murder by the United States.”

Duran Case
Shenon and Sabato missed that the Mexican Federal Security Directorate (DFS) immediately and exhaustively interrogated Silvia Duran at the request of the CIA. The very night of the assassination, Chief of Station Win Scott asked CIA asset Gustavo Díaz-Ordaz (LITEMPO-2), outgoing Interior Secretary and incoming President of Mexico, to hold Duran “incommunicado until she gives all details of Oswald” (NARA 104-10422-10090). Langley allowed the Station to “provide questions to the Mexican interrogators” (NARA 104-10102-10145).

On the other hand, the affair with Oswald was a slander by a cousin of Duran´s husband, the well-known anti-Communist Mexican writer Elena Garro. It was reported by CIA contract agent June Cobb (AMUPAS-1), who was renting a room from Garro, but the Legal Attaché (FBI) Nathan Ferris rightly dismissed it after having interviewed Garro and her daughter twice in November 1964. They simply “failed to substantiate the allegations” (NARA 104-10007-10043).

On a related 1965-CIA memo (NARA 104-10404-10320), the Deputy Chief of Station, Alan White, wrote down: “I don’t know what FBI did in November 64, but the Garros have been talking about this for a long time and she is said to be extremely bright.” Scott ruled out White’s concern with a lapidary remark: “She is also nuts.” Apart from Cobb, Garro drove other nuts as well. Charles W. Thomas, a political officer at the U.S. Embassy, raised the fake story with the Secretary of State William Rogers in 1969. Philip Shenon resorted to it in A Cruel and Shocking Act (Henry Holt and Co., 2013). Anyway, a slander never becomes a fact by mere repetition.

Garro refused to appear before the House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), while Duran accepted and was thoroughly interviewed by an HSCA panel in 1978. She was adamant that her one and only encounter with Oswald took place at the Cuban consulate on September 27, 1963. As consular clerk, she provided nothing but the standard service related to his application for an in-transit visa to go on to the Soviet Union.

Duran had made the same statement to her Mexican interrogators, and Scott even reported to Langley “she was perfectly willing travel to the United States to confront Oswald.” Notwithstanding, Duran couldn´t get through to the Warren Commission because Scott remarked on the same report: “Present plan in passing info to Warren Commission is to eliminate mention on telephone taps, in order to protect continuing ops.” (NARA 104-10020-10018). The CIA phone-tapping operation LIENVOY involved three calls linked to Duran (NARA 104-10413-10074):

1) Friday, September 27, 16:00 hours. The Soviet Consulate received a call from the Cuban Consulate. Duran said she had there a U.S. citizen who had requested a transit visa to Cuba because he is going to the USSR.

2) Friday, September 27, 16:26 hours. The Cuban Consulate received a call from the Soviet Embassy. The caller asked Duran if the American has been there and she replied: “Yes, he is still here.”

3) Saturday, September 28, ca. 12:00 hours. The Soviet Consulate received a call from a woman who identified herself as Silvia Duran at the Cuban Consulate. She handed the phone over to an American who said in Russian: “I was in your Embassy and spoke to your consul (…) I went to the Cuban Embassy to ask them for my address, because they have it.” From the first two calls, the CIA immediately learned what Duran would later declare to the Mexican authorities and the HSCA; from the third call, a burning issue cropped up: Duran and the American had been impersonated. The Cuban Consulate was closed on Saturdays and Duran didn’t work overtime on September 28, 1963. The CIA transcriber, Boris Tarasoff, firstly noted the American was speaking in “hardly recognizable Russian” and then identified him as the same person in two further calls:

4) Tuesday, October 1, 10:31 hours. A man outside (MO) called the Soviet Military Attaché Office speaking in broken Russian: “Hello, I was at your place last Saturday and talked to your Consul (…) I wanted to ask you if there is anything new.” He was given the phone number 15-60-55.

5) Tuesday, October 1, 10:35 hours. MO said in broken Russian: “Hello, this LEE OSWALD speaking. I was at your place last Saturday and spoke to a Consul (…) but I don’t remember the name… A Soviet replied: Kostikov. He is dark? MO: Yes. My name is OSWALD. SOVIET: Just a minute. I’ll find out (…) Nothing has been received as yet. MO: And what… (SOVIET hangs up). Oswald was fluent in Russian. His own wife Marina said, “he had a pretty good Russian tongue, and she thought at first he was a Baltic Russian.” (NARA 157-10014.10003). After giving on Saturday a curious statement about the Cuban Embassy having his address, which suggests a safe house of the Cuban Intelligence Service (CuIS), the imposter eventually placed on record both the name Oswald and a meeting with Valeriy Kostikov, a KGB officer reported by the CIA to the Warren Commission as “believed to work” for Department XIII, responsible of executive action, including assassination, although neither the CIA nor the FBI could find “any information to fully support [it].” (NARA 124-10369-10063).

Oswald’s impersonation in Mexico City is a key pre-assassination fact. It reinforces the hypothesis of CIA insiders forging Oswald’s linkages to the CuIS and the KGB. Thereupon, framing him up in Dallas and covering the deed up would be part of the natural course of events.

 

CONTINUE READING AT JFKFACTS

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: Arnaldo M. Fernandez, Castro, JFK, Kennedy assassination, Mexico City, Oswald, Sabato, Shenon

Dallas Mayor During JFK Assassination Was CIA Asset

Texas School Book Depository in Dealey Plaza, Dallas. Former Dallas Mayor Earle Cabell (inset). Photo credit: Anita & Greg / Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0), US Government Printing Office / Wikimedia and CIA / Wikimedia.

 

Courtesy of Russ Baker, with thanks to Dr. John Newman

2 August, 2017 | Who.What.Why. Here is the first major revelation from the historic release of previously withheld government records on the JFK Assassination: the mayor of Dallas when President John F. Kennedy was killed in that city was a CIA asset.

We were alerted to this salient fact by retired military intelligence officer and author John Newman, who is conducting a thorough analysis of the long-secret documents.

At the time of the assassination, Dallas Mayor Earle Cabell, brother of one-time Deputy Director of Central Intelligence Charles P. Cabell, had been a CIA asset since 1956.

It is worth noting that Kennedy dismissed CIA Director Allen Dulles in November 1961, and that Earle Cabell’s brother Charles left the CIA on January 31, 1962, after Kennedy forced him to resign. Thus, both Dulles and Charles Cabell were no longer working for the CIA on November 22, 1963, when Kennedy was killed.

Read more at Who.What.Why.

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: CIA, Dallas, Earle Cabell, JFK, Kennedy assassination

AARC BOARD RESPONDS TO SABATO AND SHENON

On July 25, 2017 The Washington Post published an opinion piece, President Trump, give us the full story on the JFK assassination, by Larry Sabato and Phil Shenon. The following three responses to that article are contributed by AARC Board members Dr. Don Thomas, Malcolm Blunt, and Dr. Gary Aguilar.

 

Dr. Donald B. Thomas: In an otherwise persuasively reasoned op-ed in the Washington Post arguing for unfettered release of JFK assassination documents (as required by law), Philip Shenon and Larry Sabato indulged in uninformed and unsupported overstatement by claiming that “… 21st-century forensic science demonstrates that Oswald was almost certainly the lone gunman in Dallas…” A novice reading that statement would likely conclude that there have been recent (since 2000) scientific studies that incriminate Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK murder case. But there are none. Not one. There is not even one that claims to be. There have been excellent (and otherwise) forensic studies on the JFK evidence in recent years, but none of them inculpate anyone. In short it is a Trumpism – made up –  fake news. Shenon and Sabato’s bald claim about the forensics is an alternative fact, the very sort of invention the Washington Post should be striving hard to avoid.

 

Malcolm Blunt: 21st Century bullshit is no different than 20th century bullshit. Forensic evidence is so debased now; Posner and Failure Analysis were the first nail in the coffin; the belief that computers can be so programmed that the solution to the problem is 100% solved, hence: “Case Closed.”

God, spare me from this.

Better we should look at the documents being released and work on what I’m sure to most is irrelevant minutiae. Although most of these releases are going to be absolutely meaningless to Post and Times reporters, really we are being given missing pages from an incomplete dictionary. Agency cryptonyms, pseudonyms, internal systems and management… Very valuable.

 

Dr. Gary Aguilar: Sabato and Shennon write, inter alia, “… 21st-century forensic science demonstrates that Oswald was almost certainly the lone gunman in Dallas … .”  
 
Sweeping statements such as this are easy to make, not so easy to back up. But perhaps the authors are referring to the forensic science presented in the 2013 Koch-funded, PBS Nova show, “Cold Case: JFK.” If so, it’s notable that Nova expert, anti-conspiracist Mr. Lucien Haag, published his findings in several articles published in ’15 and ’16 in the “peer-reviewed” AFTE Journal.  
 
Cyril Wecht, MD, JD and I published two rebuttals in that very journal that are worth examining by anyone who believes that “21st-century forensic science” supports Oswald’s guilt. 
 
Check this: https://statick2k-5f2f.kxcdn.com/images/pdf/Aguila… 
 
And this: https://statick2k-5f2f.kxcdn.com/images/pdf/Aguila… 
 
An overview of the whole shoddy affair can be found here: https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-reviews…

 

VIDEO PRESENTATIONS

Dr. Donald B. Thomas: JFK Acoustical Evidence: Challenge and Corroboration HERE

Malcolm Blunt: JFK Records and NARA HERE

Dr. Gary Aguilar: Junk Science and the Death of JFK  HERE

Filed Under: News and Views Tagged With: Assassination, Don Thomas, Forensics, Gary Aguilar, JFK, Kennedy assassination, Malcolm Blunt, Sabato, Shenon

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • …
  • 63
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Donate your preferred amount to support the work of the AARC.

cards
Powered by paypal

Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Warren Commission
  • Garrison Investigation
  • House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)
  • Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • LBJ Library
  • Other Agencies and Commissions
  • Church Committee Reports

Recent Posts

  • RFK Jr. asked Obama to probe ‘two gunmen’ theory, called for reexamination of his father’s assassination: new files
  • PRESIDENT’S PAGE
  • Planned Attack on Lady Gaga Concert in Brazil Is Foiled, Police Say
  • JOHN SIMKIN ARCHIVE
  • NEW: Records Related to the Assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy
Copyright 2014 AARC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Tools